# Green's theorem: Wikis

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

# Encyclopedia

In physics and mathematics, Green's theorem gives the relationship between a line integral around a simple closed curve C and a double integral over the plane region D bounded by C. It is the two-dimensional special case of the more general Stokes' theorem, and is named after British mathematician George Green.

Let C be a positively oriented, piecewise smooth, simple closed curve in the plane R2, and let D be the region bounded by C. If L and M are functions of (x, y) defined on an open region containing D and have continuous partial derivatives there, then

$\oint_{C} (L\, \mathrm{d}x + M\, \mathrm{d}y) = \iint_{D} \left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial L}{\partial y}\right)\, \mathrm{d}A.$

For positive orientation, an arrow pointing in the counterclockwise direction may be drawn in the small circle in the integral symbol.

In physics, Green's theorem is mostly used to solve two-dimensional flow integrals, stating that the sum of fluid outflows at any point inside a volume is equal to the total outflow summed about an enclosing area.

## Proof when D is a simple region

If D is a simple region with its boundary consisting of the curves C1, C2, C3, C4, Green's theorem can be demonstrated.

The following is a proof of the theorem for the simplified area D, a type I region where C2 and C4 are vertical lines. A similar proof exists for when D is a type II region where C1 and C3 are straight lines. The general case can be deduced from this special case by approximating the domain D by a union of simple domains.

If it can be shown that

$\int_{C} L\, dx = \iint_{D} \left(- \frac{\partial L}{\partial y}\right)\, dA\qquad\mathrm{(1)}$

and

$\int_{C} M\, dy = \iint_{D} \left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial x}\right)\, dA\qquad\mathrm{(2)}$

are true, then Green's theorem is proven in the first case.

Define the type I region D as pictured on the right by:

$D = \{(x,y)|a\le x\le b, g_1(x) \le y \le g_2(x)\}$

where g1 and g2 are continuous functions on [a, b]. Compute the double integral in (1):

 $\iint_{D} \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial y}\right)\, dA$ $=\int_a^b\!\!\int_{g_1(x)}^{g_2(x)} \left[\frac{\partial L}{\partial y} (x,y)\, dy\, dx \right]$ $= \int_a^b \Big\{L(x,g_2(x)) - L(x,g_1(x)) \Big\} \, dx\qquad\mathrm{(3)}$

Now compute the line integral in (1). C can be rewritten as the union of four curves: C1, C2, C3, C4.

With C1, use the parametric equations: x = x, y = g1(x), axb. Then

$\int_{C_1} L(x,y)\, dx = \int_a^b \Big\{L(x,g_1(x))\Big\}\, dx$

With C3, use the parametric equations: x = x, y = g2(x), axb. Then

$\int_{C_3} L(x,y)\, dx = -\int_{-C_3} L(x,y)\, dx = - \int_a^b [L(x,g_2(x))]\, dx$

The integral over C3 is negated because it goes in the negative direction from b to a, as C is oriented positively (counterclockwise). On C2 and C4, x remains constant, meaning

$\int_{C_4} L(x,y)\, dx = \int_{C_2} L(x,y)\, dx = 0$

Therefore,

 $\int_{C} L\, dx$ $= \int_{C_1} L(x,y)\, dx + \int_{C_2} L(x,y)\, dx + \int_{C_3} L(x,y)\, dx + \int_{C_4} L(x,y)\, dx$ $= -\int_a^b [L(x,g_2(x))]\, dx + \int_a^b [L(x,g_1(x))]\, dx\qquad\mathrm{(4)}$

Combining (3) with (4), we get (1). Similar computations give (2).

## Relationship to the Stokes theorem

Green's theorem is a special case of Stokes' theorem, when applied to a region on the xy-plane:

We can augment the two-dimensional field into a three-dimensional field with a z-component that is always 0: $\mathbf{F} = (L, M, 0)$.

$\oint_{C} (L\, dx + M\, dy) = \oint_{C} (L, M, 0) \cdot (dx, dy, dz) = \oint_{C} \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{r}.\$

Then by Stokes' Theorem:

$\oint_{C} \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{r} = \iint_S \nabla \times \mathbf{F} \cdot \mathbf{\hat n} \, dS.\$

The surface S is just the region in the plane D, with the unit normals pointing up (in +z direction) to match the "positive orientation" definitions for both theorems.

The expression inside the integral becomes

$\nabla \times \mathbf{F} \cdot \mathbf{\hat n} = \left[ \left(\frac{\partial 0}{\partial y} - \frac{\partial M}{\partial z}\right) \mathbf{i} + \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial z} - \frac{\partial 0}{\partial x}\right) \mathbf{j} + \left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial L}{\partial y}\right) \mathbf{k} \right] \cdot \mathbf{k} = \left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial L}{\partial y}\right).\$

Thus we get the right side of Green's theorem

$\iint_S \nabla \times \mathbf{F} \cdot \mathbf{\hat n} \, dS = \iint_D \left(\frac{\partial M}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial L}{\partial y}\right) \, dA.\$

## Relationship to the divergence theorem

Considering only two-dimensional vector fields, Green's theorem is equivalent to the following two-dimensional analogue of the divergence theorem:

$\iint_D\left(\nabla\cdot\mathbf{F}\right)dA=\oint_C \mathbf{F} \cdot \mathbf{\hat n} \, ds,$

where $\mathbf{\hat n}$ is the outward-pointing unit normal vector on the boundary.

To see this, consider the unit normal in the right side of the equation. Since $d\mathbf{r} = ( dx, dy)$ is a vector pointing tangential along a curve, and the curve C is the positively-oriented (i.e. counterclockwise) curve along the boundary, an outward normal would be a vector which points 90° to the right, which would be (dy, − dx). The length of this vector is $\sqrt{dx^2 + dy^2} = ds$. So $\mathbf{\hat n}\,ds = ( dy, -dx).$

Now let the components of $\mathbf{F} = ( P, Q)$. Then the right hand side becomes

$\int_C \mathbf{F} \cdot \mathbf{\hat n} \, ds = \int_C P dy - Q dx$

which by Green's theorem becomes

$\int_C -Q dx + P dy = \iint_{D} \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial Q}{\partial y}\right)\, dA = \iint_D\left(\nabla\cdot\mathbf{F}\right)dA.$

Topics in Calculus
Fundamental theorem
Limits of functions
Continuity
Mean value theorem
Vector calculus
Divergence
Curl
Laplacian
Green's theorem
Stokes' theorem
Divergence theorem

In mathematics, Green's theorem gives the relationship between a line integral around a simple closed curve C and a double integral over the plane region D bounded by C. It is the two-dimensional special case of the more general Stokes' theorem, and is named after British mathematician George Green.

Let C be a positively oriented, piecewise smooth, simple closed curve in the plane $\mathbb\left\{R\right\}$2, and let D be the region bounded by C. If L and M are functions of (x, y) defined on an open region containing D and have continuous partial derivatives there, then

$\oint_\left\{C\right\} \left(L\, \mathrm\left\{d\right\}x + M\, \mathrm\left\{d\right\}y\right) = \iint_\left\{D\right\} \left\left(\frac\left\{\partial M\right\}\left\{\partial x\right\} - \frac\left\{\partial L\right\}\left\{\partial y\right\}\right\right)\, \mathrm\left\{d\right\}x\, \mathrm\left\{d\right\}y.$

For positive orientation, an arrow pointing in the counterclockwise direction may be drawn in the small circle in the integral symbol.

In physics, Green's theorem is mostly used to solve two-dimensional flow integrals, stating that the sum of fluid outflows at any point inside a volume is equal to the total outflow summed about an enclosing area. In plane geometry, and in particular, area surveying, Green's theorem can be used to determine the area and centroid of plane figures solely by integrating over the perimeter.

## Proof when D is a simple region

The following is a proof of the theorem for the simplified area D, a type I region where C2 and C4 are vertical lines. A similar proof exists for when D is a type II region where C1 and C3 are straight lines. The general case can be deduced from this special case by approximating the domain D by a union of simple domains.

If it can be shown that

$\int_\left\{C\right\} L\, dx = \iint_\left\{D\right\} \left\left(- \frac\left\{\partial L\right\}\left\{\partial y\right\}\right\right)\, dA\qquad\mathrm\left\{\left(1\right)\right\}$

and

$\int_\left\{C\right\} M\, dy = \iint_\left\{D\right\} \left\left(\frac\left\{\partial M\right\}\left\{\partial x\right\}\right\right)\, dA\qquad\mathrm\left\{\left(2\right)\right\}$

are true, then Green's theorem is proven in the first case.

Define the type I region D as pictured on the right by:

$D = \\left\{\left(x,y\right)|a\le x\le b, g_1\left(x\right) \le y \le g_2\left(x\right)\\right\}$

where g1 and g2 are continuous functions on [a, b]. Compute the double integral in (1):

 $\iint_D \frac\left\{\partial L\right\}\left\{\partial y\right\}\, dA$ $=\int_a^b\,\int_\left\{g_1\left(x\right)\right\}^\left\{g_2\left(x\right)\right\} \frac\left\{\partial L\right\}\left\{\partial y\right\} \left(x,y\right)\,dy\,dx$ $= \int_a^b \Big\\left\{L\left(x,g_2\left(x\right)\right) - L\left(x,g_1\left(x\right)\right) \Big\\right\} \, dx\qquad\mathrm\left\{\left(3\right)\right\}$

Now compute the line integral in (1). C can be rewritten as the union of four curves: C1, C2, C3, C4.

With C1, use the parametric equations: x = x, y = g1(x), axb. Then

$\int_\left\{C_1\right\} L\left(x,y\right)\, dx = \int_a^b L\left(x,g_1\left(x\right)\right)\, dx$

With C3, use the parametric equations: x = x, y = g2(x), axb. Then

$\int_\left\{C_3\right\} L\left(x,y\right)\, dx = -\int_\left\{-C_3\right\} L\left(x,y\right)\, dx = - \int_a^b L\left(x,g_2\left(x\right)\right)\, dx$

The integral over C3 is negated because it goes in the negative direction from b to a, as C is oriented positively (counterclockwise). On C2 and C4, x remains constant, meaning

$\int_\left\{C_4\right\} L\left(x,y\right)\, dx = \int_\left\{C_2\right\} L\left(x,y\right)\, dx = 0$

Therefore,

 $\int_\left\{C\right\} L\, dx$ $= \int_\left\{C_1\right\} L\left(x,y\right)\, dx + \int_\left\{C_2\right\} L\left(x,y\right)\, dx + \int_\left\{C_3\right\} L\left(x,y\right)\, dx + \int_\left\{C_4\right\} L\left(x,y\right)\, dx$ $= -\int_a^b L\left(x,g_2\left(x\right)\right)\, dx + \int_a^b L\left(x,g_1\left(x\right)\right)\, dx\qquad\mathrm\left\{\left(4\right)\right\}$

Combining (3) with (4), we get (1). Similar computations give (2).

## Relationship to the Stokes theorem

Green's theorem is a special case of Stokes' theorem, when applied to a region on the xy-plane:

We can augment the two-dimensional field into a three-dimensional field with a z-component that is always 0: $\mathbf\left\{F\right\} = \left(L, M, 0\right)$.

$\oint_\left\{C\right\} \left(L\, dx + M\, dy\right) = \oint_\left\{C\right\} \left(L, M, 0\right) \cdot \left(dx, dy, dz\right) = \oint_\left\{C\right\} \mathbf\left\{F\right\} \cdot d\mathbf\left\{r\right\}.\$

Then by Stokes' Theorem:

$\oint_\left\{C\right\} \mathbf\left\{F\right\} \cdot d\mathbf\left\{r\right\} = \iint_S \nabla \times \mathbf\left\{F\right\} \cdot \mathbf\left\{\hat n\right\} \, dS.\$

The surface $S$ is just the region in the plane $D$, with the unit normals pointing up (in +z direction) to match the "positive orientation" definitions for both theorems.

The expression inside the integral becomes

$\nabla \times \mathbf\left\{F\right\} \cdot \mathbf\left\{\hat n\right\} = \left\left[ \left\left(\frac\left\{\partial 0\right\}\left\{\partial y\right\} - \frac\left\{\partial M\right\}\left\{\partial z\right\}\right\right) \mathbf\left\{i\right\} + \left\left(\frac\left\{\partial L\right\}\left\{\partial z\right\} - \frac\left\{\partial 0\right\}\left\{\partial x\right\}\right\right) \mathbf\left\{j\right\} + \left\left(\frac\left\{\partial M\right\}\left\{\partial x\right\} - \frac\left\{\partial L\right\}\left\{\partial y\right\}\right\right) \mathbf\left\{k\right\} \right\right] \cdot \mathbf\left\{k\right\} = \left\left(\frac\left\{\partial M\right\}\left\{\partial x\right\} - \frac\left\{\partial L\right\}\left\{\partial y\right\}\right\right).\$

Thus we get the right side of Green's theorem

$\iint_S \nabla \times \mathbf\left\{F\right\} \cdot \mathbf\left\{\hat n\right\} \, dS = \iint_D \left\left(\frac\left\{\partial M\right\}\left\{\partial x\right\} - \frac\left\{\partial L\right\}\left\{\partial y\right\}\right\right) \, dA.\$

## Relationship to the divergence theorem

Considering only two-dimensional vector fields, Green's theorem is equivalent to the following two-dimensional version of the divergence theorem:

$\iint_D\left\left(\nabla\cdot\mathbf\left\{F\right\}\right\right)dA=\oint_C \mathbf\left\{F\right\} \cdot \mathbf\left\{\hat n\right\} \, ds,$

where $\mathbf\left\{\hat n\right\}$ is the outward-pointing unit normal vector on the boundary.

To see this, consider the unit normal in the right side of the equation. Since $d\mathbf\left\{r\right\} = \left( dx, dy\right)$ is a vector pointing tangential along a curve, and the curve C is the positively-oriented (i.e. counterclockwise) curve along the boundary, an outward normal would be a vector which points 90° to the right, which would be $\left( dy, -dx\right)$. The length of this vector is $\sqrt\left\{dx^2 + dy^2\right\} = ds$. So $\mathbf\left\{\hat n\right\}\,ds = \left( dy, -dx\right).$

Now let the components of $\mathbf\left\{F\right\} = \left( P, Q\right)$. Then the right hand side becomes

$\int_C \mathbf\left\{F\right\} \cdot \mathbf\left\{\hat n\right\} \, ds = \int_C P dy - Q dx$

which by Green's theorem becomes

$\int_C -Q dx + P dy = \iint_\left\{D\right\} \left\left(\frac\left\{\partial P\right\}\left\{\partial x\right\} + \frac\left\{\partial Q\right\}\left\{\partial y\right\}\right\right)\, dA = \iint_D\left\left(\nabla\cdot\mathbf\left\{F\right\}\right\right)dA.$

## Area Calculation

Green's theorem can be used to compute area by line integral.[1] The area of D is given by:

$A = \iint_\left\{D\right\}\mathrm\left\{d\right\}A.$

Provided we choose L and M such that:

$\frac\left\{\partial M\right\}\left\{\partial x\right\} - \frac\left\{\partial L\right\}\left\{\partial y\right\} = 1$

Then the area is given by:

$A = \oint_\left\{C\right\} \left(L\, \mathrm\left\{d\right\}x + M\, \mathrm\left\{d\right\}y\right)$

Possible formulas for the area of D include[1]:

$A=\oint_\left\{C\right\} x\, \mathrm\left\{d\right\}y = -\oint_\left\{C\right\} y\, \mathrm\left\{d\right\}x = \tfrac 12 \oint_\left\{C\right\} \left(-y\, \mathrm\left\{d\right\}x + x\, \mathrm\left\{d\right\}y\right)$

## Reference

1. ^ a b Stewart, James. Calculus (6th ed.). Thomson, Brooks/Cole.

# Wiktionary

Up to date as of January 15, 2010

## English

### Noun

Wikipedia has an article on:

Wikipedia

Green's theorem

1. (calculus) A generalization of the fundamental theorem of calculus to the two-dimensional plane, which states that given two scalar fields P and Q and a simply connected region R, the area integral of derivatives of the fields equals the line integral of the fields, or
$\iint_R \left( {\partial Q \over \partial x} - {\partial P \over \partial y}\right) dx \, dy = \oint_{\partial R} P\, dx + Q\, dy$.
2. (calculus) Letting $\vec G = (P, Q)$ be a vector field, and $d\vec l = (dx, dy)$ this can be restated as
$\iint_R \nabla \wedge \vec G \ dx \, dy = \oint_{\partial R} \vec G \cdot d\vec l$
where $\wedge$ is the wedge product, or equivalently, as
$\iint_R \nabla \cdot \vec G \ dx \, dy = \oint_{\partial R} \vec G \wedge d\vec l$,
with the earlier formula resembling Stoke's theorem, and the latter resembling the divergence theorem.