The Full Wiki

Julian Jaynes: Wikis

  
  

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Encyclopedia

Updated live from Wikipedia, last check: June 02, 2012 14:41 UTC (48 seconds ago)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Julian Jaynes

Julian Jaynes (February 27, 1920 – November 21, 1997) was an American psychologist, best known for his book The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind (1976), in which he argued that ancient peoples did not access consciousness (did not possess an introspective mind-space), but instead had their behavior directed by auditory hallucinations, which they interpreted as the voice of their chief, king, or the gods. Jaynes argued that the change from this mode of thinking (which he called the bicameral mind) to consciousness (construed as self-identification of interior mental states) occurred over a period of centuries about three thousand years ago and was based on the development of metaphorical language and the emergence of writing.

Contents

Life

Jaynes was born in West Newton, Massachusetts, son of Julian Clifford Jaynes (1854-1922), a Unitarian minister, and Clara Bullard Jaynes. He attended Harvard University, was an undergraduate at McGill University and afterwards received master's and doctorate degrees from Yale University. He was mentored by Frank A. Beach and was a close friend of Edwin G. Boring. During this time period Jaynes made significant contributions in the fields of animal behavior and ethology. After Yale, Jaynes spent several years in England working as an actor and playwright. Jaynes later returned to the United States, and lectured in psychology at Princeton University from 1966 to 1990, teaching a popular class on consciousness for much of that time. He was in high demand as a lecturer, and was frequently invited to lecture at conferences and as a guest lecturer at other universities, including Harvard, Columbia, Cornell, Johns Hopkins, Rutgers, Dalhousie, Wellesley, Florida State, the Universities of New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Prince Edward Island, and Massachusetts at Amherst and Boston Harbor. In 1984 he was invited to give the plenary lecture at the Wittgenstein Symposium in Kirchburg, Austria. He gave six major lectures in 1985 and nine in 1986. He was awarded an honorary Ph.D. by Rhode Island College in 1979 and another from Elizabethtown College in 1985.[1]

Influence

Jaynes's theory has been influential to philosophers such as Daniel Dennett,[2] psychologists such as Tim Crow[3] and Steven Pinker,[4] and psychiatrists such as Henry Nasrallah.[5] Jaynes's ideas have also influenced writers such as William S. Burroughs,[6] Neal Stephenson,[7] Robert J. Sawyer,[8] and Ken Wilber. Jaynes's theory inspired the investigation of auditory hallucinations by researchers such as psychologist Thomas Posey[9] and clinical psychologist John Hamilton,[10] which ultimately has led to a rethinking of the association of auditory hallucinations and mental illness.[11] Richard Dawkins (famed University of Oxford evolutionary biologist and renowned atheist), cited Jaynes' ideas in his book The God Delusion as impactful on him, stating "It is one of those books that is either complete rubbish or a work of consummate genius, nothing in between ...".[12]Jaynes's theory has been cited in hundreds of scientific and popular books.

In the late 1990s, Jaynes's ideas received renewed attention as brain imaging technology confirmed many of his early predictions.[13][14] A 2007 book titled Reflections on the Dawn of Consciousness: Julian Jaynes's Bicameral Mind Theory Revisited contains several of Jaynes's essays along with chapters by scholars from a variety of disciplines expanding on his ideas.[15] At the April 2008 "Toward a Science of Consciousness" Conference held in Tucson, Arizona, Marcel Kuijsten (Executive Director and Founder of the Julian Jaynes Society) and Brian J. McVeigh (University of Arizona) hosted a workshop devoted to Jaynesian psychology. At the same conference, a panel devoted to Jaynes was also held, with John Limber (University of New Hampshire), Marcel Kuijsten, John Hainly (Southern University), Scott Greer (University of Prince Edward Island), and Brian J. McVeigh presenting relevant research. At the same conference the philosopher Jan Sleutels (Leiden University) presented on Jaynesian psychology.

Criticism

At the time of publication of The Origin of Consciousness, Jaynes was criticized for publishing with a trade publisher and not submitting the work for peer review. Daniel Dennett, in introducing in 1998 his 1986 paper "Julian Jaynes's Software Archeology",[16] began

Many of the factual claims advanced in Julian Jaynes's 1976 cult classic, The Origins of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, are false. Many were no doubt known to be false in 1976 (by researchers more up-to-the-minute than Jaynes)....

but said it deserves attention "because it asked some very good questions that had never been properly asked before and boldly proposed answers to them."

Jaynes's theories on consciousness and the bicameral mind proved controversial. An early criticism by philosopher Ned Block argued that Jaynes had confused the emergence of consciousness with the emergence of the concept of consciousness. In other words, according to Block, humans were conscious all along but didn't have the concept of consciousness and thus did not discuss it in their texts. Dennett countered that for some things, such as money, baseball, or consciousness, one cannot have the thing without also having the concept of the thing.[17] Block's arguments have more recently been criticized by the Dutch philosopher Jan Sleutels.[18]

It was a successful work of popular science, selling out the first print run before a second could replace it. The book was a nominee for the National Book Award in 1978, and received dozens of positive book reviews, including those by well-known critics such as John Updike in The New Yorker, Christopher Lehmann-Haupt in the New York Times, and Marshall McLuhan in the Toronto Globe and Mail. Articles on Jaynes's theory appeared in Time[19] magazine and Psychology Today[20] in 1977. Jaynes later expanded on the ideas in his book in a series of commentaries in the journal Behavioral and Brain Sciences, in lectures and discussions published in Canadian Psychology, and in Art/World. He wrote an extensive Afterword for the 1990 edition of his book, in which he expanded on his theory and addressed some of the criticisms. More than 30 years later, Jaynes's book is still in print.

Notes

  1. ^ Kuijsten, Marcel (2007). Reflections on the Dawn of Consciousness: Julian Jaynes's Bicameral Mind Theory Revisited. Julian Jaynes Society. 13–68. ISBN 0-9790744-0-1. 
  2. ^ Dennett, Daniel (1992). Consciousness Explained. Back Bay Books. 
  3. ^ Crow, Tim (2005). "Right Hemisphere Language Functions and Schizophrenia: The Forgotten Hemisphere". Brain 128 (5): 963. 
  4. ^ Pinker, Steven (1999). How the Mind Works. W.W. Norton & Co.. 
  5. ^ Nasrallah, Henry (1985). "The Unintegrated Right Cerebral Hemispheric Consciousness as Alien Intruder: A Possible Mechanism for Schneiderian Delusions in Schizophrenia". Comprehensive Psychiatry 26 (3): 273. 
  6. ^ Burroughs, William S. "Sects and Death." Three Fisted Tales of Bob. Ed. Rev. Ivan Stang. Fireside, 1990. ISBN 0-671-67190-1
  7. ^ Stephenson, Neal (1992). Snow Crash. Bantam Books. 
  8. ^ Sawyer, Robert (2009). WWW: Wake. Ace. 
  9. ^ Posey, Thomas (1983). "Auditory Hallucinations of Hearing Voices in 375 Normal Subjects". Imagination, Cognition, and Personality 3. 
  10. ^ Hamilton, John (1988). "Auditory Hallucinations in Nonverbal Quadriplegics". Psychiatry 48. 
  11. ^ Smith, Daniel (2007). Muses, Madmen, and Prophets: Rethinking the History, Science, and Meaning of Auditory Hallucination. Penguin Press. 
  12. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2006). The God Delusion. Mariner Books.
  13. ^ Olin, Robert (1999). "Auditory Hallcinations and the Bicameral Mind". Lancet 354 (9173): 166. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)75304-6. 
  14. ^ Sher, Leo (2000). "Neuroimaging, Auditory Hallucinations, and the Bicameral Mind". Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience 25 (3). 
  15. ^ Kuijsten, Marcel (2007). Reflections on the Dawn of Consciousness: Julian Jaynes's Bicameral Mind Theory Revisited. Julian Jaynes Society. ISBN 0-9790744-0-1. 
  16. ^ Dennett, Daniel (1986). "Julian Jaynes's Software Archeology". Canadian Psychology 27 (2). , reprinted with introductory paragraph in Dennett,Brainchildren: Essays on Designing Minds, 1998, pp. 121-130
  17. ^ Dennet, op. cit., at pp. 127-128 in Brainstorms
  18. ^ Kuijsten, Marcel (2007). Reflections on the Dawn of Consciousness: Julian Jaynes's Bicameral Mind Theory Revisited. Julian Jaynes Society. pp. 303-335. ISBN 0-9790744-0-1. 
  19. ^ Leo, John (1977). "The Lost Voices of the Gods". Time 14. 
  20. ^ Keen, Sam (November 1977). "Julian Jaynes: Portrait of the Psychologist as a Maverick Theorizer". Psychology Today 11. 

External links


Quotes

Up to date as of January 14, 2010

From Wikiquote

Julian Jaynes (27 February 192021 November 1997) was an American psychologist, best known for his book The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind (1976)

Contents

Sourced

  • "What is the meaning of life?" This question has no answer except in the history of how it came to be asked. There is no answer because words have meaning, not life or persons or the universe itself. Our search for certainty rests in our attempts at understanding the history of all individual selves and all civilizations. Beyond that, there is only awe.

The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind (1976)

  • Consciousness is a much smaller part of mental life than we are conscious of, since we cannot be conscious of what we aren’t conscious of.
    • p. 23
  • Subjective conscious mind is an analog of what is called the real world. It is built up with a vocabulary or lexical field whose terms are all metaphors or analogs of behavior in the physical world.
    • p. 55
  • We have said that consciousness is an operation rather than a thing, a repository, or a function. It operates by way of analogy, by way of constructing an analog space with an analog ‘I’, that can observe that space, and move metaphorically in it. It operates on any reactivity, excerpts relevant aspects, narratizes and conciliates them together in a metaphorical space where such meanings can be manipulated like things in space.
    • p. 65-66
  • Conscious mind is a spatial analog of the world and mental acts are analogs of bodily acts. Consciousness operates only on objectively observable things. Or, to say it another way with echoes of John Locke, there is nothing in consciousness that is not an analog of something that was in behavior first.
    • p. 66
  • The presence of voices which had to be obeyed were the absolute prerequisite to the conscious stage of mind in which it is the self that is responsible and can debate within itself, can order and direct, and that the creation of such a self is the product of culture. In a sense, we have become our own gods.
    • p. 79
  • These [internal body sensations] are then the supposed substantives inside the body that by literary metaphor, by being compared to containers and persons, accrue to themselves spatial and behavioral qualities which in later literature develop into the unified mind-space with its analog ‘I’ that we have come to call consciousness.
    • p. 271
  • Poetry, from describing external events objectively, is becoming subjectified into a poetry of personal conscious expression.
    • p. 274
  • The mind is still haunted with its old unconscious ways; it broods on lost authorities; and the yearning, the deep and hollowing yearning for divine volition and service is with us still.
    • p. 313
  • Behavior now must be changed from within the new consciousness rather than from Mosaic laws carving behavior from without. Sin and desire are now within conscious desire and conscious contrition, rather than in the external behaviors of the decalogue and the penances of temple sacrifice and community punishment. The divine kingdom to be regained is psychological not physical. It is metaphorical not literal. It is "within" not in extenso.
    • p. 318

See also

External links

Wikipedia
Wikipedia has an article about:







Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message
Please enter the solution to case below
12+12=