Disability Support Program (DSP) 2001 Inauguration
In 2001,
Pat Binns’
government inaugurated the Disability Support Program intended to
provide assistive devices and social integration assistance to
Islanders with disabilities. The DSP grandfathered several older
programs.<ref> CBC: P.E.I. offers new disability support
program
[889]</ref>
Complaints against the DSP
Thirteen Human Rights complaints were filed with one closed.
<ref>PEI Human Rights Panel: Jennifer Coady v. Dept. of
Health and Social Services
[890]</ref> Twelve Human Rights claims affecting
90 Islanders with disabilities were settled just prior to the 2003
election. <ref>CBC:P.E.I. flip-flops on disability age
cut-off
[891]</ref> Four alleged cases of Human
Rights abuse, based on the changes in 2001 funding for autism
supports, were heard in January of 2007 (undecided). <ref>PEI
Human Rights Commission: Vic Douse v. Government of PEI
[892]</ref> <ref>Ibid: Carolyn
Bateman v. Government of PEI
[893]</ref> <ref>Ibid: Brad and
Dale Wonnacott v. Government of PEI
[894]</ref> <ref>Ibid: Margaret
Murphy v. Government of PEI
[895]</ref> (Official references do not
disclose the nature of the complaints but media reports do.)
<ref>The Guardian January 31, 2007: Parents of autistic
children allege discrimination under support program, reprinted
[896]</ref> <ref>CBC January 30,
2007: Disability funding complaint goes to human rights
commission
[897]</ref>
The DSP generated seven complaints to the PEI Privacy Commissioner,
5 reported and 2 reported in the media. <ref> Freedom of
Information and Protection of Privacy Act Re: Department of Social
Services and Seniors Disability Support Program Prince Edward
Island Information and Privacy Commissioner: INVESTIGATION REPORT
PP-06-004
[898]</ref> <ref>Ibid:
INVESTIGATION REPORT PP-06-001
[899]</ref> <ref>Ibid: INVESTIGATION
REPORT PP-06-002
[900]</ref> <ref>Ibid: INVESTIGATION
REPORT PP-06-005
[901]</ref> <ref>CBC December 5, 2006 No
SIN in support applications, province told
[902]</ref> <ref>CBC News at Six TV video:
Intimate Detail Personal Questions
[903]</ref>
PEI Government Response 2003
Facing DSP client dissatisfaction and an election in 2003 Binns’
government commissioned the Baker Report. <ref>FORMATIVE
EVALUATION:PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DISABILITY SUPPORT PROGRAM Final
Report July, 2003
[904]</ref> The Baker report faults the
government in 9 instances for a “corporate culture of cost
containment cost avoidance” that “manifested itself in a
conservative approach to service delivery…”, “that is largely
counterproductive to a new program…”, and “…appears to be
systemic.” <ref> Ibid pages vi, viii, 45, 51, 56, 62, 63, 82,
and 83</ref> Baker provides a detailed analysis of the
strengths and weaknesses of the program, including some negative
feedback from the disability community about access, coverage,
equality and the review process.<ref>Highlights -
BackgrounderReport of Disability Support Program Formative
Evaluation and Telephone Survey August 22, 2003
[905]</ref><ref>PEI Disability Support
Program Telephone Survey
[906]</ref> The Minister issued a press release
that neutralized the complaints and forward going recommendations
of the Baker Report. <ref>Minister Releases Evaluation of the
Disability Support Program
[907]</ref>
The report was swept under the rug after Binns’ election win that
fall when reforms to the program were not made and criticisms were
not adressed. In fact, as we found out later the move was on to
tighten up spending and the program client review process.
Ministerial Advisory Committee on Disability Issues
In June of 2004, the Minister announced the formation of the
Ministerial Advisory Committee on Disability Issues which was
pre-announced in the August 2003 press release
(Ibid).<ref>Minister announces formation of advisory
committee on disability issues
[908]</ref> Members included "Kevin Porter,
Victor Gallant, Raeanne Garnhum, Sandra Boswell, Helene Garg,
Stephen Pate, Willy Sigsworth, Joan teRaa, Kevin Walsh, and Debra
Pagett." The Advisory Committe was not able to produce any
improvements to the Disability Support Program prior to the 2006
cutbacks. Its 2006 Annual report merely re-iterates some of the
problems identified in Baker. <ref>Advisory Committee on
Disability Issues Annual Report January 2006
[909]</ref>
DSP Reforms 2006
In April 1, 2006, Binns’ government cut DSP spending. 2006 spending
had been $8.7 million but was cut to $8.1 million in the Budget
estimates of April 1, 2006 (page 109) whereas all other groups in
the department received at least a 5% increase in spending.
<ref> PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND ESTIMATES 2006 2007 Prepared by
Department of the Provincial Treasury
[910]</ref>
Two contentious issues of the DSP are individual spending ceilings
and the client review process. When a person with a disability
seeks funding from the program, their are interviewed by a case
worker who administers the Screening Tool or FIM for Physical
Independance Model. The tool was purchased from a US based seniors
hospital. From the tools numberical results the caseworker
calculates the persons level of ability/disability as a percentage.
Clients with 75% or more ability are awarded a maximum of $300 per
month in support, more than 50% get $700 per month, etc. The
maximum support is $3,000 per month. All supports are subject to a
client means tested contribution. Prior to July 2006, these levels
were considered guidelines, that is if the client needed $500 in
support but the FIM indicated $300, they would have their needs met
at $500. The regulations were changed in July 2006 to remove
caseworker discretion by renaming the levels as funding "ceilings".
<ref>PEI Disability Support Program Policy Manual
[911]</ref>.
DSP clients with a disability "may request that decision be
reviewed" if they are unhappy with the decision of the case worker.
Originally the review process was a mixture of process under DSP
regulations and the actual needs of the person with the disability.
Many reviews were decided on the concept of equity not the exact
legal nature of the regulations, that is the disabled person would
receive their needs beyond the regulations. In July 2006 the
regulations for reviews were tightened up to only "make a finding
regarding adherence to the DSP policy and work processes."
<ref>PEI Disability Support Program Policy Manual
[912]</ref>. The review panel is not independant
of the department since it is comprised of three employees of the
Disability Support Program. There is an apparent conflict of
interest and requests have been made to move the process to an
independant tribunal.
DSP Reforms 2007
In the Budget of 2006/2007, the Province restored $900,000 in
funding to the DSP. PEI Disability Alert, an advocacy group, stated
this is the amount cutback from last years funding and has called
on the government to increase funding by the 9% given other
departments. <ref>CBC News April 11, 2007 Disability advocate
fears increase not enough
[913]</ref> <ref>Guardian April 4,
2007 Disability Alert takes rally for more supports to MLAs
[914]</ref>
References
<references />