The Arrhenius equation is a simple, but remarkably accurate, formula for the temperature dependence of the rate constant, and therefore, rate of a chemical reaction.^{[1]} The equation was first proposed by the Dutch chemist J. H. van 't Hoff in 1884; five years later in 1889, the Swedish chemist Svante Arrhenius provided a physical justification and interpretation for it. Nowadays it is best seen as an empirical relationship.^{[2]} It can be used to model the temperaturevariance of diffusion coefficients, population of crystal vacancies, creep rates, and many other thermallyinduced processes/reactions.
A historically useful generalization supported by the Arrhenius equation is that, for many common chemical reactions at room temperature, the reaction rate doubles for every 10 degree Celsius increase in temperature.
Contents 
In short, the Arrhenius equation gives "the dependence of the rate constant k of chemical reactions on the temperature T (in absolute temperature, such as kelvins or degrees Rankine) and activation energy ^{[3]} E_{a}", as shown below:^{[1]}
where A is the preexponential factor or simply the prefactor and R is the gas constant. The units of the preexponential factor are identical to those of the rate constant and will vary depending on the order of the reaction. If the reaction is first order it has the units s^{−1}, and for that reason it is often called the frequency factor or attempt frequency of the reaction. Most simply, k is the number of collisions which result in a reaction per second, A is the total number of collisions (leading to a reaction or not) per second and is the probability that any given collision will result in a reaction. When the activation energy is given in molecular units instead of molar units, e.g. joules per molecule instead of joules per mole, the Boltzmann constant is used instead of the gas constant. It can be seen that either increasing the temperature or decreasing the activation energy (for example through the use of catalysts) will result in an increase in rate of reaction.
Given the small temperature range in which kinetic studies are carried, it is reasonable to approximate the activation energy as being independent of the temperature. Similarly, under a wide range of practical conditions, the weak temperature dependence of the preexponential factor is negligible compared to the temperature dependence of the factor; except in the case of "barrierless" diffusionlimited reactions, in which case the preexponential factor is dominant and is directly observable.
Some authors define a modified Arrhenius equation,^{[4]} that makes explicit the temperature dependence of the preexponential factor. If one allows arbitrary temperature dependence of the prefactor, the Arrhenius description becomes overcomplete, and the inverse problem (i.e. determining the prefactor and activation energy from experimental data) becomes singular. The modified equation is usually of the form
where T_{0} is a reference temperature and allows n to be a unitless power. Clearly the original Arrhenius expression above corresponds to n = 0. Fitted rate constants typically lie in the range 1<n<1. Theoretical analyses yield various predictions for n. It has been pointed out that "it is not feasible to establish, on the basis of temperature studies of the rate constant, whether the predicted T^{½} dependence of the preexponential factor is observed experimentally."^{[2]} However, if additional evidence is available, from theory and/or from experiment (such as density dependence), there is no obstacle to incisive tests of the Arrhenius law.
Another common modification is the stretched exponential form
where β is a unitless number of order 1. This is typically regarded as a fudge factor to make the model fit the data, but can have theoretical meaning, for example showing the presence of a range of activation energies or in special cases like the Mott variable range hopping.
Taking the natural logarithm of the Arrhenius equation yields:
So, when a reaction has a rate constant which obeys the Arrhenius equation, a plot of ln(k) versus T ^{−1} gives a straight line, whose slope and intercept can be used to determine E_{a} and A. This procedure has become so common in experimental chemical kinetics that practitioners have taken to using it to define the activation energy for a reaction. That is the activation energy is defined to be (R) times the slope of a plot of ln(k) vs. (1/T):
Arrhenius argued that in order for reactants to be transformed into products, they first needed to acquire a minimum amount of energy, called the activation energy E_{a}. At an absolute temperature T, the fraction of molecules that have a kinetic energy greater than E_{a} can be calculated from the MaxwellBoltzmann distribution of statistical mechanics, and turns out to be proportional to . The concept of activation energy explains the exponential nature of the relationship, and in one way or another, it is present in all kinetic theories.
One example comes from the "collision theory" of chemical reactions, developed by Max Trautz and William Lewis in the years 191618. In this theory, molecules are supposed to react if they collide with a relative kinetic energy along their linesofcenter that exceeds E_{a}. This leads to an expression very similar to the Arrhenius equation.
Another Arrheniuslike expression appears in the "transition state theory" of chemical reactions, formulated by Wigner, Eyring, Polanyi and Evans in the 1930s. This takes various forms, but one of the most common is
where ΔG^{‡} is the Gibbs free energy of activation, k_{B} is Boltzmann's constant, and h is Planck's constant.
At first sight this looks like an exponential multiplied by a factor that is linear in temperature. However, one must remember that free energy is itself a temperature dependent quantity. The free energy of activation is the difference of an enthalpy term and an entropy term multiplied by the absolute temperature. When all of the details are worked out one ends up with an expression that again takes the form of an Arrhenius exponential multiplied by a slowly varying function of T. The precise form of the temperature dependence depends upon the reaction, and can be calculated using formulas from statistical mechanics involving the partition functions of the reactants and of the activated complex.
The Arrhenius equation is a simple, but remarkably accurate, formula for the temperature dependence of the reaction rate constant, and therefore, rate of a chemical reaction.^{[1]} The equation was first proposed by the Dutch chemist J. H. van 't Hoff in 1884; five years later in 1889, the Swedish chemist Svante Arrhenius provided a physical justification and interpretation for it. Nowadays it is best seen as an empirical relationship.^{[2]} It can be used to model the temperaturevariance of diffusion coefficients, population of crystal vacancies, creep rates, and many other thermallyinduced processes/reactions.
A historically useful generalization supported by the Arrhenius equation is that, for many common chemical reactions at room temperature, the reaction rate doubles for every 10 degree Celsius increase in temperature.
Contents 
In short, the Arrhenius equation gives "the dependence of the rate constant k of chemical reactions on the temperature T (in absolute temperature, such as kelvins or degrees Rankine) and activation energy^{[3]} E_{a}", as shown below:^{[1]}
where A is the preexponential factor or simply the prefactor and R is the gas constant. The units of the preexponential factor are identical to those of the rate constant and will vary depending on the order of the reaction. If the reaction is first order it has the units s^{−1}, and for that reason it is often called the frequency factor or attempt frequency of the reaction. Most simply, k is the number of collisions that result in a reaction per second, A is the total number of collisions (leading to a reaction or not) per second and $e^\{\{E\_a\}/\{RT\}\}$ is the probability that any given collision will result in a reaction. When the activation energy is given in molecular units instead of molar units, e.g., joules per molecule instead of joules per mole, the Boltzmann constant is used instead of the gas constant. It can be seen that either increasing the temperature or decreasing the activation energy (for example through the use of catalysts) will result in an increase in rate of reaction.
Given the small temperature range kinetic studies occur in, it is reasonable to approximate the activation energy as being independent of the temperature. Similarly, under a wide range of practical conditions, the weak temperature dependence of the preexponential factor is negligible compared to the temperature dependence of the $\backslash scriptstyle\; \backslash exp(E\_a/RT)$ factor; except in the case of "barrierless" diffusionlimited reactions, in which case the preexponential factor is dominant and is directly observable.
Some authors define a modified Arrhenius equation,^{[4]} that makes explicit the temperature dependence of the preexponential factor. If one allows arbitrary temperature dependence of the prefactor, the Arrhenius description becomes overcomplete, and the inverse problem (i.e., determining the prefactor and activation energy from experimental data) becomes singular. The modified equation is usually of the form
where T_{0} is a reference temperature and allows n to be a unitless power. Clearly the original Arrhenius expression above corresponds to n = 0. Fitted rate constants typically lie in the range 1<n<1. Theoretical analyses yield various predictions for n. It has been pointed out that "it is not feasible to establish, on the basis of temperature studies of the rate constant, whether the predicted T^{½} dependence of the preexponential factor is observed experimentally."^{[2]} However, if additional evidence is available, from theory and/or from experiment (such as density dependence), there is no obstacle to incisive tests of the Arrhenius law.
Another common modification is the stretched exponential form
where β is a unitless number of order 1. This is typically regarded as a fudge factor to make the model fit the data, but can have theoretical meaning, for example showing the presence of a range of activation energies or in special cases like the Mott variable range hopping.
Taking the natural logarithm of the Arrhenius equation yields:
So, when a reaction has a rate constant that obeys the Arrhenius equation, a plot of ln(k) versus T^{ −1} gives a straight line, whose slope and intercept can be used to determine E_{a} and A. This procedure has become so common in experimental chemical kinetics that practitioners have taken to using it to define the activation energy for a reaction. That is the activation energy is defined to be (R) times the slope of a plot of ln(k) vs. (1/T):
Arrhenius argued that for reactants to transform into products, they must first acquire a minimum amount of energy, called the activation energy E_{a}. At an absolute temperature T, the fraction of molecules that have a kinetic energy greater than E_{a} can be calculated from the MaxwellBoltzmann distribution of statistical mechanics, and turns out to be proportional to $\backslash \; e^\{\backslash frac\{E\_a\}\{RT\}\}$. The concept of activation energy explains the exponential nature of the relationship, and in one way or another, it is present in all kinetic theories.
One example comes from the "collision theory" of chemical reactions, developed by Max Trautz and William Lewis in the years 191618. In this theory, molecules are supposed to react if they collide with a relative kinetic energy along their linesofcenter that exceeds E_{a}. This leads to an expression very similar to the Arrhenius equation.
Another Arrheniuslike expression appears in the "transition state theory" of chemical reactions, formulated by Wigner, Eyring, Polanyi and Evans in the 1930s. This takes various forms, but one of the most common is
where ΔG^{‡} is the Gibbs free energy of activation, k_{B} is Boltzmann's constant, and h is Planck's constant.
At first sight this looks like an exponential multiplied by a factor that is linear in temperature. However, one must remember that free energy is itself a temperature dependent quantity. The free energy of activation is the difference of an enthalpy term and an entropy term multiplied by the absolute temperature. When all of the details are worked out one ends up with an expression that again takes the form of an Arrhenius exponential multiplied by a slowly varying function of T. The precise form of the temperature dependence depends upon the reaction, and can be calculated using formulas from statistical mechanics involving the partition functions of the reactants and of the activated complex.
Both the Arrhenius activation energy and the rate constant k are experimentally determined, and represent macroscopic reactionspecific parameters that are not simply related to threshold energies and the success of individual collisions at the molecular level. Consider a particular collision (an elementary reaction) between molecules A and B. The collision angle, the relative translational energy, the internal (particularly vibrational) energy will all determine the chance that the collision will produce a product molecule AB. Macroscopic measurements of E and k are the result of many individual collisions with differing collision parameters. To probe reaction rates at molecular level, experiments have to be conducted under nearcollisional conditions and this subject is often called molecular reaction dynamics (see Levine).'
From Svante Arrhenius Swedish chemist
Arrhenius equation
