From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Gerontion" is a poem by T. S. Eliot that was first published in 1920. The work relates the opinions and impressions of a gerontic, or elderly man through a dramatic monologue which describes Europe after World War I through the eyes of a man who has lived the majority of his life in the 19th Century. .^[1] Eliot considered using this already published poem as a preface to The Waste Land, but decided to keep it as an independent poem.^[2] Along with The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock and The Waste Land, and other works published by Eliot in the early part of his career, Gerontion discusses themes of religion, sexuality, and other general topics of Modernist poetry.^[3]

History

Eliot was working on the poem after the end of World War One when Europe was undergoing changes as old systems of government and international replations were being replaced. During that time, Eliot was working at Lloyds Bank, editing The Egoist, and trying to publish poetry. Eliot had published in 1920 Ara Vos Prec, a limited printed work that collected his early poems including Gerontion.^[4]

Two earlier versions of the poem can be found, the original typescript of the poem as well as that version with comments by Ezra Pound. In the typescript, the name of the poem is "Gerousia", referring to the name of the Council of the Elders at Sparta. ^[5] Pound who was living in the London, England in 1919, acted as Eliot's editor and influenced many of his works. When Eliot considered publishing the poem as the opening part of The Waste Land, Pound discouraged him from doing so saying, "I do not advise printing Gerontion as preface. One don't miss it at all as the thing now stands. To be more lucid still, let me say that I advise you NOT to print Gerontion as prelude".^[2] The lines were never added to the text and remained an individual poem. ^[5]

The poem

"Gerontion" opens with an epigraph (from Shakespeare's play Measure for Measure) which states:

Thou hast nor youth nor age

But as it were an after dinner sleep

Dreaming of both. ^[6].

The words of the epigraph belong to Duke Vincentio, who, disguised as a friar, offers solace to the imprisoned Claudio as he awaits his impending execution with the solemnity of a man being read his last rites. And this is also written in to ‘Gerontion’: ‘Think at last/ We have not reached conclusion’, the speaker instructs, tendering the thought of an afterlife as the Duke does to Claudio. However, Eliot does not entirely keep faith with Shakespeare’s play. For one thing he misquotes it, dispossessing ‘after dinner sleep’ of an apostrophe ‘s’ after ‘dinner’, and mistaking ‘Dreaming on both’ for ‘Dreaming of both’. This is forgivable, since poetry is not, or should not be, answerable to pedantry. But then what of are we to make of the later misquotation of Lancelot Andrewes, which changes ‘the Word without a word’ to ‘The word within a word’? Surely Eliot, judging from the insistent negatives in the early parts of the poem, means to negate or invert the phrase, as he also does Andrewes’s negative affirmation that ‘Christ is no wild-cat’ with his ‘Christ the tiger’? Make no mistake, this can be no mistake; more like wilful error or formal sin. And after such knowledge, what forgiveness? What forgiveness, one might add, for a man being read his last rites, thinking, if not praying, that we have not reached conclusion, and fearing that the dream to come will make for nothing so cosy as an after dinner sleep. Which is to say that it suits Eliot’s purpose to misremember the lines from Measure for Measure. After all, the poem’s persona is an old man with a decaying mind and a failing memory, memory being the only remnant, as he reminds us, of what’s still believed in.

       -Source:Denis Donoghue, ‘On “Gerontion”’, The Southern Review'

The poem itself is a dramatic monologue by an elderly character that critics believe to be an older version of J. Alfred Prufrock. The use of pronouns such as "us" and "I" regarding the speaker and a member of the opposite sex as well as the general discourse in lines 53-58, in the opinion of Anthony David Moody, presents the same sexual themes that face Prufrock, only this time they meet with the body of an older man.^{[6] [7]} . The poem contains six stanzas of free verse describing the relationship between the narrator and the world around him, ending with a couplet that declares,

Tenants of the house

Thoughts of a dry brain in a dry season."

which describes the monologue as the the production of the "dry brain," of the narrator in the "dry season" of his age. ^[8] Hugh Kenner suggests that these "tenants" are the voices of The Waste Land and that Eliot is describing the method of the poem's narrative by saying that the speaker uses several different voices to express the impressions of Gerontion.^[9].Kenner also suggests that the poem resembles a portion of a Jacobean play as it relates its story in fragmented form and lack of a formal plot.^[10]

Themes

Many of the themes within "Gerontion" are present throughout Eliot's later works, especially within The Waste Land. This is especially true of the internal struggle within the poem and the narrator's "waiting for rain". Time is also altered by allowing past and present to be superimposed, and a series of places and characters connected to various cultures are introduced.^[11]

Religion

To Donald J. Childs, the poem attempts to present the theme of Christianity from the viewpoint of the Modernist individual with various references to the Incarnation and salvation. Childs believes that the poem moves from Christmas Day in line 19: "in the Juvescence of the year," to the Crucifixion in line 21 as it speaks of "Depraved May" and "flowering Judas". He argues that Gerontion contemplates the "paradoxical recovery of freedom through slavery and grace through sin". ^[3]. In line 20, the narrator refers to Jesus as "Christ the tiger", which emphasizes judgment rather than compassion, according to Jewel Spears Brooker in Mystery and Escape:T.S. Eliot and the Dialectic of Modernism. ^[12].

Peter Sharpe states that "Gerontion" is the poem that shows Eliot "taking on the mantle of his New England Puritan forbears" as Gerontion views his life as the product of sin. Sharpe suggests that Christ appears to Gerontion as a scourge because he understands that he must reject the "dead world" in order to obtain the salvation offered by Christianity. ^[13]. However, other critics disagree; Russell Kirk believes that the poem is "a description of life devoid of faith, drearily parched, it is cautionary".^[14] Marion Montgomery claims that Gerontion's "problem is that he can discover no vital presence in the sinful shell of his body".^[15]

In The American T.S. Eliot, Eric Whitman Sigg describes the poem as "a portrait of religious disillusion and despair", and suggests that the poem, like "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock", explores the relationship between action and inaction and their consequences. ^[16] To this, Alfred Kazin adds that Eliot, especially in "Gerontion" shows that "it is easier for God to devour us than for us to partake of Him in a seemly spirit." ^[17]. To Kazin, it is religion, not faith that Eliot describes through the narrative of "Gerontion", and that religion is important not because of its spirituality but because of "the 'culture' it leaves". Kazin suggests that in lines 33-36 the poem attempts to show how Elliot tells his generation that history is "nothing but human depravity:

After such knowledge, what forgiveness? Think now

History has many cunning passages, contrived corridors

And issues, deceives with whispering ambitions,

Guides us by vanities.^[17]

Nasreen Ayaz argues that in the fourth movement of the poem, Gerontion shows that his loss of faith in Christianity has resulted in an emotional sterility to go along with the physical. In that stanza he remembers a former mistress and regrets that he no longer has the ability to interact with her on a physical level. The "closer contact" sought by the narrator represents both the physical longing of intimacy as well as the emotional connection he previously had with the female described in the poem. ^[18]

In lines 17-19, Gerontion alludes to the Pharisees statement to Christ in Matthew 12:38 when they say "Master, we would see a sign from thee."^[19] The narrator of the poem uses these words in a different manner:

Signs are taken for wonders. “We would see a sign!”

The word within a word, unable to speak a word,

Swaddled with darkness.

James Longenbach argues that these lines show that Gerontion is unable to extract the spiritual meaning of the Biblical text because he is unable to understand words in a spiritual sense: "Gerontion's words have no metaphysical buttressing, and his language is studded with puns, words within words. The passage on history is a series of metaphors that dissolve into incomprehensibility"^[20].

Sexuality

The narrator of the poem discusses sexuality throughout the text, spending several lines, including lines 57-58 where he says:

I have lost my passion: why should I need to keep it

Since what is kept must be adulterated?.

Ian Duncan MacKillop in F.R. Leavis argues that impotence is a pretext of the poem the same way that embarrassment is the pretext of "Portrait of a Lady". He argues that the narrator writes each line of the poem with an understanding that he is unable to fulfill any of his sexual desires.^[21]. Gelpi, in A Coherent Splendor: An American Poetic Renaissance also states that the poem is centered upon the theme of impotence, arguing that old age brings the poet "not wisdom but confirmed decrepitude and impotence." He also argues that this theme continues into Eliot's later works Ash Wednesday and Four Quartets.^[22] To Sharpe, the inability of the narrator to carry out his sexual desires leads him to "humiliated arrogance" and the "apprehension of Judgement without the knowledge of God's mercy ^[13].

In lines 59-60, the speaker explains that he has lost his physical senses due to his age:

I have lost my sight, smell, hearing, taste and touch:

How should I use them for your closer contact?

Marion Montgomery, writing in T. S. Eliot: an Essay on the American Magus, equates the loss of these senses with the mindset that controls the narrative of the poem. Gerontion has lost the ability to partake in the same sexual endeavors that face Nathaniel Hawthorne's hero in "Young Goodman Brown", yet Montgomery believes he has "turned from innocent hope to pursue significance in the dark forces of the blood". Gerontion's exploration of sinful pleasures takes place in his mind, according to Montgomery, as he can "discover no vital presence in the sinful shell of his body". ^[23].

Sources

There is a connection between Gerontion and Eliot's understanding of F. H. Bradley's views. In Eliot's doctoral dissertation, later published as Knowledge and Experience in the Philosophy of F. H. Bradley, Eliot explores Bradley's philosophy in order to determine how the mind relates to reality. By relying on Bradley, Eliot is able to formulate his own skepticism and states: "Everything, from one point of view, is subjective; and everything, from another point of view is objective; and there is no absolute point of view from which a decision may be pronounced."^[24] In terms of poetic structure, Eliot was influenced by Jacobean dramatists like Thomas Middleton that relied on blank verse in their dramatic monologues. Lines within the poems are connected to the works of a wide range of writers, including A. C. Benson, Lancelot Andrews, and Henry Adams's The Education of Henry Adams.^[25]

Critical response

Eliot scholar Grover Smith says of this poem, "If any notion remained that in the poems of 1919 Eliot was sentimentally contrasting a resplendent past with a dismal present, Gerontion should have helped to dispel it."^[26] Bernard Bergonzi claims that "Eliot's most considerable poem of the period between 1915 and 1919 is 'Gerontion'".^[27] Kirk believes that "To me, the blank verse of 'Gerontion' is Eliot's most moving poetry, but he never tried this virile mode later."^[14]

Notes

References

• Bergonzi, Bernard. T. S. Eliot. New York: Macmillan Company, 1972.
• Childs, Donald J. and Eliot, T.S. Mystic, Son, and Lover. Continuum International Publishing Group (1997)
• Kirk, Russell. Eliot and His Age. Wilmington: ISA Books, 2008.
• David C. Martin (2003-07-01). Wilderness of Mirrors: Intrigue, Deception, and the Secrets that Destroyed Two of the Cold War's Most Important Agents. The Lyons Press. ISBN 1-58574-824-2. 
• Montgomery, Marion. T. S. Eliot: An Essay on the American Magus. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1970.

From Wikisource