From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Fishman Affidavit is a set of court
documents submitted by ex-Scientologist Steven Fishman in 1993 in the federal
case, Church of Scientology International v. Fishman and
Geertz (Case No. CV 91-6426 (HLH (Tx) U.S. District Court for
the Central District of California).
The Affidavit contained criticisms of the Church
of Scientology and substantial portions of the Operating
Thetan course materials.
Church
of Scientology International v. Fishman and Geertz
The documents were brought as exhibits attached to a declaration
by Steven Fishman on 9 April, 1993 as part of Church of
Scientology International v. Fishman and Geertz. Along with Kendrick Moxon
and Laurie Bartilson, Timothy Bowles was one of the lead attorneys
for the Church of Scientology in the case[1].
Fishman told the court that he had committed crimes on behalf of
the Church. He also attested that he was assigned to murder his psychologist, Dr. Uwe
Geertz, and then commit suicide.[2][3]
As evidence, Fishman submitted course materials he said that he
purchased from Ellie Bolger, a fellow Scientologist, and Richard Ofshe, an
expert witness for his defense. The Church says the documents were
stolen and considers them to be copyrighted and a trade secret.[4] Among
other materials, the affidavit contains 61 pages of the allegedly
trade-secret and copyrighted story of Xenu.
The Fishman Affidavit contains much text from the old versions
of the Operating Thetan levels. The versions of OT I to OT VII in
the Fishman Affidavit are considered authentic as the church's Religious Technology Center
brought copyright
lawsuits over their release on the Internet. Fishman's description of OT VIII contains the accusation
that Jesus was a pedophile. After initially asserting
copyright to all the OT level descriptions in the affidavit, RTC
amended its claim to remove the OT VIII description, calling it a
forgery. Fishman stated that he had obtained his copy of OT VIII
from Ofshe, a different source than his copies of the other OT
Levels, purchased from a fellow Scientologist.[5]
The Church of Scientology dropped its libel case against Fishman
and Geertz in 1994.[6]
An important side aspect of the case was the fact that several
highranking Scientology officials and lead attorneys for the
organization and former highranking Scientologists submitted
declarations on their activities for the Church of Scientology,
giving thereby insight into the internal ongoings of the
Scientology management.
Among others, declarations were submitted by:
- Richard & Vicki Aznaran, former executives of the Religious Technology
Center
- Jonathan Epstein, at that time "International Finance
Director" of the Church of Scientology
International[7]
- Guillaume Lesevre, at that time Executive Director
International of the Church of Scientology International[8]
- David
Miscavige, Chairman of the Board of the Religious Technology
Center[9]
- Raymond Mithoff, at that time "Senior Case Supervisor
International" of the Church of Scientology International[10]
- Thomas Spring, tax attorney for the Church of Scientology
International[11]
- Norman Starkey, at that time Executive
Director of Author Services Inc.[12]
- André
Tabayoyon, Ex-Scientologist and former security official of the
Church of Scientology International
- William Walsh, attorney for different organizations of the Church
of Scientology[13]
- Marc Yager, at that time Chairman of the "Watchdog Committee" of the
Church of Scientology International[14]
- Monique Yingling, tax attorney for the Church of Scientology
International[15]
- Robert Vaughn Young, former
spokesperson for the Guardian's Office
and Author Services Inc.
- Stacy Brooks
Young, former official of the U.S. Office of Special
Affairs
Posted to
the Internet
Although the Church of Scientology attempted to prevent others
from receiving the document by continuously borrowing it, the text
of this declaration and its exhibits were scanned, OCR'd and converted to
text and posted onto the Usenet newsgroup alt.religion.scientology by
ex-Scientologist Arnie Lerma[16].
The material was then placed on the World Wide Web by David S.
Touretzky.
Lerma's newsgroup posting resulted in the August 1995 raid of
his home for copyright violation on the materials, and the
resulting lawsuit Religious Technology Center (Scientology) vs
Arnaldo Lerma, Richard Leiby, and The Washington Post[16].
U.S. Federal Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled that while
Richard Leiby and the Washington Post had
not violated copyright, Lerma was liable and fined $2,500 but with
no costs awarded to Scientology. Judge Brinkema also stated that
the primary motivation for the case was "to stifle criticism of
Scientology in general and to harass its critics."[17][18]
After being posted to the newsgroup, the documents were mirrored
on hundreds of websites worldwide.[19]
The Church of Scientology responded by suing a number of people and their Internet service providers
for copyright
infringement. The defendants responded by challenging the
church to prove it was actually the copyright holder of the
disputed documents.
The other notable case in connection with this was against Dutch writer Karin Spaink. The
Church brought suit on copyright violation grounds for reproducing
the source material, and claimed rewordings would reveal a trade
secret. In 2003, Spaink won the case, with the court holding that
her quotation of Scientology works was acceptable and expressing
concern about Scientology's attempts to prevent discussion of its
doctrines.[20] The
Church appealed but dropped the case after a negative advice on the
appeal from the Attorney-General to the court in March 2005. In
December 2005 the court dismissed the appeal, making the previous
ruling final. The Church has no further possibility for appeal due
to their dropping the case. The ruling also reversed earlier
decisions affecting hyperlinking.[21]
Critics of the church have accused it of intentionally using
lawsuits in these and other cases as SLAPP
suits, intended to silence their opposition. Critics of Steven
Fishman have produced the affidavit of Kenneth D. Long, a
Scientology executive, which states that Fishman received services
from a Scientology mission, did a few introductory courses, never
worked for the Church or CCHR, and did not get any auditing or do
any courses at the main Miami church, which would conflict with his
claims.[22] Vicki
Aznaran, a former Scientologist who was involved in
anti-Scientology litigation before retracting her claims as part of
a settlement with Scientology, gave a declaration through
Scientology attorneys in which she states various allegations made
by Steven Fishman and other church critics are untrue,[23]
contradicting her previous declaration given in CSI v. Fishman
and Geertz.[24]
References
- ^
Gonnet, Roger (1998). La secte:
secte armée pour la guerre. Alban. pp. 212. ISBN
2911751043.
- ^ Behar, Richard (1991-05-06). "The Thriving Cult of Greed
and Power". Time. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,972865-1,00.html. Retrieved
2008-01-26.
- ^ Ortega, Tony (1999-12-23). "Double Crossed". Phoenix New
Times. Village Voice Media. http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/1999-12-23/news/double-crossed/full. Retrieved
2008-01-26.
- ^
"Court TV Library".
Court TV Online Legal Documents. 1999-11-28. http://www.courttv.com/archive/legaldocs/cyberlaw/scientology3.html. Retrieved 2007-08-22.
"Plaintiff claims that these documents are protected from both
unauthorized use and unauthorized disclosure under the copyright
laws of the United States and under trade secret laws,
respectively."
- ^
Press Release by Steven
Fishman, "Press Release: Scientology upper level references (OT
materials) affirmed unsealed and in the public domain by United
States Court of Appeals.", Pages 1-7., April 28, 1994.
- ^
Garcia, Wayne (1994-07-07). "Church of Scientology
settles suit with PR firm". St. Petersburg Times. http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/sptimes/access/51847739.html?dids=51847739:51847739&FMT=FT. Retrieved 2008-01-26.
"Earlier this year, Scientology dropped its libel case against
former Scientologist Steve Fishman and his therapist, Uwe
Geertz."
- ^
Declaration of Jonathan Epstein, Church of Scientology
International vs. Steven Fishman & Uwe Geertz, Case No. CV
91-6426 (HLH (Tx), U.S. District Court for the Central District of
California, Los Angeles, February 7th, 1994
- ^
Declaration of Guillaume Lesevre, Church of Scientology
International vs. Steven Fishman & Uwe Geertz, Case No. CV
91-6426 (HLH (Tx), U.S. District Court for the Central District of
California, Los Angeles, February 7th, 1994
- ^
Declaration of David Miscavige, Church of Scientology International
vs. Steven Fishman & Uwe Geertz, Case No. CV 91-6426 (HLH (Tx),
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Los
Angeles, February 8th, 1994
- ^
Declaration of Raymond Mithoff, Church of Scientology International
vs. Steven Fishman & Uwe Geertz, Case No. CV 91-6426 (HLH (Tx),
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Los
Angeles, February 7th, 1994
- ^
Declaration of Thomas Spring, Church of Scientology International
vs. Steven Fishman & Uwe Geertz, Case No. CV 91-6426 (HLH (Tx),
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Los
Angeles, February 7th, 1994
- ^
Declaration of Norman Starkey, Church of Scientology International
vs. Steven Fishman & Uwe Geertz, Case No. CV 91-6426 (HLH (Tx),
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Los
Angeles, February 7th, 1994
- ^
Declaration of William Walsh, Church of Scientology International
vs. Steven Fishman & Uwe Geertz, Case No. CV 91-6426 (HLH (Tx),
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Los
Angeles, February 8th, 1994
- ^
Declaration of Marc Yager, Church of Scientology International vs.
Steven Fishman & Uwe Geertz, Case No. CV 91-6426 (HLH (Tx),
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Los
Angeles, February 7th, 1994
- ^
Declaration of Monique Yingling, Church of Scientology
International vs. Steven Fishman & Uwe Geertz, Case No. CV
91-6426 (HLH (Tx), U.S. District Court for the Central District of
California, Los Angeles, February 7th, 1994
- ^ a
b
"Civil Action No.
95-1107-A". Electronic Frontier
Foundation. http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/Scientology_cases/brinkema_rtc_washpost_112895.opinion. Retrieved
2007-10-10.
- ^ Prendergast, Alan (1997-03-06). "Nightmare on the Net".
Denver Westword.
Village
Voice Media. http://www.westword.com/1997-03-06/news/nightmare-on-the-net/full. Retrieved
2008-07-08.
- ^ Prendergast, Alan (1997-08-14). "Hush-Hush Money". Denver Westword. Village
Voice Media. http://www.westword.com/1997-08-14/news/hush-hush-money/full. Retrieved
2008-07-08.
- ^ ""OT III Scholarship
Page"". David S. Touretzky. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/OTIII. Retrieved
2007-10-10.
- ^
Grossman, Wendy M. (2003-09-12). "The mills of Xenu grind
exceeding slow". The Inquirer. http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=11516. Retrieved
2007-10-30.
- ^ ""Hyperlinks remain legal
after Scientology defeat"". ZDNet UK.
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/itmanagement/0,1000000308,39116197,00.htm. Retrieved
2007-10-10.
- ^
[1] Affidavit of
Kenneth D. Long, April 10, 1991
- ^
[2] The Declaration
of Vicki Aznaran
- ^
[3] The Declaration
of Vicki Aznaran in CSI v. Fishman and Geertz, April 4, 1994.
See also
External
links