From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The James-Lange theory refers to a hypothesis
on the origin and nature of emotions developed independently by two
19th-century scholars, William James and Carl Lange. The theory states that within
human beings, as a response to experiences in the world, the
autonomic nervous
system creates physiological events such as muscular tension, a
rise in heart rate, perspiration, and dryness of the mouth.
Emotions, then, are feelings which come about as a result
of these physiological changes, rather than being their cause.
James and Lange arrived at the theory independently. Lange
specifically stated that vasomotor changes are emotions.
(Ex. A person rationalizes that because he/she is crying, he/she
must be sad.) James elucidated his concept as:
|
“ |
My theory ... is that the bodily changes follow directly the
perception of the exciting fact, and that our feeling of the same
changes as they occur is the emotion. Common sense says, we lose
our fortune, are sorry and weep; we meet a bear, are frightened and
run; we are insulted by a rival, are angry and strike. The
hypothesis here to be defended says that this order of sequence is
incorrect ... and that the more rational statement is that we feel
sorry because we cry, angry because we strike, afraid because we
tremble ... Without the bodily states following on the perception,
the latter would be purely cognitive in form, pale, colorless,
destitute of emotional warmth. We might then see the bear, and
judge it best to run, receive the insult and deem it right to
strike, but we should not actually feel afraid or angry.[1]
|
” |
The notion of causality is a difficult one. The theory has been
largely disfavored in modern times. Some evidence to support it,
however, may come from the fact that sufferers of various
psychological challenges such as panic disorders
often experience psychoemotional trauma after
physiological responses arise in the body, responses which
individuals are conditioned to associate with a particular
emotional state but which can, via therapy, be dissociated.
This theory was challenged in the 1920s by psychologists such as
Walter Cannon and Philip Bard, who
theorized that physiological changes are caused by emotions
(collectively known as the Cannon-Bard theory of emotion).
The third theory of emotion is called the Schachter &
Singer's two factor theory of
emotion. This theory states that emotions are a direct result
of an analysis of the surroundings.
Criticisms
- The viscera are largely unresponsive and react
relatively slowly (i.e. - we 'feel' the emotion before the
physiological changes have occurred.)
- Cutting nerves from the viscera has no effect on emotions in
rats.
- Visceral responses are the same no matter what the reported
emotion.
- Injecting adrenaline/epinephrine (as in released from
the adrenal glands during "normal" emotional state) does not induce
the feeling of an emotion, only your moods.
- A double dissociation has been found for autonomic nervous system
responses between those with those with injuries to the ventromedial prefrontal
cortex that have the feelings not the responses, and those with
injuries to the right somatosensory
cortex that lack the feelings but not the responses.[2]
See also
References