Democratic Party (Turkey, historical): Wikis

Advertisements
  

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Encyclopedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Turkey

This article is part of the series:
Politics and government of
Turkey



Other countries · Atlas
Politics portal

This article is about the historical Democratic Party in Turkey. For the new party of the name founded in 2007, see Democratic Party (Turkey, current).

The Democratic Party (Demokrat Parti) was a Turkish moderately right wing political party, and the country's third legal opposition party, after the Liberal Republican Party (Serbest Cumhuriyet Fırkası) established by Ali Fethi Okyar in 1930, and the National Development Party (Milli Kalkınma Partisi) established by Nuri Demirağ in 1945. It was the first of the opposition parties to rise to power, de-seating the Republican People’s Party during the national elections of 1950 and ending Turkey's one party era. The party facilitated the resurgence of Islam, especially at the popular level, in Turkey. [1]

Contents

Ideology

The Democratic Party was founded in 1946 to oppose the ruling Republican People's Party, which had established the Turkish Republic and had remained in power from the founding of the Republic through 1950. Its founding members were all well-respected figures in the RPP before breaking off and establishing the Democratic Party (DP). For this reason, both political parties had ideologies rooted in Kemalism which prevented the DP from differing substantially in practice from its predecessor, although it held notable variances in platform.[2 ] Additionally, the DP still had to function within the confines of the 1924 constitution established by Ataturk and the first parliament which restricted the distance they could put between themselves and the RPP.

The main differences in platform between the two lay in economic policy. While the RPP was guided by statism, the Democratic Party was more interested in privatizing state industries that had helped jump-start the Turkish Republic after World War I now that the country was no longer nascent. The Democratic Party did not repudiate the Republican People's Party's policy of Westernization, but did not pursue it with quite the same vigour. It was also less militantly secular than the Republican People's Party, and championed populism which gained it wide support among Turkey’s intelligentsia.

The foreign word Demokrat actually bore a resemblance to the Turkish words Demir Kırat, "Iron Kırat". The horse Kırat was a character in popular Turkish legend; it was the horse and trusted companion of Köroğlu, a Robin Hood-type hero who championed causes of the common people against the oppressive regime. "Democrat" and "Demir Kırat" were often interchanged by the peasantry, and the peripheral populations began to view the Democrat Party as the supernatural hero protecting their rights just as in the folklore. [3]

Rise to Power

The events and outcome of World War II played a large role in the emergence of the Democratic Party. A condemnation of fascism coincided with the defeat of the Axis Powers, and Prime Minister İsmet İnönü realized that if he did not invite opposition against the RPP, Turkey would fall into social upheaval: one-party governments were no longer acceptable means of rule for modern states. [2 ] On November 1, 1945, İnönü made a speech in which he formally invited the formation of opposition parties in order to align Turkey with the democratic principals that had emerged victorious in the war. But other factors were already at work in undermining the authoritarian rule of the Republican People’s Party— namely, the stagnant nature of the economy. Within the RPP and throughout the country, a rift was forming between statists and liberals, and that rift was magnified with the passage of the land reform bill of 1945. Although the bill was passed, dissent within the RPP led to the expulsion of three party members who then banded together to form the new Democratic Party that same year.

Due to the Democratic Party’s infancy and its inability to fully organize or establish rapport with the Turkish public immediately after its conception, they lost the 1946 national elections with no surprise. In the four years that spanned before the next election, İnönü and the RPP tried desperately to reaffirm their popularity in the Republic, but voters were unconvinced that the party could implement any real change after twenty seven years in power. [2 ]

By 1950, the Democrat Party had come to portray itself as the champions of the Turkish people, resentful of the RPP and ruling elite classes, despite the fact that most of its leaders were members of this same bureaucratic class. The Democratic Party exploited the RPP's association with Westernization, a source of hostility for the public and a sign they were losing touch with their citizenry. Following the example of the DP, the RPP extended its efforts into the villages to compete for votes, inducting the peasantry into politics for the first time. [3]

In the 1950 elections, the Democratic Party enjoyed a landslide victory and won the majority of seats in the National Assembly, surprising many, especially the Democrats themselves. Their leader, Adnan Menderes, became Prime Minister and his peaceful transition to power marked the beginning of a competitive political system in Turkey.

1950-1961

The new Democrat Parliament offered a new, broadened political elite. There was a shift from members with military and bureaucratic backgrounds to those with commercial backgrounds and increased representation from small provinces (opposed to mainly Istanbul or Ankara). [4] Despite attacks on Inonu and the RPP's efforts to orient Turkey with the West, the Democrats under Menderes continued this trend. In 1952, Turkey joined NATO and strengthened its ties with the West, an effort to protect against potential Soviet expansionism. Menderes and the Democrat Party became increasingly more involved in issues of national security, and it is often thought that they highlighted these efforts to draw attention away from the poor economic health of the nation, a tactic that would not remain successful for long. [5]

The 1954 elections were again overwhelmingly won by the Democrat Party and Menderes remained Prime Minister. However, by 1955 widespread support for the DP began to deteriorate due to its growing authoritarian rule and the nation's worsening economic situation. The policies pursued under the DP rule had led to high inflation rates, shortages of critical goods, and poor economic development. In the years ahead, the DP increasingly suppressed opposition within their own party and with that of rival parties and stifled the press. [6]

On May 27, 1960, the Democratic Party was ultimately removed from government by a military group called the National Unity Committee. The coup was led by General Cemal Gürsel and ousted Menderes as Prime Minister. The military feared that the founding principles of the Turkish Republic were being eroded, and there was growing public dissatisfaction with Menderes' perceived intolerance of criticism. The military junta stayed in power for the next eighteen months, outlawing the Democrat Party and executing its top leaders, namely Menderes and his two close associates. The party was officially suppressed on September 29, 1961.

Relaunch attempt

In November 1992, at what was declared to be the party's 5th Grand Conference, several former members relaunched the Democratic Party under the same name and emblem. It was at first led by Hayrettin Erkmen, but the most prominent leader was Aydın Menderes, son of Adnan, who was elected the party's third leader in February 1994. He led until a crippling road accident in 1996.

The relaunched Democratic Party never entertained mainstream politics, and did not participate in Turkey's most recent elections in November 2002. Other recent leaders have included Yalçın Koçak.

References

  1. ^ http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/article/opr/t125/e519?_hi=19&_pos=3
  2. ^ a b c Ahmad, Feroz. Turkey: The Quest for Identity. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 2003.
  3. ^ a b Party Competition in Rural Turkey: Agent of Change or Defender of Traditional Rule?, Arnold Leder. Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1 (Jan., 1979), pp. 82-105. Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
  4. ^ The Anatomy of Political and Social Change: Turkish Parties, Parliaments, and Elections, Frank Tachau, Mary-Jo D. Good. Comparative Politics, Vol. 5, No. 4 (Jul., 1973), pp. 551-573. Published by: Ph.D. Program in Political Science of the City University of New York.
  5. ^ The Compliant Ally? Turkey and the West in the Middle East 1954-58, Ayşegül Sever. Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 34, No. 2 (Apr., 1998), pp. 73-90. Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
  6. ^ The Recruitment of Cabinet Ministers as a Political Process: Turkey, 1946-1979,Ilter Turan. International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 18, No. 4 (Nov., 1986), pp. 455-472. Cambridge University Press.
Advertisements

Advertisements






Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message