The Full Wiki

More info on Clitophon (dialogue)

Clitophon (dialogue): Wikis

Advertisements

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Encyclopedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Platon-2b.jpg
Part of the series on:
The Dialogues of Plato
Early dialogues:
ApologyCharmidesCrito
EuthyphroFirst Alcibiades
Hippias MajorHippias Minor
IonLachesLysis
Transitional & middle dialogues:
CratylusEuthydemusGorgias
MenexenusMenoPhaedo
ProtagorasSymposium
Later middle dialogues:
RepublicPhaedrus
ParmenidesTheaetetus
Late dialogues:
ClitophonTimaeusCritias
SophistStatesman
PhilebusLaws
Of Doubtful Authenticity:
EpinomisEpistles
HalcyonHipparchus
MinosRival Lovers
Second AlcibiadesTheages

The Clitophon (also Cleitophon) is a dialogue generally ascribed to Plato, though there is some disagreement regarding its authenticity. It is the shortest of the dialogues, and is significant for focusing on Socrates' role as an exhorter of other people to engage in philosophic inquiry. There are two participants, Cleitophon and Socrates, and the central feature of the discussion is Cleitophon's lengthy complaint about Socrates. The crux of this complaint is that, while no one excels Socrates in protreptic or exhortation to the virtues and the life of philosophy, no one is more useless to one already persuaded of their importance. Socrates does not respond, or the dialogue does not contain his response.

Some scholars doubt the authenticity of the Clitophon because (as we have it today) Socrates does not emerge victorious in the verbal battle. One school of thought in favor of its authenticity thinks that Plato wrote it, but then decided to have the argument in the Republic. The argument for this idea is that it is the rare piece of esoterica or not meant for publication. The dialogue has also been interpreted as a finished piece of the Platonic corpus, intended to be read in the version which we currently possess.

In fact the ancient tradition never questioned the dialogue's authenticity, and it is referred to as Plato's work by Olympiodorus, Apuleius, Hippolytus and Alcinous. Suspicion about the Clitophon seems to have arisen in the Renaissance, when Marsilio Ficino wrote "hic liber non est Platonis" at the head of his translation of the dialogue. The Clitophon was published (mistakenly) among the Platonic spuria in the Aldine editions of Plato, a mistake that was retracted and apologized for by the editors, but never corrected.

Much recent scholarship has regarded the dialogue as authentic, including articles by Mark Kremer, David Roochnik, Clifford Orwin and Jan Blits. The most comprehensive study of the of Clitophon, that of S.R. Slings, (Plato: Clitophon, (Cambridge, 1999)) claims that the Clitophon is authentic; Slings changed his mind regarding the dialogue's authenticity twenty years after his Doctoral dissertation spoke against its authenticity. The most recent study of the Clitophon, (G.S. Bowe, "In Defense of Clitophon," Classical Philology 102:3, 2007 pp. 245-264) also argues for the Clitophon's authenticity and contains a review of the relevant literature, as well as remarks on its significance for Plato's Republic.

Advertisements

Advertisements






Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message