![]() |
|
| Type | Private |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 |
| Headquarters | |
| Industry | Internet-auction |
| Revenue | Not Available (2008) |
| Employees | less than 10 |
| Website | http://www.lixtor.co.nz/ |
Lixtor is an Internet-auction website operating in New Zealand since 2005, as a free alternative to currently dominant "paid" online-trading website in New Zealand, TradeMe. [1]
Lixtor's business model is substantially different from its rival site TradeMe as it tries to operate its business on advertising revenue rather than charging users on listing fees and success fee. [2]
Contents |
On November 06, 2008 the National Business Review reported on an article [1] that Lixtor has been legally-threatened by TradeMe over "copyright infringement" on their "Privacy Policy" and "Terms and Conditions". However, Lixtor stated that it was rather a false-flagged operation carried out by TradeMe to "intimidate" Lixtor because TradeMe was threatened by Lixtor's "no fee" business model [1].
Following this dispute with TradeMe, Lixtor listed their auction site for sale on TradeMe on November 17, 2008, with the starting bid $100,000,000 [3 ][4 ]. The listing was listed with the option to support Plunket by rounding up the success fee [3 ]. However the auction was disabled by the TradeMe administrators hours after the auction [4 ][5 ].
Nonetheless, Lixtor re-listed the auction minutes after their listing was disabled by TradeMe moderators [4 ], but this second listing was also removed hours later [6 ]. No more listings were reported after this [4 ], possibly due to TradeMe's policy to suspend the "suspicious" members [7 ].
On November 20, 2008, a community newspaper The Aucklander also reported that TradeMe's lawyers asked Lixtor to remove their "Terms and Conditions" [8]
On February 3, 2009, in the wake of the emerging New Zealand copyright law Section 92a, New Zealand Creative Freedom Foundation published an article[9]. It was stated that Lixtor vs. TradeMe case is a good example of how the new section 92a in the New Zealand copyright law could be "misused", if passed.
|
|