The Full Wiki



More info on Hard labor

Hard labor: Wikis

  

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Did you know ...


More interesting facts on Hard labor

Include this on your site/blog:

Encyclopedia

Updated live from Wikipedia, last check: June 01, 2012 18:45 UTC (42 seconds ago)
(Redirected to Penal labour article)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Female convicts chained together by their necks for work on a road. Dar es Salaam, Tanganyika c.1890-1927.

Penal labour or penal servitude is a form of unfree labour. The term may refer to several related situations: labour as a form of punishment, the prison system used as a means to secure labour, labour as a form of occupation of convicts, and labour camps used as a form of political disgrace.

Contents

Penal labor

Part of a series on
Slavery
Early history

History · Antiquity · Aztec · Ancient Greece · Rome · Medieval Europe · Thrall · Kholop · Serfdom

Religion

The Bible · Judaism · Christianity · Islam

By country or region

Africa · Atlantic · Arab · Coastwise · Angola · Britain and Ireland · British Virgin Islands · Brazil · Canada · India · Iran · Japan · Libya · Mauritania · Romania · Spanish New World colonies · Sudan · Swedish · United States

Contemporary slavery

Modern Africa · Debt bondage · Penal labour · Sexual slavery · Unfree labour · Human trafficking

Opposition and resistance

Timeline · Abolitionism · Compensated emancipation · Opponents of slavery‎ · Slave rebellion · Slave narrative

Punitive labour occupies a spectrum between two types: productive labour, such as industrial work; and intrinsically pointless tasks used as primitive occupational therapy and/or physical torment. In Victorian prisons, inmates commonly were made to work the treadmill: in some cases, this was productive labour to grind grain; in others, it served no purpose. Similar punishments included the crank machine (a device where prisoner had to turn a crank that merely pushed paddles through sand in a drum), and shot drill, carrying cannonballs around for no purpose.[1] Semi-punitive labour also included oakum-picking: teasing apart old tarry rope to make caulking material for sailing vessels.

Prison labour

Convict or prison labour (also called hard labour) is a form of unfree labour used in both past and present as an additional form of punishment beyond imprisonment alone. Sometimes authorities turn prison labour into an industry, as on a prison farm. In such cases, the pursuit of income from their productive labour may even overtake the preoccupation with punishment and/or reeducation as such of the prisoners, who are then at risk of being exploited as slave-like cheap labour (profit may be minor after expenses, e.g. on security).

The 13th Amendment of the American Constitution seemingly allows penal labour as it states that "neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for a crime." Douglas A. Blackmon of the Wall Street Journal has argued that in the United States in the 19th century, after the abolition of slavery, government officials on behalf of business interests "enacted [laws] specifically to intimidate blacks, [and] tens of thousands of African Americans were arbitrarily arrested". This resulted in "neoslavery...[at] coal mines, lumber camps, brickyards, railroads, quarries and farm plantations" and "beatings and physical torture", as blacks were "hit with outrageous fines, and charged for the costs of their own arrests."[2]

Penal labour is sometimes used as a punishment in the U.S. military.[3]

In Britain in the 19th century, hard labour became a standard feature of penal servitude as penal transportation was phased out. Although it was prescribed for severe crimes (e.g. rape, attempted murder, wounding with intent, per the Offences against the Person Act 1861) it was also widely applied in cases of minor crime such as petty theft and vagrancy, as well as victimless behaviour deemed harmful to the fabric of society. Notable recipients of forced labour under British law include Oscar Wilde (after his conviction for gross indecency) and John William Gott (a terminally ill trouser salesman convicted of blasphemy).

The British penal colonies in Australia between 1788 and 1868 provide a major historical example of convict labour, as described above: during that period, Australia received thousands of transported convict labourers, many of whom had received harsh sentences for minor misdemeanours in Britain or Ireland.

In the United Kingdom, the Penal Servitude Act 1853 (16 & 17 Vict. c.99) substituted penal servitude for transportation, except in cases where a person could be sentenced to transportation for life or for a term not less than fourteen years. Section 2 of the Penal Servitude Act 1857 (20 & 21 Vict. c.3) abolished the sentence of transportation in all cases and provided that in all cases a person who would otherwise have been liable to transportation would be liable to penal servitude instead.

Sentences of penal servitude were served in convict prisons and were controlled by the Home Office and the Prison Commissioners. After sentencing, convicts would be classified according to the seriousness of the offence of which they were convicted and their criminal record. First time offenders would be classified in the Star class; persons not suitable for the Star class, but without serious convictions would be classified in the intermediate class; and habitual offenders would be classified in the Recidivist class. Care was taken to ensure that convicts in one class did not mix with convicts in another.

As late as 1885, 75% of all prison inmates were involved in some sort of productive endeavour, mostly in private contract and leasing systems. By 1935 the portion of prisoners working had fallen to 44%, and almost 90% of those worked in state-run programs rather than for private contractors.[4]

Japan

Main article: Penal system of Japan

Most Japanese prisoners are required to engage in prison labor, often in manufacturing parts which are then sold cheaply to private Japanese companies. This practice has raised charges of unfair competition since the prisoners' wages are far below market rate.

Non-punitive prison labour

Inmates sewing national flags in a Brazilian prison.

In a number of penal systems, the inmates have the possibility of a job. This may serve several purposes. Some say it gives an inmate a meaningful occupation and a possibility of earning some money. It may also play an important role in resocialisation: inmates may acquire skills that would help them to find a job after release. It may also have an important penological function: reducing the cruel monotony of prison life for the inmate, keeping inmates busy on productive activities, rather than, for example, potentially violent or antisocial activities, and helping to increase inmate fitness, and thus decrease health problems, rather than letting inmates succumb to a sedentary lifestyle.

The classic occupation in 20th century British prisons was sewing mailbags. This has diversified into areas such as engineering, furniture making, desktop publishing, repairing wheelchairs and producing traffic signs, but such opportunities are not widely available, and many prisoners who work perform routine prison maintenance tasks (such as in the prison kitchen) or obsolete unskilled assembly work (such as in the prison laundry) that is argued to be no preparation for work after release.[5] Classic 20th century American prisoner work involved making license plates; the task is still being performed by inmates in certain areas.[6]

Though the use of non-punitive prison labour is not generally controversial if the labour in question serves the public good, is done for sound penological reasons, and is not excessive, cruel, unusual, inhumane, degrading, or humiliating, a significant amount of controversy has arisen with regards to the use of prison labour if the prison in question is privatized, a phenomenon present in a few areas of the United States. Goods produced through penal labor are regulated through the Ashurst-Sumners Act which criminalized the interstate transport of such goods.

Labour camps

Prison labour used for construction in the Soviet Union, 1931–33

Another historically significant example of forced labour was that of political prisoners and other persecuted people in labour camps, especially in totalitarian regimes since the 20th century where millions of convicts were exploited and often killed by hard labour and bad living conditions.

For much of the history of the Soviet Union and other Communist states, political opponents of these governments were often sentenced to forced labour camps. The Soviet Gulag camps were a continuation of the punitive labour system of Imperial Russia known as katorga, but on a larger scale.

See Laogai and Reeducation through labour for the People's Republic of China's case.

See also

References


Template:About

Hard Labor
File:Three Dog Night - Hard
Studio album by Three Dog Night
Released March 1974
Recorded ???
Genre Pop/Rock
Length 35:51
Label Dunhill DSD-50168
Producer Jimmy Ienner
Professional reviews
Three Dog Night chronology
Cyan
(1973)
Hard Labor
(1974)
Joy to the World: Their Greatest Hits
(1974)

Hard Labor is the eleventh album by American rock band Three Dog Night, released in 1974 (see 1974 in music).

The original album cover, depicting of the birth of a record album (shown at right), was deemed too controversial and was soon reworked with a huge bandage covering the "birth". The cover also includes an attached "birth record sheet" of the album. The label shown on the original cover's album is the same custom label used on the actual album.

Contents

Track listing

Side 1

  1. "Prelude" – 1:00
  2. "Sure As I'm Sittin' Here" (John Hiatt) – 4:46
  3. "Anytime Babe" (Larry Weiss) – 3:07
  4. "Interlude I" – 0:19
  5. "Put out the Light" (Daniel Moore) – 3:06
  6. "Sitting in Limbo" (Gully Bright, Jimmy Cliff, Plummer) – 4:56

Side 2

  1. "I'd Be So Happy" (Skip Prokop) – 4:48
  2. "Interlude II" – 0:21
  3. "Play Something Sweet (Brickyard Blues)" (Allen Toussaint) – 4:48
  4. "On the Way Back Home" (Moore) – 4:16
  5. "The Show Must Go On" (David Courtney, Leo Sayer) – 4:24

Personnel

Production

  • Producer: Jimmy Ienner
  • Engineers: Greg Calbi, Roy Cicala, Dennis Ferrante, Jimmy Ienner, Jay Messina, Tom Rabstenek, John Stronach
  • Assistant engineers: Corky Stasiak
  • Remixing: Roy Cicala, Jay Messina
  • Arranger: Three Dog Night
  • Art direction: Ed Caraeff
  • Design: David Larkham
  • Photography: Ed Caraeff

Charts

Album - Billboard (North America)

Year Chart Position
1974 Pop Albums 20

Singles - Billboard (North America)

Year Single Chart Position
1974 "Sure As I'm Sittin' Here" Pop Singles 16
1974 "The Show Must Go On" Pop Singles 4
1974 "Play Something Sweet (Brickyard Blues)" Pop Singles 33







Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message
Please enter the solution to case below
70+12=