The Full Wiki

Atypical antipsychotic: Wikis

  
  

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Encyclopedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Skeletal formula of clozapine, the first atypical antipsychotic

The atypical antipsychotics (also known as second generation antipsychotics) are a group of antipsychotic drugs used to treat psychiatric conditions. Some atypical antipsychotics are FDA approved for use in the treatment of schizophrenia. Some carry FDA approved indications for acute mania, bipolar mania, psychotic agitation, bipolar maintenance, and other indications. Atypicals differ from typical antipsychotics in that they have less of a propensity for causing extrapyramidal symptoms.

Contents

List of atypical antipsychotics

The following are approved and marketed in various parts of the world:

And these are currently under development but are not yet licensed:

History

The first atypical anti-psychotic medication, clozapine, was discovered in the 1950s, and introduced into clinical practice in the 1970s. Clozapine fell out of favor due to concerns over drug-induced agranulocytosis. With research indicating its effectiveness in treatment-resistant schizophrenia and the development of an adverse event monitoring system, clozapine reemerged as a viable antipsychotic. Despite the effectiveness of clozapine for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, agents with a more favourable side effect profile were sought after for widespread use. During the 1990s, olanzapine, risperidone and quetiapine were introduced, with ziprasidone and aripiprazole following in the early 2000s. The latest atypical anti-psychotic, paliperidone, was approved by the FDA in late 2006.

The atypical anti-psychotics have found favour among clinicians and are now considered to be first line treatments for schizophrenia and are gradually replacing the typical antipsychotics. In the past, most researchers have agreed that the defining characteristic of an atypical antipsychotic is the decreased propensity of these agents to cause Extrapyramidal Side Effects (EPS)[1] and an absence of sustained prolactin elevation.[2]

The terminology can be imprecise. The definition of "atypicality" was based upon the absence of extrapyramidal side effects, but there is now a clear understanding that atypical antipsychotics can still induce these effects (though to a lesser degree than typical antipsychotics.)[3] Recent literature focuses more upon specific pharmacological actions, and less upon categorization of an agent as "typical" or "atypical".

More recent research is questioning the notion that second generation anti-psychotics are superior to first generation typical anti-psychotics. Using a number of parameters to assess quality of life, Manchester University researchers found that typical anti-psychotics were no worse than atypical anti-psychotics. The research was funded by the National Health Service (NHS) of the UK.[4] Because each medication (whether first or second generation) has its own profile of desirable and adverse effects, a neuropsychopharmacologist may recommend one of the older ("typical" or first generation) or newer ("atypical" or second generation) antipsychotics alone or in combination with other medications, based on the symptom profile, response pattern, and adverse effects history of the individual patient.

Pharmacology

The mechanism of action of these agents is unknown, and differs greatly from drug to drug. The variation in the receptor binding profile is such that the only effect all have in common is an anti-psychotic effect; the side effect profiles vary tremendously. While modulation of the dopamine neurotransmitter system is the most important mechanism by which anti-psychotics exert their benefits, the role of the serotonergic activity of the atypicals is debated. Some researchers believe that D2 receptor antagonism, coupled with 5-HT2A receptor antagonism, is responsible for the "atypicality" of atypical anti-psychotics. Others believe that fast dissociation (a fast Koff) from the D2 receptor, allowing for better transmission of normal physiological dopamine surges, better explains the pharmacological evidence.

There is extensive evidence that atypical anti-psychotics have less of an affinity for D2 receptors and more of an affinity for the D4 receptors.[citation needed] This may explain why atypical anti-psychotics are somewhat less likely to cause tardive dyskinesia.[citation needed] The idea is that D2 receptors are dopaminergically ubiquitous and affect the motor system as much as the motivational aspect of the dopamine system. On the other hand, D4 is a more accurate dopamine receptor subtype. Atypical anti-psychotics also affect the norepinephrine, acetylcholine, and histamine receptors of various subtypes.[5] However, studies have shown that D4 selective antagonism has no anti-psychotic effect.[citation needed]

Side effects

The side effects reportedly associated with the various atypical antipsychotics vary and are medication-specific. Generally speaking, atypical antipsychotics are hoped to have a lower likelihood for the development of tardive dyskinesia than the typical antipsychotics. However, tardive dyskinesia typically develops after long term (possibly decades) use of antipsychotics. It is not clear, then, if atypical antipsychotics, having been in use for a relatively short time, produce a lower incidence of tardive dyskinesia.

Akathisia is more likely to be less intense with these drugs than the typical antipsychotics[citation needed] although many patients would dispute this claim. In 2004, the Committee for the Safety of Medicines (CSM) in the UK issued a warning that olanzapine and risperidone should not be given to elderly patients with dementia, because of an increased risk of stroke. Sometimes atypical antipsychotics can cause abnormal shifts in sleep patterns, and extreme tiredness and weakness.

In 2006, USA Today published an article about the effects of antipsychotic medication in children. None of the atypicals (Clozaril, Risperdal, Zyprexa, Seroquel, Abilify and Geodon) have been approved for children, and there is little research on their effects on children. From 2000–2004, there were 45 reported deaths in which an atypical antipsychotic was listed as the "primary suspect." There were also 1328 reports of serious, and sometimes life threatening, side effects. These include tardive dyskinesia (involuntary jerking and facial grimacing) and dystonia (involuntary muscle contractions that can interfere with talking and eating).

Tardive dyskinesia

All of the atypical antipsychotics warn about the possibility of tardive dyskinesia in their package inserts and in the PDR. It is not possible to truly know the risks of tardive dyskinesia when taking atypicals, because tardive dyskinesia can take many decades to develop and the atypical antipsychotics are not old enough to have been tested over a long enough period of time to determine all of the long-term risks.

Metabolism

Recently, metabolic concerns have been of grave concern to clinicians, patients and the FDA. In 2003, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required all manufacturers of atypical antipsychotics to change their labeling to include a warning about the risks of hyperglycemia and diabetes with atypical antipsychotics. It must also be pointed out that although all atypicals must carry the warning on their labeling, some evidence shows that atypicals are not equal in their effects on weight and insulin sensitivity.[6] The general consensus is that clozapine and olanzapine are associated with the greatest effects on weight gain and decreased insulin sensitivity, followed by risperidone and quetiapine.[6] Ziprasidone and aripiprazole are thought to have the smallest effects on weight and insulin resistance, but clinical experience with these newer agents is not as developed as that with the older agents.[6]

See also

References

  1. ^ Farah A (2005). "Atypicality of atypical antipsychotics". Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 7 (6): 268–74. PMID 16498489.& PMC 1324958. http://www.psychiatrist.com/pcc/redirect/v07n06p268.htm. 
  2. ^ Seeman P (February 2002). "Atypical antipsychotics: mechanism of action". Can J Psychiatry 47 (1): 27–38. PMID 11873706. 
  3. ^ Weiden PJ (January 2007). "EPS profiles: the atypical antipsychotics are not all the same". J Psychiatr Pract 13 (1): 13–24. doi:10.1097/00131746-200701000-00003. PMID 17242588. http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?an=00131746-200701000-00003. 
  4. ^ Jones PB, Barnes TR, Davies L, et al. (2006). "Randomized controlled trial of the effect on Quality of Life of second- vs first-generation antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS 1)". Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 63 (10): 1079–87. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.10.1079. PMID 17015810. 
  5. ^ Sharafi M (2005). "Comparison of Classical and Clozapine Treatment on Schizophrenia Using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale of Schizophrenia (PANSS) and SPECT Imaging". Int J Med Sci 2 (2): 79–86. PMID 15968344. http://www.medsci.org/v2p79.htm. 
  6. ^ a b c American Diabetes Association; American Psychiatric Association; American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; North American Association for the Study of Obesity (February 2004). "Consensus development conference on antipsychotic drugs and obesity and diabetes". Diabetes Care 27 (2): 596–601. doi:10.2337/diacare.27.2.596. PMID 14747245. http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/full/27/2/596. 

External links








Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message