![]() |
|
|---|---|
![]() Encyclopædia Dramatica's front page on February 25, 2010. |
|
| URL | encyclopediadramatica.com |
| Slogan | In lulz we trust |
| Commercial? | Yes |
| Type of site | Satirical wiki |
| Registration | Optional (required to edit pages) |
| Available language(s) | English |
| Created by | Girlvinyl (Sherrod DeGrippo)[1] |
| Launched | December 9, 2004[1] |
| Revenue | Advertising and donations |
| Current status | Active |
Encyclopædia Dramatica is a satirical open wiki built on MediaWiki software.[2] Launched on December 9, 2004, it satirizes both encyclopedic topics and current events, especially those related to or relevant to internet culture. It is also associated with the internet subculture Anonymous. The site's "elaborate trolling culture",[3] chronicling of internet trolling, use of content with shock value, and criticism of other internet communities have all gained media coverage and commentary. Some of the content on Encyclopædia Dramatica is "flamingly racist and misogynist",[3] sexually explicit or otherwise disturbing, including uncensored material taken from shock sites.[4]
Contents |
Encyclopædia Dramatica was founded in 2004 by Sherrod Degrippo, also known as "Girlvinyl".[5][1] It characterizes itself as "[d]one in the spirit of Ambrose Bierce's The Devil's Dictionary".[1] The New York Times has characterized the wiki as "an online compendium of troll humor and troll lore"[6] that it labeled a "troll archive".[6] C't, a European magazine for IT-professionals, noted the site's role in introducing newcomers to the culture of /b/ board of 4chan, a notorious Internet forum.[7] An author has said that it is a platform from which to initiate "exchange between the sensitive and the cruel" in order to achieve the "joy of disrupting another’s emotional equilibrium" because it "intentionally disrupts online communities" whose members have an "emotional investment" in them.[6] Encyclopædia Dramatica defines trolling in terms of doing things "for the lulz" (for laughs),[8] a phrase that it qualifies as "a catchall explanation for any trolling you do".[8]
The targets of this trolling come from "every pocket of the Web",[9] to include not only the non-corporeal aspects of Internet phenomena, (e.g. online catchphrases, fan pages, forums, and viral phenomena), but also real people (e.g. amateur celebrities, identifiable internet drama participants and even Encyclopædia Dramatica's own forum members).[9][10] These are derided in a manner described variously as "coarse", "offensive", "obscene",[11][12] "irreverent, obtuse, politically incorrect",[13] "crude but hilarious",[9] "crude and abusive".[14] The material is presented to appear comprehensive, with extensive use of shock-value prose, drawings, photographs, and the like. The emotional responses are then added to the articles, often in similarly derogatory or inflammatory manner, with the purpose of provoking further emotional response. Adherents of the practice assert that visitors to the website "shouldn't take anything said on Dramatica seriously."[13]
Articles at Encyclopædia Dramatica are notably critical of MySpace[11] as well as users on YouTube, LiveJournal, DeviantART, and Wikipedia. In The New York Times Magazine, journalist Jonathan Dee described it as a "snarky Wikipedia anti-fansite".[10] Shaun Davies of Australia's Nine Network has called it "Wikipedia's bastard child, a compendium of internet trends and culture which lampoons every subject it touches."[13] The site "is run like Wikipedia, but its style is the opposite; most of its information is biased and opinionated, not to mention racist, homophobic, and spiteful, but on the upside its snide attitude makes it spot-on about most Internet memes it covers."[15] This coverage of Internet jargon and memes has been acknowledged in the New Statesman,[16] on Language Log,[17] in C't magazine,[7] and in Wired magazine[9] - where it was described once as the wiki "where the vast parallel universe of Anonymous in-jokes, catchphrases, and obsessions is lovingly annotated".[3]
In 2006 a group of trolls emailed the website's creator, DeGrippo, demanding edits to the protected article describing them. After she refused to do so, the trolls ordered taxis, pizzas, escort services and sent death threats and threats of rape to DeGrippo's apartment.[5] In December 2008, the site claimed they needed donations as they were under attack and had lost its advertisers.[18]
The website received mainstream media attention after Jason Fortuny used Encyclopædia Dramatica to post photographs, e-mails and phone numbers from one hundred and seventy-six responses to a Craigslist advertisement he posted in 2006, in which he posed as a woman seeking sexual encounters with dominant men.[2][6] The incident led a blogger at Wired Magazine to suggest it may be the "world's lamest wiki".[19]
The website is known for serving as a platform for members of the group known as "Anonymous", making Encyclopædia Dramatica a "favourite target for critics, who accuse Anonymous of propagating hate."[13] Through its association with members of Anonymous, Encyclopædia Dramatica received incidental coverage when actions by members of the group led to the arrest of an alleged pedophile,[20] when they demonstrated against Scientology in London;[21][22] when a member of Anonymous broke into the e-mail account of former vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin,[23] and when a member of Anonymous claimed credit for an attack on the virtual Second Life headquarters of former presidential candidate John Edwards.[24] The convergence of Encyclopædia Dramatica with the anti-Scientology campaign of Project Chanology was noted by technology journalist Julian Dibbell.[25]
In January 2010, the Encyclopædia Dramatica article Aboriginal was removed from the search engine results of Google Australia, following a complaint that its content was racist.[26][27][28] A search on terms related to the article will produce a message that one of the results has been removed after a legal request relating to Australia's Racial Discrimination Act 1975.[29][30] In March 2010, it was reported by ninemsn that the Australian Human Rights Commission had contacted the site's owner Joseph Evers with the possibility of charges being brought against him under Australian law, over what it claimed constituted "racial hatred" towards Aborigines.[31]
On December 16, 2008, Encyclopædia Dramatica won the People's Choice Winners category for favorite wiki in Mashable's 2nd Annual Open Web Awards, with wikiHow as the runner-up.[32]
|
|||||||||||||||||
| URL | encyclopediadramatica.com |
|---|---|
| Type of site | Satirical wiki |
| Owned by | Sherrod DeGrippo[1]("Girlvinyl") |
| Created by | {{{author}}} |
| Current status of site | Active |
Encyclopædia Dramatica is a website that stores mostly lampoons that have pictures to go with it. The lampoons satirize current events and themes, commonly Internet-related ones. Encyclopædia Dramatica has been described as a "snarky Wikipedia anti-fansite".[2]
The site is a wiki. The site runs MediaWiki software,[3][4] that presents its content in an disrespectful, politically incorrect[5] and often abusive style,[6] using links and cross references made to appear complete, with a great amount of obscene writings, drawings and photographs. Many articles are written in a satirical manner to upset those who take the content seriously; this practice of causing people into an emotional response is known on the Internet as trolling.[1][5][7] The emotional responses are then added to the articles, often in a negative or inflammatory way, with the purpose of causing further emotional response. The site claims that it is "[d]one in the spirit of Ambrose Bierce's The Devil's Dictionary".[8][8]
This wiki has been described as "an online compendium of troll humor and lore".[1] Its articles relate to news, current events, gossip and other "drama" topics from across the web, controversial article content, forums, fansites, Internet subculture, users of web services,[2] and online catchphrases are satirized in a manner described variously as coarse, offensive and frequently obscene.[5][9][10][11] Articles at Encyclopædia Dramatica are notably critical of MySpace[11] and administrators of Wikipedia.[2]
|
|