# The Full Wiki

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

# Encyclopedia

In numerical analysis, a quadrature rule is an approximation of the definite integral of a function, usually stated as a weighted sum of function values at specified points within the domain of integration. (See numerical integration for more on quadrature rules.) An n-point Gaussian quadrature rule, named after Carl Friedrich Gauss, is a quadrature rule constructed to yield an exact result for polynomials of degree 2n − 1 or less by a suitable choice of the points xi and weights wi for i = 1,...,n. The domain of integration for such a rule is conventionally taken as [−1, 1], so the rule is stated as

$\int_{-1}^1 f(x)\,dx \approx \sum_{i=1}^n w_i f(x_i).$

Gaussian quadrature as above will only produce accurate results if the function f(x) is well approximated by a polynomial function within the range [-1,1]. The method is, for example, not suitable for functions with singularities.

Common weighting functions include $W(x)=(1-x^2)^{-1/2}\,$ (Gauss-Chebyshev) and $W(x)=e^{-x^2}$ (Gauss-Hermite).

It can be shown (see Press, et al., or Stoer and Bulirsch) that the evaluation points are just the roots of a polynomial belonging to a class of orthogonal polynomials.

## Rules for the basic problem

For the integration problem stated above, the associated polynomials are Legendre polynomials, Pn(x). With the nth polynomial normalized to give Pn(1) = 1, the ith Gauss node, xi, is the ith root of Pn; its weight is given by (Abramowitz & Stegun 1972, p. 887)

$w_i = \frac{2}{\left( 1-x_i^2 \right) (P'_n(x_i))^2} \,\!$

Some low-order rules for solving the integration problem are listed below.

Number of points, n Points, xi Weights, wi
1 0 2
2 $\pm 1/\sqrt{3}$ 1
3 0 89
$\pm\sqrt{3/5}$ 59
4 $\pm\sqrt{\Big( 3 - 2\sqrt{6/5} \Big)/7}$ $\tfrac{18+\sqrt{30}}{36}$
$\pm\sqrt{\Big( 3 + 2\sqrt{6/5} \Big)/7}$ $\tfrac{18-\sqrt{30}}{36}$
5 0 128225
$\pm\tfrac13\sqrt{5-2\sqrt{10/7}}$ $\tfrac{322+13\sqrt{70}}{900}$
$\pm\tfrac13\sqrt{5+2\sqrt{10/7}}$ $\tfrac{322-13\sqrt{70}}{900}$

## Change of interval for Gaussian quadrature

An integral over [a, b] must be changed into an integral over [−1, 1] before applying the Gaussian quadrature rule. This change of interval can be done in the following way:

$\int_a^b f(x)\,dx = \frac{b-a}{2} \int_{-1}^1 f\left(\frac{b-a}{2}x + \frac{a+b}{2}\right)\,dx$

After applying the Gaussian quadrature rule, the following approximation is:

$\int_a^b f(x)\,dx \approx \frac{b-a}{2} \sum_{i=1}^n w_i f\left(\frac{b-a}{2}x_i + \frac{a+b}{2}\right)$

## Other forms of Gaussian quadrature

The integration problem can be expressed in a slightly more general way by introducing a positive weight function ω into the integrand, and allowing an interval other than [−1, 1]. That is, the problem is to calculate

$\int_a^b \omega(x)\,f(x)\,dx$

for some choices of a, b, and ω. For a = −1, b = 1, and ω(x) = 1, the problem is the same as that considered above. Other choices lead to other integration rules. Some of these are tabulated below. Equation numbers are given for Abramowitz and Stegun (A & S).

Interval ω(x) Orthogonal polynomials A & S For more information, see …
[−1, 1] $1\,$ Legendre polynomials 25.4.29 Section Rules for the basic problem, above
(−1, 1) $(1-x)^\alpha (1+x)^\beta,\quad \alpha, \beta > -1\,$ Jacobi polynomials 25.4.33 (β = 0)
(−1, 1) $\frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - x^2}}$ Chebyshev polynomials (first kind) 25.4.38 Chebyshev–Gauss quadrature
[−1, 1] $\sqrt{1 - x^2}$ Chebyshev polynomials (second kind) 25.4.40 Chebyshev–Gauss quadrature
[0, ∞) $e^{-x}\,$ Laguerre polynomials 25.4.45 Gauss–Laguerre quadrature
(−∞, ∞) $e^{-x^2}$ Hermite polynomials 25.4.46 Gauss–Hermite quadrature

### Fundamental theorem

Let pn be a nontrivial polynomial of degree n such that

$\int_a^b \omega(x) \, x^k p_n(x) \, dx = 0, \quad \text{for all }k=0,1,\ldots,n-1.$

If we pick the n nodes xi to be the zeros of pn , then there exist n weights wi which make the Gauss-quadrature computed integral exact for all polynomials h(x) of degree 2n − 1 or less. Furthermore, all these nodes xi will lie in the open interval (a, b) (Stoer & Bulirsch 2002, pp. 172–175).

The polynomial pn is said to be an orthogonal polynomial of degree n associated to the weight function ω(x). It is unique up to a constant normalization factor. The idea underlying the proof is that, because of its sufficiently low degree, h(x) can be divided by pn(x) to produce quotient q(x) and remainder r(x), both latter polynomials which will have degree strictly lower than n, so that both will be orthogonal to pn(x), by the defining property of pn(x). Thus

$\int_a^b \omega(x)\,h(x)\,dx = \int_a^b \omega(x)\,r(x)\,dx$.

Because of the choice of nodes xi , the corresponding relation

$\sum_{i=1}^n w_i h(x_i) = \sum_{i=1}^n w_i r(x_i)$

holds also. The exactness of the computed integral for h(x) then follows from corresponding exactness for polynomials of degree only n or less (as is r(x)). This (superficially less exacting) requirement can now be satisfied by choosing the weights wi equal to the integrals (using same weight function ω) of the Lagrange basis polynomials $\ell_i(x)$ of these particular n nodes xi.

### Computation of Gaussian quadrature rules

For computing the nodes xi and weights wi of Gaussian quadrature rules, the fundamental tool is the three-term recurrence relation satisfied by the set of orthogonal polynomials associated to the corresponding weight function. For n points, these nodes and weights can be computed in O(n2) operations by the following algorithm.

If, for instance, pn is the monic orthogonal polynomial of degree n (the orthogonal polynomial of degree n with the highest degree coefficient equal to one), one can show that such orthogonal polynomials are related through the recurrence relation

$p_{n+1}(x)+(B_n-x)p_n (x)+A_n p_{n-1}(x)=0, \qquad n=1,2,\ldots$

From this, nodes and weights can be computed from the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of an associated linear algebra problem. This is usually named as the Golub–Welsch algorithm (Gil, Segura & Temme 2007).

The starting idea comes from the observation that, if xi is a root of the orthogonal polynomial pn then, using the previous recurrence formula for $k=0,1,\ldots, n-1$ and because pn(xj) = 0, we have

$J\tilde{P}=x_j \tilde{P}$

where $\tilde{P}=[p_0 (x_j),p_1 (x_j),...,p_{n-1}(x_j)]^{T}$

and J is the so-called Jacobi matrix:

$\mathbf{J}=\left( \begin{array}{llllll} B_0 & 1 & 0 & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots\ A_1 & B_1 & 1 & 0 & \ldots & \ldots \ 0 & A_2 & B_2 & 1 & 0 & \ldots \ \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots \ \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & A_{n-2} & B_{n-2} & 1 \ \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & A_{n-1} & B_{n-1} \end{array} \right).$

The nodes of gaussian quadrature can therefore be computed as the eigenvalues of a tridiagonal matrix.

For computing the weights and nodes, it is preferable to consider the symmetric tridiagonal matrix $\mathcal{J}$ with elements $\mathcal{J}_{i,i}=J_{i,i}$, $i=1,\ldots,n$ and $\mathcal{J}_{i-1,i}=\mathcal{J}_{i,i-1}=\sqrt{J_{i,i-1}J_{i-1,i}},\, i=2,\ldots,n$. $\mathbf{J}$ and $\mathcal{J}$ are equivalent and therefore have the same eigenvalues (the nodes). The weights can be computed from the matrix J. If φ(j) is a normalized eigenvector (i.e., an eigenvector with euclidean norm equal to one) associated to the eigenvalue xj, the corresponding weight can be computed from the first component of this eigenvector, namely:

$w_j=\mu_0 \left(\phi_1^{(j)}\right)^2$

where μ0 is the integral of the weight function

$\mu_0=\int_a^b w(x) dx.$

See, for instance, (Gil, Segura & Temme 2007) for further details.

### Error estimates

The error of a Gaussian quadrature rule can be stated as follows (Stoer & Bulirsch 2002, Thm 3.6.24). For an integrand which has 2n continuous derivatives,

$\int_a^b \omega(x)\,f(x)\,dx - \sum_{i=1}^n w_i\,f(x_i) = \frac{f^{(2n)}(\xi)}{(2n)!} \, (p_n,p_n)$

for some ξ in (a, b), where pn is the orthogonal polynomial of degree n and where

$(f,g) = \int_a^b \omega(x) f(x) g(x) \, dx . \,\!$

In the important special case of ω(x) = 1, we have the error estimate (Kahaner, Moler & Nash 1989, §5.2)

$\frac{(b-a)^{2n+1} (n!)^4}{(2n+1)[(2n)!]^3} f^{(2n)} (\xi) , \qquad a < \xi < b . \,\!$

Stoer and Bulirsch remark that this error estimate is inconvenient in practice, since it may be difficult to estimate the order 2n derivative, and furthermore the actual error may be much less than a bound established by the derivative. Another approach is to use two Gaussian quadrature rules of different orders, and to estimate the error as the difference between the two results. For this purpose, Gauss–Kronrod quadrature rules can be useful.

Important consequence of the above equation is that Gaussian quadrature of order n is accurate for all polynomials up to degree 2n–1.

### Gauss–Kronrod rules

If the interval [a, b] is subdivided, the Gauss evaluation points of the new subintervals never coincide with the previous evaluation points (except at zero for odd numbers), and thus the integrand must be evaluated at every point. Gauss–Kronrod rules are extensions of Gauss quadrature rules generated by adding n + 1 points to an n-point rule in such a way that the resulting rule is of order 3n + 1. This allows for computing higher-order estimates while re-using the function values of a lower-order estimate. The difference between a Gauss quadrature rule and its Kronrod extension are often used as an estimate of the approximation error.

### Gauss-Lobatto rules

Also known as Lobatto quadrature (Abramowitz & Stegun 1972, p. 888), named after Dutch mathematician Rehuel Lobatto.

It is similar to Gaussian quadrature with the following differences:

1. The integration points include the end points of the integration interval.
2. It is accurate for polynomials up to degree 2n–3, where n is the number of integration points.

Lobatto quadrature of function f(x) on interval [–1, +1]:

$\int_{-1}^{1}{f(x) \, dx} = \frac {1} {n(n-1)}[f(1) + f(-1)] + \sum_{i = 2} ^{n-1} {w_i f(x_i)} + R_n.$

Abscissas: xi is the (i − 1)st zero of P'n − 1(x).

Weights:

$w_i = \frac{2}{n(n-1)[P_{n-1}(x_i)]^2} \quad (x_i \ne \pm 1).$

Remainder: $R_n = \frac {- n (n-1)^3 2^{2n-1} [(n-2)!]^4} {(2n-1) [(2n-3)!]^3} f^{(2n-2)}(\xi), \quad (-1 < \xi < 1)$

## References

In numerical analysis, a quadrature rule is an approximation of the definite integral of a function, usually stated as a weighted sum of function values at specified points within the domain of integration. (See numerical integration for more on quadrature rules.) An n-point Gaussian quadrature rule, named after Carl Friedrich Gauss, is a quadrature rule constructed to yield an exact result for polynomials of degree 2n − 1 or less by a suitable choice of the points xi and weights wi for i = 1,...,n. The domain of integration for such a rule is conventionally taken as [−1, 1], so the rule is stated as

$\int_\left\{-1\right\}^1 f\left(x\right)\,dx \approx \sum_\left\{i=1\right\}^n w_i f\left(x_i\right).$

Gaussian quadrature as above will only produce accurate results if the function f(x) is well approximated by a polynomial function within the range [-1,1]. The method is not, for example, suitable for functions with singularities. However, if the integrated function can be written as $f\left(x\right) = W\left(x\right) g\left(x\right)\,$, where g(x) is approximately polynomial, and W(x) is known, then there are alternative weights $w_i$ such that

$\int_\left\{-1\right\}^1 f\left(x\right)\,dx = \int_\left\{-1\right\}^1 W\left(x\right) g\left(x\right)\,dx \approx \sum_\left\{i=1\right\}^n w_i g\left(x_i\right).$

Common weighting functions include $W\left(x\right)=\left(1-x^2\right)^\left\{-1/2\right\}\,$ (Gauss-Chebyshev) and $W\left(x\right)=e^\left\{-x^2\right\}$ (Gauss-Hermite).

It can be shown (see Press, et al., or Stoer and Bulirsch) that the evaluation points are just the roots of a polynomial belonging to a class of orthogonal polynomials.

## Rules for the basic problem

For the integration problem stated above, the associated polynomials are Legendre polynomials, Pn(x). With the nth polynomial normalized to give Pn(1) = 1, the ith Gauss node, xi, is the ith root of Pn; its weight is given by (Abramowitz & Stegun 1972, p. 887)

$w_i = \frac\left\{2\right\}\left\{\left\left( 1-x_i^2 \right\right) \left[P\text{'}_n\left(x_i\right)\right]^2\right\} \,\!$

Some low-order rules for solving the integration problem are listed below.

Number of points, n Points, xi Weights, wi
1 0 2
2 $\pm 1/\sqrt\left\{3\right\}$ 1
3 0 89
$\pm\sqrt\left\{15\right\}/5$ 59
4 $\pm\sqrt\left\{\Big\left( 3 - 2\sqrt\left\{6/5\right\} \Big\right)/7\right\}$ $\tfrac\left\{18+\sqrt\left\{30\right\}\right\}\left\{36\right\}$
$\pm\sqrt\left\{\Big\left( 3 + 2\sqrt\left\{6/5\right\} \Big\right)/7\right\}$ $\tfrac\left\{18-\sqrt\left\{30\right\}\right\}\left\{36\right\}$
5 0 128225
$\pm\tfrac13\sqrt\left\{5-2\sqrt\left\{10/7\right\}\right\}$ $\tfrac\left\{322+13\sqrt\left\{70\right\}\right\}\left\{900\right\}$
$\pm\tfrac13\sqrt\left\{5+2\sqrt\left\{10/7\right\}\right\}$ $\tfrac\left\{322-13\sqrt\left\{70\right\}\right\}\left\{900\right\}$

## Change of interval for Gaussian quadrature

An integral over [a, b] must be changed into an integral over [−1, 1] before applying the Gaussian quadrature rule. This change of interval can be done in the following way:



\int_a^b f(x)\,dx = \frac{b-a}{2} \int_{-1}^1 f\left(\frac{b-a}{2}x + \frac{a+b}{2}\right)\,dx

After applying the Gaussian quadrature rule, the following approximation is:



\int_a^b f(x)\,dx \approx \frac{b-a}{2} \sum_{i=1}^n w_i f\left(\frac{b-a}{2}x_i + \frac{a+b}{2}\right)

## Other forms

The integration problem can be expressed in a slightly more general way by introducing a positive weight function ω into the integrand, and allowing an interval other than [−1, 1]. That is, the problem is to calculate

$\int_a^b \omega\left(x\right)\,f\left(x\right)\,dx$

for some choices of a, b, and ω. For a = −1, b = 1, and ω(x) = 1, the problem is the same as that considered above. Other choices lead to other integration rules. Some of these are tabulated below. Equation numbers are given for Abramowitz and Stegun (A & S).

Interval ω(x) Orthogonal polynomials A & S For more information, see ...
[−1, 1] $1\,$ Legendre polynomials 25.4.29 Section Rules for the basic problem, above
(−1, 1) $\left(1-x\right)^\alpha \left(1+x\right)^\beta,\quad \alpha, \beta > -1\,$ Jacobi polynomials 25.4.33 ($\beta=0$)
(−1, 1) $\frac\left\{1\right\}\left\{\sqrt\left\{1 - x^2\right\}\right\}$ Chebyshev polynomials (first kind) 25.4.38 Chebyshev–Gauss quadrature
[−1, 1] $\sqrt\left\{1 - x^2\right\}$ Chebyshev polynomials (second kind) 25.4.40 Chebyshev–Gauss quadrature
[0, ∞) $e^\left\{-x\right\}\,$ Laguerre polynomials 25.4.45 Gauss–Laguerre quadrature
(−∞, ∞) $e^\left\{-x^2\right\}$ Hermite polynomials 25.4.46 Gauss–Hermite quadrature

### Fundamental theorem

Let $p_n$ be a nontrivial polynomial of degree n such that



\int_a^b \omega(x) \, x^k p_n(x) \, dx = 0, \quad \text{for all }k=0,1,\ldots,n-1.

If we pick the n nodes xi to be the zeros of pn , then there exist n weights wi which make the Gauss-quadrature computed integral exact for all polynomials $h\left(x\right)$ of degree 2n − 1 or less. Furthermore, all these nodes xi will lie in the open interval (a, b) (Stoer & Bulirsch 2002, pp. 172–175).

The polynomial $p_n$ is said to be an orthogonal polynomial of degree n associated to the weight function $\omega \left(x\right)$. It is unique up to a constant normalization factor. The idea underlying the proof is that, because of its sufficiently low degree, $h\left(x\right)$ can be divided by $p_n\left(x\right)$ to produce quotient $q\left(x\right)$ and remainder $r\left(x\right)$, both latter polynomials which will have degree strictly lower than n, so that both will be orthogonal to $p_n\left(x\right)$, by the defining property of $p_n\left(x\right)$. Thus

$\int_a^b \omega\left(x\right)\,h\left(x\right)\,dx = \int_a^b \omega\left(x\right)\,r\left(x\right)\,dx$.

Because of the choice of nodes xi , the corresponding relation

$\sum_\left\{i=1\right\}^n w_i h\left(x_i\right) = \sum_\left\{i=1\right\}^n w_i r\left(x_i\right)$

holds also. The exactness of the computed integral for $h\left(x\right)$ then follows from corresponding exactness for polynomials of degree only n or less (as is $r\left(x\right)$). This (superficially less exacting) requirement can now be satisfied by choosing the weights wi equal to the integrals (using same weight function $\omega$) of the Lagrange basis polynomials $\ell_i\left(x\right)$ of these particular n nodes xi.

### Computation of Gaussian quadrature rules

For computing the nodes $x_i$ and weights $w_i$ of Gaussian quadrature rules, the fundamental tool is the three-term recurrence relation satisfied by the set of orthogonal polynomials associated to the corresponding weight function. For n points, these nodes and weights can be computed in O(n2) operations by the following algorithm.

If, for instance, $p_n$ is the monic orthogonal polynomial of degree n (the orthogonal polynomial of degree n with the highest degree coefficient equal to one), one can show that such orthogonal polynomials are related through the recurrence relation

$p_\left\{n+1\right\}\left(x\right)+\left(B_n-x\right)p_n \left(x\right)+A_n p_\left\{n-1\right\}\left(x\right)=0, \qquad n=1,2,\ldots$

From this, nodes and weights can be computed from the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of an associated linear algebra problem. This is usually named as the Golub–Welsch algorithm (Gil, Segura & Temme 2007).

The starting idea comes from the observation that, if $x_i$ is a root of the orthogonal polynomial $p_n$ then, using the previous recurrence formula for $k=0,1,\ldots, n-1$ and because $p_n \left(x_j\right)=0$, we have

$J\tilde\left\{P\right\}=x_j \tilde\left\{P\right\}$

where $\tilde\left\{P\right\}=\left[p_0 \left(x_j\right),p_1 \left(x_j\right),...,p_\left\{n-1\right\}\left(x_j\right)\right]^\left\{T\right\}$

and $J$ is the so-called Jacobi matrix:

$\mathbf\left\{J\right\}=\left\left( \begin\left\{array\right\}\left\{llllll\right\} B_0 & 1 & 0 & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots\\ A_1 & B_1 & 1 & 0 & \ldots & \ldots \\ 0 & A_2 & B_2 & 1 & 0 & \ldots \\ \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots \\ \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & A_\left\{n-2\right\} & B_\left\{n-2\right\} & 1 \\ \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & \ldots & A_\left\{n-1\right\} & B_\left\{n-1\right\} \end\left\{array\right\} \right\right).$

The nodes of gaussian quadrature can therefore be computed as the eigenvalues of a tridiagonal matrix.

For computing the weights and nodes, it is preferable to consider the symmetric tridiagonal matrix $\mathcal\left\{J\right\}$ with elements $\mathcal\left\{J\right\}_\left\{i,i\right\}=J_\left\{i,i\right\}=B_\left\{i-1\right\},\, i=1,\ldots,n$ and $\mathcal\left\{J\right\}_\left\{i-1,i\right\}=\mathcal\left\{J\right\}_\left\{i,i-1\right\}=\sqrt\left\{J_\left\{i,i-1\right\}J_\left\{i-1,i\right\}\right\}=\sqrt\left\{A_\left\{i-1\right\}\right\},\, i=2,\ldots,n.$ $\mathbf\left\{J\right\}$ and $\mathcal\left\{J\right\}$ are similar matrices and therefore have the same eigenvalues (the nodes). The weights can be computed from the corresponding eigenvectors: If $\phi^\left\{\left(j\right)\right\}$ is a normalized eigenvector (i.e., an eigenvector with euclidean norm equal to one) associated to the eigenvalue $x_j$, the corresponding weight can be computed from the first component of this eigenvector, namely:

$w_j=\mu_0 \left\left(\phi_1^\left\{\left(j\right)\right\}\right\right)^2$

where $\mu_0$ is the integral of the weight function

$\mu_0=\int_a^b w\left(x\right) dx.$

See, for instance, (Gil, Segura & Temme 2007) for further details.

### Error estimates

The error of a Gaussian quadrature rule can be stated as follows (Stoer & Bulirsch 2002, Thm 3.6.24). For an integrand which has 2n continuous derivatives,

$\int_a^b \omega\left(x\right)\,f\left(x\right)\,dx - \sum_\left\{i=1\right\}^n w_i\,f\left(x_i\right)$
= \frac{f^{(2n)}(\xi)}{(2n)!} \, (p_n,p_n)

for some ξ in (a, b), where pn is the orthogonal polynomial of degree n and where

$\left(f,g\right) = \int_a^b \omega\left(x\right) f\left(x\right) g\left(x\right) \, dx . \,\!$

In the important special case of ω(x) = 1, we have the error estimate (Kahaner, Moler & Nash 1989, §5.2)

$\frac\left\{\left(b-a\right)^\left\{2n+1\right\} \left(n!\right)^4\right\}\left\{\left(2n+1\right)\left[\left(2n\right)!\right]^3\right\} f^\left\{\left(2n\right)\right\} \left(\xi\right) , \qquad a < \xi < b . \,\!$

Stoer and Bulirsch remark that this error estimate is inconvenient in practice, since it may be difficult to estimate the order 2n derivative, and furthermore the actual error may be much less than a bound established by the derivative. Another approach is to use two Gaussian quadrature rules of different orders, and to estimate the error as the difference between the two results. For this purpose, Gauss–Kronrod quadrature rules can be useful.

Important consequence of the above equation is that Gaussian quadrature of order n is accurate for all polynomials up to degree 2n–1.

### Gauss–Kronrod rules

If the interval [a, b] is subdivided, the Gauss evaluation points of the new subintervals never coincide with the previous evaluation points (except at zero for odd numbers), and thus the integrand must be evaluated at every point. Gauss–Kronrod rules are extensions of Gauss quadrature rules generated by adding $n+1$ points to an $n$-point rule in such a way that the resulting rule is of order $3n+1$. This allows for computing higher-order estimates while re-using the function values of a lower-order estimate. The difference between a Gauss quadrature rule and its Kronrod extension are often used as an estimate of the approximation error.

### Gauss-Lobatto rules

Also known as Lobatto quadrature (Abramowitz & Stegun 1972, p. 888), named after Dutch mathematician Rehuel Lobatto.

It is similar to Gaussian quadrature with the following differences:

1. The integration points include the end points of the integration interval.
2. It is accurate for polynomials up to degree 2n–3, where n is the number of integration points.

Lobatto quadrature of function f(x) on interval [–1, +1]:


\int_{-1}^{1}{f(x) \, dx} =
\frac {2} {n(n-1)}[f(1) + f(-1)] +
\sum_{i = 2} ^{n-1} {w_i f(x_i)} + R_n.

Abscissas: $x_i$ is the $\left(i-1\right)$st zero of $P\text{'}_\left\{n-1\right\}\left(x\right)$.

Weights:


w_i = \frac{2}{n(n-1)[P_{n-1}(x_i)]^2} \quad (x_i \ne \pm 1).

Remainder: 

R_n = \frac
{- n (n-1)^3 2^{2n-1} [(n-2)!]^4}
{(2n-1) [(2n-2)!]^3}
f^{(2n-2)}(\xi), \quad (-1 < \xi < 1)