From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
John Robert "Haj" Ross (born May 7, 1938 in Boston, Massachusetts) is a linguist who played a
part in the development of generative semantics (as opposed
to interpretive semantics) along with George Lakoff, James D.
McCawley, and Paul
Postal. Ross was a student of Bernard Bloch, Samuel Martin and Rulon
Wells at Yale University, Zellig Harris,
Henry Hiz, Henry Hoenigswald and Franklin Southworth at the University of Pennsylvania,
and Roman
Jakobson, Noam
Chomsky, Morris
Halle, Paul
Postal, Edward
Klima and Hu Matthews at MIT.
Ross met Lakoff in 1963 and began collaborating with him
especially on work by and influenced by Postal. He was a professor
of linguistics at MIT from 1966-1985 and has worked in Brazil, Singapore and British Columbia. He is currently at
the University of North Texas and
is well known in the Linguistics Department for his fascinating but
often tangentially structured lectures. His class offerings there
include Linguistics and Literature, Syntax, Field Methods, History
of English, Metaphor and Semantics; he also oversees U.N.T.'s
Doctorate in Poetics program.
Ross's 1967 MIT dissertation is a landmark in syntactic theory and documents in great detail
Ross's discovery of islands. Ross is also well known for his
onomastic fecundity; he has coined many new terms describing
syntactic phenomena that are well-known to this day, including
copula switch, Do-Gobbling, freeze(s), gapping, heavy NP shift, (inner) islands, myopia, the penthouse
principle, pied piping, pruning, scrambling, siamese sentences. sluicing, slifting, sloppy identity, sounding, squib, squishes, viability, and syntactic islands.
Relating to syntactic islands, he also coined the terms
"left-branch condition", "complex-np constraint", "coordinate
structure constraint", and "sentential subject constraint". In phonology, he suggested the
term conspiracy to Charles Kisseberth.
Like Roman
Jakobson, Ross analyzes poetry using linguistics (see poetics).
He describes himself and the interpenetration of his work on
language in the following terms:
“ |
I am interested in
poetics “and” semantax – I do not see the sense in trying to keep
“them” separate. Worse – studying the structural beauties of
language without simultaneously watching how the great writers make
use of the structural capabilities of their languages to hint at
the ineffable – such a limitation leads to joyless linguistic
science. Language becomes flat, grey.
And the other tack – studying the incredible intricacies of the
verbal art of the greatest masters of language without having the
most subtle of linguistic tools to do one’s literary criticism with
– this is as successful as doing astronomy with an inexpensive
telescope.
The fundamental point to be kept in view is that a language is
alive – chloroforming it and pinning it to a board to make it
easier to talk about is no less distressing than seeing a luna moth
in a museum exhibit. Without this liveness, there could be no
verbal art. Computer languages like FORTRAN and C++ are magnificent
instruments for making computers do what we want them to, but they
are notably inadequate for sonnets.
All of us who love language must help to coinvent a
chloroform-free linguistics which is at the same time a literary
theory which contributes to cutting-edge phonology, morphology,
syntax, semantics, pragmatics.
The noetic challenge posed by this necessity is not unique to
the study of language: as Morris Berman says, in his epochal The
Reenchantment of The World, for all fields of study, nothing less
than a fusion of fact and value will do.
Les mots ont une âme. La plupart des lecteurs, et même des
écrivains, ne leur demandent qu'un sens. Il faut trouver cette âme
qui apparaît au contact d'autres mots, qui éclate et éclaire
certains livres d'une lumière inconnue, bien difficile à faire
jaillir.
Words have a soul. The majority of readers, and even of writers,
demand only that they have a sense. It is necessary to find that
soul, which appears in the contact with other words, which erupts
from and illumines certain books with an unknown light, one not a
little difficult to cause to gush forth.
-
- Guy de Maupassant, from “Flaubert vu par Guy de Maupassant en
1884” La Revue Bleue. 19 et 26 janvier 1884, Flaubert vu par
Maupassant dans une étude parue en 1876
|
” |
References
- Harris, Randy Allen. (1995). The linguistics wars.
Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-509834-X.
- Joseph, John; Swiggers, Pierre (Eds.). (2000). Biographical
dictionary of western linguistics, 1450-present. London:
Routledge.
- Lakoff, George; & Ross, John R. (1966). Criterion for verb
phrase constituency. In Harvard Computation Laboratory Report
to the National Science Foundation on Mathematical linguistics and
automatic translation (No. NSF-17). Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Computation Laboratory.
- Lakoff, George; & Ross, John R. (1976). Is deep structure
necessary?. In J. D. McCawley (Ed.), Syntax and semantics
7 (pp. 159–164).
- Ross, John R. (1966). A proposed rule of tree-pruning. In
Harvard Computation Laboratory Report to the National Science
Foundation on Mathematical linguistics and automatic
translation (No. NSF-17). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Computation Laboratory.
- Ross, John R. (1966). Relativization in extraposed clauses. In
Harvard Computation Laboratory Report to the National Science
Foundation on Mathematical linguistics and automatic
translation (No. NSF-17). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Computation Laboratory.
- Ross, John R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax.
(Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
(Published as Ross 1986). (Available online at http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/15166).
- Ross, John R. (1967). On the cyclic nature of English
pronominalization. In To honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the
occasion of his seventieth birthday (No. 3, pp. 1669–1682).
The Hague: Mouton.
- Ross, John R. (1969). Auxiliaries as main verbs. In W. Todd
(Ed.), Studies in philosophical linguistics (Series 1).
Evanston, IL: Great Expectations Press.
- Ross, John R. (1970). On declarative sentences. In R. A. Jacobs
& P. S. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in English
transformational grammar (pp. 222–272). Washington: Georgetown
University Press.
- Ross, John R. (1970). Gapping and the order of constituents. In
M. Bierwisch & Karl E. Heidolph (Eds.), Progress in
linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.
- Ross, John R. (1972) Act. In Donald Davidson and Gilbert Harman
(Eds.), Semantics of Natural Languages, D. Reidel and
Company, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 70–126.
- Ross, John R. (1972). The category squish: Endstation
Hauptwort. In Paul M. Peranteau, Judith N. Levi, Gloria C. Phares,
et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Regional Meeting of
the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago Linguistic Society,
University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 316–338.
- Ross, John R. (1972). Doubl-ing. In J. Kimball (Ed.),
Syntax and semantics (Vol. 1, pp. 157–186). New York:
Seminar Press.
- Ross, John R. (1972). A reanalysis of English word stress (part
I). In Michael K. Brame (Ed.), Contributions to generative
phonology. Austin: University of Texas Press.
- Ross, John R. (1973). Slifting. In Maurice Gross and Marcel
Schützenberger (Eds.), The Formal Analysis of Natural
Languages, Mouton and Company, ’s Gravenhage, Holland, pp.
133–172.
- Ross, John R. (1973). The Penthouse Principle and the order of
constituents. In Claudia Corum et al. (Eds.), You Take the High
Node and I’ll Take the Low Node, Chicago Linguistic Society,
University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 397–422.
- Cooper, William E. and Ross, John R. (1975). World order. In
Robin E. Grossman et al. (Eds.), Papers from the Parasession on
Functionalism, Chicago Linguistic Society, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 63–111.
- Ross, Haj (1982). The sound of meaning. (1982). In
Linguistics in the Morning Calm, edited by the Linguistic
Society of Korea, Hanshin Publishing Company, Seoul, Korea, pp.
275–290.
- Ross, Haj (1984). Inner islands. In Claudia Brugman and Monica
Macauley et al. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting
of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley Linguistics
Society, University of California, Berkeley, pp. 258 – 265.
- Ross, John R. (1986). Infinite syntax!. Norwood, NJ:
ABLEX, ISBN 0-89391-042-2.
- Ross, Haj (1995) Defective noun phrases. In Audra Dainora,
Rachel Hemphill, Barbara Lukas, Barbara Need and Sheri Pargman
(Eds.) (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-First Regional Meeting
of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago Linguistic Society,
University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 398–440.
- Ross, Haj (2000) The frozenness of pseudoclefts – towards an
inequality-based syntax. In Arika Okrent and John P. Boyle (Eds.),
Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago
Linguistic Society, Chicago Linguistic Society, University of
Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 385–426.
- Ross, John R. (2004). Siamese sentences – a first look at a
parallel construction. In Mary Andronis, Erin Debenport, Anne
Pycha, and Keiko Yoshimura (Eds), Proceedings of the
Thirty-Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic
Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago,
Chicago, Illinois. pp. 569–584.
External
links