The Full Wiki

More info on Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact

Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact: Wikis

  
  
  

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Encyclopedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact
Treaty of Non-Aggression between Germany and the Soviet Union
MolotovRibbentropStalin.jpg
Molotov signs the German–Soviet non-aggression pact. Behind him are Ribbentrop and Stalin.
Signed
Location
August 23,1939
Moscow, Soviet Union
Signatories  Soviet Union
Nazi Germany Nazi Germany
Languages German, Russian
Wikisource logo Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact at Wikisource
Text of the secret protocol (in German)

The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, colloquially named after the Soviet foreign minister Vyacheslav Molotov and the German foreign minister Joachim von Ribbentrop, was an agreement officially titled the Treaty of Non-Aggression between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics[1] and signed in Moscow in the early hours of 24 August 1939 (but dated 23 August).[2] It was a non-aggression pact between the two countries and pledged neutrality by either party if the other were attacked by a third party. It remained in effect until 22 June 1941 when Germany implemented Operation Barbarossa, invading the Soviet Union.

In addition to stipulations of non-aggression, the treaty included a secret protocol dividing Northern and Eastern Europe into German and Soviet spheres of influence, anticipating potential "territorial and political rearrangements" of these countries. Thereafter, Germany and the Soviet Union invaded their respective sides of Poland, dividing the country between them. Part of eastern Finland was annexed by the Soviet Union after the Winter War. This was followed by Soviet annexations of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Bessarabia.

Contents

Names

The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact is commonly referred to under a number of names in addition to the official one and the one bearing the names of the foreign ministers. It is also known as the Nazi–Soviet Pact, Hitler–Stalin Pact, German–Soviet Non-aggression Pact and sometimes the Nazi–Soviet Alliance.[3]

Background

The outcome of the First World War was disastrous for both German Reich and Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic. During the war, the Bolsheviks struggled for survival, and Lenin had no option except to recognize the independence of Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland. Moreover, facing a German military advance, Lenin and Trotsky were forced to enter into the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk[4], which ceded some western Russian territory to the German Empire. After Germany's collapse, British, French and Japanese troops intervened in the Russian Civil War.[5]

On 16 April 1922, Germany and Soviet Russia entered the Treaty of Rapallo, pursuant to which they renounced territorial and financial claims against each other.[6] The parties further pledged neutrality in the event of an attack against one another with the 1926 Treaty of Berlin.[7] While trade between the two countries fell sharply after World War I, trade agreements signed in the mid-1920s helped to increase trade to 433 million Reichsmarks per year by 1927.[8]

At the beginning of the 1930s, the Nazi Party's rise to power increased tensions between Germany, the Soviet Union and other countries with ethnic Slavs, which were considered "Untermenschen" according to Nazi racial ideology.[9] Moreover, the anti-Semitic Nazis associated ethnic Jews with both communism and financial capitalism, both of which they opposed.[10][11] Consequently, Nazi theory held that Slavs in the Soviet Union were being ruled by "Jewish Bolshevik" masters.[12] In 1934, Hitler himself had spoken of an inescapable battle against both Pan-Slavism and Neo-Slavism, the victory in which would lead to "permanent mastery of the world", though he stated that they would "walk part of the road with the Russians, if that will help us."[13] The resulting manifestation of German anti-Bolshevism and an increase in Soviet foreign debts caused German–Soviet trade to dramatically decline.[14] Imports of Soviet goods to Germany fell to 223 million Reichsmarks in 1934 as the more isolationist Stalinist regime asserted power and the abandonment of post-World War I Treaty of Versailles military controls decreased Germany's reliance on Soviet imports.[8][15]

In 1936, Germany and Fascist Italy supported Spanish Nationalists in the Spanish Civil War, while the Soviets supported the partially socialist-led Second Spanish Republic under the leadership of president Manuel Azaña.[16] In 1936, Germany and Japan entered the Anti-Comintern Pact,[17] and were joined a year later by Italy.[18] [16] Thus, in a sense, the Spanish Civil War became also the scene of a proxy war between Germany and the USSR.[19]

Hitler's fierce anti-Soviet rhetoric was one of the reasons why the UK and France decided that Soviet participation in the 1938 Munich Conference regarding Czechoslovakia would be both dangerous and useless.[20] The Munich Agreement that followed[21] marked a partial German annexation of Czechoslovakia in late 1938 followed by its complete dissolution in March 1939,[22] which is seen as part of an appeasement of Germany conducted by Chamberlain's and Daladier's cabinets.[23] This policy immediately raised the question of whether the Soviet Union could avoid being next on Hitler's list.[24] The Soviet leadership believed that the West may want to encourage German aggression in the East[25] and that France and Britain might stay neutral in a war initiated by Germany, hoping that the warring states would wear each other out and put an end to both the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany.[26]

For Germany, because an autarkic economic approach or an alliance with Britain were impossible, closer relations with the Soviet Union to obtain raw materials became necessary, if not just for economic reasons alone.[27] Moreover, an expected British blockade in the event of war would create massive shortages for Germany in a number of key raw materials.[28] After the Munich agreement, the resulting increase in German military supply needs and Soviet demands for military machinery, talks between the two countries occurred from late 1938 to March 1939.[29] The third Soviet Five Year Plan required massive new infusions of technology and industrial equipment.[27][30]

On 31 March 1939, in response to Nazi Germany's defiance of the Munich Agreement and occupation of Czechoslovakia,[31] the United Kingdom pledged the support of itself and France to guarantee the independence of Poland, Belgium, Roumania, Greece, and Turkey.[32] On 6 April Poland and the UK agreed to formalize the guarantee as a military alliance, pending negotiations.[33] On 28 April 1939, Hitler denounced the 1934 German–Polish Non-Aggression Pact and the 1935 Anglo-German Naval Agreement.[34]

Negotiations

Starting in mid-March 1939, the Soviet Union, Britain and France (the "Tripartite" group) traded a flurry of suggestions and counterplans regarding a potential political and military agreement.[35] Although informal consultations commenced in April, the main negotiations began only in May.[35] At the same time, throughout the early 1939, Germany and the Soviet Union had discussed entering into an economic deal involving raw materials needed for German war production.[36] German war planners had estimated massive raw materials shortfalls if Germany entered a war without Soviet supply.[37] For months, Germany had secretly hinted to Soviet diplomats that it could offer better terms for a political agreement than Britain and France.[38][39][40]

Pre-August Tripartite negotiations

The Soviet Union feared Western powers and the possibility of "capitalist encirclements", had little faith either that war could be avoided, or faith in the Polish army, and wanted nothing less than an ironclad military alliance[41] that would provide a guaranteed support for a two-pronged attack on Germany.[42][43] Britain and France believed that war could still be avoided, and that the Soviet Union, weakened by the Great Purge,[44] could not be a main military participant[42], a point that many military sources were at variance with, especially after the sound thrashing administered to the Japanese Kwantung army on the Mandchurian frontier[41]. France was more anxious to find an agreement with the USSR than was Britain; as a continental power, it was more willing to make concessions, more fearful of the dangers of an agreement between the USSR and Germany.[42] These contrasting attitudes partly explain why the USSR has often been charged with playing a double game in 1939: carrying on open negotiations for a alliance with Britain and France whilst secretly considering propositions from Germany[42].

By the end of May drafts were formally presented.[35] In mid-June the main Tripartite negotiations started.[45] The discussion was focused on potential guarantees to central and east European countries should a German aggression arise.[41] The USSR proposed to consider that a political turn towards Germany by the Baltic states would constitute an "indirect aggression" towards the Soviet Union.[46] Britain opposed such proposals, because they feared the Soviets' proposed language could justify a Soviet intervention in Finland and the Baltic states, or push those countries to seek closer relations with Germany.[47][48] The discussion about a definition of "indirect aggression" became one of the sticking points between the parties, and by mid-July the tripartite political negotiations effectively stalled, while the parties agreed to start negotiations on a military agreement, which the Soviets insisted must be entered into simultaneously with any political agreement.[49]

Beginning of Soviet–German secret talks

From April to July, Soviet and German officials made statements regarding the potential for the beginning of political negotiations, while no actual negotiations took place during that time period.[50] The ensuing discussion of a potential political deal between Germany and the Soviet had to be channeled into the framework of economic negotiations between the two countries, because close military and diplomatic connections, as was the case before mid-1930s, had afterward been largely severed.[51] In May, Stalin replaced his Foreign Minister Maxim Litvinov, who was regarded as pro-western and was Jewish, with Vyacheslav Molotov, allowing the Soviet Union more latitude in discussions with more parties, not only with Britain and France.[52]

In late July and early August 1939, Soviet and German officials agreed on most of the details for a planned economic agreement,[53] and specifically addressed a potential political agreement,[54][55][56][57] which the Soviets stated could only come after an economic agreement.[58]

August negotiations

In early August, Germany and the Soviet Union worked out the last details of their economic deal,[59] and started to discuss a political alliance. They explained to each other the reasons for their foreign policy hostility in the 1930s, finding common ground in the anti-capitalism of both countries.[60][61][62]

At the same time, Tripartite Soviet–British–French negotiators scheduled talks on military matters to occur in Moscow in August 1939, aiming to define the specifics of what should be the reaction of the Soviet Union, France and Britain, if they were to sign any agreement, in case a German attack occur.[47] The tripartite military talks started in mid-August, hit a sticking point regarding passage of Soviet troops through Poland if Germans attacked, and the parties waited as British and French officials overseas pressured Polish officials to agree to such terms.[63][64] Polish officials refused to allow Soviet troops on to Polish territory if Germans attacked; as Polish foreign minister Józef Beck pointed out, they feared that once the Red Army entered their territories, it might never leave.[65][66] While Britain and France refused to allow Soviet Union to impinge on the sovereignty of its neighbors, Germany possessed no such reservations [67].

That day, the 1939 German–Soviet Commercial Agreement was finally signed.[68] On 21 August the Soviets suspended Tripartite military talks, citing other reasons.[38][69] That same day, Stalin received assurance that Germany would approve secret protocols to the proposed non-aggression pact that would place half of Poland (border along the Vistula river), Latvia, Estonia, Finland, and Bessarabia in the Soviets' sphere of influence.[70] That night, Stalin replied that the Soviets were willing to sign the pact, and that he would receive Ribbentrop on 23 August.[71]

The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact and its secret protocol

Following completion of the Soviet-German trade and credit agreement, there has arisen the question of improving political links between Germany and the USSR.
Excerpt from the article “On Soviet-German Relations” on Soviet newspaper Izvestia, August 21, 1939[72]
"The Prussian Tribute in Moscow", satirical newspaper "Mucha", September 8, 1939, Warsaw
Ribbentrop and Stalin at the signing of the Pact

On 22 August, one day after the talks broke down with France and Britain, Moscow revealed that Ribbentrop would visit Stalin the next day. This happened while the Soviets were still negotiating with the British and French missions in Moscow. With the Western nations unwilling to accede to Soviet demands, Stalin instead entered a secret Nazi–Soviet alliance.[73] On 24 August a 10-year non-aggression pact was signed with provisions that included: consultation; arbitration if either party disagreed; neutrality if either went to war against a third power; no membership of a group "which is directly or indirectly aimed at the other."

Last page of the Additional Secret Protocol
of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact

Most notably, there was also a secret protocol to the pact, revealed only after Germany's defeat in 1945, according to which the states of Northern and Eastern Europe were divided into German and Soviet "spheres of influence".[74] In the North, Finland, Estonia and Latvia were assigned to the Soviet sphere.[74] Poland was to be partitioned in the event of its "political rearrangement"—the areas east of the Pisa, Narev, Vistula and San rivers going to the Soviet Union while Germany would occupy the west.[74] Lithuania, adjacent to East Prussia, would be in the German sphere of influence, although a second secret protocol agreed to in September 1939 reassigned the majority of Lithuania to the USSR.[75] According to the secret protocol, Lithuania would retrieve its historical capital Vilnius, occupied during the inter-war period by Poland. Another clause of the treaty was that Germany would not interfere with the Soviet Union's actions towards Bessarabia, then part of Romania; as the result, Bessarabia was joined to the Moldovan ASSR, and become the Moldovan SSR under control of Moscow.[74]

At the signing, Ribbentrop and Stalin enjoyed warm conversations, exchanged toasts and further addressed the prior hostilities between the countries in the 1930s.[76] They characterized Britain as always attempting to disrupt Soviet-German relations, stated that the Anti-Comintern pact was not aimed at the Soviet Union, but actually aimed at Western democracies and "frightened principally the City of London [i.e., the British financiers] and the English shopkeepers."[77]

On 24 August Pravda and Izvestia carried news of the non-secret portions of the Pact, complete with the now infamous front-page picture of Molotov signing the treaty, with a smiling Stalin looking on (located at the top of this article).[38] The news was met with utter shock and surprise by government leaders and media worldwide, most of whom were aware only of the British–French–Soviet negotiations that had taken place for months.[38] The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact was received with shock by Nazi Germany’s allies, notably Japan, by the Comintern and foreign communist parties, and by Jewish communities all around the world.[78] So, that day, German diplomat Hans von Herwarth, whose grandmother was Jewish, informed Guido Relli, an Italian diplomat,[79] and American chargé d'affaires Charles Bohlen on the secret protocol regarding vital interests in the countries' allotted "spheres of influence", without revealing the annexation rights for "territorial and political rearrangement".[80][81]

Time Magazine repeatedly referred to the Pact as the "Communazi Pact" and its participants as "communazis" until April 1941.[82][83][84][85][86][87][88]

Soviet propaganda and representatives went to great lengths to minimize the importance of the fact that they had opposed and fought against the Nazis in various ways for a decade prior to signing the Pact. Upon signing the pact, Molotov tried to reassure the Germans of his good intentions by commenting to journalists that "fascism is a matter of taste".[89] For its part, Nazi Germany also did a public volte-face regarding its virulent opposition to the Soviet Union, though Hitler still viewed an attack on the Soviet Union as "inevitable".[citation needed]

Concerns over the possible existence of a secret protocol were first expressed by the intelligence organizations of the Baltic states[citation needed] scant days after the pact was signed. Speculation grew stronger when Soviet negotiators referred to its content during negotiations for military bases in those countries (see occupation of the Baltic States).

The day after the Pact was signed, the French and British military negotiation delegation urgently requested a meeting with Soviet military negotiation Kliment Voroshilov.[90] On August 25, Voroshilov told them "[i]n view of the changed political situation, no useful purpose can be served in continuing the conversation."[90] That day, Hitler told the British ambassador to Berlin that the pact with the Soviets prevented Germany from facing a two front war, changing the strategic situation from that in World War I, and that Britain should accept his demands regarding Poland.[91]

On 25 August, surprising Hitler, Britain entered into a defense pact with Poland.[91] Consequently, Hitler postponed his planned invasion of Poland from 26 August until 1 September 1939.[91][92] Britain and France responded by guaranteeing the sovereignty of Poland, so they declared war on Germany on 3 September 1939.

Planned and actual territorial changes in Central Europe 1939–1940

Implementing the division of Eastern and Central Europe

Poland never will rise again in the form of the Versailles treaty. That is guaranteed not only by Germany, but also… Russia.
Adolf Hitler in a public speech in Danzig at the end of September 1939[93]
Rendezvous. David Low's cartoon, published in the Evening Standard on 20 September 1939, shows Hitler greeting Stalin, following their joint invasion of Poland, with the words, "The scum of the earth, I believe?". To which Stalin replies, "The bloody assassin of the workers, I presume?"

Initial invasions

On 1 September barely a week after the pact had been signed, the partition of Poland commenced with Germany attacking from the west.[94] Within the first few days of the invasion, Germany began conducting massacres of Polish and Jewish civilians and POWs.[95][96] These executions took place in over 30 towns and villages in the first month of German occupation alone.[97][98][99] The Luftwaffe also took part by strafing fleeing civilian refugees on roads and carrying out an aerial bombing campaign[100][101][102][103] . The Soviet Union assisted German air forces by allowing them to use signals broadcast by the Soviet radio station at Minsk allegedly "for urgent aeronautical experiments".[104]

Stalin did not instantly interpret the protocol as permitting the Soviet Union to grab territory. Stalin was waiting to see whether the Germans would halt within the agreed, and also the Soviet Union needed to secure the frontier in the Far East.[105] On 17 September the Red Army invaded eastern Poland, violating the 1932 Soviet–Polish Non-Aggression Pact, and occupied the Polish territory assigned to it by the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. This was followed by co-ordination with German forces in Poland[106].

Polish troops already fighting much stronger German forces on its western side desperately tried to delay the capture of Warsaw. Consequently, Polish forces were not able to mount significant resistance against the Soviets. The Soviet Union marshaled 466,516 soldiers, 3,739 tanks, 380 armored cars, and approximately 1,200 fighters, 600 bombers, and 200 other aircraft against Poland.[107] The Polish armed forces in the East consisted mostly of lightly armed border guard units of the Korpus Ochrony Pogranicza (KOP), the 'border protection corps'. In the Northeast of Poland, only a few cities were defended[citation needed] and after a heavy but short struggle Polish forces withdrew to Lithuania where they were interned. Some of the Polish forces which were fighting the Soviets in the far South of the nation withdrew to Romania.

Common parade of Wehrmacht and Red Army in Brest at the end of the Invasion of Poland. At the center Major General Heinz Guderian and Brigadier Semyon Krivoshein

On 21 September the Soviets and Germans signed a formal agreement coordinating military movements in Poland, including the "purging" of saboteurs.[108] A joint German–Soviet parade was held in L'vov and Brest-Litovsk, while the countries commanders met in the latter location.[109] Stalin had decided in August that he was going to liquidate the Polish state, and a German–Soviet meeting in September addressed the future structure of the "Polish region."[109] Soviet authorities immediately started a campaign of sovietization[110][111] of the newly acquired areas. The Soviets organized staged elections,[112] the result of which was to become a legitimization of Soviet annexation of eastern Poland.[113] Soviet authorities attempted to erase Polish history and culture,[114], withdrew the Polish currency without exchanging roubles,[115] collectivized agriculture,[116] and nationalized and redistributed private and state-owned Polish property.[117] Soviet authorities regarded service for the pre-war Polish state as a "crime against revolution"[118] and "counter-revolutionary activity",[119] and subsequently started arresting large numbers of Polish citizens.

Modifying the secret protocols

Eleven days after the Soviet invasion of Eastern Poland, the secret protocol of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact was modified by the German–Soviet Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Demarcation,[120]) allotting Germany a larger part of Poland and transferring Lithuania's territory (with the exception of left bank of river Scheschupe, the "Lithuanian Strip") from the envisioned German sphere to the Soviets.[121] On 28 September 1939 the Soviet Union and German Reich issued a joint declaration in which they declared:

"Second Ribbentrop–Molotov Pact" of 28 September 1939. Map of Poland signed by Stalin and Ribbentrop adjusting the German–Soviet border in the aftermath of German and Soviet invasion of Poland.
Soviet and German soldiers in Lublin

After the Government of the German Reich and the Government of the U.S.S.R. have, by means of the treaty signed today, definitively settled the problems arising from the collapse of the Polish state and have thereby created a sure foundation for a lasting peace in Eastern Europe, they mutually express their conviction that it would serve the true interest of all peoples to put an end to the state of war existing at present between Germany on the one side and England and France on the other. Both Governments will therefore direct their common efforts, jointly with other friendly powers if occasion arises, toward attaining this goal as soon as possible.

Should, however, the efforts of the two Governments remain fruitless, this would demonstrate the fact that England and France are responsible for the continuation of the war, whereupon, in case of the continuation of the war, the Governments of Germany and of the U.S.S.R. shall engage in mutual consultations with regard to necessary measures.[122]

On 3 October 1939, Friedrich Werner von der Schulenburg, German ambassador in Moscow, informed Joachim Ribbentrop that the Soviet government was willing to cede the city of Vilnius and its environs. On 8 October 1939, a new Nazi-Soviet agreement was reached by an exchange of letters between Vyacheslav Molotov and the German Ambassador.[123]

Three Baltic States, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, were given no choice but to sign a so-called Pact of defence and mutual assistance which permitted the Soviet Union to station troops in them.[121]

The Soviet war with Finland and Katyn Massacre

After the Baltic states were forced to accept treaties[124], Stalin turned his sights on Finland, confident that Finnish capitulation could be attained without great effort.[125] The Soviets demanded territories on the Karelian Isthmus, the islands of the Gulf of Finland and a military base near the Finnish capital Helsinki,[126][127] which Finland rejected.[128] The Soviets staged the shelling of Mainila and used it as a pretext to withdraw from the non-aggression pact.[129] The Red Army attacked in November 1939.[130] Simultaneously, Stalin set up a puppet government in the Finnish Democratic Republic.[131]. The leader of the Leningrad Military District Andrei Zhdanov commissioned a celebratory piece from Dmitri Shostakovich, entitled "Suite on Finnish Themes" to be performed as the marching bands of the Red Army would be parading through Helsinki.[132] After Finnish defenses surprisingly held out for over three months while inflicting stiff losses on Soviet forces, the Soviets settled for an interim peace. Finland ceded eastern areas of Karelia (10% of Finnish territory)[130], which resulted in approximately 422,000 Karelians (12% of Finland's population) losing their homes.[133] Soviet official casualty counts in the war exceeded 200,000,[134] while Soviet Premier Nikita Kruschev later claimed the casualties may have been one million.[135]

At around this time, Soviet NKVD officers also conducted lengthy interrogations of 300,000 Polish POWs in camps[136][137][137][138][139] that were, in effect, a selection process to determine who would be killed.[3] On March 5, 1940, in what would later be known as the Katyn massacre,[3][140][141] orders were signed to execute 25,700 Polish POWs, labeled "nationalists and counterrevolutionaries", kept at camps and prisons in occupied western Ukraine and Belarus.[142]

Soviets take the Baltics and Bessarabia

In mid-June 1940, when international attention was focused on the German invasion of France, Soviet NKVD troops raided border posts in Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia.[121][143] State administrations were liquidated and replaced by Soviet cadres,[121] in which 34,250 Latvians, 75,000 Lithuanians and almost 60,000 Estonians were deported or killed.[144] Elections were held with single pro-Soviet candidates listed for many positions, with resulting peoples assemblies immediately requested admission into the USSR, which was granted by the Soviet Union.[121] The USSR annexed the whole of Lithuania, including the Scheschupe area, which was to be given to Germany.

Finally, on 26 June, four days after France sued for an armistice with the Third Reich, the Soviet Union issued an ultimatum demanding Bessarabia and, unexpectedly, Northern Bukovina from Romania.[145] Two days later, the Romanians caved to the Soviet demands and the Soviets occupied the territory. The Hertza region was initially not requested by the USSR but was later occupied by force after the Romanians agreed to the initial soviet demands.[145]

German and Soviet soldiers at the so-called Border of Peace established by the pact

Holocaust beginnings, Operation Tannenberg and other Nazi atrocities

At the end of October 1939, Germany enacted the death penalty for disobedience to the German occupation.[146] Germany began a campaign of "Germanization", which meant to assimilate the occupied territories politically, culturally, socially, and economically into the German Reich.[147][148][149] 50,000 to 200,000 Polish children were kidnapped to be Germanized.[150][151]

Polish hostages being blindfolded during preparations for their mass execution in Palmiry, 1940

Elimination of Polish elites and inteligentia was part of Generalplan Ost. The Intelligenzaktion, a plan to eliminate the Polish intelligentsia, Poland's 'leadership class', took place soon after the German invasion of Poland, lasting from fall of 1939 till spring of 1940. As the result of this operation in 10 regional actions were killed about 60,000 Polish nobles, teachers, social workers, priests, judges and political activists.[152][153] It was continued in May 1940 when Germany launched AB-Aktion, [150] More than 16,000 members of the intelligentsia were murdered in Operation Tannenberg alone.[154]

Germany also planned to incorporate all land into the Third Reich.[148] This effort resulted in the forced resettlement of 2 million Poles. Families were forced to travel in the severe winter of 1939–40, leaving behind almost all of their possessions without recompense.[148] As part of Operation Tannenberg alone, 750,000 Polish peasants were forced to leave and their property was given to Germans.[155] A further 330,000 were murdered.[156] Germany eventually planned to move ethnic Poles to Siberia.[157][158]

Although Germany used forced labourers in most occupied countries, Poles and other Eastern Europeans were viewed as inferior and, thus, better suited for such duties.[150] Between 1 and 2.5 million Polish citizens[150][159] were transported to the Reich for forced labour, against their will.[160][161] All Polish males were required to perform forced labour.[150] While ethnic Poles were subject to selective persecution, all ethnic Jews were targeted by the Reich.[159] In the winter of 1939–40, about 100,000 Jews were thus deported to Poland.[162] They were initially gathered into massive urban ghettos,[163] such as 380,000 held in the Warsaw Ghetto, where large numbers died under the harsh conditions therein, including 43,000 in the Warsaw Ghetto alone.[159][164][165] Poles and ethnic Jews were imprisoned in nearly every camp of the extensive concentration camp system in German-occupied Poland and the Reich. In Auschwitz, which began operating on 14 June 1940, 1.1 million people died.[166][167]

Romania and Soviet republics

In the summer of 1940, fear of the Soviet Union, in conjunction with German support for the territorial demands of Romania's neighbors and the Romanian government's own miscalculations, resulted in more territorial losses for Romania. Between 28 June and 4 July the Soviet Union occupied and annexed Bessarabia, Northern Bukovina and the Hertza region of Romania.[168]

On 30 August 1940, Ribbentrop and Italian Foreign Minister Galeazzo Ciano issued the Second Vienna Award giving Northern Transylvania to Hungary. On 7 September 1940, Romania ceded Southern Dobruja to Bulgaria (Axis-sponsored Treaty of Craiova).[169] After various events in Romania, over the next few months, it increasingly took on the aspect of a German-occupied country.[169]

The Soviet-occupied territories were converted into republics of the Soviet Union. During the two years following the annexation, the Soviets arrested approximately 100,000 Polish citizens[170] and deported between 350,000 and 1,500,000, of whom between 250,000 and 1,000,000 died, mostly civilians.[171][172] Forced re-settlements into Gulag labour camps and exile settlements in remote areas of the Soviet Union occurred.[111] According to Norman Davies,[173] almost half of them were dead by July 1940.[174] In Bessarabia, about 1,000,000 Romanians also died of famine or deportation.

Further secret protocol modifications, settling borders and immigration issues

German and Soviet soldiers meeting in Brest

On 10 January 1941, Germany and the Soviet Union signed an agreement settling several ongoing issues.[175] Secret protocols in the new agreement modified the "Secret Additional Protocols" of the German–Soviet Boundary and Friendship Treaty, ceding the Lithuanian Strip to the Soviet Union in exchange for 7.5 million dollars (31.5 million Reichsmark).[175] The agreement formally set the border between Germany and the Soviet Union between the Igorka river and the Baltic Sea.[176] It also extended trade regulation of the 1940 German–Soviet Commercial Agreement until August 1, 1942, increased deliveries above the levels of year one of that agreement,[176] settled trading rights in the Baltics and Bessarabia, calculated the compensation for German property interests in the Baltic States now occupied by the Soviets and other issues.[175] It also covered the migration to Germany within two and a half months of ethnic Germans and German citizens in Soviet-held Baltic territories, and the migration to the Soviet Union of Baltic and "White Russian" "nationals" in German-held territories.[176]

Soviet-German relations during the Pact's operation

Early political issues

Beginning in September 1939, the Soviet Comintern suspended all anti-Nazi and anti-fascist propaganda, explaining that the war in Europe was a matter of capitalist states attacking each other for imperialist purposes.[177] When anti-German demonstrations erupted in Prague, Czechoslovakia, the Comintern ordered the Czech Communist Party to employ all of its strength to paralyze "chauvinist elements."[177] Moscow soon forced the Communist Parties of France and Great Britain to adopt an anti-war position. On 7 September Stalin called Georgi Dimitrov, and the latter sketched a new Comintern line on the war. The new line – which stated that the war was unjust and imperialist – was approved by the secretariat of the Communist International on 9 September. Thus, the various western Communist parties now had to oppose the war, and to vote against war credits.[178] A number of French communists (including Maurice Thorez, who fled to Moscow), deserted from the French Army, owing to a 'revolutionary defeatist' attitude taken by Western Communist leaders.

Despite a warming by the Comintern, German tensions were raised when the Soviets stated in September that they must enter Poland to "protect" their ethnic Ukrainian and Belorussian brethren therein from Germany, though Molotov later admitted to German officials that this excuse was necessary because the Soviets could find no other pretext for the Soviet invasion.[179]

While active collaboration between Nazi Germany and Soviet Union caused great shock in western Europe and amongst communists opposed to Germany, on 1 October 1939, Winston Churchill declared that the Russian armies acted for the safety of Russia against "the Nazi menace."[180]

Expansion of raw materials and military trading

Germany and the Soviet Union entered an intricate trade pact on February 11, 1940 that was over four times larger than the one the two countries had signed in August of 1939.[181] The trade pact helped Germany to surmount a British blockade of Germany.[181] In the first year, Germany received one million tons of cereals, half a million tons of wheat, 900,000 tons of oil, 100,000 tons of cotton, 500,000 tons of phosphates and considerable amounts of other vital raw materials, along with the transit of one million tons of soybeans from Manchuria.[citation needed] These and other supplies were being transported through Soviet and occupied Polish territories.[181] The Soviets were to receive a naval cruiser, the plans to the battleship Bismarck, heavy naval guns, other naval gear and thirty of Germany's latest warplanes, including the Me-109 and Me-110 fighters and Ju-88 bomber.[181] The Soviets would also receive oil and electric equipment, locomotives, turbines, generators, diesel engines, ships, machine tools and samples of Germany artillery, tanks, explosives, chemical-warfare equipment and other items.[181]

The Soviets also helped Germany to avoid British naval blockades by providing a submarine base, Basis Nord, in the northern Soviet Union near Murmansk.[177] This also provided a refueling and maintenance location, and a takeoff point for raids and attacks on shipping.[177] In addition, the Soviets provided Germany with access to the Northern Sea Route for both cargo ships and raiders (though only the raider Komet used the route before the German invasion), which forced Britain to protect sea lanes in both the Atlantic and the Pacific.[182]

Summer deterioration of relations

The Finnish and Baltic invasions began a deterioration of relations between the Soviets and Germany.[183] Stalin's invasions were, however (as the intent to accomplish these was not communicated to the Germans beforehand), a severe irritant to Berlin and prompted concern that Stalin was seeking to form an anti-German bloc.[184] Molotov's reassurances to the Germans, and the Germans' mistrust, intensified. On June 16, 1940, as the Soviets invaded Lithuania, but before they had invaded Latvia and Estonia, Ribbentrop instructed his staff "to submit a report as soon as possible as to whether in the Baltic States a tendency to seek support from the Reich can be observed or whether an attempt was made to form a bloc." [185]

In August 1940, the Soviet Union briefly suspended its deliveries under their commercial agreement after their relations were strained following disagreement over policy in Romania, the Soviets war with Finland, Germany falling behind in its deliveries of goods under the pact and with Stalin worried that Hitler's war with the West might end quickly after France signed an armistice.[186] The suspension created significant resource problems for Germany.[186] By the end of August, relations improved again as the countries had redrawn the Hungarian and Romanian borders, settled some Bulgarian claims and Stalin was again convinced that Germany would face a long war in the west with Britain's improvement in its air battle with Germany and the execution of an agreement between the United States and Britain regarding destroyers and bases.[187] However, in late August, Germany arranged its own occupation of Romania, targeting oil fields.[188] The move raised tensions with the Soviets, who responded that Germany was supposed to have consulted with the Soviet Union under Article III of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact.[188]

German–Soviet Axis talks

Ribbentrop welcoming Molotov in Berlin, November 1940

After Germany entered a Tripartite Pact with Japan and Italy, Ribbentrop wrote to Stalin, inviting Molotov to Berlin for negotiations aimed to create a 'continental bloc' of Germany, Italy, Japan and the USSR that would oppose Britain and the USA.[189] Stalin sent Molotov to Berlin to negotiate the terms for the Soviet Union to join the Axis and potentially enjoy the spoils of the pact.[190][191] After negotiations during November 1940 on where to extend the USSR's sphere of influence, Hitler broke off talks and continued planning for the eventual attempts to invade the Soviet Union.[189][192]

Late relations

In an effort to demonstrate peaceful intentions toward Germany, on 13 April 1941, the Soviets signed a neutrality pact with Axis power Japan.[193] While Stalin had little faith in Japan's commitment to neutrality, he felt that the pact was important for its political symbolism, to reinforce a public affection for Germany.[194] Stalin felt that there was a growing split in German circles about whether Germany should initiate a war with the Soviet Union.[194] Stalin did not know that Hitler had been secretly discussing an invasion of the Soviet Union since summer 1940,[195] and that Hitler had ordered his military in late 1940 to prepare for war in the east regardless of the parties' talks of a potential Soviet entry as a fourth Axis Power.[196]

Hitler breaks the Pact

Nazi Germany terminated the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact with its invasion of the Soviet Union at 3:15am on 22 June 1941.[94] Stalin had ignored several warnings that Germany was likely to attack,[197][198][199] and ordered no full-scale mobilization of forces.[200] After the launch of the invasion, the territories gained by the Soviet Union due to the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact were lost in a matter of weeks. Within six months, the Soviet military had suffered 4.3 million casualties[201] and Germany had captured three million Soviet prisoners.[202] The imports of Soviet raw materials into Germany over the duration of the countries' economic relationship proved vital to Barbarossa. Without Soviet imports, German stocks would have run out in several key products by October 1941, and Germany would have already run through its stocks of rubber and grain before the first day of the invasion.[203]

Aftermath

Soviet expansion, change of Central-eastern European borders and creation of the Eastern bloc after World War II

Denial of the Secret Protocol's existence by the Soviet Union

The German original of the secret protocols was presumably destroyed in the bombing of Germany,[204] but a microfilmed copy was kept[205] in the documents archive of the German Foreign Office. In May 1945, Karl von Loesch, a civil servant in Foreign Office, gave this copy to British Lt. Col. R.C. Thomson.

Despite publication of the recovered copy in western media, for decades, it was the official policy of the Soviet Union to deny the existence of the secret protocol.[205] The secret protocol's existence was officially denied until 1989. Vyacheslav Molotov, one of the signatories, went to his grave categorically rejecting its existence.[206]

On 23 August 1986, tens of thousands of demonstrators in 21 western cities including New York, London, Stockholm, Toronto, Seattle, and Perth participated in Black Ribbon Day Rallies to draw attention to the secret protocols.

Stalin's Falsifiers of History and Axis negotiations

After the publication of the secret protocols and other secret German–Soviet relations documents, in 1948, Stalin published Falsifiers of History, which included the claim that, during the Pact's operation, Stalin rejected Hitler's claim to share in a division of the world,[192] without mentioning the Soviet offer to join the Axis. That version persisted, without exception, in historical studies, official accounts, memoirs and textbooks published in the Soviet Union until the Soviet Union's dissolution.[192]

The book also claimed that the Munich agreement was a "secret agreement" between Germany and "the west" and a "highly important phase in their policy aimed at goading the Hitlerite aggressors against the Soviet Union."[207][208]

Denunciation of the pact

For decades, it was the official policy of the Soviet Union to deny the existence of the secret protocol to the Soviet-German Pact. It was only after the Baltic Way demonstrations of 23 August 1989, where two million people created a human chain set on the 50th anniversary of the signing of the Pact that this policy changed. At the behest of Mikhail Gorbachev, Alexander Nikolaevich Yakovlev headed a commission investigating the existence of such a protocol. In December 1989, the commission concluded that the protocol had existed and revealed its findings to the Soviet Congress of People's Deputies.[204] As a result, the first democratically elected Congress of Soviets "passed the declaration admitting the existence of the secret protocols, condemning and denouncing them".[209]

In 1992, the document itself was declassified only after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Both successor-states of the pact parties have declared the Secret Protocols to be invalid from the moment they were signed. The Federal Republic of Germany declared this on September 1, 1989 and the Soviet Union on December 24, 1989.[210]

In August 2009, in an article written for the Polish newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin condemned the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact as "immoral."[211]

Post-war commentary regarding the motives of Stalin and Hitler

The protocol is considered a crime against peace as a conspiracy to conduct war of aggression.[212]

Some scholars believe that from the very beginning of the Tripartite negotiations between the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom and France, it became clear that the Soviet position required the other parties to agree to a Soviet occupation of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania,[40] as well as for Finland be included in the Soviet sphere of influence.[67]

Regarding the timing of German rapprochement, many historians agree that the dismissal of Litvinov, whose Jewish ethnicity was viewed disfavorably by Nazi Germany, removed an obstacle to negotiations with Germany.[52][213][214][215][216][217][218][219] Stalin immediately directed Molotov to "purge the ministry of Jews."[220][221][222] Given Litvinov's prior attempts to create an anti-fascist coalition, association with the doctrine of collective security with France and Britain, and pro-Western orientation[223] by the standards of the Kremlin, his dismissal indicated the existence of a Soviet option of rapprochement with Germany.[224][225] Likewise, Molotov's appointment served as a signal to Germany that the USSR was open to offers.[224] The dismissal also signaled to France and Britain the existence of a potential negotiation option with Germany.[35][226] One British official wrote that Litvinov's disappearance also meant the loss of an admirable technician or shock-absorber, while Molotov's "modus operandi" was "more truly Bolshevik than diplomatic or cosmopolitan."[227] Carr argued that the Soviet Union's replacement of Foreign Minister Litvinov with Molotov on May 3, 1939 indicated not an irrevocable shift towards alignment with Germany, but rather Stalin’s way of engaging in hard bargaining with the British and the French by appointing a proverbial hard man, namely Molotov to the Foreign Commissariat.[228] Historian Albert Resis stated that the Litvinov dismissal gave the Soviets freedom to pursue quickened German negotiations, but that they did not abandon British–French talks.[229] Derek Watson argued that non-Jewish Molotov could get the best deal with Britain and France because he was not encumbered with the baggage of collective security and could negotiate with Germany.[230] Geoffrey Roberts argued that Litvinov's dismisall helped the Soviets with British–French talks, because Litvinov doubted or maybe even opposed such discussions.[231]

After the war, defenders of the Soviet position argued that it was necessary to enter into a non-aggression pact with Germany to buy time, since the Soviet Union was not in a position to fight a war in 1939, and needed at least three years to prepare.[citation needed] Edward Hallett Carr, a frequent defender of Soviet policy[232], stated: "In return for 'non-intervention' Stalin secured a breathing space of immunity from German attack."[233] According to Carr, the "bastion" created by means of the Pact, "was and could only be, a line of defense against potential German attack."[233] An important advantage (projected by Carr) was that "if Soviet Russia had eventually to fight Hitler, the Western Powers would already be involved."[233][234] However, during the last decades, this view has been disputed. Historian Werner Maser stated that "the claim that the Soviet Union was at the time threatened by Hitler, as Stalin supposed,...is a legend, to whose creators Stalin himself belonged." (Maser 1994: 64). In Maser's view (1994: 42), "neither Germany nor Japan were in a situation [of] invading the USSR even with the least perspective [sic] of success," and this could not have been unknown to Stalin. Carr further stated that, for a long time, the primary motive of Stalin's sudden change of course was assumed to be the fear of German aggressive intentions.[235]

Some critical of Stalin's policy, such as Viktor Suvorov, claim that Stalin's primary motive for signing the Soviet–German non-aggression treaty was his calculation that such a pact could result in a conflict between the capitalist countries of Western Europe.[citation needed] This idea is supported by Albert L. Weeks.[236] Claims by Suvorov that Stalin planned to invade Germany in 1941 have remained under debate among historians with, for example, David Glantz opposing such claims while Mikhail Meltyukhov supports them.[citation needed]

Soviet sources have claimed that soon after the pact was signed, both UK and US showed understanding that the buffer zone was necessary to keep Hitler from advancing for some time, accepting strategic reasons[237]; however, soon after the World War II ended, those countries changed their view. Many Polish newspapers published numerous articles claiming that Russia must apologize to Poland for the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact.[238]

Regarding whether Soviet invasions of the Baltics or strike in Finland prompted Operation Barbarossa, two weeks after Soviet armies had entered the Baltics, Berlin requested Finland to permit the transit of Nazi troops, followed five weeks thereafter by Hitler's issuance of a secret directive "to take up the Russian problem, to think about war preparations," a war whose objective would include establishment of a Baltic confederation.[239]

Remembrance

The European Parliament has called for proclaiming 23 August the anniversary of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, as a Europe-wide Remembrance Day for the victims of all totalitarian and authoritarian regimes, to be commemorated with dignity and impartiality.[240]

In connection with the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, an Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe parliamentary resolution condemned both communism and fascism for starting World War II and called for a day of remembrance for victims of both Stalinism and Nazism on 23 August.[241] In response to the resolution, the Russian lawmakers threatened the OSCE with "harsh consequences".[241][242]

See also

Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact Related

Notes

  1. ^ Russian: Договор о ненападении между Германией и Советским Союзом; German: Nichtangriffsvertrag zwischen Deutschland und der Union der Sozialistischen Sowjetrepubliken; from facsimile at 100(0) Schlüsseldokumente (www.1000dokumente.de), accessed 17 September 2009.
  2. ^ Blank Pages by G.C.Malcher ISBN 1 897984 00 6 Page 7
  3. ^ a b c Fischer, Benjamin B., "The Katyn Controversy: Stalin's Killing Field", Studies in Intelligence, Winter 1999–2000, last accessed on 10 December 2005
  4. ^ Text of the 3 March 1918 Peace Treaty of Brest-Litovsk
  5. ^ Montefiore 2005, p. 32
  6. ^ German–Russian agreement, signed at Rapallo, 16 April 1922
  7. ^ Treaty of Berlin Between the Soviet Union and Germany; 24 April 1926
  8. ^ a b Ericson 1999, p. 14–15
  9. ^ Bendersky,Joseph W., A History of Nazi Germany: 1919–1945, Rowman & Littlefield, 2000, ISBN 083041567X, page 177
  10. ^ Lee, Stephen J. and Paul Shuter, Weimar and Nazi Germany, Heinemann, 1996, ISBN 043530920X, page 33
  11. ^ Bendersky, Joseph W., A History of Nazi Germany: 1919–1945, Rowman & Littlefield, 2000, ISBN 083041567X, page 159
  12. ^ Müller, Rolf-Dieter, Gerd R. Ueberschär, Hitler's War in the East, 1941–1945: A Critical Assessment, Berghahn Books, 2002, ISBN 157181293, page 244
  13. ^ Rauschning, Hermann, Hitler Speaks: A Series of Political Conversations With Adolf Hitler on His Real Aims, Kessinger Publishing, 2006,ISBN 142860034, pages 136–7
  14. ^ To 53 million RM in German imports (0.9 percent of Germany's total imports and 6.3 percent of Russia's total exports) and 34 million RM in German exports (0.6 percent of Germany's total exports and 4.6 percent of Russia's total imports) in 1938, see Ericson, III, Edward E., Karl Schnurre and the Evolution of Nazi–Soviet Relations, 1936–1941, German Studies Review, Vol. 21, No. 2 (May, 1998, pp. 263–283
  15. ^ Hehn 2005, p. 212
  16. ^ a b Jurado, Carlos Caballero and Ramiro Bujeiro, The Condor Legion: German Troops in the Spanish Civil War, Osprey Publishing, 2006, ISBN 1841768995, page 5–6
  17. ^ Gerhard Weinberg: The Foreign Policy of Hitler's Germany Diplomatic Revolution in Europe 1933–36, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970, pages 346.
  18. ^ Robert Melvin Spector. World Without Civilization: Mass Murder and the Holocaust, History, and Analysis, pg. 257
  19. ^ Michael Lind. Vietnam, the necessary war: a reinterpretation of America's most disastrous military conflict. Simon and Schuster, 2002. ISBN 0684870274, 9780684870274, p. 59
  20. ^ Hitler and Russia. The Times, June 24, 1941
  21. ^ Text of the Agreement concluded at Munich, 29 September 1938, between Germany, Great Britain, France and Italy
  22. ^ Kershaw 2001, p. 157–8
  23. ^ Kershaw 2001, p. 124
  24. ^ Max Beloff. Soviet Foreign Policy, 1929–41: Some Notes. Soviet Studies, Vol. 2, No. 2 (Oct., 1950), pp. 123–137
  25. ^ Kershaw 2001, p. 194
  26. ^ E. H. Carr, From Munich to Moscow I., Soviet Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, (June, 1949), pp. 3–17. Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
  27. ^ a b Ericson 1999, p. 1–2
  28. ^ Ericson 1999, p. 3–4
  29. ^ Ericson 1999, p. 29–35
  30. ^ Hehn 2005, p. 42–43
  31. ^ Martin Collier, Philip Pedley. Germany, 1919–45
  32. ^ Hermann Kinder, Werner Hilgemann, The Anchor Atlas of World History. Volume II, p.165. Anchor Press, Doubleday, New York 1978. ISBN 0-385-13355-3
  33. ^ Andrew J. Crozier. The Causes of the Second World War, pg. 151
  34. ^ Manipulating the Ether: The Power of Broadcast Radio in Thirties America Robert J. Brown ISBN 0786420669
  35. ^ a b c d Watson 2000, p. 6968
  36. ^ Ericson 1999, p. 23–35
  37. ^ Ericson 1999, p. 44
  38. ^ a b c d Roberts 2006, p. 30
  39. ^ Tentative Efforts To Improve German–Soviet Relations, April 17 – August 14, 1939
  40. ^ a b "Natural Enemies: The United States and the Soviet Union in the Cold War 1917–1991" by Robert C. Grogin 2001, Lexington Books page 28
  41. ^ a b c Michael Jabara Carley. End of the 'Low, Dishonest Decade': Failure of the Anglo–Franco–Soviet Alliance in 1939. Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 45, No. 2 (1993), pp. 303–341
  42. ^ a b c d Watson 2000, p. 695
  43. ^ In Jonathan Haslam's view, it shouldn't be overlooked, however, that Stalin's adherence to the collective security line was purely conditional. [Review of] Stalin's Drive to the West, 1938–1945: The Origins of the Cold War. by R. Raack; The Soviet Union and the Origins of the Second World War: Russo-German Relations and the Road to War, 1933–1941. by G. Roberts. The Journal of Modern History > Vol. 69, No. 4 (December, 1997), p.787
  44. ^ D.C. Watt, How War Came: the Immediate Origins of the Second World War 1938–1939 (London, 1989), p. 118. ISBN 039457916X, 9780394579160
  45. ^ Watson 2000, p. 704
  46. ^ Watson 2000, p. 708
  47. ^ a b Shirer 1990, p. 502
  48. ^ Hiden, John, The Baltic and the Outbreak of the Second World War, Cambridge University Press, 2003, ISBN 0521531209, page 46
  49. ^ Watson 2000, p. 710–11
  50. ^ Nekrich, Ulam & Freeze 1997, p. 107–111
  51. ^ Ericson 1999, p. 46
  52. ^ a b Nekrich, Ulam & Freeze 1997, p. 109–110
  53. ^ Fest 2002, p. 588
  54. ^ Ulam 1989, p. 509–10
  55. ^ Shirer 1990, p. 503
  56. ^ Roberts 1992, p. 64
  57. ^ On 28 July Molotov sent a political instruction to the Soviet ambassador in Berlin that marked a start of secret Soviet-German political negotiations. Roberts, Geoffrey, The Soviet Decision for a Pact with Nazi Germany Soviet Studies, Vol. 44, No. 1 (1992), pp. 64–67.
  58. ^ Ericson 1999, p. 54–55
  59. ^ Ericson 1999, p. 56
  60. ^ Nekrich, Ulam & Freeze 1997, p. 115
  61. ^ Fest 2002, p. 589–90
  62. ^ Bertriko, Jean-Jacques Subrenat, A. and David Cousins, Estonia: Identity and Independence, Rodopi, 2004, ISBN 9042008903 page 131
  63. ^ Watson 2000, p. 713
  64. ^ Shirer 1990, p. 536
  65. ^ Shirer 1990, p. 537
  66. ^ Anna M. Cienciala (2004). The Coming of the War and Eastern Europe in World War II (lecture notes, University of Kansas). Retrieved 15 March 2006.
  67. ^ a b Salmon, Patrick, "Scandinavia and the Great Powers 1890–1940", 2002, Cambridge University Press
  68. ^ Shirer 1990, p. 525
  69. ^ Watson 2000, p. 715
  70. ^ Murphy, David E., What Stalin Knew: The Enigma of Barbarossa, Yale University Press, 2006, ISBN 030011981X, page 23
  71. ^ Shirer 1990, p. 528
  72. ^ Media build up to World War II, BBC News, August 24, 2009
  73. ^ Watt, p. 367
  74. ^ a b c d Text of the Nazi–Soviet Non-Aggression Pact, executed 23 August 1939
  75. ^ Christie, Kenneth, Historical Injustice and Democratic Transition in Eastern Asia and Northern Europe: Ghosts at the Table of Democracy, RoutledgeCurzon, 2002, ISBN 0700715991
  76. ^ Shirer 1990, p. 539
  77. ^ Shirer 1990, p. 540
  78. ^ Ruud van Dijk (ed.) Encyclopedia of the Cold War, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London 2008, p. 597, ISBN 978-0-415-97515-5
  79. ^ Bernd Wegner, ed. From Peace to War: Germany, Soviet Russia and the World, 1939–1941. Providence and Oxford: Berghahn Books, 1997. p. ISBN 978-1-57181-882-9
  80. ^ Sławomir Dębski, Między Berlinem a Moskwą. Stosunki niemiecko-sowieckie 1939–1941, Warszawa 2007 , Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych. ISBN 978-83-89607-08-9
  81. ^ Dunn, Dennis J., Caught Between Roosevelt & Stalin: America's Ambassadors to Moscow, University Press of Kentucky, 1998 ISBN 0813120233, pages 124–5
  82. ^ Arms & Art" (September 11, 1939)
  83. ^ "Children of Moscow" (September 18, 1939)
  84. ^ "Moscow's Week" (October 9, 1939)
  85. ^ "Revival" (October 9, 1939)
  86. ^ "Communazi Columnists" (June 3, 1940)
  87. ^ "The Revolt of the Intellectuals" (January 6, 1941), by Whittaker Chambers
  88. ^ In Again, Out Again" (April 7, 1941)
  89. ^ Fulton John Sheen, Communism and the Conscience of the West, Bobbs–Merrill Co, 1948, page 115
  90. ^ a b Shirer 1990, p. 541–2
  91. ^ a b c Nekrich, Ulam & Freeze 1997, p. 123
  92. ^ Frank McDonough. Neville Chamberlain, Appeasement and the British Road to War, pg. 86
  93. ^ Seven Years War?, TIME Magazine, October 2, 1939
  94. ^ a b Roberts 2006, p. 82
  95. ^ Szymon Datner Crimes committed by the Wehrmacht during the September campaign and the period of military government Poznan, 1962 Page 11
  96. ^ J.L.Garvin “German Atrocities in Poland, Free Europe, Page 15
  97. ^ Genocide 1939–1945 by S.Datner, J.Gumkowski and K.Leszczynski, Wydawnictwo Zachodnie 1962 Page 127–34
  98. ^ http://www.um-swiecie.pl/index_en.php?cid=142&unroll=142
  99. ^ Martin Gilbert The Holocaust Fontana, 1990 ISBN 0-00-637194-9 Page 85–88
  100. ^ Davies, N. (1986) God's Playground Volume II Oxford University Press ISBN 0-19-821944-X Page 437
  101. ^ Cyprian & Sawicki 1961, p. 65
  102. ^ http://felsztyn.tripod.com/germaninvasion/id4.html
  103. ^ Genocide 1939–1945 by S.Datner, J.Gumkowski and K.Leszczynski, Wydawnictwo Zachodnie 1962 Page 18
  104. ^ АВП СССР, ф. 06, оп. 1, п. 8, д. 74, л. 20. л. 26." The item 4 of this document states: "Hilger asked to pass the request of the German Air forces' Chief of Staff. (the Germans wanted the radio station in Minsk, when it is idle, to start a continuous broadcast needed for urgent aeronautical experiments. This translation should contain the embedded call signs "Richard Wilhelm 1.0", and, in addition to that, to broadcast the word "Minsk" as frequent as possible. The Molotov's resolution on that document authorised broadcasting of the word "Minsk" only)."
  105. ^ Service 2003, p. 256
  106. ^ Roberts 2006, p. 43
  107. ^ Zaloga, Steven J., Poland 1939, Osprey Publishing, Botley, UK, 2002, p.80.
  108. ^ Nerkich, Ulam & Freeze 1997, p. 130
  109. ^ a b Nerkich, Ulam & Freeze 1997, p. 131
  110. ^ (Polish) various authors (1998). Adam Sudoł. ed. Sowietyzacja Kresów Wschodnich II Rzeczypospolitej po 17 września 1939. Bydgoszcz: Wyższa Szkoła Pedagogiczna. pp. 441. ISBN 83-7096-281-5. 
  111. ^ a b (English) various authors (2001). "Stalinist Forced Relocation Policies". in Myron Weiner, Sharon Stanton Russell. Demography and National Security. Berghahn Books. pp. 308–315. ISBN 1-57181-339-X. http://books.google.com/books?ie=UTF-8&vid=ISBN157181339X&id=J9nuv7MGQ5MC&pg=PA309&lpg=PA309&dq=Sovietization&sig=QTVI52AN1LIHVn13mJYNqUyNCNw. 
  112. ^ (Polish) Bartłomiej Kozłowski (2005). "„Wybory” do Zgromadzeń Ludowych Zachodniej Ukrainy i Zachodniej Białorusi". Polska.pl. NASK. http://wiadomosci.polska.pl/kalendarz/kalendarium/article.htm?id=132394. Retrieved 13 March 2006. 
  113. ^ (English) Jan Tomasz Gross (2003). Revolution from Abroad. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 396. ISBN 0-691-09603-1.  [1]
  114. ^ Trela-Mazur, Elżbieta (1997). Włodzimierz Bonusiak, et al. (eds.). ed (in Polish). Sowietyzacja oświaty w Małopolsce Wschodniej pod radziecką okupacją 1939–1941 (Sovietization of Education in Eastern Lesser Poland During the Soviet Occupation 1939–1941). Kielce: Wyższa Szkoła Pedagogiczna im. Jana Kochanowskiego. ISBN 978-837133100-8. 
  115. ^ (Polish)Karolina Lanckorońska (2001). "I – Lwów". Wspomnienia wojenne; 22 IX 1939–5 IV 1945. Kraków: ZNAK. pp. 364. ISBN 83-240-0077-1. http://www.lwow.com.pl/karolina.html. 
  116. ^ (Polish) Encyklopedia PWN, "OKUPACJA SOWIECKA W POLSCE 1939–41", last accessed on 1 March 2006, online, Polish language
  117. ^ Piotrowski 2007, p. 11
  118. ^ (English) Gustaw Herling-Grudziński (1996). A World Apart: Imprisonment in a Soviet Labor Camp During World War II. Penguin Books. pp. 284. ISBN 0-14-025184-7. 
  119. ^ (Polish) Władysław Anders (1995). Bez ostatniego rozdziału. Lublin: Test. pp. 540. ISBN 83-7038-168-5. 
  120. ^ German–Soviet Boundary and Friendship Treaty
  121. ^ a b c d e Wettig, Gerhard, Stalin and the Cold War in Europe, Rowman & Littlefield, Landham, Md, 2008, ISBN 0742555429, page 20–21
  122. ^ Declaration of the Government of the German Reich and the Government of the U.S.S.R. of September 28, 1939
  123. ^ Domas Krivickas, The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of 1939: legal and political consequences. LITUANUS, Volume 34, No. 2 – Summer 1989. ISSN 0024-5089
  124. ^ Engle & Paananen 1985, p. 6
  125. ^ Turtola, Martti (1999). "Kansainvälinen kehitys Euroopassa ja Suomessa 1930-luvulla". in Leskinen, Jari; Juutilainen, Antti. Talvisodan pikkujättiläinen. pp. 35–37. 
  126. ^ Turtola, Martti (1999). "Kansainvälinen kehitys Euroopassa ja Suomessa 1930-luvulla". in Leskinen, Jari; Juutilainen, Antti. Talvisodan pikkujättiläinen. pp. 32–33. 
  127. ^ Trotter 2002, pp. 12–13
  128. ^ Edwards 2006, p. 55
  129. ^ Turtola, Martti (1999). "Kansainvälinen kehitys Euroopassa ja Suomessa 1930-luvulla". in Leskinen, Jari; Juutilainen, Antti. Talvisodan pikkujättiläinen. pp. 44–45. 
  130. ^ a b Kennedy-Pipe, Caroline, Stalin's Cold War, New York : Manchester University Press, 1995, ISBN 0719042011
  131. ^ Chubaryan; Shukman 2002, p. xxi
  132. ^ Edwards 2006, p. 98
  133. ^ Engle & Paananen 1985, pp. 142–143
  134. ^ Roberts 2006, p. 52
  135. ^ Mosier, John, The Blitzkrieg Myth: How Hitler and the Allies Misread the Strategic Realities of World War II, HarperCollins, 2004, ISBN 0060009772, page 88
  136. ^ (Polish) obozy jenieckie żołnierzy polskich (Prison camps for Polish soldiers) Encyklopedia PWN. Last accessed on 28 November 2006.
  137. ^ a b (Polish) Edukacja Humanistyczna w wojsku. 1/2005. Dom wydawniczy Wojska Polskiego. ISNN 1734-6584. (Official publication of the Polish Army)
  138. ^ (Russian) Молотов на V сессии Верховного Совета 31 октября цифра «примерно 250 тыс.» (Please provide translation of the reference title and publication data and means)
  139. ^ (Russian) Отчёт Украинского и Белорусского фронтов Красной Армии Мельтюхов, с. 367. [2] (Please provide translation of the reference title and publication data and means)
  140. ^ Sanford, Google Books, p. 20–24.
  141. ^ "Stalin's Killing Field" (PDF). https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/kent-csi/pdf/v43i3a06p.pdf. Retrieved 2008-07-19. 
  142. ^ Excerpt from the minutes No. 13 of the Politburo of the Central Committee meeting, shooting order of March 5, 1940 online, last accessed on 19 December 2005, original in Russian with English translation
  143. ^ Senn, Alfred Erich, Lithuania 1940 : revolution from above, Amsterdam, New York, Rodopi, 2007 ISBN 9789042022256
  144. ^ Simon Sebag Montefiore. Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar. p. 334. 
  145. ^ a b Roberts 2006, p. 55
  146. ^ Iwo Pogonowski, Jews in Poland Hippocrene, 1998 ISBN 0-7818-0604-6 Page 101
  147. ^ O.Halecki A History of Poland Routledge & Kegan, 1983 ISBN 0-7102-0050-1 Page 312
  148. ^ a b c Garlinski 1987, p. 28
  149. ^ http://www.remember.org/forgotten/
  150. ^ a b c d e http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php?lang=en&ModuleId=10005473
  151. ^ Cyprian & Sawicki 1961, p. 83–91
  152. ^ Maria Wardzyńska "Był rok 1939 Operacja niemieckiej policji bezpieczeństwa w Polsce. Intelligenzaktion" IPN Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, 2009 ISBN 978-83-7629-063-8
  153. ^ Meier, Anna "Die Intelligenzaktion: Die Vernichtung Der Polnischen Oberschicht Im Gau Danzig-Westpreusen" VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, ISBN 3639047214 ISBN 978-3639047219
  154. ^ Garlinski 1987, p. 27
  155. ^ Davies, N. (1986) God's Playground Volume II Oxford University Press ISBN 0-19-821944-X Page 446
  156. ^ Adam Zamoyski The Polish Way John Murray, 1989 ISBN 0-7195-4674-5 Page 358
  157. ^ Cyprian & Sawicki 1961, p. 73
  158. ^ Genocide 1939–1945 by S.Datner, J.Gumkowski and K.Leszczynski, Wydawnictwo Zachodnie 1962 Page 8
  159. ^ a b c http://www.msz.gov.pl/Nazi,German,Camps,on,Polish,Soil,,During,World,War,II,6465.html
  160. ^ Piotrowski 2007, p. 22
  161. ^ Cyprian & Sawicki 1961, p. 139
  162. ^ Garlinski 1987, p. 29
  163. ^ O.Halecki A History of Poland Routledge & Kegan, 1983 ISBN 0-7102-0050-1 Page 313
  164. ^ Berenbaum, Michael. The World Must Know, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, 2006, p. 114.
  165. ^ "Deportations to and from the Warsaw Ghetto", United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.
  166. ^ Brian Harmon, John Drobnicki, Historical sources and the Auschwitz death toll estimates, The Nizkor Project
  167. ^ Piper, Franciszek & Meyer, Fritjof. "Die Zahl der Opfer von Auschwitz. Neue Erkentnisse durch neue Archivfunde", Osteuropa, 52, Jg., 5/2002, pp. 631–641, (review article).
  168. ^ Vladimir Beshanov, Czerwony Blitzkrieg. Inicjał. Warszawa 2008. pp. 250–262. ISBN 978-83-926205-2-5
  169. ^ a b Wasserstein, Bernard, Barbarism and Civilization: A History of Europe in Our Time, Oxford University Press, 2007 ISBN 0198730748, page 305
  170. ^ (Polish) Represje 1939–41 Aresztowani na Kresach Wschodnich (Repressions 1939–41. Arrested on the Eastern Borderlands.) Ośrodek Karta. Retrieved 15 November 2006.
  171. ^ Rieber, pp. 14, 32–37.
  172. ^ The actual number of deported in the period of 1939–1941 remains unknown and various estimates vary from 350,000 ((Polish) Encyklopedia PWN 'OKUPACJA SOWIECKA W POLSCE 1939–41', last retrieved on March 14, 2006, Polish language) to over 2 millions (mostly WWII estimates by the underground. The earlier number is based on records made by the NKVD and does not include roughly 180,000 prisoners of war, also in Soviet captivity. Most modern historians estimate the number of all people deported from areas taken by Soviet Union during this period at between 800,000 and 1,500,000; for example R. J. Rummel gives the number of 1,200,000 million; Tony Kushner and Katharine Knox give 1,500,000 in their Refugees in an Age of Genocide, p.219; in his Lethal Politics: Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1917, p.132. See also: Marek Wierzbicki, Tadeusz M. Płużański (March 2001). "Wybiórcze traktowanie źródeł". Tygodnik Solidarność (March 2, 2001).  and (Polish) Albin Głowacki (September 2003). "Formy, skala i konsekwencje sowieckich represji wobec Polaków w latach 1939–1941". in Piotr Chmielowiec. Okupacja sowiecka ziem polskich 1939–1941. Rzeszów-Warsaw: Instytut Pamięci Narodowej. ISBN 83-89078-78-3. http://www.ipn.gov.pl/a_140803_przemysl_konf.html. 
  173. ^ (English) Norman Davies (1982). God's Playground. A History of Poland, Vol. 2: 1795 to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 449–455. ISBN 0-19-925340-4. 
  174. ^ Bernd Wegner, From Peace to War: Germany, Soviet Russia, and the World, 1939–1941, Bernd Wegner, 1997, ISBN 1-57181-882-0. Google Print, p.78
  175. ^ a b c Ericson 1999, p. 150–3
  176. ^ a b c Johari, J.C., Soviet Diplomacy 1925–41: 1925–27, Anmol Publications PVT. LTD., 2000, ISBN 8174884912 pages 134–137
  177. ^ a b c d Cohen, Yohanon, Small Nations in Times of Crisis and Confrontation, SUNY Press, 1989, ISBN 0791400182, page 110
  178. ^ "From the Red Flag to the Union Jack"
  179. ^ Nekrich, Ulam & Freeze 1997, p. 128–129
  180. ^ Churchill, Winston (1986). The Second World War. Houghton Mifflin Books. ISBN 039541055X. http://books.google.com/books?id=e0_3Nrc8D0wC&pg=PA403&dq=&sig=ACfU3U0qoTT2sPMd5uCgz1VEXjbjP5v8hA. 
  181. ^ a b c d e Shirer 1990, p. 668–669
  182. ^ Philbin III 1994, p. 130–142
  183. ^ Kennan, George. Russian and the West, under Lenin and Stalin, NY Mentor Books, 1961 pp 318,319
  184. ^ Cartier, Raymond. Hitler et ses Généreaux, Paris, J'ai Lu/A. Faiard, 1962. p.233
  185. ^ Sontag, R.J. and Beddie, J.S. editors. Nazi–Soviet Relations 1939–1941, Washington: State Department, 1948, p. 151)
  186. ^ a b Philbin III 1994, p. 48 & 59
  187. ^ Philbin III 1994, p. 60
  188. ^ a b Shirer 1990, p. 720
  189. ^ a b Roberts 2006, p. 59
  190. ^ Roberts 2006, p. 58
  191. ^ Brackman 2001, p. 341
  192. ^ a b c Nekrich, Ulam & Freeze 1997, p. 202–205
  193. ^ Roberts 2006, p. 63
  194. ^ a b Roberts 2006, p. 66
  195. ^ Ericson 1999, p. 129–130
  196. ^ Weeks, Albert L., Stalin's Other War: Soviet Grand Strategy, 1939–1941, Rowman & Littlefield, 2003, ISBN 0742521923, page 74–5
  197. ^ Roberts 2006, p. 67
  198. ^ "Stalin's Intelligence". The New York Times. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E06E4D71638F931A25755C0A9639C8B63. 
  199. ^ Roberts 2006, p. 67–68
  200. ^ Roberts 2006, p. 69
  201. ^ Roberts 2006, p. 116–117
  202. ^ Roberts 2006, p. 85
  203. ^ Ericson 1999, p. 202–205
  204. ^ a b Dreifeilds, Juris, Latvia in Transition, Cambridge University Press, 1996, ISBN 052155537X, page 34–35
  205. ^ a b Biskupski & Wandycz 2003, p. 147
  206. ^ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8221119.stm
  207. ^ Taubert, Fritz, The Myth of Munich, Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, 2003, ISBN 3486566733, page 318
  208. ^ Henig, Ruth Beatrice, The Origins of the Second World War, 1933–41: 1933–1941, Routledge, 2005, ISBN 0415332621, pages 67–68
  209. ^ Jerzy W. Borejsza, Klaus Ziemer, Magdalena Hułas. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes in Europe. Berghahn Books, 2006. Page 521.
  210. ^ Dietrich A. Loeber. "CONSEQUENCES OF THE MOLOTOV-RIBBENTROP PACT FOR LITHUANIA OF TODAY INTERNATIONAL LAW ASPECTS". http://www.lfpr.lt/uploads/File/1999-4/Loeber.pdf. Retrieved 2009-11-07. 
  211. ^ "Putin condemns Nazi-Soviet pact". BBC News. 31 August 2009. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8230387.stm. Retrieved 31 August 2009. 
  212. ^ Nicolas Werth, Karel Bartošek, Jean-Louis Panné, Jean-Louis Margolin, Andrzej Paczkowski, Stéphane Courtois, The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression, Harvard University Press, 1999, hardcover, 858 pages, ISBN 0-674-07608-7, page 5.
  213. ^ Israėli︠, Viktor Levonovich, On the Battlefields of the Cold War: A Soviet Ambassador's Confession, Penn State Press, 2003, ISBN 0271022973, page 10
  214. ^ Shirer 1990, p. 480–1
  215. ^ Ulam 1989, p. 508
  216. ^ Herf, Jeffrey, The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda During World War II and the Holocaust, Harvard University Press, 2006, ISBN 0674021754, pages 97–98
  217. ^ Osborn, Patrick R., Operation Pike: Britain Versus the Soviet Union, 1939–1941, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2000, ISBN 0313313687, page xix
  218. ^ Levin, Nora, The Jews in the Soviet Union Since 1917: Paradox of Survival, NYU Press, 1988, ISBN 0814750516, page 330. Litvniov "was referred to by the German radio as 'Litvinov-Finkelstein'-- was dropped in favor of Vyascheslav Molotov. 'The emininent Jew', as Churchill put it, 'the target of German antagonism was flung aside . . . like a broken tool . . . The Jew Litvinov was gone and Hitler's dominant prejudice placated.'"
  219. ^ In an introduction to a 1992 paper, Geoffrey Roberts writes: "Perhaps the only thing that can be salvaged from the wreckage of the orthodox interpretation of Litvinov's dismissal is some notion that, by appointing Molotov foreign minister, Stalin was preparing for the contingency of a possible deal with Hitler. In view of Litvinov's Jewish heritage and his militant anti-nazism, that is not an unreasonable supposition. But it is a hypothesis for which there is as yet no evidence. Moreover, we shall see that what evidence there is suggests that Stalin's decision was determined by a quite different set of circumstances and calculations", Geoffrey Roberts. The Fall of Litvinov: A Revisionist View Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 27, No. 4 (October, 1992), pp. 639–657 Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/260946
  220. ^ Resis 2000, p. 35
  221. ^ Moss, Walter, A History of Russia: Since 1855, Anthem Press, 2005, ISBN 1843310341, page 283
  222. ^ Herf, Jeffrey, The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda During World War II and the Holocaust, Harvard University Press, 2006, ISBN 0674021754, pages 97–98
  223. ^ Gorodetsky, Gabriel, Soviet Foreign Policy, 1917–1991: A Retrospective, Routledge, 1994, ISBN 0714645060, page 55
  224. ^ a b Resis 2000, p. 51
  225. ^ According to Paul Flewers, Stalin’s address to the eighteenth congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union on March 10, 1939 discounted any idea of German designs on the Soviet Union. Stalin had intended: "To be cautious and not allow our country to be drawn into conflicts by warmongers who are accustomed to have others pull the chestnuts out of the fire for them." This was intended to warn the Western powers that they could not necessarily rely upon the support of the Soviet Union. As Flewers put it, “Stalin was publicly making the none-too-subtle implication that some form of deal between the Soviet Union and Germany could not be ruled out.” From the Red Flag to the Union Jack: The Rise of Domestic Patriotism in the Communist Party of Great Britain 1995
  226. ^ Resis 2000, p. 33–56
  227. ^ Watson 2000, p. 699
  228. ^ Carr, E.H. German–Soviet Relations Between the Two World Wars, Harper & Row: New York, 1951, 1996 pages 129–130
  229. ^ Albert Resis. The Fall of Litvinov: Harbinger of the German–Soviet Non-Aggression Pact. Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 52, No. 1 (January, 2000), pp. 33–56 Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/153750 "By replacing Litvinov with Molotov, Stalin significantly increased his freedom of manoeuvre in foreign policy. Litvinov's dismissal served as a warning to London and Paris that Moscow had a third option-rapprochement with Germany. After Litvinov's dismissal, the pace of Soviet-German contacts quickened. But that did not mean that Moscow had abandoned the search for collective security, now exemplified by the Soviet draft triple alliance. Meanwhile, Molotov's appointment served as an additional signal to Berlin that Moscow was open to offers. The signal worked; the warning did not."
  230. ^ Derek Watson. Molotov's Apprenticeship in Foreign Policy: The Triple Alliance Negotiations in 1939, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 52, No. 4 (June, 2000), pp. 695–722. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/153322 "The choice of Molotov reflected not only the appointment of a nationalist and one of Stalin's leading lieutenants, a Russian who was not a Jew and who could negotiate with Nazi Germany, but also someone unencumbered with the baggage of collective security who could obtain the best deal with Britain and France, if they could be forced into an agreement."
  231. ^ Geoffrey Roberts. The Fall of Litvinov: A Revisionist View. Journal of Contemporary History Vol. 27, No. 4 (October, 1992), pp. 639–657. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/260946. "the foreign policy factor in Litvinov's downfall was the desire of Stalin and Molotov to take charge of foreign relations in order to pursue their policy of a triple alliance with Britain and France – a policy whose utility Litvinov doubted and may even have opposed or obstructed."
  232. ^ Deutscher, Tamara, E.H. Carr-a Personal Memoir, pages 78–86 from New Left Review, Issue #137, 1983, pages 79–83
  233. ^ a b c Carr, Edward Hallett (1979). German–Soviet Relations Between the Two World Wars, 1919–1939. Ayer Publishing. pp. 136. ISBN 040510586X. 
  234. ^ Taylor, A.J.P., The Origins of the Second World War, London 1961, p. 262–3
  235. ^ E. H. Carr., From Munich to Moscow. I., Soviet Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, (June, 1949), pp. 3–17. Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
  236. ^ Stalin's Other War: Soviet Grand Strategy, 1939–1941 ISBN 0-7425-2191-5
  237. ^ Parfitt, Tom (24 November 2006). "Moscow dossier embarrasses US and Britain ahead of Riga summit". Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/nov/24/russia.politics. Retrieved 23 August 2009. 
  238. ^ "Russian Model Putin Did Not Even Think to Apologize to Poland for Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact". Pravda.ru. 2009-09-02. http://english.pravda.ru/world/europe/02-09-2009/109049-russia_poland-0. Retrieved 2009-10-05. 
  239. ^ Halder, Generaloberst, Kriegstagebuch, Stuttgart, 1962, vol. II pp. 31,2
  240. ^ European Parliament: European Parliament resolution on European conscience and totalitarianism, passed on 2 April 2009
  241. ^ a b "Russia scolds OSCE for equating Hitler and Stalin". Reuters. July 4, 2009. http://www.reuters.com/article/newsMaps/idUSTRE5632JI20090704. Retrieved 20 August 2009. 
  242. ^ "Resolution on Stalin riles Russia". BBC. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8133749.stm. Retrieved 20 August 2009. 

References

  • Brackman, Roman (2001), The Secret File of Joseph Stalin: A Hidden Life, Frank Cass Publishers, ISBN 0714650501 
  • Cyprian, Tadeusz; Sawicki, Jerzy (1961), Nazi Rule in Poland 1939–1945, Polonia Publishing House 
  • Biskupski, Mieczyslaw B.; Wandycz, Piotr Stefan (2003), Ideology, Politics, and Diplomacy in East Central Europe, Boydell & Brewer, ISBN 1580461379 
  • Edwards, Robert (2006). White Death: Russia's War on Finland 1939–40. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 13 978 0 297 84630 2. 
  • Engle, Edwards; Paananen, Lauri (1985) [1973]. The Winter War: The Russo-Finnish Conflict, 1939–40. United States: Westview Press. ISBN 0-8133-0149-1. 
  • Ericson, Edward E. (1999), Feeding the German Eagle: Soviet Economic Aid to Nazi Germany, 1933–1941, Greenwood Publishing Group, ISBN 0275963373 
  • Fest, Joachim C. (2002), Hitler, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, ISBN 0156027542 
  • Garlinski, Jozef (1987), Poland in the Second World War, Hippocrene Books, ISBN 0333392582 
  • Kershaw, Ian (2001), Hitler, 1936–1945: Nemesis, W. W. Norton, ISBN 9780393322521, OCLC 244169429 
  • Leskinen, Jari; Juutilainen, Antti, eds (1999) (in Finnish). Talvisodan pikkujättiläinen (1st ed.). Werner Söderström Osakeyhtiö. pp. 976. ISBN 951-0-23536-9. 
  • Nekrich, Aleksandr Moiseevich; Ulam, Adam Bruno; Freeze, Gregory L. (1997), Pariahs, Partners, Predators: German–Soviet Relations, 1922–1941, Columbia University Press, ISBN 0231106769 
  • Montefiore, Simon Sebac (2005) [2003]. Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar (5th ed.). Great Britain: Phoenix. ISBN 0-75381-766-7. 
  • Philbin III, Tobias R. (1994), The Lure of Neptune: German–Soviet Naval Collaboration and Ambitions, 1919–1941, University of South Carolina Press, ISBN 0872499928 
  • Piotrowski, Tadeusz (2007), Poland’s Holocaust, McFarland, ISBN 0786403713 
  • Resis, Albert (2000), "The Fall of Litvinov: Harbinger of the German–Soviet Non-Aggression Pact", Europe-Asia Studies 52 (1) 
  • Roberts, Geoffrey (2006), Stalin's Wars: From World War to Cold War, 1939–1953, Yale University Press, ISBN 0300112041 
  • Roberts, Geoffrey (1995), "Soviet Policy and the Baltic States, 1939–1940: A Reappraisal", Diplomacy and Statecraft 6 (3) 
  • Roberts, Geoffrey (1992), "The Soviet Decision for a Pact with Nazi Germany", Soviet Studies 55 (2) 
  • Roberts, Geoffrey (1992), "Infamous Encounter? The Merekalov-Weizsacker Meeting of 17 April 1939", The Historical Journal 35 (4) 
  • Service, Robert (2003 (orig. 1997)), A history of Modern Russia, Penguin books, ISBN 9-780141-011219 
  • Shirer, William L. (1990), The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany, Simon and Schuster, ISBN 0671728687 
  • Trotter, William R. (2002, 2006) [1991]. The Winter war: The Russo–Finnish War of 1939–40 (5th ed.). London: Aurum Press. ISBN 9781854108814.  First published as A Frozen Hell: The Russo–Finnish Winter War of 1939–40. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: Algonquin Books. 1991. ISBN 1565122496. OCLC 58499386. 
  • Watson, Derek (2000), "Molotov's Apprenticeship in Foreign Policy: The Triple Alliance Negotiations in 1939", Europe-Asia Studies 52 (4) 
  • Ulam, Adam Bruno (1989), Stalin: The Man and His Era, Beacon Press, ISBN 080707005X 

Bibliography

External links


Source material

Up to date as of January 22, 2010

From Wikisource

Treaty of Nonaggression between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, also known as the Hitler–Stalin Pact and formally known as the Treaty of Nonaggression between Germany and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, was a non-aggression treaty between the German Third Reich and the Soviet Union. It was signed in Moscow on August 23, 1939, by the Soviet foreign minister Vyacheslav Molotov and the German foreign minister Joachim von Ribbentrop. The mutual non-aggression treaty lasted until Operation Barbarossa of June 22, 1941, when Nazi Germany invaded the Soviet Union.Excerpted from Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Government of the German Reich and The Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

Desirous of strengthening the cause of peace between Germany and the U.S.S.R., and proceeding from the fundamental provisions of the Neutrality Agreement concluded in April, 1926 between Germany and the U.S.S.R., have reached the following Agreement:

Contents

Article I

Both High Contracting Parties obligate themselves to desist from any act of violence, any aggressive action, and any attack on each other, either individually or jointly with other Powers.

Article II

Should one of the High Contracting Parties become the object of belligerent action by a third Power, the other High Contracting Party shall in no manner lend its support to this third Power.

Article III

The Governments of the two High Contracting Parties shall in the future maintain continual contact with one another for the purpose of consultation in order to exchange information on problems affecting their common interests.

Article IV

Should disputes or conflicts arise between the High Contracting Parties, neither shall participate in any grouping of Powers whatsoever that is directly or indirectly aimed at the other party.

Article V

Should disputes or conflicts arise between the High Contracting Parties over problems of one kind or another, both parties shall settle these disputes or conflicts exclusively through friendly exchange of opinion or, if necessary, through the establishment of arbitration commissions.

Article VI

The present Treaty is concluded for a period of ten years, with the proviso that, in so far as one of the High Contracting Parties does not advance it one year prior to the expiration of this period, the validity of this Treaty shall automatically be extended for another five years.

Article VII

The present treaty shall be ratified within the shortest possible time. The ratifications shall be exchanged in Berlin. The Agreement shall enter into force as soon as it is signed.

Secret Additional Protocol

Article I

In the event of a territorial and political rearrangement in the areas belonging to the Baltic States (Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), the northern boundary of Lithuania shall represent the boundary of the spheres of influence of Germany and U.S.S.R. In this connection the interest of Lithuania in the Vilna area is recognized by each party.

Article II

In the event of a territorial and political rearrangement of the areas belonging to the Polish state, the spheres of influence of Germany and the U.S.S.R. shall be bounded approximately by the line of the rivers Narev, Vistula and San.

The question of whether the interests of both parties make desirable the maintenance of an independent Polish State and how such a state should be bounded can only be definitely determined in the course of further political developments.

In any event both Governments will resolve this question by means of a friendly agreement.

Article III

With regard to Southeastern Europe attention is called by the Soviet side to its interest in Bessarabia. The German side declares its complete political disinterest in these areas.

Article IV

This protocol shall be treated by both parties as strictly secret.

Moscow, August 23, 1939.

For the Government of the German Reich v. Ribbentrop

Plenipotentiary of the Government of the U.S.S.R. V. Molotov

Photocopy of Secret Additional Protocol to Nazi–Soviet Pact

Secret Additional Protocol to Nazi–Soviet Pact of 23.08.1939 r. Undersigned: J.Ribbentop, W.Mołotov. German text







Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message