From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
José Maurício Bustani is a Brazilian diplomat, of primarily Lebanese
extraction, who was the director-general of the Organisation
for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons until he was ousted
after falling out with the US government in
April 2002. He was Ambassador of Brazil to the United Kingdom
between 2003 and 2008 and is currently Ambassador of Brazil to France.
Bustani was born in 1945 in Porto Velho, Brazil. He received his law degree from the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro in
1967, and attended the Brazilian diplomatic school in the same
year, after which he joined the Brazilian foreign service.
Director General of the
OPCW
Bustani was appointed director general of the OPCW in 1997. His
four-year term was due to expire in 2001. However, he was
unanimously reelected to this position (with considerable US support) one year
early, in May 2000. This should have meant a new four-year term
running from 2001-2005.
Removal from
Office
Soon after, Bustani fell out of favour with the US, who now
began to lobby aggressively for Bustani’s removal, in a campaign
orchestrated by John
Bolton.[1]
Finally, at Bolton's behest, a special meeting was held in The Hague on Sunday, April
21, 2002. Following what are reputed to have been both secretive
and very tempestuous deliberations, a vote was held, with Bustani’s
removal being carried by a vote of 48-6, with 43 abstentions. This
was the first time in history that the head of a major
international organization was removed during his/her term of
office.
There is much controversy surrounding the reasons behind
Bustani’s removal. Bustani had been negotiating with the Iraqi regime, and was hoping to
persuade them to sign up to the OPCW, thus granting OPCW inspectors
full access to Iraq’s purported chemical weapons
arsenal. If Bustani had succeeded, this would have placed a
formidable obstacle in the path of the Bush administration’s war
plans, by removing their ostensible motive. Bustani’s supporters
insist this was the reason why the US forced him out.
The Bush administration
claimed that Bustani’s position was no longer tenable, stating
three main reasons: “polarizing and confrontational conduct”,
“mismanagement issues” and “advocacy of inappropriate roles for the
OPCW”.
Bustani's supporters also claim that the US ambassador issued
threats against OPCW members in order to coerce them to support the
US initiative against Bustani, including the withdrawal of US
support for the organization. It has been said that Bustani was
bullied out from the OPCW by John Bolton - something that appears
consistent with what was said about Bolton's practices during the
US
Senate hearings prior to his appointment as US ambassador to
the United
Nations.
Bustani's removal was both surprising, given the previous
support he enjoyed from the US, and utterly unique. Bustani filed a
complaint with the International Labour
Organization Administrative Tribunal, which a year later set
aside the dismissal decision, and provided moral as well as
material financial compensation to Bustani; Bustani did not seek
reinstatement.[2]
According to the Statement of the Delegation of Brazil.[3], on the
IX Conference of States Parties to the CWC on 3 December 2004, he
donated 100% of his compensation to the International Cooperation
programmes of the OPCW. A letter from Ambassador Bustani regarding
this donation and comments about the final Judgementof the ILOAT on
the issue of his removal can be found in a National Paper
distributed by Brazil, document C-9/NAT.1, dated 13 August,
2004.
Notes
- ^ "Arresting John Bolton".
George
Monbiot. http://www.monbiot.com/archives/2008/05/27/arresting-john-bolton/. Retrieved
2008-05-28.
- ^
Judgment 2232 - ILO
Administrative Tribunal
- ^
Statement of the Delegation of
Brazil in PDF
External
links