Capacity factor: Wikis

Advertisements
  

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Encyclopedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The net capacity factor of a power plant is the ratio of the actual output of a power plant over a period of time and its output if it had operated at full nameplate capacity the entire time. To calculate the capacity factor, total energy the plant produced during a period of time and divide by the energy the plant would have produced at full capacity. Capacity factors vary greatly depending on the type of fuel that is used and the design of the plant. The capacity factor should not be confused with the availability factor or with efficiency.

Contents

Sample calculation

A base load power plant with a capacity of 1,000 MW might produce 648,000 megawatt-hours in a 30-day month. The number of megawatt-hours that would have been produced had the plant been operating at full capacity can be determined by multiplying the plant's maximum capacity by the number of hours in the time period. 1,000 MW X 30 days X 24 hours/day is 720,000 megawatt-hours. The capacity factor is determined by dividing the actual output with the maximum possible output. In this case, the capacity factor is 0.9 (90%).[1]

Reasons for reduced capacity factor

There are two main reasons why a plant would have a capacity factor lower than 100%. The first reason is that it was out of service or operating at reduced output for part of the time due to equipment failures or routine maintenance. This accounts for most of the unused capacity of base load power plants. Base load plants have the lowest costs per unit of electricity because they are designed for maximum efficiency and are operated continuously at high output. Geothermal plants, nuclear plants, coal plants and bioenergy plants that burn solid material are almost always operated as base load plants.

The second reason that a plant would have a capacity factor lower than 100% is that output is curtailed because the electricity is not needed or because the price of electricity is too low to make production economical. This accounts for most of the unused capacity of peaking power plants. Peaking plants may operate for only a few hours per year or up to several hours per day. Their electricity is relatively expensive. It is uneconomical, even wasteful, to make a peaking power plant as efficient as a base load plant because they do not operate enough to pay for the extra equipment cost, and perhaps not enough to offset the embodied energy of the additional components.

Load following power plants

Load following power plants, also called intermediate power plants, are in between these extremes in terms of capacity factor, efficiency and cost per unit of electricity. They produce most of their electricity during the day, when prices and demand are highest. However, the demand and price of electricity is far lower during the night and intermediate plants shutdown or reduce their output to low levels overnight.

Capacity factor and renewable energy

When it comes to several renewable energy sources such as solar power, wind power and hydroelectricity, there is a third reason for unused capacity. The plant may be capable of producing electricity, but its fuel (wind, sunlight or water) may not be available. A hydroelectric plant's production may also be affected by requirements to keep the water level from getting too high or low and to provide water for fish downstream. However, solar, wind and hydroelectric plants do have high availability factors, so when they have fuel available, they are almost always able to produce electricity.[2]

When hydroelectric plants have water available, they are also useful for load following, because of their high dispatchability. A typical hydroelectric plant's operators can bring it from a stopped condition to full power in just a few minutes.

Wind farms are highly intermittent, due to the natural variability of the wind, but because a wind farm may have hundreds of widely-spaced wind turbines, the farm as a whole tends to be robust against the failure of individual turbines. In a large wind farm, a few wind turbines may be down for planned or unplanned maintenance at a given time, but the remaining turbines are generally available to capture power from the wind.

Solar energy is variable because of the daily rotation of the earth and because of cloud cover. However, solar power plants designed for solar-only generation are well matched to summer noon peak loads in areas with significant cooling demands, such as Spain or the south-western United States. Using thermal energy storage systems, the operating periods of solar thermal power stations can be extended to meet baseload needs.[3]

Geothermal has a higher capacity factor than many other power sources, and geothermal resources are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. While the carrier medium for geothermal electricity (water) must be properly managed, the source of geothermal energy, the Earth's heat, will be available for the foreseeable future.[4] geothermal power can be looked at as a nuclear battery where the heat is produced via the decay of radioactive elements in the core and mantel of the earth.

Typical capacity factors

  • Wind farms 20-40%.[5][6]
  • Photovoltaic solar in Massachusetts 12-15%.[5]
  • Photovoltaic solar in Arizona 19%[7]
  • Thermal solar power tower 73%[8] (Solar Tres project, currently being built in Spain with a thermal storage capacity of ca. 15 equivalent full load hours).
  • Thermal solar parabolic trough (without thermal storage) ca. 15% [9]
  • Nuclear 60% to over 100%, U.S. average 92%.[5] Worldwide average varied between about 81% to 87% between 1995 and 2005.[10]
  • Base load coal plant 70-90%[5]
  • Combined cycle gas plant, about 60%[5]
  • Geothermal plant, worldwide average 73%, demonstrated 90%[11]
  • Hydroelectricity, worldwide average 44%

See also

References

  1. ^ Glossary Capacity factor (net)
  2. ^ How Does A Wind Turbine's Energy Production Differ from Its Power Production?
  3. ^ Spain Pioneers Grid-Connected Solar-Tower Thermal Power p. 3.
  4. ^ A Guide to Geothermal Energy and the Environment
  5. ^ a b c d e "Wind Power: Capacity Factor, Intermittency, and what happens when the wind doesn't blow?" (PDF). Renewable Energy Research Laboratory, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. http://www.ceere.org/rerl/about_wind/RERL_Fact_Sheet_2a_Capacity_Factor.pdf. Retrieved 2008-10-16.  
  6. ^ "Blowing Away the Myths" (PDF). The British Wind Energy Association. February 2005. http://www.bwea.com/pdf/ref_three.pdf. Retrieved 2008-10-16.  
  7. ^ Laumer, John (June 2008). "Solar Versus Wind Power: Which Has The Most Stable Power Output?". Treehugger. http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/03/solar-versus-wind-power.php. Retrieved 2008-10-16.  
  8. ^ "Executive Summary: Assessment of Parabolic Trough and Power Tower Solar Technology Cost and Performance Forecasts" (PDF). National Renewable Energy Laboratory. October 2003. http://www.nrel.gov/csp/pdfs/35060.pdf. Retrieved 2008-10-16.  
  9. ^ " "The parabolic trough power plants Andasol 1 to 3 -The largest solar power plants in the world -Technology premiere in Europe" (PDF). Solar Millennium. 2009-03-30. http://www.solarmillenium.de/upload/Download/Technologie/eng/Andasol1-3engl.pdf". Retrieved 2009-05-14.  
  10. ^ "15 Years of Progress" (PDF). World Association of Nuclear Operators. 2006. http://www.wano.org.uk/PerformanceIndicators/PI_Trifold/WANO15yrsProgress.pdf. Retrieved 2008-10-20.  
  11. ^ Fridleifsson,, Ingvar B.; Bertani, Ruggero; Huenges, Ernst; Lund, John W.; Ragnarsson, Arni; Rybach, Ladislaus (2008-02-11). O. Hohmeyer and T. Trittin. ed (pdf). The possible role and contribution of geothermal energy to the mitigation of climate change. Luebeck, Germany. pp. 59–80. http://iga.igg.cnr.it/documenti/IGA/Fridleifsson_et_al_IPCC_Geothermal_paper_2008.pdf. Retrieved 2009-04-06.  
Advertisements

Advertisements






Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message