Cancer immunoprevention is the prevention of cancer onset with immunological means such as vaccines, immunostimulators or antibodies[1][2]. Cancer immunoprevention is conceptually different from cancer immunotherapy, which aims at stimulating immunity in patients only after tumor onset, however the same immunological means can be used both in immunoprevention and in immunotherapy.
Contents |
Immunoprevention of tumors caused by viruses or other infectious
agents aims at preventing or curing infection before the onset of
cancer. Effective vaccines are available for use in humans.
Some tumor types in humans and in animals are the consequence of
viral infections. In humans the most frequent viral tumors are
liver cancer (also called hepatocellular carcinoma),
arising in a small proportion of patients with chronic infection by
hepatitis B
virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV), and
carcinoma of the uterine cervix (also called cervical
cancer), caused by human papilloma
virus (HPV). Altogether these two tumors make 10% of all human
cancers, affecting almost one million new patients each year
worldwide[3]. The
HBV vaccine, now in worldwide use, was shown to reduce the
incidence of liver carcinoma[4]. Cancer
immunoprevention by the HBV vaccine can be thought of as a
beneficial side effect of vaccine developed and used to prevent
hepatitis B. This is not the case with HPV vaccines, which were
primarily developed for cancer prevention. Clinical trials showed that HPV vaccines
can prevent HPV infection and carcinogenesis almost completely;
these results led to vaccine approval by regulatory agencies in USA
and Europe[5].
Is it possible to devise immunopreventive strategies for tumors
not caused by infectious agents? The challenge is to predict in
each individual the risk of specific cancer types and to design
immune strategies targeting these cancer types. This is not yet
feasible in humans, thus immunoprevention of non-infectious tumors
is at a preclinical stage of development.
Effective immunoprevention of various types of cancer was obtained
in murine models of cancer risk, in particular in transgenic mice harboring activated oncogenes, thus demonstrating
that activation of the immune system in healthy hosts can indeed
prevent carcinogenesis[1].
Both non-specific immune stimuli, like cytokines and other immunostimulators, and vaccines containing a specific antigen were active in mouse
models; combinations of both types of agents yielded the best
results, up to an almost complete, long-term block of
carcinogenesis in models of aggressive cancer development[6].
Two main protective mechanisms elicited by cancer
immunoprevention in various mouse models were cytokines released by
T cells, in particular
gamma-interferon, and
cytotoxic antibodies against the target antigen. This
is at variance with cancer immunotherapy administered
to cure existing tumors, which is mainly based on cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). The lack of
a relevant CTL response in long-term immunoprevention is thought to
be an advantage, because chronic CTL activation is severely toxic
for the host. In contrast circulating antibodies provide long-term
protection without toxic side effects. A similar situation happens
in viral immunity, acute infections are resolved by CTL, whereas
long term immunity from reinfection is provided by
antibodies.
Both gamma-interferon and antibodies prevent tumor growth in
multiple ways. Gamma-interferon activates T, natural
killer and B cells,
inhibits angiogenesis and tumor invasiveness, stimulates major histocompatibility
complex expression in tumor cells and inhibits cell
proliferation. Antibodies binding to antigens on the surface of
cells trigger lytic mechanisms mediated by the complement
system (complement-mediated cytotoxicity) or by leukocytes carrying Fc receptors (antibody-dependent
cell-mediated cytotoxicity, ADCC). Moreover, antibody binding
interferes with the cellular functions of the target antigen,
causing its internalization or hampering molecular interactions,
eventually blocking downstream signaling. If the target antigen
controls cell growth (e.g. if it is the product of an oncogene),
then a block of signaling can disrupt the carcinogenic process.
Surface antigens causally involved in carcinogenesis are called oncoantigens.
The success of cancer immunoprevention in preclinical models
suggests that it might have an impact also in humans. The main
problems to be solved are the definition of appropriate human
applications and of the risks for human health.
Application to the general population, as is being done for
vaccines against HBV and HPV, is currently unfeasible, because it
would require a precise individual prediction of the risk of
cancer. Subgroups at high risk of developing a defined type of
tumor, for example families with hereditary cancer
or individuals with preneoplastic lesions, are the natural
candidates for immunoprevention of non-infectious tumors. It has
also been suggested that immunopreventive strategies can have
therapeutic effects against metastases, hence early
human trials
could aim at cancer therapy rather than prevention[2][7].
The main risk of prolonged immune stimulation for cancer prevention
is the development of autoimmune diseases. Most antitumor
immune responses are autoimmune, because most tumor antigens are
also expressed by normal cells, but it must be considered that
autoimmune responses do not necessarily evolve into autoimmune
diseases. The limited autoimmunity triggered by cancer
immunoprevention did not cause overt autoimmune diseases in
preclinical mouse studies, however this is an issue that will
require careful monitoring in early clinical trials[1].
|
|