Guantanamo military commission: Wikis


Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Guantanamo military commissions is a system for prosecuting detainees held in the United States Guantanamo Bay detainment camps, used by both the Bush and Obama administrations.[1]

The American Bar Association announced in 2002 during the Bush administration that: "In response to the unprecedented attacks of September 11, on November 13, 2001, the President announced that certain non-citizens (of the USA) would be subject to detention and trial by military authorities. The order provides that non-citizens whom the President deems to be, or to have been, members of the al Qaeda organization or to have engaged in, aided or abetted, or conspired to commit acts of international terrorism that have caused, threaten to cause, or have as their aim to cause, injury to or adverse effects on the United States or its citizens, or to have knowingly harbored such individuals, are subject to detention by military authorities and trial before a military commission."[2]

On September 28 and September 29, 2006, the US Senate and US House of Representatives, respectively, passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006, a controversial bill that allows the President to designate certain people with the status of "unlawful enemy combatants" thus making them subject to military commissions, where they have fewer civil rights than in regular trials.

Major Elizabeth Kubala Spokesperson for the Office of Military Commissions gives a press briefing.

On June 29, 2006, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in the case "Hamdan v. Rumsfeld" Docket 05-194, with a 5-3 decision for Salim Ahmed Hamdan, effectively declaring that trying Guantanamo Bay detainees under the Guantanamo military commission (known also as Military Tribunal) was illegal under US law, including the Geneva Conventions.[3]

Quoting the judgement (Paragraph 4, page 4), "4. The military commission at issue lacks the power to proceed because its structure and procedures violate both the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) and the four Geneva Conventions signed in 1949." Ultimately the Supreme Court ruled that President George W. Bush does not have the sole authority to hold tribunals and is required to get authorization to do so from the United States Congress.

With the War Crimes Act in mind, this ruling presented the Bush administration with the risk of criminal liability for war crimes. To address these legal problems, among other reasons, the Military Commissions Act was adopted.


Comparison with the American justice system

Court room where initial Guantanamo military commissions convened.

The United States has two parallel justice systems, with laws, statutes, precedents, rules of evidence, and paths for appeal. Under these justice systems prisoners have certain rights. They have a right to know the evidence against them; they have a right to protect themselves against self-incrimination; they have a right to legal counsel; they have a right to have the witnesses against them cross-examined.

The two parallel justice systems are the Judicial Branch of the US Government, and a slightly streamlined justice system named the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice) for people under military jurisdiction. People undergoing a military court martial are entitled to the same basic rights as those in the civilian justice system.

The Guantanamo military trials do not operate according to either system of justice. The differences include:

  • The accused are not allowed access to all the evidence against them. The Presiding Officers are authorized to consider secret evidence the accused have no opportunity to refute.
  • It may be possible for the commission to consider evidence that was extracted through coercive interrogation techniques before the enactment of the Detainee Treatment Act.[4] However, legally the commission is restricted from considering any evidence extracted by torture, as defined by the Department of Defense.[5 ]
  • The Appointing Officer in overall charge of the commissions is sitting in on them. He is authorized to shut down any commission, without warning, and without explanation.
  • The proceedings may be closed at the discretion of the Presiding Officer, so that secret information may be discussed by the commission. [6]
  • The accused are not permitted a free choice of attorneys, as they can only use military lawyers or those civilian attorneys eligible for the Secret security clearance.[7]
  • Because the accused are charged as unlawful combatants, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld stated that an acquittal on all charges by the commission is no guarantee of a release.[8]

The accused

Name Charges Verdict Dates
David Hicks Providing material support for terrorism[9] Found guilty, sentenced to seven years in prison (only served nine months of penalty, mostly in Australia, under terms of plea agreement) Charged: February 3, 2007[9]
Sentenced: March 30, 2007
Arrived in Australia: May 20, 2007
Released: December 29, 2007
Salim Hamdan Conspiracy; providing material support for terrorism Acquitted on conspiracy charge; found guilty for providing material support and sentenced to five and a half years (66 months) in prison (credited for 61 months in detention) Captured: November 24, 2001
Charged: May 10, 2007
Sentenced: August 7, 2008
Ali Hamza al-Bahlul Charged: February 9, 2008
Ibrahim al Qosi Captured: December 2001
Omar Khadr Murder in violation of the law of war; attempted murder in violation of the law of war; conspiracy; providing material support for terrorism; spying Charged: February 2, 2007
Sufyian Barhoumi
Ghassan al-Shirbi
Jabran al-Qahtani
Benyam Mohammed Arrested in Parkistan: April 10, 2002
Abdul Zahir
Mohamed Jawad Three counts of attempted murder; three counts of committing serious bodily harm Charged: October 11, 2007

The commission members

Initially the identity of the commission members were to be kept hidden, and the commission was to consist of a Presiding Officer (a lawyer), at least four other officers (between eight and eleven in capital cases), and one alternate.

The structure of the commission was radically revised in late 2004. The impartiality of five of the officers was challenged, and two of the officers were removed. All five officers of the commission have an equal vote, the Presiding Officer performs the additional role of administering the trial, much as a judge would in a civil trial.

Peter Brownback Colonel (retired)
  • President of the Commissions for David Hicks, Salim Hamdan
  • The only lawyer on the commission.
  • A long time friend of the appointing officer.
  • Brownback was criticized for not being an active member of a state bar.
Christopher Bogdan Colonel USAF
R. Thomas Bright Colonel USMC
  • Member of the Commissions for David Hicks, Salim Hamdan
  • Challenged because he assembled lists of detainees bound for Guantánamo and executed war plans in Afghanistan.[10]
  • Remains on the commission.
Curt S. Cooper lieutenant colonel U.S. Army
  • Member of the Commissions for David Hicks, Salim Hamdan
  • Admitted referring to the Guantánamo detainees as "terrorists".
  • Admitted being unfamiliar with the Geneva Conventions.
  • Removed from the commission.
Jack K. Sparks Jr. Colonel USMC
Timothy K. Toomey lieutenant colonel USAF
  • Member of the Commissions for David Hicks, Salim Hamdan
  • An intelligence officer who was involved in the capture of suspects in Afghanistan.
  • Removed from the commission.
Ralph Kohlmann Colonel USMC

Legal advisors

There have been three individuals who have held the position of legal advisor to the civilian in charge of the Office of Military Commissions: Brigadier General Thomas Hemingway, Brigadier General Thomas W. Hartmann and Colonel Michael Chapman.

The lawyers

John D. Altenburg General (retired)
  • Appointing authority
  • Will attend all the commissions
  • Has the authority to shut down any commission, immediately, without warning or explanation.
Thomas Hemingway Brigadier General
Peter Brownback Colonel (retired)
  • Commission President (see above)
Ralph Kohlmann Colonel USMC
  • Commission President (see above)
Fred Borch Colonel
  • Chief Prosecutor
  • Leaked memos surfaced that claimed he had bragged about corrupting the fairness of the proceedings.
  • Reported to have claimed the Commission officers were chosen because they could be trusted to convict
  • Reported to have claimed that all the evidence of the suspect's innocence would be classified top-secret, so the defense never learned of it.
  • Resigned his commission.
Robert L. Swann Colonel
  • Chief Prosecutor following Fred Borch.
  • Requested two of the commission officers be removed because they would be biased in favor of conviction.
Dwight H. Sullivan Colonel USMC Reserve
Muneer Ahmad civilian
  • Defending Omar Khadr
  • Professor of law
  • Pro bono service
  • Described great difficulties put in his path by military authorities.[11]
Robert Chester Colonel
John Carr Captain
  • Appointed to serve as a Prosecutor
  • Requested transfer because the proceeding seemed unjust.
  • Promoted after transfer
Morris Davis Colonel U.S. Air Force
Thomas Fleener major Army Reserve
William C. Kuebler Lieutenant Commander U.S. Navy
John Merriam Captain U.S. Army
Michael Mori major USMC Reserve
Robert Preston major
  • Appointed to serve as a Prosecutor
  • Requested transfer because the proceeding seemed unjust.
  • Promoted after transfer
Robert D. Rachlin civilian
Sharon Shaffer
Philip Sundel
Charles Swift Lieutenant Commander
Carrie Wolf Captain USAF
  • Appointed to serve as a Prosecutor
  • Requested transfer because the proceeding seemed unjust.
  • Promoted after transfer

Security precautions

On January 2, 2008 Toronto Star reporter Michelle Shephard offered an account of the security precautions reporters go through before they can attend the hearings[13]:

  • Reporters were only allowed to bring in one pen;
  • Female reporters were frisked if they wore underwire bras;
  • Reporters were not allowed to bring in their traditional coil-ring notepads;
  • The bus bringing reporters to the hearing room is checked for explosives before it leaves;
  • 200 metres from the hearing room reporters dismount, pass through metal detectors, and are sniffed by chemical detectors for signs of exposure to explosives;
  • Only eight reporters are allowed into the hearing room -- the remainder watch over closed circuit TV;

Suspension and possible revival

On January 22, 2009, new US President Barack Obama, who had said during his 2008 campaign that he would reject the Military Commissions Act if elected,[1] issued an executive order instructing the Secretary of Defense to immediately take steps sufficient to ensure that no new charges are sworn, or referred to a military commission under the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and the Rules for Military Commissions, and that all proceedings of such military commissions to which charges have been referred but in which no judgment has been rendered, and all proceedings pending in the United States Court of Military Commission Review, are halted.[14]

On January 29, 2009 the order was overturned. Guantanamo military commission judge, Army Colonel James Pohl, ruled against the order in the case of Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri. Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri is one of three Guantanamo Bay inmates known to have been tortured by water-boarding.[15]

In May 2009, The New York Times reported that the Obama administration is considering the tribunals as an alternative to trying detainees in the regular court system.[1]

See also


  1. ^ a b c "U.S. May Revive Guantánamo Military Courts" (webpage). The New York Times. May 2, 2009. Retrieved 2009-05-02.  
  2. ^ "American Bar Association Task Force on Terrorism and the law report and recommendations on Military Commissions" (PDF). American Bar Association. January 4, 2002. Retrieved 2007-12-16.  
  3. ^ "Syllabus: Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States. October 2005. Retrieved 2007-12-17.  
  4. ^ "FAQs about the Military Commissions Act". The Center for Victims of Torture. Retrieved 2007-12-17.  
  5. ^ "Military Commission Instruction No. 10" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. March 24, 2006. Retrieved 2007-12-16.  
  6. ^ Feb 28 2004
  7. ^ "Trial Guide for Military Commissions" (PDF). United States Department of Defense. August 17, 2004. Retrieved 2007-12-17.  
  8. ^ Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers (March 28, 2002). "Transcript: Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and General Richard Myers, briefed reporters March 28 at the Pentagon.". United States Embassy, Canberra. Retrieved 2007-12-17.  
  9. ^ a b "". Minister for Foreign Affairs (Australia). 2007-02-03. Retrieved 2008-08-11.  
  10. ^ "Three Guantánamo panelists dismissed over bias allegations". USA Today. October 21, 2004. Retrieved 2007-12-17.  
  11. ^ "At Gitmo, still no day in court: How feds avoid hearings for terror suspects — despite Supreme Court ruling". Newsday. June 15, 2005.,0,2202228,print.story?coll=ny-world-big-pix. Retrieved 2007-12-17.  
  12. ^ "U.S. prosecutor in Khadr case blasts sympathetic views of Canadian teen". CBC. January 10, 2006. Retrieved 2007-12-16.  
  13. ^ Michelle Shephard (January 2, 2008). "Guantanamo hearings try patience: Underwire bra, extra pen among items unpopular with military overseers at terrorist suspects' trials". Toronto Star. Retrieved 2008-01-04.  
  14. ^ "Closure Of Guantanamo Detention Facilities". 2009-01-22. Retrieved 2009-01-27.  
  15. ^ "Judge rejects Obama bid to stall trial". NZ Herald - AP. 2009-01-29. Retrieved 2009-02-07.  

External links



Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address