The Full Wiki

Advertisements

More info on H-infinity methods in control theory

H-infinity methods in control theory: Wikis

Advertisements
  
  

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Did you know ...


More interesting facts on H-infinity methods in control theory

Include this on your site/blog:

Encyclopedia

Advertisements

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

H (i.e. "H-infinity") methods are used in control theory to synthesize controllers achieving robust performance or stabilization. To use H methods, a control designer expresses the control problem as a mathematical optimization problem and then finds the controller that solves this. H techniques have the advantage over classical control techniques in that they are readily applicable to problems involving multivariable systems with cross-coupling between channels; disadvantages of H techniques include the level of mathematical understanding needed to apply them successfully and the need for a reasonably good model of the system to be controlled. Problem formulation is important, since any controller synthesized will only be 'optimal' in the formulated sense: optimizing the wrong thing often makes things worse rather than better. Also, non-linear constraints such as saturation are generally not well-handled.

The term H comes from the name of the mathematical space over which the optimization takes place: H is the space of matrix-valued functions that are analytic and bounded in the open right-half of the complex plane defined by Re(s) > 0; the H norm is the maximum singular value of the function over that space. (This can be interpreted as a maximum gain in any direction and at any frequency; for SISO systems, this is effectively the maximum magnitude of the frequency response.) H techniques can be used to minimize the closed loop impact of a perturbation: depending on the problem formulation, the impact will either be measured in terms of stabilization or performance.

Simultaneously optimizing robust performance and robust stabilization is difficult. One method that comes close to achieving this is H loop-shaping, which allows the control designer to apply classical loop-shaping concepts to the multivariable frequency response to get good robust performance, and then optimizes the response near the system bandwidth to achieve good robust stabilization.

Commercial software is available to support H controller synthesis.

Problem formulation

First, the process has to be represented according to the following standard configuration:

H-infty plant representation.png

Plant P has two inputs, the exogenous input w, that includes reference signal and disturbances, and the manipulated variables u. There are two outputs, the error signals z that we want to minimize, and the measured variables v, that we use to control the system. v is used in K to calculate the manipulated variable u. Remark that all these are generally vectors, whereas P and K are matrices.

In formulae, the system is:

\begin{bmatrix} z\\ v \end{bmatrix} = \mathbf{P}(s)\, \begin{bmatrix} w\\ u\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}P_{11}(s) & P_{12}(s)\\P_{21}(s) & P_{22}(s)\end{bmatrix} \, \begin{bmatrix} w\\ u\end{bmatrix}
u = \mathbf{K}(s) \, v

It is therefore possible to express the dependency of z on w as:

z=F_\ell(\mathbf{P},\mathbf{K})\,w

Called the lower linear fractional transformation, F_\ell is defined (the subscript comes from lower):

F_\ell(\mathbf{P},\mathbf{K}) = P_{11} + P_{12}\,\mathbf{K}\,(I-P_{22}\,\mathbf{K})^{-1}\,P_{21}

Therefore, the objective of \mathcal{H}_\infty control design is to find a controller \mathbf{K} such that F_\ell(\mathbf{P},\mathbf{K}) is minimised according to the \mathcal{H}_\infty norm. The same definition applies to \mathcal{H}_2 control design. The infinity norm of the transfer function matrix F_\ell(\mathbf{P},\mathbf{K}) is defined as:

||F_\ell(\mathbf{P},\mathbf{K})||_\infty = \sup_\omega \bar{\sigma}(F_\ell(\mathbf{P},\mathbf{K})(j\omega))

where \bar{\sigma} is the maximum singular value of the matrix F_\ell(\mathbf{P},\mathbf{K})(j\omega).

The achievable H norm of the closed loop system is mainly given through the matrix D11 (when the system P is given in the form (A, B1, B2, C1, C2, D11, D12, D22, D21)). There are several ways to come to an H controller:

  • A Youla parametrization of the closed loop often leads to very high-order controller.
  • Riccati-based approaches solve 2 Riccati equations to find the controller, but require several simplifying assumptions.
  • An optimization-based reformulation of the Riccati equation uses Linear matrix inequalities and requires fewer assumptions.

See also

References


Advertisements






Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message