The Full Wiki

AMPA receptor: Wikis

Advertisements
  

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Encyclopedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (also known as AMPA receptor, AMPAR, or quisqualate receptor) is a non-NMDA-type ionotropic transmembrane receptor for glutamate that mediates fast synaptic transmission in the central nervous system (CNS). Its name is derived from its ability to be activated by the artificial glutamate analog, AMPA. The receptor was discovered by Tage Honore and colleagues at the School of Pharmacy in Copenhagen, and published in 1982 in the Journal of Neurochemistry (Honore T; Lauridsen J; Krogsgaard-Larsen P. The binding of [3H]AMPA, a structural analogue of glutamic acid, to rat brain membranes, Journal of Neurochemistry, 1982, 38, 173-178). AMPARs are found in many parts of the brain and are the most commonly found receptor in the nervous system.

Contents

Structure and Function

Advertisements

Subunit Composition

AMPARs are composed of four types of subunits, designated as GluR1 (GRIA1), GluR2 (GRIA2), GluR3 (GRIA3), and GluR4, alternatively called GluRA-D2 (GRIA4), which combine to form tetramers.[1][2][3] Most AMPARs are heterotetrameric, consisting of symmetric 'dimer of dimers' of GluR2 and either GluR1, GluR3 or GluR4.[4][5] Dimerization starts in the Endoplasmic reticulum with the interaction of n-terminal LIVBP domains, then "zips up" through the ligand binding domain into the transmembrane ion pore.[5]

The conformation of the subunit protein in the plasma membrane caused controversy for some time. While the amino acid sequence of the subunit indicated that there were four transmembrane domains (parts of the protein that pass through the plasma membrane), proteins interacting with the subunit indicated that the N-terminus was extracellular while the C-terminus was intracellular. If each of the four transmembrane domains went all the way through the plasma membrane, then the two termini would have to be on the same side of the membrane. Eventually, it was discovered that the second transmembrane domain isn't in fact trans at all, but kinks back on itself within the membrane and returns to the intracellular side (see schematic diagram).[6] When the four subunits of the tetramer come together, this second membranous domain forms the ion-permeable pore of the receptor.

AMPAR subunits differ most in their c-terminal sequence, which determines their interactions with scaffolding proteins. All AMPARs contain PDZ-binding domains, but which PDZ domain they bind to differs. For example, GluR1 binds to SAP97 through SAP97's class I PDZ domain[7], while GluR2 binds to PICK1[8] and GRIP/ABP. Of note, AMPARs cannot directly bind to the common synaptic protein PSD-95 due to incompatible PDZ domains.

Phosphorylation of AMPARs can regulate channel localization, conductance, and open probability. GluR1 has four known phosphorylation sites at serine 818 (S818), S831, threonine 840, and S845 (other subunits have similar phosphorylation sites, but GluR1 has been the most extensively studied). S818 is phosphorylated by PKC, and is necessary for long term potentiation (LTP; for GluR1's role in LTP, see below).[9] S831 is phosphorylated by CaMKII during LTP, which helps deliver GluR1-containing AMPAR to the synapse,[10] and increases their single channel conductance.[11] The T840 site was more recently discovered, and has been implicated in LTD.[12] Finally, S845 is phosphorylated by both PKA which regulates its open probability.[13]

Ion Channel Function

Each AMPAR has four sites to which an agonist (such as glutamate) can bind, one for each subunit.[14] The binding site is believed to be formed by the n-tail, and the extracellular loop between transmembrane domains three and four [15]. When an agonist binds, these two loops move towards each other, opening the pore. The channel opens when two sites are occupied[16], and increases its current as more binding sites are occupied[17]. Once open, the channel may undergo rapid desensitization, stopping the current. The mechanism of desensitization is believed to be due to a small change in angle of one of the parts of the binding site, closing the pore[18]. AMPARs open and close quickly, and are thus responsible for most of the fast excitatory synaptic transmission in the central nervous system.[16]

The AMPAR's permeability to calcium and other cations, such as sodium and potassium, is governed by the GluR2 subunit. If an AMPAR lacks a GluR2 subunit, then it will be permeable to sodium, potassium and calcium. The presence of a GluR2 subunit will almost certainly render the channel impermeable to calcium. This is determined by post-transcriptional modification - RNA editing - of the Q/R editing site of the GluR2 mRNA. Here, editing alters the uncharged amino acid glutamine (Q), to the positively-charged arginine (R) in the receptor's ion channel. The positively-charged amino acid at the critical point makes it energetically unfavourable for calcium to enter the cell through the pore. Almost all of the GluR2 subunits in CNS are edited to the GluR2(R) form. This means that the principal ions gated by AMPARs are sodium and potassium. The prevention of calcium entry into the cell on activation of GluR2-containing AMPARs is proposed to guard against excitotoxicity.[19]

The subunit composition of the AMPAR is also important for the way this receptor is modulated. If an AMPAR lacks GluR2 subunits, then it is susceptible to being blocked in a voltage-dependent manner by a class of molecules called polyamines. Thus when the neuron is at a depolarized membrane potential, polyamines will block the AMPAR channel more strongly, preventing the flux of potassium ions through the channel pore. GluR2-lacking AMPARs are thus said to have an inwardly rectifying I/V curve, which means that they pass less outward current than inward current.

Alongside RNA editing, alternative splicing allows a range of functional AMPA receptor subunits beyond what is encoded in the genome. In other words, although one gene (GRIA1-4) is encoded for each subunit (GluR1-4), splicing after transcription from DNA allows some exons to be translated interchangeably, leading to several functionally different subunits from each gene.

The flip/flop sequence is one such interchangeable exon. A 38-amino acid sequence found prior to (ie towards the C-terminus of) the 4th membranous domain in all four AMPAR subunits, it determines the speed of desensitisation[20] of the receptor and also the speed at which the receptor is resensitised[21] and the rate of channel closing[22]. The flip form is present in prenatal AMPA receptors, and gives a sustained current in response to glutamate activation.[23]

Synaptic Plasticity

AMPA receptors (AMPAR) are both glutamate receptors and cation channels that are integral to plasticity and synaptic transmission at many postsynaptic membranes. One of the most widely and thoroughly investigated forms of plasticity in the nervous system is known as long-term potentiation, or LTP. There are two necessary components of LTP: presynaptic glutamate release, and postsynaptic depolarization. Therefore, LTP can be induced experimentally in a paired electrophysiological recording when a presynaptic cell is stimulated to release glutamate on a postsynaptic cell that is depolarized. The typical LTP induction protocol involves a “tetanus” stimulation, which is a 100Hz stimulation for 1 second. When one applies this protocol to a pair of cells, one will see a sustained increase of the amplitude of the excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) following tetanus. This response is very intriguing because it is thought to be the physiological correlate for learning and memory in the cell. In fact, it was recently shown that following a single paired-avoidance paradigm in mice, LTP could be recorded in some hippocampal synapses in vivo.[24]

The molecular basis for LTP has been extensively studied, and AMPARs have been shown to play an integral role in the process. Both GluR1 and GluR2 play an important role in synaptic plasticity. It is now known that the underlying physiological correlate for the increase in EPSP size is a postsynaptic upregulation of AMPARs at the membrane, which is accomplished through the interactions of AMPARs with many cellular proteins.

The simplest explanation for LTP is as follows (see the long-term potentiation article for a much more detailed account). Glutamate binds to postsynaptic AMPARs and another glutamate receptor, the NMDA receptor (NMDAR). Ligand binding causes the AMPARs to open, and Na+ flows into the postsynaptic cell, resulting in a depolarization. NMDARs, on the other hand, do not open directly because their pores are occluded at resting membrane potential by Mg2+ ions. NMDARs can only open when a depolarization from the AMPAR activation leads to repulsion of the Mg2+ cation out into the extracellular space, allowing the pore to pass current. Unlike AMPARs, though, NMDARs are permeable to both Na+ and Ca2+. The Ca2+ that enters the cell triggers the upregulation of AMPARs to the membrane, which results in a long-lasting increase in EPSP size underlying LTP. The calcium entry also phosphorylates CaMKII, which phosphorylates AMPARs, increasing their single channel conductance.

Ligands

Agonists

Positive Allosteric Modulators

Antagonists

References

  1. ^ "Glutamate receptors: Structures and functions. University of Bristol Centre for Synaptic Plasticity.". http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/Synaptic/info/glutamate.html. Retrieved 2007-09-02.  
  2. ^ Shi SH, Hayashi Y, Petralia RS, et al. (1999). "Rapid spine delivery and redistribution of AMPA receptors after synaptic NMDA receptor activation". Science 284 (5421): 1811–6. doi:10.1126/science.284.5421.1811. PMID 10364548.  
  3. ^ Song I, Huganir RL (2002). "Regulation of AMPA receptors during synaptic plasticity". Trends Neurosci. 25 (11): 578–88. doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02270-1. PMID 12392933.  
  4. ^ Mayer, M. L. (2005). Glutamate receptor ion channels. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15 (3), 282-288.
  5. ^ a b Greger IH, Ziff EB, Penn AC (August 2007). "Molecular determinants of AMPA receptor subunit assembly". Trends Neurosci. 30 (8): 407–16. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2007.06.005. PMID 17629578.  
  6. ^ Hollmann M, Maron C, Heinemann S (1994). "N-glycosylation site tagging suggests a three transmembrane domain topology for the glutamate receptor GluR1". Neuron 13 (6): 1331–43. doi:10.1016/0896-6273(94)90419-7. PMID 7993626.  
  7. ^ Leonard AS, Davare MA, Horne MC, Garner CC, Hell JW (July 1998). "SAP97 is associated with the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid receptor GluR1 subunit". J. Biol. Chem. 273 (31): 19518–24. doi:10.1074/jbc.273.31.19518. PMID 9677374. http://www.jbc.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=9677374.  
  8. ^ Greger IH, Khatri L, Ziff EB (May 2002). "RNA editing at arg607 controls AMPA receptor exit from the endoplasmic reticulum". Neuron 34 (5): 759–72. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00693-1. PMID 12062022. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0896627302006931.  
  9. ^ Boehm J, Kang MG, Johnson RC, Esteban J, Huganir RL, Malinow R (July 2006). "Synaptic incorporation of AMPA receptors during LTP is controlled by a PKC phosphorylation site on GluR1". Neuron 51 (2): 213–25. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.06.013. PMID 16846856.  
  10. ^ Hayashi Y, Shi SH, Esteban JA, Piccini A, Poncer JC, Malinow R (March 2000). "Driving AMPA receptors into synapses by LTP and CaMKII: requirement for GluR1 and PDZ domain interaction". Science (journal) 287 (5461): 2262–7. PMID 10731148. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=10731148.  
  11. ^ Derkach V, Barria A, Soderling TR (March 1999). "Ca2+/calmodulin-kinase II enhances channel conductance of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate type glutamate receptors". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96 (6): 3269–74. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.6.3269. PMID 10077673. PMC 15931. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=10077673.  
  12. ^ Delgado JY, Coba M, Anderson CN, et al. (November 2007). "NMDA receptor activation dephosphorylates AMPA receptor glutamate receptor 1 subunits at threonine 840". J. Neurosci. 27 (48): 13210–21. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3056-07.2007. PMID 18045915.  
  13. ^ Banke TG, Bowie D, Lee H, Huganir RL, Schousboe A, Traynelis SF (January 2000). "Control of GluR1 AMPA receptor function by cAMP-dependent protein kinase". J. Neurosci. 20 (1): 89–102. PMID 10627585. http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=10627585.  
  14. ^ Mayer, M. L. (2005). Glutamate receptor ion channels. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15 (3), 282-288.
  15. ^ Armstrong N, Sun Y, Chen GQ, Gouaux E (October 1998). "Structure of a glutamate-receptor ligand-binding core in complex with kainate". Nature 395 (6705): 913–7. doi:10.1038/27692. PMID 9804426.  
  16. ^ a b Platt SR (2007). "The role of glutamate in central nervous system health and disease--a review". Vet. J. 173 (2): 278–86. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.11.007. PMID 16376594.  
  17. ^ Rosenmund C, Stern-Bach Y, Stevens CF (June 1998). "The tetrameric structure of a glutamate receptor channel". Science (journal) 280 (5369): 1596–9. PMID 9616121. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=9616121.  
  18. ^ Armstrong N, Jasti J, Beich-Frandsen M, Gouaux E (October 2006). "Measurement of conformational changes accompanying desensitization in an ionotropic glutamate receptor". Cell 127 (1): 85–97. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.037. PMID 17018279.  
  19. ^ Kim DY, Kim SH, Choi HB, Min C, Gwag BJ (2001). "High abundance of GluR1 mRNA and reduced Q/R editing of GluR2 mRNA in individual NADPH-diaphorase neurons". Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 17 (6): 1025–33. doi:10.1006/mcne.2001.0988. PMID 11414791.  
  20. ^ Mosbacher J, Schoepfer R, Monyer H, Burnashev N, Seeburg PH, Ruppersberg JP (1994). "A molecular determinant for submillisecond desensitization in glutamate receptors". Science 266 (5187): 1059–62. doi:10.1126/science.7973663. PMID 7973663.  
  21. ^ Sommer B, Keinänen K, Verdoorn TA, et al. (1990). "Flip and flop: a cell-specific functional switch in glutamate-operated channels of the CNS". Science 249 (4976): 1580–5. doi:10.1126/science.1699275. PMID 1699275.  
  22. ^ Pei W, Huang Z, Niu L.. GluR3 flip and flop: differences in channel opening kinetics.. PMID 17256974.  
  23. ^ GluR2 glutamate receptor subunit flip and flop isoforms are decreased in the hippocampal formation in schizophrenia: a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) study, Eastwood et al., Molecular Brain Research Vol44, Iss1, Feb1997, Pg92-98
  24. ^ Whitlock JR, Heynen AJ, Shuler MG, Bear MF (2006). "Learning induces long-term potentiation in the hippocampus". Science 313 (5790): 1093–7. doi:10.1126/science.1128134. PMID 16931756.  
  25. ^ Murray TK, Whalley K, Robinson CS, et al. (2003). "LY503430, a novel alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid receptor potentiator with functional, neuroprotective and neurotrophic effects in rodent models of Parkinson's disease". J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 306 (2): 752–62. doi:10.1124/jpet.103.049445. PMID 12730350.  
  26. ^ O'Neill MJ, Bleakman D, Zimmerman DM, Nisenbaum ES (2004). "AMPA receptor potentiators for the treatment of CNS disorders". Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord 3 (3): 181–94. doi:10.2174/1568007043337508. PMID 15180479.  

See Also

Arc/Arg3.1

External links


Advertisements






Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message