From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Example of EEML Goal modeling and process modeling.
Extended Enterprise Modeling Language (EEML) in
software engineering is a modelling language used for Enterprise modelling across a
number of layers.
Overview
Extended Enterprise Modeling Language (EEML) is modelling
language, which combines structural modeling, business process modeling, goal modeling with
goal hierarchies, and resource modeling. It is used in practice to
bridge the type of goal modeling used in common requirements
engineering to other modeling approaches. According to Johannesson
and Söderström (2008) "the process logic in EEML is mainly
expressed through nested structures of tasks and decision points.
The sequencing of tasks is expressed by the flow relation between
decision points. Each task has an input port and the output port
being decision points for modeling process logic".[1]
EEML is intended to be a simple language, which makes it easy to
update models. In addition to capturing the various tasks(can
consist of several sub-tasks) and their interdependencies, models
show which roles perform each task, and the tools, services and
information they apply.
History
Extended Enterprise Modeling Language (EEML) is from the late
1990s, developed in the EU project EXTERNAL as extension of the
Action Port Model (APM) by S. Carlsen (1998).[2] The
EXTERNAL project [3] aimed
to "facilitate inter-organisational cooperation in knowledge
intensive industries. It is the hypotheses of the project that
interactive process models form a suitable framework for tools and
methodologies for dynamically networked organisations. In the
project EEML (Extended Enterprise Modelling Language) was first
constructed as a common metamodel, designed to enable syntactic and
semantic interoperability".[4]
It has been further developed in the EU projects Unified
Enterprise Modelling Language (UEML)[5] from
2002 to 2003 and the ongoing ATHENA project.[6] The
objectives of UEML Working group has been to "define, to validate
and to disseminate a set of core language constructs to support a
Unified Language for Enterprise Modelling, named UEML, to serve as
a basis for interoperability within a smart organisation or a
network of enterprises".[7]
EEML
Topics
Modeling
domains
The EEML-language is divided into 4 sub-languages, with
well-defined links across these languages[8]:
Process modeling in EEML, according to Krogstie (2006) "supports
the modeling of process logic which is mainly expressed through
nested structures of tasks and decision points. The sequencing of
the tasks is expressed by the flow relation between decision
points. Each task has minimum an input port and an output port
being decision points for modeling process logic, Resource roles
are used to connect resources of various kinds (persons,
organizations, information, material objects, software tools and
manual tools) to the tasks. In addition, data modeling (using UML
class diagrams), goal modeling and competency modeling (skill
requirements and skills possessed) can be integrated with the
process models".[8]
EEML
Layers
EEML has four layers of interest
- Generic Task Type: This layer identifies the constituent tasks
of generic, repetitive processes and the logical dependencies
between these tasks.
- Specific Task Type: In this layer process models are expanded,
concretised, decomposed and specialised to facilitate business
solutions.
- Manage Task Instances: Here, more detailed decisions are taken
regarding work in the actual work environment with its
organisational, information, and tool resources.
- Perform Task Instances: This layer covers the actual execution
of tasks.
Goal
Modelling
Goal Modelling is one of the four EEML modeling domains age. A
goal expresses the wanted (or unwanted) state of affairs (either
current or future) in a certain context. Example of the goal model
is depicted below. It shows goals and relationships between them.
It is possible to model advanced goal-relationships in EEML by
using goal connectors. A goal connector is used when one need to
link several goals.
|
|
|
Goal modeling and process modeling
|
In goal modeling to fulfil Goal1, one must achieve to other
goals: both Goal2 and Goal3 (goal-connector with “and” as the
logical relation going out). If Goal2 and Goal3 are two different
ways of achieving Goal1, then it should be “xor” logical
relationship. It can be an opposite situation when both Goal2 and
Goal3 need to be fulfilled and to achieve them one must fulfil
Goal1. In this case Goal2 and Goal3 are linked to goal connector
and this goal connector has a link to Goal1 with ”and”-logical
relationship.
The table indicate different types of connecting relationships
in EEML goal modeling. Goal model can also be interlinked with a
process model.
Goal
modelling principles
Within requirements engineering (RE),
the notion of goal has increasingly been used. Goals generally
describe objectives which a system should achieve through
cooperation of actors in the intended software and in the
environment [9]. Goals
are central in some RE frameworks, and can play a supporting role
in others. Goal-oriented techniques may particularly be useful in
early-phase RE. Early-phase requirements consider e.g. how the
intended system meets organizational goals, why the system is
needed and how the stakeholders’ interests may be addressed. [10]
- Expresses the relationships between systems and their
environments : Earlier, requirements engineering focused only
on what the system is supposed to do. Over the past years, there
has been a more or less mutual understanding, that it is also very
important to understand and characterize the interaction between
the intended system and its environment. Relationships between
systems and their environments are often expressed as goal-based
relationships. The motivation for this is “partly today's more
dynamic business and organizational environments, where systems are
increasingly used to fundamentally change business processes rather
than to automate long-established practices”.[11] Goals
can also be useful when modelling contexts. [12]
- Clarifies requirements : Specifying goals leads to asking
“why”, “how” and “how else”. [13]
Requirements of the stakeholders are often revealed in this
process. The stakeholders may seem to be more likely to become
aware of potential alternatives for fulfilling their goals, and
thereby less likely to over-specify their requirements.
Requirements from clients and stakeholders may often be unclear,
especially the non-functional ones. A goal-oriented approach allows
the requirements to be refined and clarified through an incremental
process, by analyzing requirements in terms of goal
decomposition.
- Deals with conflicts : Goals may provide a useful way of
dealing with conflicts, such as tradeoffs between costs
performance, flexibility, etc, and divergent interests of the
stakeholders. Goals can deal with conflicts because meeting of one
goal can interfere with the meeting of others. Different opinions
on how to meet a goal has led to different ways of handling
conflicts. [14]
- Decides requirements completeness : Requirements can be
considered complete if they fulfil explicit goals in the
requirement model.
- Connects requirements to design : Goals can be used in
order to connect the requirements to the design. For some, goals
are an important mechanism in this matter. (The Non-Functional
Requirements (NFR) framework uses goals to guide the design
process.)
Goal-oriented Requirements
Language
Goal-oriented
Requirements Language (GRL) is a language that is designed to
support goal-oriented modeling and reasoning
about requirements, especially the non-functional requirements [15] It
allows to express conflict between goals and helps to make
decisions that resolve conflicts. There are three main categories
of concepts in GRL: intentional elements, intentional relationships
and actors [16]. They
are called for intentional because they are used in models that
primarily concerned with answering "why" question of requirements
(for ex. why certain choices for behavior or structure were made,
what alternatives exist and what is the reason for choosing of
certain alternative.)
See also
References
- ^
Paul Johannesson and Eva Söderström (2008) .Information Systems
Engineering. p.58-61.
- ^
Carlsen, S. (1998). "Action port model: A mixed paradigm conceptual
workflow modeling language". In: Proceedings of Third IFCIS
Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS'98), New
York.
- ^
EXTERNAL EXTERNAL - Extended Enterprise Resources, Networks And
Learning, EU Project, IST-1999-10091,
- ^
Håvard D. Jørgensen (2004). Interactive Process
Models. Thesis Norwegian University of Science and
Technology Trondheim, Norway. p.173-202.
- ^
François Vernadat (2002). "UEML:
towards a unified enterprise modelling language". In: Int. J.
Production Research, 40 (17), 4309-4321.
- ^
John Krogstie
and T.A. Halpin, Keng Siau (2004).
Information Modeling Methods and Methodologies. Idea Group
Inc (IGI), p.73.
- ^
Unified Enterprise Modelling
Language. Accessed 29 Nov 2008.
- ^ a
b
John Krogstie
(2006). " Using EEML for Combined
Goal and Process Oriented Modeling: A Case Study".
- ^
L. Liu and E. Yu, “Designing information systems in social context:
a goal and scenario modelling approach”, 2003 Elsevier Ltd. http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~liu/publications/ISj03.pdf
- ^
E. Yu, “Towards Modelling and Reasoning Support for Early-Phase
Requirements Engineering”, 1997 IEEE
- ^
E. Yu and J. Mylopoulos, “Why Goal-Oriented Requirements
Engineering”, http://www.cs.toronto.edu/pub/eric/REFSQ98.html
- ^
K.Pohl and P. Haumer, “Modelling Contextual Information about
Scenarios”, Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Requirements Engineering:
Foundations of Software Quality REFSQ ’97, Barcelona, Catalonia,
Spain, June 1997 pp. 187-204.
- ^
E. Yu and J. Mylopoulos, “Why Goal-Oriented Requirements
Engineering”, http://www.cs.toronto.edu/pub/eric/REFSQ98.html
- ^
E. Yu and J. Mylopoulos, “Why Goal-Oriented Requirements
Engineering”, http://www.cs.toronto.edu/pub/eric/REFSQ98.html
- ^
Lin Liu, Eric Yu, “Designing information systems in social context:
a goal and scenario modelling approach”
- ^
GRL web site, University of Toronto, http://www.cs.toronto.edu/km/GRL/
Further
reading
- Bolchini, D., Paolini, P.: "Goal-Driven Requirements Analysis
for Hypermedia-intensive Web Applications", Requirements
Engineering Journal, Springer, RE03 Special Issue (9) 2004:
85-103.
- Jørgensen, Håvard D.: "Process-Integrated eLearning"
- Kramberg, V.: "Goal-oriented Business
Processes with WS-BPEL", Master Thesis, University of
Stuttgart, 2008.
- John
Krogstie (2005). EEML2005: Extended Enterprise Modeling
Language
- John
Krogstie (2001). "A Semiotic Approach to Quality in
Requirements Specifications" (Proc. IFIP 8.1) IFIP 8.1. Working
Conference on Organizational Semiotics.
- Lin Liu, Eric Yu. "Designing information systems in social
context: a goal and scenario modelling approach"
External
links