Dallas Hansen (b.
February 14 1977) is a
Winnipeg,
Manitoba-based writer whose work appeared
periodically on the
Winnipeg Free Press editorial page from
2000 until December, 2006, when he wrote a column the newspaper
later learned was fabricated.
Hansen is an advocate for the
construction of a
subway system in inner-city Winnipeg, which he
believes will lead to increased densification and the rebirth of
Winnipeg's troubled inner city. In 2005, he co-founded
TRU Winnipeg,
the city's Transit Riders' Union, which aims to promote urbanism
and the resurrection of the inner city though the construction of a
subway and
through
urban
planning based upon the ideas of
Jane Jacobs.
Views
Although a
fierce advocate for regenerating inner city neighbourhoods via
new urbanist
infill, he has expressed his admiration of the free market. He
supports the free movement of goods, capital, and ideas across
international borders, but also the free movement of labour. He has
written that both the United States and Mexico would be better
served by an open border between the two countries. He believes
cities, to prosper, require proper infrastructure—rapid transit—and
that urban neighbourhoods feature high residential densities and
mixed-use storefront-apartment commercial strips.
Hansen is also
a strong supporter of traditionalist architecture and is
unsympathetic to modernism.
Hansen is also critical of
Ritalin treatment of
ADHD, as well as the
increasingly widespread use of such antidepressant drugs as
Zoloft, and
Prozac.
In the summer of 2006,
Hansen gained headlines in the Winnipeg Free Press after he was
barred from the new skateboard park at The Forks after officials
alleged he was being disruptive and disrespectful to others.
In
September, 2006, Hansen wrote a controversial piece headlined
"Willpower best weapon against poverty," which celebrated
individual achievement under capitalism while calling for
welfare
reform. In a libertarian vein, Hansen believes welfare creates
poverty rather than solves it.
In December 2006, Hansen wrote a
controversial piece headlined, "Time to put a cork in liquor
monopoly" calling for the dismantling of Manitoba's government-run
liquor retailing monopoly. It featured an anecdotal lead about how
he and his girlfriend weren't allowed to purchase a bottle of wine
from a Manitoba Liquor Control Commission store because he didn't
have identification.
Recently one afternoon, my girlfriend
Denise and I sought out a bottle of red wine to enjoy later that
evening. Such a common consumer good, and an obvious
companion to dinner, ought to be readily available. But,
alas, the experience turned out to be quite
difficult.We headed for the government monopoly store
at Portage Avenue and Banning Street and selected, with the
assistance of a Liquor Mart staff member, a promising Chilean
merlot. As luck would have it, however, that same helpful
employee decided at the time of purchase to demand from me some
form of government-issued identification."For proof of
age," I said, pointing to the worrisome number of white strands to
be found atop my head. "Aren't these dozens of grey hairs
sufficient?"They were not. Apparently my
being a frequent and regular customer (as well as a public figure)
meant nothing either. Another Liquor Mart employee,
apparently a supervisor, then advised me to come back with my
ID.Since we had walked to the liquor store, I did not
bother bringing my driving licence, and since I was not planning an
exit from the country I did not think to bring my passport.
I was, to say the least, rather miffed that an identity
document could be demanded from someone so obviously above the age
of majority just so he could purchase so simple a consumer good as
a bottle of vino. Yet in the interest of avoiding conflict
I simply allowed Denise to present her driving
licence."Sorry, this is no good," the clerk said to
her. Although the photographic component of her two-part
Manitoba driving license was valid until 2008, the paper portion
had expired some months earlier. Since Denise, unlike
myself, does not drive at all, she hadn't bothered renewing
it. Thus now, despite showing definitive proof of age, she
was being denied the opportunity to enjoy Chilean merlot with that
evening's meal on account of an arcane
technicality.The Free Press ran an Editor's Note on
December 12th about the column as follows:
"A Dec.
9 column on the Manitoba Liquor Control Commission contained an
inaccurate account of an incident at a liquor store. The
column began with an anecdote about a writer being asked for
identification at a liquor commission outlet. The
commission has provided the Free Press with taped evidence and
witness statements showing that an incident occurred, but was not
accurately described in the paper and contained false
information. In fact, liquor store staff were following a
policy that requires them to ask any customer who appears to be
under 25 for identification. The writer became agitated,
used profanity and made rude gestures, according to liquor store
employees. The writer was not accompanied by a female,
though his column said that a woman with him produced expired
identification that was rejected. The Free Press has
withdrawn the column from its website and apologizes to the liquor
commission and readers for the errors."Hansen stands by
the veracity of his writing, maintaining that the taped incident
and the anecdote mentioned in his column were two separate
incidents, and that his leading anecdote happened as
described.
Radio and Television
In 2006, Hansen appeared
on
CBC Radio, the
Alex
Jones Radio Show, and
Charles Adler's radio
show.
Hansen also appeared in the
Showcase TV documentary
Webdreams.
External links
Transit Riders' Union of
Winnipeg 9/11
article dallashansen.com