Na-Dene languages: Wikis


Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

North America
ISO 639-5: xnd
Na-Dene langs.png

Na-Dene (also Nadene, Na-Déné, etc., pronounced /ˌnɑːdɨˈneɪ/, also Athabaskan-Eyak-Tlingit, Tlina-Dene) is a Native American language family which includes at least the Athabaskan languages, Eyak, and Tlingit languages. An inclusion of Haida is controversial. In February 2008 a proposal relating Na-Dene (excluding Haida) to the Yeniseian languages of Siberia was published and well received by a number of linguists.[1]


The name

Edward Sapir originally constructed the term Na-Dene to refer to the combined family of Athabaskan, Tlingit, and tentatively Haida. (The existence of Eyak was not known at the time.) In his “The Na-Dene languages: A preliminary report” he describes how he arrived at the term (Sapir 1915, p. 558):

The name that I have chosen for the stock, Na-dene, may be justified by reference to no. 51 of the comparative vocabulary. Dene, in various dialectic forms, is a wide-spread Athabaskan term for “person, people”; the element *-ne (*-n, *-η) which forms part of it is an old stem for “person, people” which, as suffix or prefix, is frequently used in Athabaskan in that sense. It is cognate with H. na “to dwell; house” and Tl. na “people”. The compound term Na-dene thus designates by means of native stems the speakers of the three languages concerned, besides continuing the use of the old term Dene for the Athabaskan branch of the stock.

Family division

In its non-controversial core, Na-Dene consists of two branches, Tlingit and Athabaskan-Eyak:

For linguists who follow Edward Sapir in connecting Haida to the above languages, the Haida isolate represents an additional branch, with Athabaskan-Eyak-Tlingit together forming the other. Dene or Dine (the Athabaskan languages) is a widely distributed group of Native languages and peoples spoken in Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Northwest Territories, Nunavut, Saskatchewan, Yukon, Alaska, parts of Oregon, northern California, and the American Southwest as far as northern Mexico. The southwestern division of Athabaskan is also called Southern Athabaskan or Apachean, and includes Navajo and all the Apache dialects. Eyak was spoken in south central Alaska; the last speaker died in 2008. Navajo is by far the most widely spoken language of the Na-Dene family, spoken in Arizona, New Mexico, and other regions of the American Southwest.

Typological profile of Athabaskan-Eyak-Tlingit

All of these languages share a highly complex prefixing verb structure in which tense and mood markers are interdigitated between subject and object agreement markers. The morphological hallmark of the family is a series of prefixes found directly before the verb root that raise or lower the transitivity of the verb word. These prefixes, traditionally known as "classifiers", derive historically from a combination of three distinct classes of morphemes and not found in any other Native American family.

Generalized model of Athabaskan-Eyak-Tlingit verb morphology

object agreement shape or anatomical prefix tense-mood-aspect prefix 1,2p subject agreement perfective-stative prefix classifier prefix(es) verb root tense-mood-aspect suffix

The phoneme system contains a large number of guttural (velar or uvular) consonants (fronting in many modern Athabaskan languages to palatals and velars, correspondingly) as well as a general absence of labial obstruents (except where /b/ has arisen from *w). In the historical phonology there is a widespread tendency, observable across many Athabaskan languages, for phonemic tonal distinctions to arise from glottal features originally found at the end of the syllable. The glottal features in question are often evident in Eyak or Tlingit. These languages are typologically unusual in containing extensive prefixation yet being SOV and postpositional, features normally associated with suffixing languages.

Proposals of deeper genealogical relations involving Athabaskan-Eyak-Tlingit

A genealogical connection between the Tlingit, Eyak and Athabaskan languages was suggested early in the 19th century, but not universally accepted until much later. Haida, with 15 fluent speakers (M. Krauss, 1995), was originally linked to Tlingit by Franz Boas in 1894. Both Haida and Tlingit were then connected to Athabaskan by Edward Sapir in 1915. Linguists such as Lyle Campbell (1997) today consider the evidence inconclusive and have classified Haida as a language isolate. In order to emphasise the exclusion of Haida, Campbell refers to the language family as Athabaskan-Eyak-Tlingit rather than Na-Dene. Jeff Leer has recently proposed the name Tlina-Dene instead of the cumbersome AET, to emphasize the exclusion of Haida (Leer 2007).



Professor Edward Vajda of Western Washington University in 2008 presented compelling evidence that the Na-Dene languages (Athabaskan-Eyak-Tlingit) are related to Yeniseian (or Yeniseic) languages of Siberia[2], the only living representative of which is the Ket language. Key evidence includes homologies in verb prefixes and also a systematic correspondence between the distribution of Ket tones and consonant articulations found in Athabaskan-Eyak-Tlingit. His paper has been favorably reviewed by several experts on Na-Dene and Yeniseic languages, including Michael Krauss, Jeff Leer, James Kari, and Heinrich Werner, as well as a number of other well-known linguists, including Bernard Comrie, Johanna Nichols, Victor Golla, Michael Fortescue, and Eric Hamp. It was also the conclusion of this seminar that this comparison with Yeniseic data shows that Haida cannot be classified in a genealogical unit with Athabaskan-Eyak-Tlingit.[3]

Earlier proposals

According to Joseph Greenberg's controversial classification of the languages of Native North America, Na-Dené (including Haida as well as Athabaskan-Eyak + Tlingit) is one of the three main groups of Native languages spoken in the Americas, and represents a distinct wave of migration from Asia to the Americas. The genealogical relationship of Tlingit, Eyak and Athabaskan is widely accepted, while the inclusion of Haida remains controversial. The other two families recognized by Greenberg for the Americas are the widely accepted Eskimo-Aleut family, spoken in Siberia, Alaska, the Canadian Arctic and Greenland, and the far less widely accepted Amerind, Greenberg's most controversial classification, which includes every language native to the Americas that is not Eskimo-Aleut or Na-Dené.

Contemporary supporters of Greenberg's theory such as Merritt Ruhlen have suggested that the Na-Dené language family represents a distinct migration of people from Asia to the New World. Ruhlen claims this migration occurred six to eight thousand years ago, placing it around four thousand years later than the previous migration into the Americas by Amerind speakers. Ruhlen speculates that the Na-Dené speakers may have arrived in boats, initially settling near the Queen Charlotte Islands, now in British Columbia, Canada.[4]

According to Sergei Starostin and his followers, Na-Dené (including Haida) belongs to the much broader Dene-Caucasian superfamily, which also contains the North Caucasian languages, Sino-Tibetan languages, Yeniseian languages and Basque. Some of the links subsumed by the Dene-Caucasian proposal were suggested much earlier. The hypothesis that Sino-Tibetan is genealogically related to Na-Dene (including Haida) was considered by Edward Sapir nearly a century ago.[5]


  1. ^ [1]
  2. ^ See Vajda 2008b
  3. ^ Dene-Yeniseic Symposium. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks
  4. ^ [2]
  5. ^ Campbell, Lyle (1997). American Indian Languages: The Historical Linguistics of Native America. Oxford: Oxford University Press


  • Bengtson, J.D. 1994. “Edward Sapir and the ‘Sino-Dene’ Hypothesis.” Anthropological Science 102: 207-230.
  • Dürr, Michael & Egon Renner. 1995. The history of the Na-Dene controversy: A sketch. Language and Culture in North America: Studies in Honor of Heinz-Jürgen Pinnow, ed. by Egon Renner & Michael Dürr, 3-18. (Lincom Studies in Native American Linguistics 2). Munich: Lincom Europa.
  • Enrico, John. 2004. Toward Proto – Na-Dene. Anthropological Linguistics 46(3).229 – 302.
  • Goddard, Pliny E. 1920. International Journal of American Linguistics 1.266 – 279. (Has Tlingit in a genealogical relationship with Athapascan.)
  • Greenberg, J.H. 1987a. Language in the Americas. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Greenberg, J.H. 1987b. “The Na-Dene Problem.” In Greenberg (1987a), pp. 321-330.
  • Greenberg, J.H., and Merritt Ruhlen. 1992. "Linguistic Origins of Native Americans." Scientific American 267.5: 94-99. (November 1992)
  • Hamp, Eric P. 1979. Tongass Tlingit and Na-Dene. Berkeley Linguistics Society 5.460 – 463.
  • Hymes, Dell. 1956. Na-Dene and positional analysis of categories. American Anthropologist 58.624 – 628.
  • Hymes, Dell. Na-Dene ethnopoetics: A preliminary report: Haida and Tlingit. Language and Culture in North America: Studies in Honor of Heinz-Jürgen Pinnow, ed. by Egon Renner & Michael Dürr, 265 – 311. (Lincom Studies in Native American Linguistics 2). Munich: Lincom Europa.
  • Kaye, A.S. 1992. "Distant Genetic Relationship and Edward Sapir." Semiotica 91.3/4: 273-300.
  • Krauss, Michael E. 1964. Proto-Athapaskan-Eyak and the problem of Na-Dene: The phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics 30(2).118 – 36.
  • Krauss, Michael E. 1965. Proto-Athapaskan-Eyak and the problem of Na-Dene II: The morphology. International Journal of American Linguistics 31(1).18 – 28.
  • Krauss, Michael E. 1968. Noun classification systems in Athapaskan, Eyak, Tlingit, and Haida verbs. International Journal of American Linguistics 34(3).194 – 203.
  • Krauss, Michael E. 1973. Na-Dene. Linguistics in North America, ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, 903-78. (Current Trends in Linguistics 10). The Hague: Mouton.
  • Leer, Jeff. 1979. Proto-Athabaskan verb stem variation, part one: Phonology. (Alaska Native Language Center Papers 1). Fairbanks, Alaska: Alaska Native Language Center.
  • Leer, Jeff. 1989. Directional systems in Athapaskan and Na-Dene. Athapaskan linguistics: Current perspectives on a language family, ed. by Eung-Do Cook & Keren Rice, ch. 15, pp. 575 – 622. (Trends in linguistics: State of the art reports 15). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ISBN.
  • Leer, Jeff. 2007. Topics in Tlingit verb system and orthographies. Whitehorse, Yukon Territory: Yukon Native Language Centre. ISBN 1-55242-247-X.
  • Leer, Jeff, Doug Hitch, & John Ritter. 2001. Interior Tlingit noun dictionary: The dialects spoken by Tlingit elders of Carcross and Teslin, Yukon, and Atlin, British Columbia. Whitehorse, Yukon Territory: Yukon Native Language Centre. ISBN 1-55242-227-5.
  • Levine, Robert D. 1979. Haida and Na-Dene: A new look at the evidence. International Journal of American Linguistics 45(2).157 – 70.
  • Manaster Ramer, A. 1996. "Sapir's Classifications: Haida and the Other Na-Dene Languages." Anthropological Linguistics 38: 179-216.
  • Pinnow, Heinz-Jürgen. 1962. Two problems of the historical phonology of Na-Dene languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 28.162 – 166.
  • Pinnow, Heinz-Jürgen. 1964. On the historical position of Tlingit. International Journal of American Linguistics 30.155 – 164.
  • Pinnow, Heinz-Jürgen. 1966. Grundzüge einer historischen Lautlehre des Tlingit. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
  • Pinnow, Heinz-Jürgen. 1968a. Genetic relationships versus borrowing in Na-Dene. International Journal of American Linguistics 34(3).194 – 203.
  • Pinnow, Heinz-Jürgen. 1968b. Sprachhistorische Studien zur Verbstammvariation im Tlingit. Orbis 17.509 – 531.
  • Pinnow, Heinz-Jürgen. 1970. Notes on the classifiers in the Na-Dene languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 36(1).63 – 67.
  • Pinnow, Heinz-Jürgen. 1976. Geschichte der Na-Dene-Forschung. (Indiana : Beihefte ; 5). Berlin: Mann. ISBN 3-7861-3027-2
  • Pinnow. H-J. 1985. Das Haida als Na-Dene Sprache. (Abhandlungen der völkerkundlichen Arbeitsgemeinschaft, Hefte 43-46.) Nortorf, Germany: Völkerkundliche Arbeitsgemeinschaft.
  • Pinnow. H-J. 2006a. Die Na-Dene-Sprachen im Lichte der Greenberg-Klassifikation. / The Na-Déné Languages in Light of Greenberg's Classification. Zweite erweiterte Auflage / Second revised edition. Bredstedt: Druckerei Lempfert.
  • Pinnow. H-J. 2006b. Sprachhistorische Untersuchung zur Stellung des Haida als Na-Dene-Sprache. (Unveränderte Neuausgabe aus INDIANA 10, Gedenkschrift Gerdt Kutscher. Teil 2. Berlin 1985. Mit einem Anhang = Die Na-Dene-Sprachen im Verhältnis zum Tibeto-Chinesischen.) Bredstedt: Druckerei Lempfert.
  • Rubicz, R., Melvin, K.L., Crawford, M.H. 2002. Genetic Evidence for the phylogenetic relationship between Na-Dene and Yeniseian speakers. Human Biology, Dec(6).743 – 761.
  • Ruhlen, Merritt. 1994a. The Origin of Language: Tracing the Evolution of the Mother Tongue. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • Ruhlen, Merritt. 1994b. "Na-Dene Etymologies." In Ruhlen (1994a), pp. 93-110
  • Ruhlen M. 1998. "The Origin of the Na-Dene". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 95, no. 23: 13994-6.
  • Sapir, Edward. 1915. The Na-Dene languages: A preliminary report. American Anthropologist 17.534 – 558.
  • Thompson, Chad. 1996. The Na-Dene middle voice: An impersonal source of the D-element. International Journal of American Linguistics 62(4).351 – 378.
  • Vajda, Edward (2008). A Siberian Link with Na-Dene Languages (PDF). Dene-Yeniseic Symposium, Fairbanks.

See also

External links


Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address