In mathematics, an amenable group is a locally compact topological group G carrying a kind of averaging operation on bounded functions that is invariant under left (or right) translation by group elements. The original definition, in terms of a finitely additive invariant measure (or mean) on subsets of G, was introduced by John von Neumann in 1929 under the German name "messbar" ("measurable" in English) in response to the Banach-Tarski paradox. In 1949 Mahlon M. Day introduced the English translation "amenable", apparently as a pun.[1]
The amenability property has a large number of equivalent formulations. In the field of analysis, the definition is in terms of linear functionals. An intuitive way to understand this version (which can be made precise) is that the support of the regular representation is the whole space of irreducible representations.
In discrete group theory, where G has no topological structure, a simpler definition is used. In this setting, a group is amenable if one can say what percentage of G any given subset takes up.
If a group has a Følner sequence then it is automatically amenable.
Contents |
Let G be a locally compact group
and
be the Banach
space of all essentially bounded functions
with respect to the Haar measure.
Definition 1. A linear functional on
is called a mean if it maps the constant function f(g) = 1 to 1 and
non-negative functions to non-negative numbers.
Definition 2. Let Lg be the left
action of
on
,
i.e. (Lgf)(h)
= f(g − 1h). Then, a
mean μ is said to be
left-invariant if μ(Lgf) =
μ(f) for all
and
Similarly, μ is said to be
right-invariant if μ(Rgf) =
μ(f), where Rg is the right
action (Rgf)(h)
= f(hg).
Definition 3. A locally compact group G is amenable if
there is a left- (or right-)invariant mean on 
The definition of amenability is quite a lot simpler in the case of a discrete group, i.e. a group with no topological structure.
Definition. A discrete group G is amenable if there is a measure—a function that assigns to each subset of G a number from 0 to 1—such that
This definition can be summarized thus: G is amenable if it has a finitely-additive left-invariant probability measure. Given a subset A of G, the measure can be thought of as answering the question: what is the probability that a random element of G is in A?
It is a fact that this definition is equivalent to the
definition in terms of
.
Having a measure μ on G allows us to define integration
of bounded functions on G.
Given a bounded function
,
the integral

is defined as in Lebesgue integration. (Note that some of the properties of the Lebesgue integral fail here, since our measure is only finitely-additive.)
If a group has a left-invariant measure, it automatically has a bi-invariant one. Given a left-invariant measure μ, the function μ − (A) = μ(A − 1) is a right-invariant measure. Combining these two gives a bi-invariant measure:

The following conditions are equivalent for a countable discrete group Γ:
If a countable discrete group contains a (non-abelian) free subgroup on two generators, then it is not amenable. The converse to this statement is the so-called von Neumann conjecture, which was disproved by Olshanskii in 1980 using his Tarski monsters. Adyan subsequently showed that free Burnside groups are non-amenable: since they are periodic, they cannot contain the free group on two generators. In 2002, Sapir and Olshanskii found finitely generated counterexamples: non-amenable finitely presented groups that have periodic normal subgroups of finite index.[2]
For finitely generated linear groups, however, the von Neumann conjecture is true by the Tits alternative[3]: every subgroup of Gl(n,k) with k a field either has a normal solvable subgroup of finite index (and therefore is amenable) or contains the free group on two generators. Although Tits' proof used algebraic geometry, Guivarc'h later found an analytic proof based on V. Oseledets' multiplicative ergodic theorem.[4] Analogues of the Tits alternative have been proved for many other classes of groups, such as fundamental groups of 2-dimensional simplicial complexes of non-positive curvature.[5]
|
|