Economic sociology studies the social and broad philosophical effect of economic phenomena, particularly with respect to the concept of modernity and its constituent aspects (rationalisation, secularisation, urbanisation, social stratification, and so on). As sociology arose primarily as a reaction to capitalist modernity, economics plays a role in almost any sociological enquiry. The specific term "economic sociology" was first coined by William Stanley Jevons in 1879, later to be used in the works of Émile Durkheim, Max Weber and Georg Simmel between 1890 and 1920.[1] Weber's work regarding the relationship between economics and religion is perhaps most iconic of the approach set forth in economic sociology.
Contents |
Immigration to the United States During the twentieth century, the trends of the immigration groups was to settle in urban areas. There was much cluster in the ethnic neighborhoods with the Chinatowns, Little Italys, and other areas becoming features of larger cities. Many immigrants found their lives little better if not worse then the ones they had left. Yes, they gained greater religious and political freedom in their new home, but they faced much greater discrimination and prejudice towards them. The high level of competition for jobs allowed employers to impose very long work days for low pay creating unhealthy working conditions. In spite of these conditions, the economy on the other hand was booming.
The Sociological debate today focuses on new immigrants' ability to employment and achieve economic self-sufficiency. Have our immigrant policies hindered the economy or helped improve it? Is it fair to have less educated immigrants working long hours for little pay just because they do not know better? These are just a few of the questions involved in this debate. To not go too deep into numbers, but to understand this debate better, you must note that more and more legal immigrants are being allowed into the United States each year. During the 1990's it was over 977,000 and just from 2002 to 2006 it was just above 1,021,000.
Side One- George Bajas came out with an essay in 1994 titled " The Economics of Immigration." Bajas goes on to say that since the 1980s, the United States has attracted "lower-quality" immigrants with less education and few marketable job skills. This side argues heavily on the bads of new immigration and the results of such high immigration. Borja's estimates show that as high as 21 percent of immigrant households participate in social assistance programs consisting of food stamps, Medicaid, etc. Because recent immigrants have trouble finding jobs in the short term, the economic assimilation is slow.
Side two- This side takes the opposite approach of course, claiming that recent immigration has either a positive effect and if not, no effect or influence on the economy. There are economists and policy analysts to back this up as well. One of them is the economist Julian Simon. Simon argues that immigrants benefit the U.S. economy by joining the labor force and paying into the federal revenue system for their whole lives. By the time they receive their long term benefits of such things as Social Security, their children will be covering these costs by working and paying into the tax system themselves.
The Bottom Line- This is just a brief introductory to the social debate, as there is clearly much more to it. As you can see, there are valed points to both sides which makes it so controversial. There are goods and bads that come with Immigration. What makes the United States so unique is our freedom, and that is why immigration is offered to the US.
Economic sociology arose as a new approach to the analysis of economic phenomena; emphasising particularly the role economic structures and institutions play upon society, and the influence a society holds over the nature of economic structures and institutions. The relationship between capitalism and modernity is a salient issue, perhaps best demonstrated in Weber's The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1905) and Simmel's The Philosophy of Money (1900). Economic sociology may be said to have begun with Tocqueville's Democracy in America (1835-40) and The Old Regime and the Revolution (1856).[2] Marx's historical materialism would attempt to demonstrate how economic forces influence the structure of society on a fundamental level. Émile Durkheim's The Division of Labour in Society was published in 1922, whilst Max Weber's Economy and Society was released in the same year.
Contemporary economic sociology focuses particularly on the social consequences of economic exchanges, the social meanings they involve and the social interactions they facilitate or obstruct. Influential figures in modern economic sociology include Fred L. Block, James S. Coleman, Mark Granovetter, Harrison White, Paul DiMaggio, Joel M. Podolny, Richard Swedberg and Viviana Zelizer in the United States, as well as Luc Boltanski, Laurent Thévenot, or Jens Beckert in Europe. To this may be added Amitai Etzioni, who has popularised the idea of socioeconomics, and Chuck Sabel and Wolfgang Streeck, who work in the tradition of political economy/sociology.
The focus on mathematical analysis and utility maximisation during the 20th century has led some to see economics as a discipline moving away from its roots in the social sciences. Many critiques of economics or economic policy begin from the accusation that abstract modelling is missing some key social phenomenon that needs to be addressed. In reply, many mainstream economists point out that such cultural and social arguments often seem to favour the interests of local monopolists and the already powerful.[citation needed]
Economic sociology is an attempt by sociologists to redefine in sociological terms questions traditionally addressed by economists. It is also an answer to attempts by economists (such as Gary Becker) to bring economic approaches - in particular utility maximisation and game theory - to the analysis of social situations that are not obviously related to production or trade. Karl Polanyi, in his book The Great Transformation, was the first theorist to come up with the idea of the "embeddedness", meaning that the economy is "embedded" in social institutions which is vital so that the market does not destroy other aspects of human life.
Modern Marxist thought has focused on the social implications of consumerism (or "commodity fetishism") and economic development within the system of economic relations that produce them. Important theorists include Georg Lukács, Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Walter Benjamin, Guy Debord, Louis Althusser, Nicos Poulantzas, Ralph Miliband, Jürgen Habermas, Raymond Williams, Fredric Jameson, Antonio Negri, and Stuart Hall.
Economic sociology is sometimes synonymous with socioeconomics. In most cases, however, socioeconomists focus on the social impact of very specific economic changes, such as the closing of a factory, market manipulation, new natural gas regulation, and so on.
  | Abstract. - rational choice and sociology : The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics |
|
|
Top topics
Wikis
Quiz
Search
