| ‹ 2002 |
||||
| Hong Kong Chief Executive election, 2005 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 June 2005 | ||||
![]() |
||||
| Nominee | Donald Tsang | |||
| Party | Nonpartisan | |||
| Electoral vote | Unopposed | |||
|
Incumbent Chief Executive Chief Executive-elect |
||||
The Hong Kong Chief Executive election of 2005 was held to fill the vacancy of the territory's top office. Tung Chee Hwa submitted a resignation document to the Chinese government, and it was officially approved on 12 March. On 24 June, Donald Tsang was sworn in as the new Chief Executive on 16 June. Since Tsang was the only candidate, no actual election was held.
Contents |
During the 1996 and 2002 election, an 800-member Election Committee was used to elect the Chief Executive. Unlike the US system, there is no universal suffrage or universal right to vote. Senior employees, managers and professionals mainly vote pro-China to ensure their businesses can run smoothly. They were entirely biased in favor of Beijing's stance in the previous two elections.[1]
The previously elected Tung Chee Hwa had long been an unpopular Chief executive. Tung claimed his health was deteriorating early in 2005 and announced he was ready to resign. He filed for resignation on 10 March[2], and two days later it was approved.
As of early April, there were 33 vacant spots, and nominations were opened for a poll to fill them.
On 1 May a by-election was held to fill the 33 vacant spots in the electoral college. Since four of the members are ex-officio members by more than one channels (e.g. deputy to PRC's National People's Congress and member of the Legislative Council simultaneously), so that there were only 796 electors.
Next, from 3 June to 16 June nominations were open to candidates who wanted to participate in this election. Donald Tsang for a long time remained the front-runner. He was declared elected unopposed as he was the only candidate managed to have 100 or more nominations from members of the Election Committee.
In the interim, Tsang and later Henry Tang served as acting Chief Executives in accordance with the Basic Law. Tsang was subsequently re-elected on 25 March 2007, and served a new five-year term starting from 1 July 2007.
Article 52 item 1 cites a health illness as an acceptable reason for resignation:
| “ | "The Chief Executive
of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region must resign under
any of the following circumstances: (1) When he or she loses the ability to discharge his or her duties as a result of serious illness or other reasons.[3]" |
” |
Given the status of this resignation as voluntary (as Tung claims), and there are allegations that the citing of health reasons may not be an actual truth, as there is technically nothing prohibiting the use of excuses in such a manner. It is rumoured that the actual motive is a decision imposed by the central government, but it can also be a desire to spend more time with the family or many other reasons.
Article 53 gives the provisions for an acting Chief Executive.
| “ | "If the Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is not able to discharge his or her duties for a short period, such duties shall temporarily be assumed by the Administrative Secretary, Financial Secretary or Secretary of Justice in this order of precedence.[3]" | ” |
This gave Donald Tsang, the Secretary of Administration at the time, the right to act as Chief Executive from 12 March to 25 May. He then had to resign, since it was illegal for him to become a candidate while acting as Chief Executive at the same time. Henry Tang, who was then Financial Secretary, filled him in according to the article. He then appointed Michael Suen as the new (acting in the interim) Chief Secretary. When Tsang was elected he was brought before the central government for approval and inauguration. The second section of Article 53 gives provisions for a new election.
| “ | "In the event that the office of Chief Executive becomes vacant, a new Chief Executive shall be selected within six months in accordance with the provisions of Article 45 of this Law. During the period of vacancy, his or her duties shall be assumed according to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.[3]" | ” |
The process is well defined under this clause, and Tsang's term as acting Chief Executive was limited to six months. The Chief Executive Election Ordinance defines the time as 120 days, give or take a few days, (ensuring an election on Sunday rather than on a weekday), which made 10 July the date for the election, if one had been warranted by multiple candidature.
Article 45 gives the requirements for choosing the Chief Executive, and Annex I does likewise in a more specific manner.
| “ | "The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be selected by election or through consultations held locally and be appointed by the Central People's Government.[3]" | ” |
| “ | "The method for selecting the Chief Executive shall be specified in the light of the actual situation in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and in accordance with the principle of gradual and orderly progress. The ultimate aim is the selection of the Chief Executive by universal suffrage upon nomination by a broadly representative nominating committee in accordance with democratic procedures.[3]" | ” |
The specific method for selecting the Chief Executive is prescribed in Basic Law Annex I: "Method for the Selection of the Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region". The Election Committee shall be composed of 800 members from the following sectors:
| Sector | Members[3] |
|---|---|
| Industrial, commercial and financial sectors | 200 |
| The professions | 200 |
| Labour, social services, religious and other sectors | 200 |
| Members of the Legislative Council
Representatives of district-based organizations Hong Kong deputies to the National People's Congress Representatives of Hong Kong members of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference || 200 |
|
| Total | 800 |
Article 46 was a subject of controversy regarding the term of the newly-elected Chief Executive. The article states:
| “ | "The term of office of the Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be five years. He or she may serve for not more than two consecutive terms." | ” |
The law requires a term of five years, but mainland officials have said the new leader filling-in can only serve until 2007. The matter was settled after a re-interpretation by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPCSC).[4] Though this did damage the credibility and integrity of the one country, two systems formula.[4]
A literal interpretation would mean Tsang has to serve until 2010, but this is not common sense behaviour in most other nations; one can only complete the term of a predecessor. The Chinese government has decided that the new leader would serve until Inauguration day in 2007.
In April 2005, 33 vacancies (27 from the regular constituencies, 6 from the religious sector) existed in the Election Committee. Nominations were accepted over a one-week timeframe from 9 April to 15 April to fill the seats. The six empty seats in the religious sector were appointed by the religious councils. Out of the 27 seats in 16 functional constituencies, 12 candidates were immediately declared elected to their seats because there were no more candidates competing than the number of seats available, and hence, these ones were declared elected unopposed.
In the other seven constituencies, where 15 vacancies were present, a poll was held on 1 May, and the count was conducted smoothly with all the elected candidates expected to be entered onto the official listing of Election Committee members within the near future. The by-election was marked by voter apathy, where only 15% of the eligible population turned up, with some constituencies reporting as low as 12%, despite the pleadings of the Hong Kong Government. Only two functional constituencies, Agriculture and Fisheries (85%) and District Council (86%) had higher voter turnouts than one quarter.
In early June, candidature nominations were held. The support of 100 Election Committee members is required (Ann. 1, Sect. 4, above) for nominations to be valid. Given the largely pro-China status of the Election Committee, it became common for the favoured candidate of the Chinese government to get elected unopposed. Given there were four vacancies in the EC, 697 signatures would theoretically be necessary to secure unopposed election.
| Name in English | Name in Chinese | Position | Support in EC | Nomination |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donald Tsang | 曾蔭權 | Former Chief Secretary | 674 | Valid |
| Lee Wing Tat | 李永達 | Chairman of the Democratic Party and Member of the Legislative Council | 52 | Invalid |
| Chim Pui Chung | 詹培忠 | Member of the Legislative Council | 21 | Invalid |
Tsang instantly became the frontrunner in the race to succeed Tung, due to his lengthy experience and high approval ratings. The Standard cited high-level sources saying that Beijing hoped Tsang would forestall any possibility of being challenged for the office by securing at least 500 to 700 nominating votes. Sources close to Tsang confirmed Beijing was worried that a contested election could lead to political uncertainty, and wanted to be sure that "no one runs against their man".[5]
On 15 June, Tsang handed in his nomination form which bore the signatures of 674 members of Election Committee. Later in the evening, the Returning Officer, Madam Justice Carlye Chu Fun Ling vetted the nomination form and determined that his nomination as a candidate in the election was valid[6]. The other candidates failed, having garnered fewer than the required 100 backers, Tsang was declared the only valid candidate in the election. Tsang was declared elected unopposed on 16 June, gazetted by the Government on 21 June, and duly inaugurated on 24 June.
During the election campaign, Donald Tsang received about HK$27.33 million sponsorship for the campaign, about 20% of which came from the businessmen from the property sector. Although Tsang stated publicly that each sponsor could not sponsor in excess of one hundred-thousand Hong Kong dollars, some of the businessmen sponsored him in different names, for example, Stanley Ho and Lee Shau Kee each sponsored HK$1 million under their family members' names. In the end Tsang used only HK$4.12 million of the sponsorship. The remaining HK$23.21 million dollars would be donated to 14 charitable organizations.
The most recent are listed at the top.
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|