The Full Wiki

Apocrypha: Wikis

  
  
  
  
  

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Did you know ...


More interesting facts on Apocrypha

Include this on your site/blog:

Encyclopedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The term Apocrypha is used with various meanings, including "hidden", "esoteric", "spurious", "of questionable authenticity", and "Christian texts that are not canonical".

The word is originally Greek (ἀπόκρυφα) and means "those having been hidden away". [1]

The general term is usually applied to the books that the Christian Church considered useful but not divinely inspired. As such, it is misleading to refer to the Gospel according to the Hebrews or Gnostic writings as apocryphal, because they would not be classified in the same category by orthodox believers. Non-canonical books are texts of uncertain authenticity, or writings where the work is seriously questioned. Given that different denominations have different beliefs about what constitutes canonical scripture, there are several versions of the apocrypha.

During 16th-century controversies about the biblical canon, the word acquired a negative connotation, and has become a synonym for "spurious" or "false". This usage usually involves fictitious or legendary accounts that are plausible enough to be commonly considered true. For example, Laozi's alleged authorship of the Tao Te Ching, Napoleon Bonaparte's self-coronation rather than at the hands of Pope Pius VII, and the Parson Weems account of George Washington and the cherry tree, are all considered apocryphal.

There is disagreement about how to depict a modern equivalent term to the ancient word apocrypha. Some would argue that it was like "top secret government files". Thus, in ancient China, "the divine chapters and esoteric charts are certainly to be held in the Metal Bound Box and stored in the Stone Room ... never been recorded in formal documents"[2] : "The description indicates that these esoteric ... apocryphal writings were well-kept in the Southern Qi imperial library without publication in a common catalogue."[3] (Their not being mentioned in the public catalogue would indicate their being accessible only to government agents having a "top secret" security-clearance.)

However, although some would like to promote conspiracy, the word simply refers to the author or authenticity which has not been substantiated and so is hidden.

Contents

Denotation and connotation

Apocrypha has evolved in meaning somewhat, and its associated implications have ranged from positive to pejorative. Apocrypha, according to Merriam-Webster Dictionary, means "books included in the Septuagint and Vulgate but excluded from the Jewish and Protestant canons of the Old Testament."[4]

Esoteric writings

The word "apocryphal" (ἀπόκρυφος) was first applied, in a positive sense, to writings which were kept secret because they were the vehicles of esoteric knowledge considered too profound or too sacred to be disclosed to anyone other than the initiated. For example, it is used in this sense to describe A Holy and Secret Book of Moses, called Eighth, or Moyseos holy books citing esoteric eighth St (Μωυσέως ἱερὰ βίβλος ἀπόκρυφος ἐπικαλούμενη ὀγδόη ἢ ἁγία). This is a text taken from a Leiden papyrus of the third or fourth century AD, but the text may be as old as the first century, but there has not be found proof of it. In a similar vein, the disciples of the Gnostic Prodicus boasted that they possessed the secret (ἀπόκρυφα) books of Zoroaster. The term in general enjoyed high consideration among the Gnostics (see Acts of Thomas, 10, 27, 44).[5]

Writings of questionable value

"Apocrypha" was also applied to writings that were hidden not because of their divinity but because of their questionable value to the church. Many in Protestant traditions cite Revelation 22:18-19 as a potential curse for those who attach any canonical authority to extra-biblical writings such as the Apocrypha. However, a strict exegesis of this text would indicate it was meant for only the Book of Revelation. Rv.22:18f. (TNIV) states: "I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If any one of you adds anything to them, God will add to you the plagues described in this scroll. And if any one of you takes words away from this scroll of prophecy, God will take away from you your share in the tree of life and in the Holy City, which are described in this scroll." In this case, if one holds to a strict hermeneutic, the "words of the prophecy" do not refer to the Bible as a whole but to Jesus' Revelation to John. Origen, in Commentaries on Matthew, distinguishes between writings which were read by the churches and apocryphal writings: γραφὴ μὴ φερομένη μέν ἒν τοῖς κοινοῖς καὶ δεδημοσιευμένοις βιβλίοις εἰκὸς δ' ὅτι ἒν ἀποκρύφοις φερομένη (writing not found on the common and published books in one hand, actually found on the secret ones on the other).[6] The meaning of αποκρυφος is here practically equivalent to "excluded from the public use of the church", and prepares the way for an even less favourable use of the word.[5]

Spurious writings

In general use, the word "apocrypha" came to mean "false, spurious, bad, or heretical." This meaning also appears in Origen's prologue to his commentary on the Song of Songs, of which only the Latin translation survives: De scripturis his, quae appellantur apocryphae, pro eo quod multa in iis corrupta et contra fidem veram inveniuntur a majoribus tradita non placuit iis dari locum nec admitti ad auctoritatem.[5] "Concerning these scriptures, which are called apocryphal, for the reason that many things are found in them corrupt and against the true faith handed down by the elders, it has pleased them that they not be given a place nor be admitted to authority."

Other meanings

Other uses of apocrypha developed over the history of Western Christianity. The Gelasian Decree refers to religious works by church fathers Eusebius, Tertullian and Clement of Alexandria as apocrypha. Augustine defined the word as meaning simply "obscurity of origin," implying that any book of unknown authorship or questionable authenticity would be considered as apocrypha. On the other hand, Jerome (in Protogus Galeatus) declared that all books outside the Hebrew canon were apocryphal.[5] In practice, Jerome treated some books outside the Hebrew canon as if they were canonical, and the Western Church did not accept Jerome's definition of apocrypha, instead retaining the word's prior meaning (see: Deuterocanon). As a result, various church authorities labeled different books as apocrypha, treating them with varying levels of regard.

Some apocryphal books were included in the Septuagint with little distinction made between them and the rest of the Old Testament. Origen, Clement and others cited some apocryphal books as "scripture," "divine scripture," "inspired," and the like. On the other hand, teachers connected with Palestine and familiar with the Hebrew canon excluded from the canon all of the Old Testament not found there. This view is reflected in the canon of Melito of Sardis, and in the prefaces and letters of Jerome.[5] A third view was that the books were not as valuable as the canonical scriptures of the Hebrew collection, but were of value for moral uses, as introductory texts for new converts from paganism, and to be read in congregations. They were referred to as "ecclesiastical" works by Rufinus.[5]

These three opinions regarding the apocryphal books prevailed until the Protestant Reformation, when the idea of what constitutes canon became a matter of primary concern for Roman Catholics and Protestants alike. In 1546 the Catholic Council of Trent reconfirmed the canon of Augustine, dating to the second and third centuries, declaring "He is also to be anathema who does not receive these entire books, with all their parts, as they have been accustomed to be read in the Catholic Church, and are found in the ancient editions of the Latin Vulgate, as sacred and canonical." The whole of the books in question, with the exception of 1 Esdras and 2 Esdras and the Prayer of Manasses, were declared canonical at Trent.[5] The Protestants, in comparison, were diverse in their opinion of the deuterocanon. Some considered them divinely inspired, others rejected them. Anglicans took a position between the Catholic Church and the Protestant Churches; they kept them as Christian intertestamental readings and a part of the Bible, but no doctrine should be based on them. John Wycliffe, a 14th century Christian Humanist, had declared in his biblical translation that "whatever book is in the Old Testament besides these twenty-five shall be set among the apocrypha, that is, without authority or belief."[5] Nevertheless, his translation of the Bible included the apocrypha and the Epistle of the Loadiceans.[7]

The respect accorded to apocryphal books varied between Protestant denominations. In both the German (1534) and English (1535) translations of the Bible, the apocrypha are published in a separate section from the other books, although the Lutheran and Anglican lists are different. In some editions (like the Westminster), readers were warned that these books were not "to be any otherwise approved or made use of than other human writings." A milder distinction was expressed elsewhere, such as in the "argument" introducing them in the Geneva Bible, and in the Sixth Article of the Church of England, where it is said that "the other books the church doth read for example of life and instruction of manners," though not to establish doctrine.[5]

According to the Orthodox Anglican Church:

On the other hand, the Anglican Communion emphatically maintains that the Apocrypha is part of the Bible and is to be read with respect by her members. Two of the hymns used in the American Prayer Book office of Morning Prayer, the Benedictus es and Benedicite, are taken from the Apocrypha. One of the offertory sentences in Holy Communion comes from an apocryphal book (Tob. 4: 8-9). Lessons from the Apocrypha are regularly appointed to be read in the daily, Sunday, and special services of Morning and Evening Prayer. There are altogether 111 such lessons in the latest revised American Prayer Book Lectionary [The books used are: II Esdras, Tobit, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Baruch, Three Holy Children, and I Maccabees.] The position of the Church is best summarized in the words of Article Six of the Thirty-nine Articles: “In the name of Holy Scripture we do understand those canonical Books of the Old and New Testament, of whose authority there was never any doubt in the Church… And the other Books (as Hierome [St. Jerome] saith) the Church doth read for example of life and instruction of manners; but yet doth it not apply them to establish any doctrine…”
[citation needed]

Texts

Judaism

Although traditional rabbinical Judaism insists on the exclusive canonization of the current 24 books in the Tanakh, it also claims to have an oral law handed down from Moses. The Sadducees - unlike the Pharisees but like the Samaritans - seem to have maintained an earlier and smaller number of texts as canonical, preferring to hold to only what was written in the Law of Moses[8] (making most of the presently accepted canon, both Jewish and Christian, apocryphal in their eyes). Certain circles in Judaism, such as the Essenes in Judea and the Therapeutae in Egypt, were said to have a secret literature (see Dead Sea scrolls). Other traditions maintained different customs regarding canonicity.[9] The Ethiopic Jews, for instance, seem to have retained a spread of canonical texts similar to the Ethiopian Orthodox Christians,[10] cf Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol 6, p 1147. A large part of this literature consisted of the apocalypses. Based on prophecies, these apocalyptic books were not considered scripture by all, but rather part of a literary form that flourished from 200 BC to AD 100.[citation needed]

Christianity

During the birth of Christianity, some of the Jewish apocrypha that dealt with the coming of the Messianic kingdom became popular in the rising Jewish-Christian communities. Occasionally these writings were changed or added to, but on the whole it was found sufficient to reinterpret them as conforming to a Christian viewpoint. Christianity eventually gave birth to new apocalyptic works, some of which were derived from traditional Jewish sources. Some of the Jewish apocrypha were part of the ordinary religious literature of the early Christians. This was not strange, as the large majority of Old Testament references in the New Testament are taken from the Greek Septuagint, which is the source of the deuterocanonical books[11] as well as most of the other biblical apocrypha.[12]

Slightly varying collections of additional Books (called deuterocanonical by the Roman Catholic Church) form part of the Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox canons.

The Book of Enoch is included in the biblical canon only of the Oriental Orthodox churches of Ethiopia and Eritrea. The Epistle of Jude quotes the book of Enoch, and some believe the use of this book also appears in the four gospels and 1 Peter. The genuineness and inspiration of Enoch were believed in by the writer of the Epistle of Barnabas, Irenaeus, Tertullian and Clement of Alexandria and much of the early church. The epistles of Paul and the gospels also show influences from the Book of Jubilees, which is part of the Ethiopian canon, as well as the Assumption of Moses and the Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs, which are included in no biblical canon.

The high position which some apocryphal books occupied in the first two centuries was undermined by a variety of influences in the Christian church. All claims to the possession of a secret tradition (as held by many Gnostic sects) were denied by the influential theologians like Irenaeus and Tertullian, the timeframe of true inspiration was limited to the apostolic age, and universal acceptance by the church was required as proof of apostolic authorship. As these principles gained currency, books deemed apocryphal tended to become regarded as spurious and heretical writings, though books now considered deuterocanonical have been used in liturgy and theology from the first century to the present.

Gnosticism

New Testament apocrypha—books similar to those in the New Testament but almost universally rejected by Catholics, Orthodox and Protestants—include several gospels and lives of apostles. Some were written by early Jewish Christians (see the Gospel according to the Hebrews). Others of these were produced by Gnostic authors or members of other groups later defined as heterodox. Many texts believed lost for centuries were unearthed in the 19th and 20th centuries, producing lively speculation about their importance in early Christianity among religious scholars, while many others survive only in the form of quotations from them in other writings; for some, no more than the title is known. Artists and theologians have drawn upon the New Testament apocrypha for such matters as the names of Dismas and Gestas and details about the Three Wise Men. The first explicit mention of the perpetual virginity of Mary is found in the pseudepigraphical Infancy Gospel of James.

The Gnostic tradition was a prolific source of apocryphal gospels. While these writings borrowed the characteristic poetic features of apocalyptic literature from Judaism, Gnostic sects largely insisted on allegorical interpretations based on a secret apostolic tradition. With them, as with most Christians of the first and second centuries, apocryphal books were highly esteemed. A well-known Gnostic apocryphal book is the Gospel of Thomas, the only complete text of which was found in the Egyptian town of Nag Hammadi in 1945. The Gospel of Judas, a Gnostic gospel, also received much media attention when it was reconstructed in 2006.

Roman Catholics and Orthodox Christians as well as Protestants generally agree on the canon of the New Testament. The Ethiopian Orthodox have in the past also included I & II Clement, and Shepherd of Hermas in their New Testament canon.

Notes

  1. ^ Specifically, ἀπόκρυφα is the neuter plural of ἀπόκρυφος, a participle derived from the verb ἀποκρύπτω [infinitive: ἀποκρύπτειν], "to hide something away."
  2. ^ Zhongli Lu : Power of the Words : Chen Prophecy in Chinese Politics AD 265-618. Peter Lang, Bern, 2003. p. 72, citing Nan Qi Shu 18.349
  3. ^ Zhongli 2003, p. 73
  4. ^ Apocrypha
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica
  6. ^ Commentaries on Matthew, X. 18, XIII. 57
  7. ^ Wyclif's Bible
  8. ^ Jewish Encyclopedia: Sadducees
  9. ^ The Old Testament Canon
  10. ^ Ethiopian Orthodox Old Testament
  11. ^ Deuterocanonical books literally means books of the second canon. The term was coined in the 16th century.
  12. ^ The Style Manual for the Society of Biblical Literature recommends the use of the term deuterocanonical literature instead of apocrypha in academic writing, although not all apocryphal books are properly deuterocanonical.

See also

External links


Quotes

Up to date as of January 14, 2010

From Wikiquote

The Apocrypha are books found beween the Old and New Testaments in many bibles. They correspond broadly to the books recognised as part of the Old Testament by many Christians but rejected by Protestants and Jews.

Contents

Sourced

I Esdras

  • Great is truth, and mighty above all things.
    • Often quoted in the Latin: Magna est veritas et praevalet.
    • 4:41
  • Women are strongest: but above all things Truth beareth away the victory.
    • 13:12

II Esdras

  • If he went not through the narrow, how could he come into the broad?
    • 7:5
  • I shall light a candle of understanding in thine heart, which shall not be put out.
    • 14:25

Tobit

  • So they went forth both, and the young man's dog with them.
    • 5:16

Judith

  • And became lord of his cities, and came unto Ecbatane, and took the towers, and spoiled the streets thereof, and turned the beauty thereof into shame.
    • 1:14

The Rest of the Book of Esther

  • Behold, a noise of a tumult with thunder, and earthquakes, and uproar in the land. And behold, two great dragons came forth ready to fight, and their cry was great.
    • 11:5-6

Wisdom of Solomon

  • Love righteousness, ye that be judges of the earth.
    • 1:1
  • The ear of jealousy heareth all things.
    • 1:10
  • Let us crown ourselves with rosebuds, before they be withered.
    • 2:8
  • Through envy of the devil came death into the world.
    • 2:24

Ecclesiasticus

  • Better it is to die than to beg.
    • 40:28
  • Let us now praise famous men, and our fathers that begat us.
    • 44:1

Baruch

  • To the Lord our God appertaineth righteousness, but unto us and to our fathers open shame, as appeareth this day.
    • 2:6

The Song of the Three Holy Children

  • For we, O Lord, are become less than any nation, and be kept under this day in all the world, because of our sins.
    • v.13
  • But the Angel of the Lord came down into the oven, together with Azarias and his fellows, and smote the flame of the fire out of the oven: And made the midst of the furnace, as it had been a moist whistling wind, so that the fire touched them not at all, neither hurt nor troubled them.
    • vv.25-26

II Maccabees

  • When he was at the last gasp.
    • 7:9
  • Nicanor lay dead in his harness.
    • 15:28

External links

Wikipedia
Wikipedia has an article about:

Wiktionary

Up to date as of January 15, 2010
(Redirected to apocrypha article)

Definition from Wiktionary, a free dictionary

Wikipedia-logo.png
Wikipedia has an article on:

Wikipedia

Contents

English

Etymology

Latin apocryphus "apocryphal", from Greek ἀπόκρυφος (apocryphos), hidden, obscure) from ἀποκρύπτειν (apocryptīn), to hide); from apo + κρύπτειν (cryptīn), to hide).

Pronunciation

  • IPA: /ʌˈpɑk.ɹə.fə/

Noun

apocrypha

  1. (plurale tantum) Certain writings which are received by some Christians as an authentic part of the Holy Scriptures, but are rejected by others.
    Note: Fourteen such writings, or books, formed part of the Septuagint, but not of the Hebrew canon recognized by the Jews of Palestine. The Council of Trent included all but three of these in the canon of inspired books having equal authority. The German and English Reformers grouped them in their Bibles under the title Apocrypha, as not having dogmatic authority, but being profitable for instruction. The Apocrypha is now commonly omitted from the King James Bible and most other English versions of Scripture. Note: the word is normally capitalised in this usage.
  2. (obsolete) Something, as a writing, that is of doubtful authorship or authority; -- formerly used also adjectively. - John Locke.

Related terms

Translations


Bible wiki

Up to date as of January 23, 2010

From BibleWiki

The word apocrypha (from the Greek word απόκρυφα meaning "those having been hidden away") is a Greek word used to describe two groups of religious writings which are not universally accepted as belonging to the Canon of Scripture.

Contents

Old Testament Apocrypha

The more widely-accepted body is linked to the Old Testament. They are found in the Septuagint, the ancient Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures. The name itself means "things hidden away", and was later attached to these works. Some are also part of the Pseudepigrapha, a body of Jewish and Judeo-Christian books which were penned under assumed names. The authors of these books had very diverse intentions. There were those who wanted to supplement the books of the Old Testament, and others who thought to replace them. Some books could be viewed as a more entertaining viewpoint for believers, while others were meant to share and spread ideas not sanctioned by the church.

Why the difference?

The reason for the difference is that there were different Old Testaments circulating in the first century. The Greek Old Testament - the Septuagint - contained several books that were not contained in the Hebrew Old Testament. The Septuagint was the standard Bible used by Greek-speaking Jews who lived outside of Israel in the first century. As early Christianity largely grew and spread outside of Israel among Greek speakers, they used the standard Greek Old Testament, which contained the Apocryphal books. The Jewish rabbis did not fix a Jewish canon which rejected the Greek books until the Council of Jamnia, cf. AD 90, by which time Christians were already using them.

Different sets among Christian groups

There are also some differences as to which Deuterocanonical books are accepted by the various Christian churches.

The Roman Catholic Church accepts Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Sirach, 1 Maccabees, 2 Maccabees, Baruch, the Greek additions to the Book of Daniel, and the Greek additions to Esther.

The Eastern Orthodox Church accepts all books in the Roman Catholic canon, and also accepts 1 Esdras (a.k.a. 3 Esdras), 3 Maccabees, the Prayer of Manasseh, and Psalm 151.

The Slavonic Bible also adds 2 Esdras, which it calls "3 Esdras." 2 Esdras is also included as "4 Esdras" in the Appendix to the Latin Vulgate.

The Anglican Church uses some Apocryphal books for reading in church, but not to establish doctrine (Article VI, 39 Articles of Religion, 1801). Therefore, editions of the Bible for use in the Anglican Church (including the original 1611 King James Version) include the Roman Catholic Apocrypha, plus 1 and 2 Esdras and the Prayer of Manasseh.

There is also 4 Maccabees, which is accepted by no Christian church, but appears in an appendix to the Septuagint, and us therefore included in some Apocryphal collections.

Some of the Apocrypha are also called the Intertestament and, until 1643, appeared in the King James Version of the Bible, between the Old and New Testaments, and is still included in some editions.

Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches use some of these texts in their canon. The Roman Catholic term for such works is often "Deuterocanonical", and the word "Apocryphal" is often regarded as slightly insulting, as it assumes a lack of authenticity. The Orthodox have no specific category for them.

Many Protestants argue that these works have no claim to be regarded as in any sense parts of Scripture:

  • They are not once quoted by the New Testament writers, who frequently quote from the LXX. Jesus and his apostles confirmed by their authority the ordinary Jewish canon, which was the same in all respects as we now have it.
    • However, the 1611 edition of the A.V. cross-referenced 11 New Testament passages to the Apocrypha, and there are several direct allusions and references in the New Testament to "apocrypha" material, such as Hebrews 11:35, which is a reference to 2 Maccabees Chapter 7. Also, when the Sadducees came to Jesus to challenge him on the issue of the Resurrection (Matthew 22:23-33), they referred to seven brothers among them who, each in turn, married the same woman, dying before having children. This story is a speculative question based on the situation of Sarah in the Book of Tobit. In addition, nowhere in the New Testament are the Books of Joshua, Judges, Ezekiel, Ezra/Nehemiah nor Chronicles directly quoted. Therefore, by this argument, these books should also be rejected from Scripture.
  • These books were written not in Hebrew but in Greek, and during the "period of silence," from the time of Malachi, after which oracles and direct revelations from God ceased till the Christian era.
    • However, there is no Scriptural definition of this "period of silence," nor any Scriptural statement that revelations from God ceased during this period. There is also no Scriptural statement that Greek is an unacceptable language for Divine Inspiration, and that would seem to be a strange claim, as it is the language that the New Testament was written in.
  • There are some claims that the contents of the books themselves show that they were no part of Scripture.
    • However, that statement is entirely matter of subjective judgement.

New Testament Apocrypha

The New Testament Apocrypha consists of a very extensive literature that usually bears distinct evidence of its non-apostolic origin, or at very least deviates in espoused doctrines from the conventional canon of Scripture far more than do the Old Testament apocrypha. They are presented in the same four types as the New Testament literature: gospels, acts, letters and apocalypses. All of these works are rejected by both Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox Christians.

This article needs to be merged with APOCRYPHA (Jewish Encyclopedia)].
This entry includes text from Easton's Bible Dictionary, 1897.

what mentions this? (please help by turning references to this page into wiki links)

Facts about ApocryphaRDF feed







Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message