The centimetregramsecond system (abbreviated CGS or cgs) is a metric system of physical units based on centimetre as the unit of length, gram as a unit of mass, and second as a unit of time. All CGS mechanical units are unambiguously derived from these three base units, but there are several different ways of extending the CGS system to cover electromagnetism.
The CGS system has been largely supplanted by the MKS system, based on metre, kilogram, and second. MKS was in turn extended and replaced by the International System of Units (SI). The latter adopts the three base units of MKS, plus the ampere, mole, candela and kelvin. In many fields of science and engineering, SI is the only system of units in use. However, there remain certain subfields where CGS is prevalent.
In measurements of purely mechanical systems (involving units of length, mass, force, energy, pressure, etc.), the differences between CGS and SI are straightforward and rather trivial; the unitconversion factors are all powers of 10 arising from the relations 100 cm = 1 m and 1000 g = 1 kg. For example, the CGS derived unit of force is the dyne, equal to 1 g·cm/s^{2}, while the SI derived unit of force is the newton, 1 kg·m/s^{2}. Thus it is straightforward to show that 1 dyne=10^{−5} newton.
On the other hand, in measurements of electromagnetic phenomena (involving units of charge, electric and magnetic fields, voltage, etc.), converting between CGS and SI is much more subtle and involved. In fact, formulas for physical laws of electromagnetism (such as Maxwell's equations) need to be adjusted depending on what system of units one uses. This is because there is no onetoone correspondence between electromagnetic units in SI and those in CGS, as there is for mechanical units. Furthermore, within CGS, there are several plausible choices of electromagnetic units, leading to different unit "subsystems", including Gaussian, "ESU", "EMU", and HeavisideLorentz. Among these choices, Gaussian units are the most common today, and in fact the phrase "CGS units" is often used to refer specifically to CGSGaussian units.
The CGS system goes back to a proposal made in 1832 by the German mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss.^{[1]} In 1874, it was extended by the British physicists James Clerk Maxwell and William Thomson with a set of electromagnetic units.
The values (by order of magnitude) of many CGS units turned out to be inconvenient for practical purposes. For example, many everyday length measurements yield hundreds or thousands of centimetres, such as those of human height and sizes of rooms and buildings. Thus the CGS system never gained wide general use outside the field of electrodynamics and laboratory science. Starting in the 1880s, and more significantly by the mid20th century, CGS was gradually superseded internationally by the MKS (metrekilogramsecond) system, which in turn became the modern SI standard.
From the international adoption of the MKS standard in the 1940s and the SI standard in the 1960s, the technical use of CGS units has gradually declined worldwide, in the United States more slowly than elsewhere. CGS units are today no longer accepted by the house styles of most scientific journals, textbook publishers, or standards bodies, although they are commonly used in astronomical journals such as the Astrophysical Journal. CGS units are still occasionally encountered in technical literature, especially in the United States in the fields of material science, electrodynamics and astronomy.
The units gram and centimetre remain useful as prefixed units within the SI system, especially for instructional physics and chemistry experiments, where they match the small scale of tabletop setups. However, where derived units are needed, the SI ones are generally used and taught instead of the CGS ones today. For example, a physics lab course might ask students to record lengths in centimeters, and masses in grams, but force (a derived unit) in newtons, a usage consistent with the SI system.
In mechanics, the CGS and SI systems of units are built in an identical way. The two systems differ only in the scale of two out of the three base units (centimetre versus metre and gram versus kilogram, respectively), while the third unit (second as the unit of time) is the same in both systems.
There is a onetoone correspondence between the base units of mechanics in CGS and SI, and the laws of mechanics are not affected by the choice of units. The definitions of all derived units in terms of the three base units are therefore the same in both systems, and there is an unambiguous onetoone correspondence of derived units:
Thus, for example, the CGS unit of pressure, barye, is related to the CGS base units of length, mass, and time in the same way as the SI unit of pressure, pascal, is related to the SI base units of length, mass, and time:
Expressing a CGS derived unit in terms of the SI base units, or vice versa, requires combining the scale factors that relate the two systems:
Quantity  Symbol  CGS unit  CGS unit abbreviation 
Definition  Equivalent in SI units 

length, position  L, x  centimetre  cm  1/100 of metre  = 10^{−2} m 
mass  m  gram  g  1/1000 of kilogram  = 10^{−3} kg 
time  t  second  s  1 second  = 1 s 
velocity  v  centimetre per second  cm/s  cm/s  = 10^{−2} m/s 
force  F  dyne  dyn  g cm / s^{2}  = 10^{−5} N 
energy  E  erg  erg  g cm^{2} / s^{2}  = 10^{−7} J 
power  P  erg per second  erg/s  g cm^{2} / s^{3}  = 10^{−7} W 
pressure  p  barye  Ba  g / (cm s^{2})  = 10^{−1} Pa 
dynamic viscosity  η  poise  P  g / (cm s)  = 10^{−1} Pa·s 
wavenumber  k  kayser  cm^{−1}  cm^{−1}  = 100 m^{−1} 
The conversion factors relating electromagnetic units in the CGS and SI systems are much more involved — so much so that formulas for physical laws of electromagnetism are adjusted depending on what system of units one uses. This illustrates the fundamental difference in the ways the two systems are built:
Relating electromagnetic quantities to length, time and mass, however, can be done in a variety of equally appealing ways. Two of them rely on the forces observed on charges. There are two fundamental laws that relate (independently of each other) the electric charge or its rate of change (electric current) to a mechanical quantity such as force. They can be written^{[3]} in systemindependent form as follows:
Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism relates these two laws to each other. It states that the ratio of proportionality constants k_{C} and k_{A} must obey k_{C} / k_{A} = c^{2}, where c is the speed of light. Therefore, if one derives the unit of charge from the Coulomb's law by setting k_{C} = 1, it is obvious that the Ampère's force law will contain a prefactor 2 / c^{2}. Alternatively, deriving the unit of current, and therefore the unit of charge, from the Ampère's force law by setting k_{A} = 1 or k_{A} = 1 / 2, will lead to a constant prefactor in the Coulomb's law.
Indeed, both of these mutuallyexclusive approaches have been practiced by the users of CGS system, leading to the two independent and mutuallyexclusive branches of CGS, described in the subsections below. However, the freedom of choice in deriving electromagnetic units from the units of length, mass, and time is not limited to the definition of charge. While the electric field can be related to the work performed by it on a moving electric charge, the magnetic force is always perpendicular to the velocity of the moving charge, and thus the work performed by the magnetic field on any charge is always zero. This leads to a choice between two laws of magnetism, each relating magnetic field to mechanical quantities and electric charge:
These two laws can be used to derive Ampère's force law, resulting in the relationship: . Therefore, if the unit of charge is based on the Ampère's force law such that k_{A} = 1, it is natural to derive the unit of magnetic field by setting . However, if it is not the case, a choice has to be made as to which of the two laws above is a more convenient basis for deriving the unit of magnetic field.
Furthermore, if we wish to describe the electric displacement field D and the magnetic field H in a medium other than a vacuum, we need to also define the constants ε_{0} and μ_{0}, which are the vacuum permittivity and permeability, respectively. Then we have^{[3]} (generally) and , where P and M are polarization density and magnetization vectors. The factors λ and λ′ are rationalization constants, which are usually chosen to be 4πk_{C}ε_{0}, a dimensionless quantity. If λ = λ′ = 1, the system is said to be "rationalized":^{[4]} the laws for systems of spherical geometry contain factors of 4π (e.g. point charges), those of cylindrical geometry — factors of 2π (e.g. wires), and those of planar geometry contain no factors of π (e.g. parallelplate capacitors). However, the original CGS system used λ = λ′ = 4π, or, equivalently, k_{C}ε_{0} = 1. Therefore, Gaussian, ESU, and EMU subsystems of CGS (described below) are not rationalized.
The table below shows the values of the above constants used in some common CGS subsystems:
system  k_{C}  α_{B}  ε_{0}  μ_{0}  λ'  

Electrostatic^{[3]}
CGS (ESU, esu, or stat) 
1  c^{−2}  1  c^{−2}  c^{−2}  1  4π  4π 
Electromagnetic^{[3]}
CGS (EMU, emu, or ab) 
c^{2}  1  c^{−2}  1  1  1  4π  4π 
Gaussian^{[3]} CGS  1  c^{−1}  1  1  c^{−2}  c^{−1}  4π  4π 
HeavisideLorentz^{[3]} CGS  1  1  c^{−1}  1  1  
SI  1  1  1 
The constant b in SI system is a unitbased scaling factor defined as: .
Also, note the following correspondence of the above constants to those in Jackson^{[3]} and Leung^{[5]}:
In systemindependent form, Maxwell's equations in vacuum can be written as:^{[3]}^{[5]}
Note that of all these variants, only in Gaussian and HeavisideLorentz systems α_{L} equals c ^{− 1} rather than 1. As a result, vectors and of an electromagnetic wave propagating in vacuum have the same units and are equal in magnitude in these two variants of CGS.
In one variant of the CGS system, Electrostatic units (ESU), charge is defined via the force it exerts on other charges, and current is then defined as charge per time. It is done by setting the Coulomb force constant k_{C} = 1, so that Coulomb's law does not contain an explicit prefactor.
The ESU unit of charge, franklin (Fr), also known as statcoulomb or esu charge, is therefore defined as follows:^{[6]}
two equal point charges spaced 1 centimetre apart are said to be of 1 franklin each if the electrostatic force between them is 1 dyne.
Therefore, in electrostatic CGS units, a franklin is equal to a centimetre times square root of dyne:
The unit of current is defined as:
Dimensionally in the ESU CGS system, charge q is therefore equivalent to m^{1/2}L^{3/2}t^{−1}. Neither charge nor current are therefore an independent dimension of physical quantity in ESU CGS. This reduction of units is an application of the Buckingham π theorem.
All electromagnetic units in ESU CGS system that do not have proper names are denoted by a corresponding SI name with an attached prefix "stat" or with a separate abbreviation "esu".^{[6]}
In another variant of the CGS system, Electromagnetic units (EMU), current is defined via the force existing between two thin, parallel, infinitely long wires carrying it, and charge is then defined as current multiplied by time. (This approach was eventually used to define the SI unit of ampere as well). In the EMU CGS subsystem, is done by setting the Ampere force constant k_{A} = 1, so that Ampère's force law simply contains 2 as an explicit prefactor (this prefactor 2 is itself a result of integrating a more general formulation of Ampère's law over the length of the infinite wire).
The EMU unit of current, biot (Bi), also known as abampere or emu current, is therefore defined as follows:^{[6]}
The biot is that constant current which, if maintained in two straight parallel conductors of infinite length, of negligible circular crosssection, and placed one centimetre apart in vacuo, would produce between these conductors a force equal to two dynes per centimetre of length.
Therefore, in electromagnetic CGS units, a biot is equal to a square root of dyne:
The unit of charge in CGS EMU is:
Dimensionally in the EMU CGS system, charge q is therefore equivalent to m^{1/2}L^{1/2}. Neither charge nor current are therefore an independent dimension of physical quantity in EMU CGS.
All electromagnetic units in EMU CGS system that do not have proper names are denoted by a corresponding SI name with an attached prefix "ab" or with a separate abbreviation "emu".^{[6]}
The ESU and EMU subsystems of CGS are connected by the fundamental relationship k_{C} / k_{A} = c^{2} (see above), where c = 29,979,245,800 ≈ 3·10^{10} is the speed of light in vacuum in cm/s. Therefore, the ratio of the corresponding “primary″ electrical and magnetic units (e.g. current, charge, voltage, etc. — quantities proportional to those that enter directly into Coulomb's law or Ampère's force law) is equal either to c^{1} or c:^{[6]}
and
Units derived from these may have ratios equal to higher powers of c, for example:
There were at various points in time about half a dozen systems of electromagnetic units in use, most based on the CGS system.^{[7]} These also include Gaussian units, and HeavisideLorentz units.
Further complicating matters is the fact that some physicists and engineers in the United States use hybrid units, such as volts per centimetre for electric field. In fact, this is essentially the same as the SI unit system, by the variant to translate all lengths used into cm, e.g. 1 m = 100 cm.
Quantity  Symbol  SI unit  ESU unit  EMU unit  Gaussian unit 

electric charge  q  1 C  = (10^{1} c) statC  = (10^{1}) abC  = (10^{1} c) Fr 
electric current  I  1 A  = (10^{1} c) statA  = (10^{1}) abA  = (10^{1} c) Fr·s^{1} 
electric potential voltage 
φ V 
1 V  = (10^{8} c^{1}) statV  = (10^{8}) abV  = (10^{8} c^{1}) statV 
electric field  E  1 V/m  = (10^{6} c^{1}) statV/cm  = (10^{6}) abV/cm  = (10^{6} c^{1}) statV/cm 
magnetic induction  B  1 T  = (10^{4} c^{1}) statT  = (10^{4}) G  = (10^{4}) G 
magnetic field strength  H  1 A/m  = (4π 10^{3} c) statA/cm  = (4π 10^{3}) Oe  = (4π 10^{3}) Oe 
magnetic dipole moment  μ  1 A·m²  = (10^{3} c) statA·cm²  = (10^{3}) abA·cm²  = (10^{3}) erg/G 
magnetic flux  Φ_{m}  1 Wb  = (10^{8} c^{1}) statT·cm²  = (10^{8}) Mw  = (10^{8}) G·cm² 
resistance  R  1 Ω  = (10^{9} c^{2}) s/cm  = (10^{9}) abΩ  = (10^{9} c^{2}) s/cm 
resistivity  ρ  1 Ω·m  = (10^{11} c^{2}) s  = (10^{11}) abΩ·cm  = (10^{11} c^{2}) s 
capacitance  C  1 F  = (10^{9} c^{2}) cm  = (10^{9}) abF  = (10^{9} c^{2}) cm 
inductance  L  1 H  = (10^{9} c^{2}) cm^{1}·s^{2}  = (10^{9}) abH  = (10^{9} c^{2}) cm^{1}·s^{2} 
In this table, c = 29,979,245,800 ≈ 3·10^{10} is the speed of light in vacuum in the CGS units of cm/s.
One can think of the SI value of the Coulomb constant k_{C} as:
This explains why SI to ESU conversions involving factors of c^{2} lead to significant simplifications of the ESU units, such as 1 statF = 1 cm and 1 statΩ = 1 s/cm: this is the consequence of the fact that in ESU system k_{C}=1. For example, a centimetre of capacitance is the capacitance between a sphere of radius 1 cm in vacuum and infinity. The capacitance C between two concentric spheres of radii R and r in ESU CGS system is:
By taking the limit as R goes to infinity we see C equals r.
Constant  Symbol  Value 

Atomic mass unit  u  1.660 538 782 × 10^{−24} g 
Bohr magneton  μ_{B}  9.274 009 15 × 10^{−21} erg/G (EMU, Gaussian) 
2.780 278 00 × 10^{−10} statA·cm^{2} (ESU)  
Bohr radius  a_{0}  5.291 772 0859 × 10^{−9} cm 
Boltzmann constant  k  1.380 6504 × 10^{−16} erg/K 
Electron mass  m_{e}  9.109 382 15 × 10^{−28} g 
Elementary charge  e  4.803 204 27 × 10^{−10} Fr (ESU, Gaussian) 
1.602 176 487 × 10^{−20} abC (EMU)  
Finestructure constant  α ≈ 1/137  7.297 352 570 × 10^{−3} 
Gravitational constant  G  6.674 28 × 10^{−8} cm^{3}/(g·s^{2}) 
Planck constant  h  6.626 068 85 × 10^{−27} erg·s 
1.054 5716 × 10^{−27} erg·s  
Speed of light in vacuum  c  ≡ 2.997 924 58 × 10^{10} cm/s 
While the absence of explicit prefactors in some CGS subsystems simplifies some theoretical calculations, it has the disadvantage that sometimes the units in CGS are hard to define through experiment. Also, lack of unique unit names leads to a great confusion: thus “15 emu” may mean either 15 abvolt, or 15 emu units of electric dipole moment, or 15 emu units of magnetic susceptibility, sometimes (but not always) per gram or per mole. On the other hand, SI starts with a unit of current, the ampere, which is easier to determine through experiment, but which requires extra prefactors in the electromagnetic equations. With its system of unique named units, SI also removes any confusion in usage: 1 ampere is a fixed quantity of a specific variable, and so are 1 henry and 1 ohm.
A key virtue of the Gaussian CGS system is that electric and magnetic fields have the same units, 4πε_{0} is replaced by 1, and the only dimensional constant appearing in the equations is c, the speed of light. The HeavisideLorentz system has these desirable properties as well (with ε_{0} equaling 1), but it is a "rationalized" system (as is SI) in which the charges and fields are defined in such a way that there are many fewer factors of 4π appearing in the formulas, and it is in HeavisideLorentz units that the Maxwell equations take their simplest form.
In SI, and other rationalized systems (e.g. HeavisideLorentz), the unit of current was chosen such that electromagnetic equations concerning charged spheres contain 4π, those concerning coils of current and straight wires contain 2π and those dealing with charged surfaces lack π entirely, which was the most convenient choice for electricalengineering applications. In those fields where formulas concerning spheres dominate (for example, astronomy), it has been argued that the nonrationalized CGS system can be somewhat more convenient notationally.
In fact, in certain fields, specialized unit systems are used to simplify formulas even further than either SI or CGS, by using some system of natural units. For example, the particle physics community uses a system where every quantity is expressed by only one unit, the eV, with lengths, times, etc. all converted into eV's by inserting factors of c and . This unit system is very convenient for particlephysics calculations, but would be impractical in other contexts.

The centimetregramsecond system (abbreviated CGS or cgs) is a metric system of physical units based on centimetre as the unit of length, gram as a unit of mass, and second as a unit of time. All CGS mechanical units are unambiguously derived from these three base units, but there are several different ways of extending the CGS system to cover electromagnetism.
The CGS system has been largely supplanted by the MKS system, based on metre, kilogram, and second. MKS was in turn extended and replaced by the International System of Units (SI). The latter adopts the three base units of MKS, plus the ampere, mole, candela and kelvin. In many fields of science and engineering, SI is the only system of units in use. However, there remain certain subfields where CGS is prevalent.
In measurements of purely mechanical systems (involving units of length, mass, force, energy, pressure, etc.), the differences between CGS and SI are straightforward and rather trivial; the unitconversion factors are all powers of 10 arising from the relations 100 cm = 1 m and 1000 g = 1 kg. For example, the CGS derived unit of force is the dyne, equal to 1 g·cm/s^{2}, while the SI derived unit of force is the newton, 1 kg·m/s^{2}. Thus it is straightforward to show that 1 dyne=10^{−5} newton.
On the other hand, in measurements of electromagnetic phenomena (involving units of charge, electric and magnetic fields, voltage, etc.), converting between CGS and SI is much more subtle and involved. In fact, formulas for physical laws of electromagnetism (such as Maxwell's equations) need to be adjusted depending on what system of units one uses. This is because there is no onetoone correspondence between electromagnetic units in SI and those in CGS, as there are for mechanical units. Furthermore, within CGS, there are several plausible choices of electromagnetic units, leading to different unit "subsystems", including Gaussian, "ESU", "EMU", and HeavisideLorentz. Among these choices, Gaussian units are the most common today, and in fact the phrase "CGS units" is often used to refer specifically to CGSGaussian units.
The CGS system goes back to a proposal made in 1832 by the German mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss.^{[1]} In 1874, it was extended by the British physicists James Clerk Maxwell and William Thomson with a set of electromagnetic units.
The values (by order of magnitude) of many CGS units turned out to be inconvenient for practical purposes. For example, many everyday length measurements yield hundreds or thousands of centimetres, such as those of human height and sizes of rooms and buildings. Thus the CGS system never gained wide general use outside the field of electrodynamics and laboratory science. Starting in the 1880s, and more significantly by the mid20th century, CGS was gradually superseded internationally by the MKS (metrekilogramsecond) system, which in turn became the modern SI standard.
From the international adoption of the MKS standard in the 1940s and the SI standard in the 1960s, the technical use of CGS units has gradually declined worldwide, in the United States more slowly than elsewhere. CGS units are today no longer accepted by the house styles of most scientific journals, textbook publishers, or standards bodies, although they are commonly used in astronomical journals such as the Astrophysical Journal. CGS units are still occasionally encountered in technical literature, especially in the United States in the fields of material science, electrodynamics and astronomy.
The units gram and centimetre remain useful as prefixed units within the SI system, especially for instructional physics and chemistry experiments, where they match the small scale of tabletop setups. However, where derived units are needed, the SI ones are generally used and taught instead of the CGS ones today. For example, a physics lab course might ask students to record lengths in centimeters, and masses in grams, but force (a derived unit) in newtons, a usage consistent with the SI system.
In mechanics, the CGS and SI systems of units are built in an identical way. The two systems differ only in the scale of two out of the three base units (centimetre versus metre and gram versus kilogram, respectively), while the third unit (second as the unit of time) is the same in both systems.
There is a onetoone correspondence between the base units of mechanics in CGS and SI, and the laws of mechanics are not affected by the choice of units. The definitions of all derived units in terms of the three base units are therefore the same in both systems, and there is an unambiguous onetoone correspondence of derived units:
Thus, for example, the CGS unit of pressure, barye, is related to the CGS base units of length, mass, and time in the same way as the SI unit of pressure, pascal, is related to the SI base units of length, mass, and time:
Expressing a CGS derived unit in terms of the SI base units, or vice versa, requires combining the scale factors that relate the two systems:
Quantity  Symbol  CGS unit  CGS unit abbreviation  Definition  Equivalent in SI units 

length, position  L, x  centimetre  cm  1/100 of metre  = 10^{−2} m 
mass  m  gram  g  1/1000 of kilogram  = 10^{−3} kg 
time  t  second  s  1 second  = 1 s 
velocity  v  centimetre per second  cm/s  cm/s  = 10^{−2} m/s 
force  F  dyne  dyn  g cm / s^{2}  = 10^{−5} N 
energy  E  erg  erg  g cm^{2} / s^{2}  = 10^{−7} J 
power  P  erg per second  erg/s  g cm^{2} / s^{3}  = 10^{−7} W 
pressure  p  barye  Ba  g / (cm s^{2})  = 10^{−1} Pa 
dynamic viscosity  μ  poise  P  g / (cm s)  = 10^{−1} Pa·s 
wavenumber  k  kayser  cm^{−1}  cm^{−1}  = 100 m^{−1} 
The conversion factors relating electromagnetic units in the CGS and SI systems are much more involved — so much so that formulas for physical laws of electromagnetism are adjusted depending on what system of units one uses. This illustrates the fundamental difference in the ways the two systems are built:
Electromagnetic relationships to length, time and mass may be derived by equally appealing methods. Two of them rely on the forces observed on charges. Two fundamental laws relate (independently of each other) the electric charge or its rate of change (electric current) to a mechanical quantity such as force. They can be written^{[3]} in systemindependent form as follows:
Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism relates these two laws to each other. It states that the ratio of proportionality constants $k\_C$ and $k\_A$ must obey $k\_C\; /\; k\_A\; =\; c^2$, where c is the speed of light. Therefore, if one derives the unit of charge from the Coulomb's law by setting $k\_C=1$, it is obvious that the Ampère's force law will contain a prefactor $2/c^2$. Alternatively, deriving the unit of current, and therefore the unit of charge, from the Ampère's force law by setting $k\_A\; =\; 1$ or $k\_A\; =\; 1/2$, will lead to a constant prefactor in the Coulomb's law.
Indeed, both of these mutuallyexclusive approaches have been practiced by the users of CGS system, leading to the two independent and mutuallyexclusive branches of CGS, described in the subsections below. However, the freedom of choice in deriving electromagnetic units from the units of length, mass, and time is not limited to the definition of charge. While the electric field can be related to the work performed by it on a moving electric charge, the magnetic force is always perpendicular to the velocity of the moving charge, and thus the work performed by the magnetic field on any charge is always zero. This leads to a choice between two laws of magnetism, each relating magnetic field to mechanical quantities and electric charge:
These two laws can be used to derive Ampère's force law, resulting in the relationship: $k\_A\; =\; \backslash alpha\_L\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash alpha\_B\backslash ;$. Therefore, if the unit of charge is based on the Ampère's force law such that $k\_A\; =\; 1$, it is natural to derive the unit of magnetic field by setting $\backslash alpha\_L\; =\; \backslash alpha\_B=1\backslash ;$. However, if it is not the case, a choice has to be made as to which of the two laws above is a more convenient basis for deriving the unit of magnetic field.
Furthermore, if we wish to describe the electric displacement field D and the magnetic field H in a medium other than a vacuum, we need to also define the constants ε_{0} and μ_{0}, which are the vacuum permittivity and permeability, respectively. Then we have^{[3]} (generally) $\backslash mathbf\{D\}\; =\; \backslash epsilon\_0\; \backslash mathbf\{E\}\; +\; \backslash lambda\; \backslash mathbf\{P\}$ and $\backslash mathbf\{H\}\; =\; \backslash mathbf\{B\}\; /\; \backslash mu\_0\; \; \backslash lambda^\backslash prime\; \backslash mathbf\{M\}$, where P and M are polarization density and magnetization vectors. The factors λ and λ′ are rationalization constants, which are usually chosen to be 4πk_{C}ε_{0}, a dimensionless quantity. If λ = λ′ = 1, the system is said to be "rationalized":^{[4]} the laws for systems of spherical geometry contain factors of 4π (e.g. point charges), those of cylindrical geometry — factors of 2π (e.g. wires), and those of planar geometry contain no factors of π (e.g. parallelplate capacitors). However, the original CGS system used λ = λ′ = 4π, or, equivalently, k_{C}ε_{0} = 1. Therefore, Gaussian, ESU, and EMU subsystems of CGS (described below) are not rationalized.
The table below shows the values of the above constants used in some common CGS subsystems:
system  $k\_C$  $\backslash alpha\_B$  $\backslash epsilon\_0$  $\backslash mu\_0$  $k\_A=\backslash frac\{k\_C\}\{c^2\}$  $\backslash alpha\_L=\backslash frac\{k\_C\}\{\backslash alpha\_Bc^2\}$  $\backslash lambda=4\backslash pi\; k\_C\backslash cdot\backslash epsilon\_0$  $\backslash lambda\text{'}$ 

Electrostatic^{[3]} CGS (ESU, esu, or stat)  1  c^{−2}  1  c^{−2}  c^{−2}  1  4π  4π 
Electromagnetic^{[3]} CGS (EMU, emu, or ab)  c^{2}  1  c^{−2}  1  1  1  4π  4π 
Gaussian^{[3]} CGS  1  c^{−1}  1  1  c^{−2}  c^{−1}  4π  4π 
HeavisideLorentz^{[3]} CGS  $\backslash frac\{1\}\{4\backslash pi\}$  $\backslash frac\{1\}\{4\backslash pi\; c\}$  1  1  $\backslash frac\{1\}\{4\backslash pi\; c^2\}$  c^{−1}  1  1 
SI  $\backslash frac\{c^2\}\{b\}$  $\backslash frac\{1\}\{b\}$  $\backslash frac\{b\}\{4\backslash pi\; c^2\}$  $\backslash frac\{4\backslash pi\}\{b\}$  $\backslash frac\{1\}\{b\}$  1  1  1 
The constant b in SI system is a unitbased scaling factor defined as: $b=10^7\backslash ,\backslash mathrm\{A\}^2/\backslash mathrm\{N\}\; =\; 10^7\backslash ,\backslash mathrm\{m/H\}=4\backslash pi/\backslash mu\_0=4\backslash pi\backslash epsilon\_0\; c^2\backslash ;$.
Also, note the following correspondence of the above constants to those in Jackson^{[3]} and Leung^{[5]}:
In systemindependent form, Maxwell's equations in vacuum can be written as:^{[3]}^{[5]}
$\backslash begin\{array\}\{ccl\}\; \backslash vec\; \backslash nabla\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash vec\; E\; \&\; =\; \&\; 4\; \backslash pi\; k\_C\; \backslash rho\; \backslash \backslash \; \backslash vec\; \backslash nabla\; \backslash cdot\; \backslash vec\; B\; \&\; =\; \&\; 0\; \backslash \backslash \; \backslash vec\; \backslash nabla\; \backslash times\; \backslash vec\; E\; \&\; =\; \&\; \backslash displaystyle\{\; \backslash alpha\_L\; \backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; \backslash vec\; B\}\{\backslash partial\; t\}\}\; \backslash \backslash \; \backslash vec\; \backslash nabla\; \backslash times\; \backslash vec\; B\; \&\; =\; \&\; \backslash displaystyle\{4\; \backslash pi\; \backslash alpha\_B\; \backslash vec\; J\; +\; \backslash frac\{\backslash alpha\_B\}\{k\_C\}\backslash frac\{\backslash partial\; \backslash vec\; E\}\{\backslash partial\; t\}\}\; \backslash end\{array\}$
Note that of all these variants, only in Gaussian and HeavisideLorentz systems $\backslash alpha\_L$ equals $c^\{1\}$ rather than 1. As a result, vectors $\backslash vec\; E$ and $\backslash vec\; B$ of an electromagnetic wave propagating in vacuum have the same units and are equal in magnitude in these two variants of CGS.
In one variant of the CGS system, Electrostatic units (ESU), charge is defined via the force it exerts on other charges, and current is then defined as charge per time. It is done by setting the Coulomb force constant $k\_C\; =\; 1$, so that Coulomb's law does not contain an explicit prefactor.
The ESU unit of charge, franklin (Fr), also known as statcoulomb or esu charge, is therefore defined as follows:^{[6]}two equal point charges spaced 1 centimetre apart are said to be of 1 franklin each if the electrostatic force between them is 1 dyne.Therefore, in electrostatic CGS units, a franklin is equal to a centimetre times square root of dyne:
The unit of current is defined as:
Dimensionally in the ESU CGS system, charge q is therefore equivalent to m^{1/2}L^{3/2}t^{−1}. Neither charge nor current are therefore an independent dimension of physical quantity in ESU CGS. This reduction of units is an application of the Buckingham π theorem.
All electromagnetic units in ESU CGS system that do not have proper names are denoted by a corresponding SI name with an attached prefix "stat" or with a separate abbreviation "esu".^{[6]}
In another variant of the CGS system, Electromagnetic units (EMU), current is defined via the force existing between two thin, parallel, infinitely long wires carrying it, and charge is then defined as current multiplied by time. (This approach was eventually used to define the SI unit of ampere as well). In the EMU CGS subsystem, is done by setting the Ampere force constant $k\_A\; =\; 1$, so that Ampère's force law simply contains 2 as an explicit prefactor (this prefactor 2 is itself a result of integrating a more general formulation of Ampère's law over the length of the infinite wire).
The EMU unit of current, biot (Bi), also known as abampere or emu current, is therefore defined as follows:^{[6]}
The biot is that constant current which, if maintained in two straight parallel conductors of infinite length, of negligible circular crosssection, and placed one centimetre apart in vacuo, would produce between these conductors a force equal to two dynes per centimetre of length.Therefore, in electromagnetic CGS units, a biot is equal to a square root of dyne:
The unit of charge in CGS EMU is:
Dimensionally in the EMU CGS system, charge q is therefore equivalent to m^{1/2}L^{1/2}. Neither charge nor current are therefore an independent dimension of physical quantity in EMU CGS.
All electromagnetic units in EMU CGS system that do not have proper names are denoted by a corresponding SI name with an attached prefix "ab" or with a separate abbreviation "emu".^{[6]}
The ESU and EMU subsystems of CGS are connected by the fundamental relationship $k\_C\; /\; k\_A\; =\; c^2$ (see above), where c = 29,979,245,800 ≈ 3·10^{10 is the speed of light in vacuum in cm/s. Therefore, the ratio of the corresponding “primary″ electrical and magnetic units (e.g. current, charge, voltage, etc. — quantities proportional to those that enter directly into Coulomb's law or Ampère's force law) is equal either to c1 or c:[6] }
\mathrm{\frac{1\,statampere}{1\,abampere}}=c^{1} and
\mathrm{\frac{1\,stattesla}{1\,gauss}}=c. Units derived from these may have ratios equal to higher powers of c, for example:
\mathrm{\frac{1\,statvolt}{1\,abvolt}}\times\mathrm{\frac{1\,abampere}{1\,statampere}}=c^2.
There were at various points in time about half a dozen systems of electromagnetic units in use, most based on the CGS system.^{[7]} These also include Gaussian units, and HeavisideLorentz units.
Further complicating matters is the fact that some physicists and engineers in the United States use hybrid units, such as volts per centimetre for electric field. In fact, this is essentially the same as the SI unit system, by the variant to translate all lengths used into cm, e.g. 1 m = 100 cm.
Quantity  Symbol  SI unit  ESU unit  EMU unit  Gaussian unit 

electric charge  q  1 C  = (10^{1} c) statC  = (10^{1}) abC  = (10^{1} c) Fr 
electric current  I  1 A  = (10^{1} c) statA  = (10^{1}) abA  = (10^{1} c) Fr·s^{1} 
electric potential voltage  φ V  1 V  = (10^{8} c^{1}) statV  = (10^{8}) abV  = (10^{8} c^{1}) statV 
electric field  E  1 V/m  = (10^{6} c^{1}) statV/cm  = (10^{6}) abV/cm  = (10^{6} c^{1}) statV/cm 
magnetic induction  B  1 T  = (10^{4} c^{1}) statT  = (10^{4}) G  = (10^{4}) G 
magnetic field strength  H  1 A/m  = (4π 10^{3} c) statA/cm  = (4π 10^{3}) Oe  = (4π 10^{3}) Oe 
magnetic dipole moment  μ  1 A·m²  = (10^{3} c) statA·cm²  = (10^{3}) abA·cm²  = (10^{3}) erg/G 
magnetic flux  Φ_{m}  1 Wb  = (10^{8} c^{1}) statT·cm²  = (10^{8}) Mw  = (10^{8}) G·cm² 
resistance  R  1 Ω  = (10^{9} c^{2}) s/cm  = (10^{9}) abΩ  = (10^{9} c^{2}) s/cm 
resistivity  ρ  1 Ω·m  = (10^{11} c^{2}) s  = (10^{11}) abΩ·cm  = (10^{11} c^{2}) s 
capacitance  C  1 F  = (10^{9} c^{2}) cm  = (10^{9}) abF  = (10^{9} c^{2}) cm 
inductance  L  1 H  = (10^{9} c^{2}) cm^{1}·s^{2}  = (10^{9}) abH  = (10^{9} c^{2}) cm^{1}·s^{2} 
In this table, c = 29,979,245,800 ≈ 3·10^{10 is the speed of light in vacuum in the CGS units of cm/s. }
One can think of the SI value of the Coulomb constant k_{C} as:
This explains why SI to ESU conversions involving factors of c^{2} lead to significant simplifications of the ESU units, such as 1 statF = 1 cm and 1 statΩ = 1 s/cm: this is the consequence of the fact that in ESU system k_{C}=1. For example, a centimetre of capacitance is the capacitance between a sphere of radius 1 cm in vacuum and infinity. The capacitance C between two concentric spheres of radii R and r in ESU CGS system is:
By taking the limit as R goes to infinity we see C equals r.
Constant  Symbol  Value 

Atomic mass unit  u  1.660 538 782 × 10^{−24} g 
Bohr magneton  μ_{B}  9.274 009 15 × 10^{−21} erg/G (EMU, Gaussian) 
2.780 278 00 × 10^{−10} statA·cm^{2} (ESU)  
Bohr radius  a_{0}  5.291 772 0859 × 10^{−9} cm 
Boltzmann constant  k  1.380 6504 × 10^{−16} erg/K 
Electron mass  m_{e}  9.109 382 15 × 10^{−28} g 
Elementary charge  e  4.803 204 27 × 10^{−10} Fr (ESU, Gaussian) 
1.602 176 487 × 10^{−20} abC (EMU)  
Finestructure constant  α ≈ 1/137  7.297 352 570 × 10^{−3} 
Gravitational constant  G  6.674 28 × 10^{−8} cm^{3}/(g·s^{2}) 
Planck constant  h  6.626 068 85 × 10^{−27} erg·s 
$\backslash hbar$  1.054 5716 × 10^{−27} erg·s  
Speed of light in vacuum  c  ≡ 2.997 924 58 × 10^{10} cm/s 
While the absence of explicit prefactors in some CGS subsystems simplifies some theoretical calculations, it has the disadvantage that sometimes the units in CGS are hard to define through experiment. Also, lack of unique unit names leads to a great confusion: thus “15 emu” may mean either 15 abvolt, or 15 emu units of electric dipole moment, or 15 emu units of magnetic susceptibility, sometimes (but not always) per gram or per mole. On the other hand, SI starts with a unit of current, the ampere, which is easier to determine through experiment, but which requires extra prefactors in the electromagnetic equations. With its system of unique named units, SI also removes any confusion in usage: 1 ampere is a fixed quantity of a specific variable, and so are 1 henry and 1 ohm.
A key virtue of the Gaussian CGS system is that electric and magnetic fields have the same units, $4\backslash pi\backslash epsilon\_0$ is replaced by $1$, and the only dimensional constant appearing in the equations is $c$, the speed of light. The HeavisideLorentz system has these desirable properties as well (with $\backslash epsilon\_0$ equaling 1), but it is a "rationalized" system (as is SI) in which the charges and fields are defined in such a way that there are many fewer factors of $4\; \backslash pi$ appearing in the formulas, and it is in HeavisideLorentz units that the Maxwell equations take their simplest form.
In SI, and other rationalized systems (e.g. HeavisideLorentz), the unit of current was chosen such that electromagnetic equations concerning charged spheres contain 4π, those concerning coils of current and straight wires contain 2π and those dealing with charged surfaces lack π entirely, which was the most convenient choice for electricalengineering applications. In those fields where formulas concerning spheres dominate (for example, astronomy), it has been argued that the nonrationalized CGS system can be somewhat more convenient notationally.
In fact, in certain fields, specialized unit systems are used to simplify formulas even further than either SI or CGS, by using some system of natural units. For example, the particle physics community uses a system where every quantity is expressed by only one unit, the eV, with lengths, times, etc. all converted into eV's by inserting factors of c and $\backslash hbar$. This unit system is very convenient for particlephysics calculations, but would be impractical in other contexts.

