Family 1: Wikis

Advertisements

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Encyclopedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Family 1 is a group of the GreekGospel manuscripts, varying in date from the 12th to the 15th century. The group takes its name from the minuscule codex 1, now in the Basel University Library. "Family 1" is also known as "the Lake Group", symbolized as f1. Hermann von Soden calls the group Ih. Aland lists it as Category III in the Gospels and Category V elsewhere.[1]

Family 1 was discovered in 1902, when Kirsopp Lake (1872–1946) published Codex 1 of the Gospels and its Allies (118, 131, 209), and established the existence new textual family. This group of manuscripts was based on four minuscules (1, 118, 131, 209), but now we consider 205, 205abs, 872 (in Mark only), 884 (in part), 1582, 2193, and 2542 (in part) to be members of the family.

The most obvious characteristic of the Lake Group is that these manuscripts placed Pericope adulterae (John 7:53-8:11) after John 21:25. Manuscripts of this family include the Longer ending of Mark to the text, but the manuscripts 1 and 1582 contain a scholion questioning the authenticity of Mark 16:9-20: Εν τισι μεν των αντιγραφων εως ωδε πληρουται ο ευαγγελιστης εως ου και Ευσεβιος ο Παμφιλου εκανονισεν εν πολλοις δε και ταυτα φερεται.[2]

In Mark 6:51 word εξίσταντο was changed into εξεπλήσσοντο against all other manuscripts.

B. H. Streeter, working largely on the basis of data supplied by Lake, proposed that Family 1, along with the Codex Koridethi (Θ), Family 13, the minuscules 28, 565, 700, and the Armenian and Georgian versions, were the remnants of what he labelled the Caesarean Text, differing in a number of common respects from the then established Byzantine, Western and Alexandrian text-types.

Anderson made a new reconstruction of the family tree and showed than minuscule 1582 is a more exact representation than 1 of the text of the archetype.

Within the family, there are three manuscripts which may be more closely related. Each one of them is copied from the next older one:

209
  ↓
205
  ↓
205abs[3]

Contents

Notable family readings

Matthew 1:11

τον Ιωακιμ, Ιωακιμ δε εγεννεσεν (Ioakim, Ioakim begot) — M, Θ, f1, 33, syrh and other mss.[4]

Matthew 2:18

κλαυθμὸς — 1-22-582, א, B, Z, 0250, 372, 2211, it, syr, eth
θρηνος και — 131-205-209-872-1192-1210-1278-2193, C, D, L, W, f13, 33, 700, 892

Matthew 5:44

ευλογειτε τους καταρωμενους υμας, καλως ποιειτε τοις μισουσιν υμας (bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you)
omitted by א, B, f1 k syrc, s copsa, bo;[5]

Matthew 6:5

προσεύχησθε οὐκ ἔσεσθε — 1-22-118-205-209-1278*-1582, Sinaiticus2, B, Z, 372, 660, 892
προσευχη ουκ εση — 131-1192-1210-2193, 1278c, D, L, W, Δ, Θ, f13, 28, 33, 565, 579, 700, 1424

Matthew 6:12

ἀφήκαμεν — 1-22-1582, א*, B, Z, 660, 1365
ἀφίεμεν — 118-131-205-209-1192-1210-1278-2193,
αφιομεν/αφιωμεν — D L W Δ Θ 157 565

Matthew 6:18

κρυφαίω (twice) — 1, 22, 1582
κρυπτω — 118, 131, 205, 209, 1192, 1210, 1278, 2193

Matthew 7:28

πάντες — 1, 22, 118, 205, 209, 1278, 1528, Δ, Θ, 697, 1278
omit — 131, 872, 1192, 1210, 2193, א, B

Matthew 8:12

εν τω Ισραηλ omitted

Matthew 8:13

παῖς — 1, 22, 118, 205, 209, 1210*, 1582, א, B, 0250, 0281, 33
παῖς αὐτοῦ — 131, 872, 1192, 1210, 2193, 1210c, C, L, W, Δ, Θ, f13, 157, 565, 579, 700, 1424[6]

Matthew 8:13b

It has additional text (see Luke 7:10): και υποστρεψας ο εκατονταρχος εις τον οικον αυτου εν αυτη τη ωρα ευρεν τον παιδα υγιαινοντα (and when the centurion returned to the house in that hour, he found the slave well) as well as codices א, C, (N), Θ, (0250), (33, 1241), g1, syrh.[7]

Matthew 9:30

ενεβριμηθη — 1, 22, 118, 205, 209, 1582, א, B, 660, 892
ενεβριμησατο — 131, 872, 1192, 1210, 1278, 2193

Matthew 19:16

διδασκαλε (teacher) — א, B, D, L, f1, 892txt, 1010, 1365, 5, ita, d, e, ff1, copbo, eth, geo, Origen, Hilary;
διδασκαλε αγαθε (good teacher) — C, K, W, Δ, Θ, f13, 28, 33, 565, 700, 892mg, 1009, 1071, 1079, 1195, 1216, 1230, 1241, 1242, 1253, 1344, 1546, 1646, 2148, 2174, Byz, Lect, it, vg, syr, copsa, arm, eth, Diatessaron.[8]

Matthew 20:23

και το βαπτισμα ο εγω βαπτιζομαι βαπτισθησεσθε (and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with)
omitted — Sinaiticus, B, D, L, Z, Θ, 085, f1, f13, it, syrs, c, copsa.[9]

Matthew 25:41

ο ητοιμασεν ο πατηρ μου τω διαβολω (witch prepared my Father for the devil) — together Codex Bezae
το ητοιμασμενον τω διαβολω (prepared for the devil) as have majority of the manuscripts.[10]

Matthew 27:35

τα ιματια μου εαυτοις, και επι τον ιματισμον μου εβαλον κληρον — Δ, Θ, 0250, f13, 537, 1424.

Mark 4:37

ωστε αυτο ηδη βυθιζεσθαι — f1
ωστε ηδη γεμιζεσθαι το πλοιον — mojorit of mss.

Mark 10:40

ητοιμασται υπο του πατρος μου — א*, b, (Θ παρα), f1 1071 1241 ( 60 ητοιμασται παρα του πατρος) ita, itr1 Diatessaron
ητοιμασται — majority mss

Mark 11:1

Βηθσφαγη — B2, Γ, f1, 1241
Βηθφαγη — majority of mss

Mark 11:10

ευλογημενη η βασιλεια του πατρος ημων Δαβιδ Ωσαννα εν τοις υψιστοις ειρηνη εν ουρανω και δοξα εν υψιστοις — Θ, 1-131-209
η ερχομενη βασιλεια εν ονοματι Κυριου ευλογημενη η βασιλεια του πατρος ημων Δαβιδ Ωσαννα εν τοις υψιστοις — 118

Luke 11:4

αλλα ρυσαι ημας απο του πονηρου (but deliver us from evil) omitted. Omission is supported by the manuscripts: Sinaiticus, B, L, f1 700 vg syrs copsa, bo, arm geo.[11]

Wisse's group profile

According to Wisse the group profiles of the Lake's Family in Luke 1, 10, and 20 are:

Luke 1: 9, 11, 17, 20, (22), 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, (34), 36, 37, 40, 43, (47), 48, 50, 51, 53.
Luke 10: 2, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, 15, 20, 22, (23), 27, (29), 34, 37, 40, 44, 45, 46, 49, 50, 51, 52, 54, 55, 56, 58, 59, 62.
Luke 20: 1, 5, 6, (7), 10, 11, 14, 19, 20, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 33, 41, 44, 45, 48, 51, 56, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 66, 67, 68, 69, 72, 75, 76.[12]

Relationship to the Textus Receptus

A comparison of the texts of the four Lake's manuscripts with the text of Stephanus shows that in the sections comprising Matthew 1-10; Matthew 22 - Mark 14; Luke 4-23; John 1-13; 18 there are in codex 1 2243 variants from the Textus Receptus, 1731 of these are found in codices 118, 209, and 214 more in 209, though not in 118.[13] Similarly for the sections comprising Mark 1-5 and Luke 1-24 there are in codex 1 1188 variants from the text of Stephanus, 804 of these are found in 131, which elsewhere agrees very closely with the text of Stephanus.[13] Lake did not enumarate itacistic differences.[13]

See also

References

  1. ^ Kurt Aland, and Barbara Aland, "The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism", transl. Erroll F. Rhodes, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1995, p. 129.
  2. ^ Kirsopp Lake, Codex 1 of the Gospels and its Allies, Texts and Studies 1902, s. 92.
  3. ^ D. C. Parker, New Testament Manuscripts and Their Texts, Cambridge University Press 2008, p. 138.
  4. ^ NA26, p. 2.
  5. ^ UBS3, p. 16.
  6. ^ Amy S. Anderson, The Textual tradition of the Gospels: Family 1 in Matthew, Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2004, pp. 121-123.
  7. ^ NA26, p. 18
  8. ^ UBS3, p. 74.
  9. ^ NA26, 56.
  10. ^ NA26, p. 74
  11. ^ UBS3, p. 256.
  12. ^ Frederik Wisse, The profile method for the classification and evaluation of manuscript evidence, William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1982, p. 106.
  13. ^ a b c Kirsopp Lake, Codex 1 of the Gospels and its Allies, Texts and Studies, volume vii, Cambridge, 1902, p. XXIV.

Bibliography

  • Kirsopp Lake, Codex 1 of the Gospels and its Allies, Texts and Studies, volume vii, Cambridge, 1902. (collates 1 with 118, 131, and 209).
  • Hermann von Soden, Die Schriften des Neuen Testaments in ihrer ältesten erreichbaren Textgestalt hergestellt auf Grund ihrer Textgeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1913.
  • B. H. Streeter, The four Gospels a Study of Origins the Manuscript Tradition, Sources, Autorship, & Dates, Oxford 1924, pp. 77–107.
  • Amy S. Anderson, The textual tradition of the Gospels: Family 1 in Matthew, Leiden; Brill, 2004.

External links

  • Family 1 at the Encyclopedia of Textual Criticism
Advertisements

Advertisements






Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message