From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Han chauvinism (simplified Chinese:
大汉族主义,
汉沙文主义; traditional Chinese:
大漢族主義, 漢沙文主義) or
Hanism (simplified Chinese:
汉本位; traditional Chinese:
漢本位) is a term which
is used in mainland China and Taiwan. Referring to people carrying ethnocentric viewpoints that favor the Han Chinese majority
ethnic group in China at the expense of the other minority
ethnic groups, often under the assumption of cultural
superiority. Han chauvinists in the People's Republic of China
often invent enemies of Manchus, Tibetans, Mongols and members of the
Han nationality that
oppose a monolithic view of the nationality. Han chauvinism is also
sometimes manifest as nostalgia in the expansionist exploits by past Chinese dynasties, especially those
identified with the Han nationality,
but in some contexts also including the Qing Dynasty, a Manchu dynasty. Actions
and speech that constitute the ethnocentric and ideological aspects
of Han chauvinism (such as hate speech against minorities) are
illegal in the People's Republic of China
and are either banned or censored.
Han
chauvinism historically
Those espousing chauvinistic attitudes often revive ancient
pejorative and anachronistic terms to refer to other ethnic groups
as "barbarians". In
ancient times, the following terms were used by various peoples of
the Zhongyuan (North China Plain) to refer to
those peoples not under the political control or cultural influence
of the main Chinese dynasty. (hence the below terms as used
historically were geographic and cultural labels, rather than
racial in the modern sense). The terms below, however, were also
used by the Japanese to various
extents, hence diluting the claim of their links specifically to
Han chauvinism.
Historical
terms
- "Nanman" (simplified Chinese:
南蛮; traditional Chinese:
南蠻) – literally
barbarians of the South - typically referring to southern ethnic
groups in present-day South China, Southwestern
China and Indo-China. Most of what were considered
Nanman then are now Han Chinese, after Chinese colonizers mixed
with the original inhabitants (for example, the inhabitants of the
province of Nanyue were originally labeled as Nanman, and today
represent the Cantonese and various other subgroups
of Han Chinese). However due to racial mixing the Cantonese are not
pure Nanman, as the sentence is oversimplifying the complicated
history of this region, they are descendants of mixed Han and
Nanman ancestry. This term was used by the Japanese to refer to European traders in
Japan.
- "Xirong" (西戎) – originally an ancient ethnic
group (Rong), this term was later used to refer to all non-Han
ethnic groups in today's Northwestern
China, who were mostly nomadic horsemen,
- "Beidi" (北狄) – originally an
ancient ethnic group (Di), this term was later used to refer to all
non-Han ethnic groups in today's Northern China, Mongolia, and Siberia, especially those who lived beyond the
Great
Wall.
- "Dongyi" (simplified Chinese:
东夷; traditional Chinese:
東夷) – literally
barbarians (or archers) of the East, referring to ancient ethnic
groups who lived in today's eastern China along the coast,
including groups which have now been assimilated into the Han nationality[1].
Taiwanese Han chauvinism
In Taiwan, Han chauvinism
is also used to accuse a preference for the culture and languages
of Mainland Chinese over the local cultures of Taiwan, both Han
Chinese and non-Han. It is most often used by pro-independence groups to attack
pro-reunification groups and the
Nationalists
(KMT) who came from the mainland after their defeat to Communist Party of China in
1949.
In the People's Republic of China,
the term Han chauvinism is also used by some members of ethnic minority groups as
justification for separatist movements.
See also
References
- ^ Taro Yayama,
"Japan Should Not Participate in China's 'East Asian Community'
Conspiracy – Japan Should Learn From European Union Development
Environment." Sankei Shimbun, December 24,
2005
- CHOW, KAI-WING: Narrating Nation, Race and National Culture:
Imagining the Hanzu Identity in Modern China, in: CHOW KAI-WING,
DOAK, KEVIN M. und POSHEK FU (Hg.): Constructing nationhood in
modern East Asia (2001). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press,
S. 47-84.
- DIKÖTTER, FRANK: The Discourse of Race in Modern China (1992).
London: Hurst & Company.
- DIKÖTTER, FRANK (ed.): The Construction of Racial Identities in
China and Japan (1997). London: Hurst & Company.
- DIKÖTTER, FRANK: Race in China, in: PAL NYIRI and JOANA
BREIDENBACH (ed.): China inside out: Contemporary Chinese
nationalism and transnationalism (2005). Budapest: Central European
University Press, pp. 177-204.
- DIKÖTTER, FRANK: Racial Identities in China: Context and
Meaning, in: The China Quarterly, 1994, No. 138, pp. 404-412.
- ELLIOT, MARK C.: The Manchu Way – The Eight Banners and Ethnic
Identity in Late Imperial China (2001). Stanford/California:
Stanford University Press.
- LAITINEN, KAUKO: Chinese Nationalism in the late Qing Dynasty –
Zhang Binglin as an Anti-Mandchu Propagandist (1990). London:
Curzon Press.
- Reuters. 2007. Far-Right Group Blasted by Jewish Organizations.
http://www.spiegel.de/ (accessed 7 June,
2008).
- RHOADS, EDWARD J.M.: Manchus & Han – Ethnic Relations and
Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861-1928
(2000). Seattle und London: University of Washington Press.
- SAUTMAN, BARRY: Peking Man and the Politics of
Paleoanthropological Nationalism in China, in: The Journal of Asian
Studies, No. 1, 2001.
- SHIMADA KENJI: Pioneer of the Chinese revolution: Zhang Binglin
and Confucianism (translated by Joshua A. Fogel) (1990).
Stanford/California: Stanford University Press.
- TRAUZETTEL, ROLF: Ethnozentrismus und das Verhalten zu
Minderheiten und Fremden am Beispiel Chinas, in: MENSEN, BERNHARD
SVD (Hg.): Fremdheit – Abgrenzung und Offenheit (Vortragsreihe
1982/83). St. Augustin: Akademie Völker und Kulturen.
- TSOU JUNG: The Revolutionary Army – a Chinese Nationalist Tract
of 1903 (übersetzt und annotiert von JOHN LUST) (1968). The
Hague/Paris: Mouton & Co.
- WONG, YOUNG-TSU: Search for Modern Nationalism – Zhang Binglin
and Revolutionary China 1869-1936 (1989). Hong Kong: Oxford
University Press.
- ZARROW, PETER (b): Historical Trauma: Anti-Manchuism and
Memories of Atrocity in Late Qing China, in: History & Memory,
Jahrgang 16, No. 2, 2004, pp. 67-107.