Fluid films, such as soap films, are commonly encountered in everyday experience. A soap film can be formed by dipping a closed contour wire into a soapy solution as in the figure on the right. Alternatively, a catenoid can be formed by dipping two rings in the soapy solution and subsequently separating them while maintaining the coaxial configuration.
Stationary fluid films form surfaces of minimal surface area, leading to the Plateau problem.
On the other hand, fluid films display fascinating and rich dynamic properties. They can undergo enormous deformations away from the equilibrium configuration. Furthermore, they display several orders of magnitude variations in thickness from nanometers to millimeters. Thus, a fluid film can simultaneously display nanoscale and macroscale phenomena.
In the study of the dynamics of free fluid films, such as soap films, it is common to model the film as two dimensional manifolds. Then the variable thickness of the film is captured by the two dimensional density $\backslash rho$.
The dynamics of fluid films can be described by the following system of exact nonlinear Hamiltonian equations which, in that respect, are a complete analogue of Euler's inviscid equations of fluid dynamics. In fact, these equations reduce to Euler's dynamic equations for flows in stationary Euclidean spaces.
The forgoing relies on the formalism of tensors, including the summation convention and the raising and lowering of tensor indices.
Consider a thin fluid film $S$ that spans a stationary closed contour boundary. Let $C$ be the normal component of the velocity field and $V^\{\backslash alpha\; \}$ be the contravariant components of the tangential velocity projection. Let $\backslash nabla\; \_\{\backslash alpha\; \}$ be the covariant surface derivative, $B\_\{\backslash alpha\; \backslash beta\; \}$ be the covariant curvature tensor, $B^\{\backslash alpha\; \}\_\{\backslash beta\; \}$ be the mixed curvature tensor and $B^\{\backslash alpha\; \}\_\{\backslash alpha\; \}$ be its trace, that is mean curvature. Furthermore, let the internal energy density per unit mass function be $e\backslash left(\; \backslash rho\; \backslash right)$ so that the total potential energy $E$ is given by
This choice of $e\backslash left(\; \backslash rho\; \backslash right)$ :
where $\backslash sigma$ is the surface energy density results in Laplace's classical model for surface tension:
where A is the total area of the soap film.
The governing system reads
\frac{\delta \rho }{\delta t}+\nabla _{\alpha }\left( \rho V^{\alpha } \right) &= \rho CB^{\alpha }_{\alpha } \\ \\ \rho \left( \frac{\delta C}{\delta t} + 2V^\alpha \nabla_\alpha C+B_{\alpha \beta }V^\alpha V^\beta \right) &= \rho^2 e_\rho B^\alpha_\alpha \\ \\ \rho \left( \frac{\delta V^\alpha}{\delta t} + V^\beta \nabla_\beta V^\alpha  C\nabla^\alpha C  2CV^\beta B^\alpha_\beta \right) &= \nabla^\alpha \left( \rho^2 e_\rho \right)
\end{align}
where the $\{\backslash delta\}/\{\backslash delta\}\; t$derivative is the central operator, originally due to Jacques Hadamard, in the The Calculus of Moving Surfaces. Note that, in compressible models, the combination $\backslash rho^2\; e\_\backslash rho$ is commonly identified with pressure $p$. The governing system above was originally formulated in reference 1.
For the Laplace choice of surface tension $\backslash left(\; e\backslash left(\; \backslash rho\; \backslash right)=\backslash sigma\; /\backslash rho\; \backslash right)$ the system becomes:
\frac{\delta \rho }{\delta t} + \nabla_\alpha \left( \rho V^{\alpha } \right) &= \rho CB^\alpha_\alpha \\ \\ \rho \left( \frac{\delta C}{\delta t}+2V^\alpha \nabla_\alpha C+B_{\alpha \beta }V^\alpha V^\beta \right) &= \sigma B^\alpha_\alpha \\ \\ \frac{\delta V^\alpha }{\delta t} + V^\beta \nabla_\beta V^\alpha  C\nabla ^\alpha C  2V^\beta B^\alpha _\beta & = 0
\end{align}
Note that on flat ($B\_\{\backslash alpha\; \backslash beta\; \}=0$) stationary ($C=0$) manifolds, the system becomes
\frac{\partial \rho }{\partial t} + \nabla_\alpha \left( \rho V^{\alpha } \right) &= 0 \\ & \\ \rho \left( \frac{\partial V^\alpha}{\partial t} + V^\beta \nabla _\beta V^\alpha \right) &= \nabla ^\alpha \left( \rho^2 e_\rho \right)
\end{align}
which is precisely classical Euler's equations of fluid dynamics.
If one disregards the tangential components of the velocity field, as frequently done in the study of thin fluid film, one arrives at the following simplified system with only two unknowns: the two dimensional density $\backslash rho$ and the normal velocity $C$:
{\frac{\delta\rho }{\delta t}} &= \rho CB_\alpha^\alpha \\
&\\ \rho\frac{\delta C}{\delta t} &=\sigma B_\alpha^\alpha \\ \end{align}
1. Exact nonlinear equations for fluid films and proper adaptations of conservation theorems from classical hydrodynamics P. Grinfeld, J. Geom. Sym. Phys. 16, 2009
