From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nehalem (pronounced /nəˈheɪləm/[1]) is the codename for an Intel processor microarchitecture, successor to the Core microarchitecture.[2] The first processor released with the Nehalem architecture was the desktop Core i7,[3] which was released in November 2008. It was followed by the i3 and i5.[4]
Initial Nehalem processors use the same 45 nm manufacturing methods as Penryn. A working system with two Nehalem processors was shown at Intel Developer Forum Fall 2007,[5][6] and a large number of Nehalem systems were shown at Computex in June 2008.
The microarchitecture is named after the Nehalem Native American nation in Oregon.[citation needed] At that stage it was supposed to be the latest evolution of the NetBurst microarchitecture. Since the abandonment of NetBurst, the codename has been recycled and refers to a completely different project, although Nehalem still has some things in common with NetBurst. Nehalem-based microprocessors utilize higher clock speeds and are more energy-efficient than Penryn microprocessors. Hyper-Threading is reintroduced along with an L3 Cache missing from most Core-based microprocessors.
The first computer to use Nehalem-based Xeon processors was the Apple Mac Pro workstation announced on March 3, 2009.[7] Nehalem-based Xeon EX processors for larger servers were expected in Q4 2009 based on initial announcements from Intel[8], but in November 2009 the launch of these processors was pushed back to the first half of 2010[9].
Mobile Nehalem-based processors were introduced in September 2009.
Technology
Microarchitecture of the quad-core implementation
Various sources have stated the specifications of processors in the Nehalem family:
Performance and power improvements
It has been reported that Nehalem will have a focus on performance, which accounts for the increased core size.[14] Compared to Penryn, Nehalem will have:
- 1.1x to 1.25x the single-threaded performance or 1.2x to 2x the multithreaded performance at the same power level
- 30% lower power usage for the same performance
- According to a preview from AnandTech "expect a 20–30% overall advantage over Penryn with a 10% increase in power usage."[15]
- Per Core, clock-for-clock, Nehalem will provide a 15–20% increase in performance compared to Penryn.[16]
PC Watch found that a Nehalem "Gainestown" processor has 1.6x the SPECint_rate2006 integer performance and 2.4x the SPECfp_rate_2006 floating-point performance of a 3.0 GHz Xeon X5365 "Clovertown" quad-core processor.[14]
A 2.93 GHz Nehalem "Bloomfield" system has been used to run a 3DMark Vantage benchmark and gave a CPU score of 17,966.[17] The 2.66 GHz variant scores 16,294. A 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo E6600 scores 4,300.[18]
AnandTech tested the Intel QuickPath Interconnect ("QPI", 4.8 GT/s version) and found the copy bandwidth using triple-channel 1066 MHz DDR3 was 12.0 GB/s. A 3.0 GHz Core 2 Quad system using dual-channel 1066 MHz DDR3 achieved 6.9 GB/s.[19]
Overclocking will be possible with Bloomfield processors and the X58 chipset. The Lynnfield processor will use a PCH removing the need for a northbridge chipset.[20]
The Nehalem processors are the first to incorporate the SSE 4.2 SIMD instructions, adding 7 new instructions to the SSE 4.1 set available in the Core 2 series.
Code names
Each combination of a Nehalem/Westmere processor die and package has both a separate codename and a product code. Typically, the same dies are used for uniprocessor (UP) and dual-processor (DP) servers, but using an extra QuickPath link for the inter-processor communication in the DP server variant. Where the Core microarchitecture used four different processor sockets, one for each market segment, Nehalem now uses Socket 1366 for the high-end of both UP and DP machines, and Socket 1156 for the low end UP machines. The name for the UP version of Gulftown is not yet known; its product code is 80613 and can be found in Intel's product database[21].
Variants
These tables list all the processors of Nehalem microarchitecture to have been leaked so far. The table is ordered roughly by performance, which usually correlates with price and power. Released processors are set in bold.
Notes:
45 nm processors
| Codename |
Market |
Cores
(Threads) |
Socket |
Brand |
Processor No. |
Clock rate |
Turbo |
TDP |
Interfaces |
L3 cache |
Release |
1k Unit Price |
| Base |
Core |
Uncore |
Chipset |
Memory |
PCIe |
| Beckton |
MP Server |
8 (16) |
LGA-1567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
130/105/90 W |
4x QPI |
4x [DDR3 with SMB motherboard] |
n/a |
24 MB |
Q1 2010[22] |
|
| Gainestown |
DP Server[23] |
4 (8) |
LGA-1366 |
Xeon[24] |
W5580 |
133 MHz |
3.2 GHz |
Yes |
130 W |
2x QPI 6.4 GT/s |
3x DDR3-13331 |
n/a |
8 MB |
March 29, 2009[25] |
$1500 |
| X5570 |
2.93 GHz |
95 W |
$1286 |
| X5560 |
2.8 GHz |
$1072 |
| X5550 |
2.66 GHz |
$858 |
| E5540 |
2.53 GHz |
80 W |
2x 5.86 GT/s |
3x DDR3-10661 |
$744 |
| E5530 |
2.4 GHz |
$530 |
| E5520 |
2.26 GHz |
$373 |
| L5520 |
2.26 GHz |
60 W |
$530 |
| 4 (4) |
E5506 |
2.13 GHz |
No |
80 W |
2x 4.8 GT/s |
3x DDR3-8001 |
4 MB |
$266 |
| E5504 |
2.0 GHz |
$224 |
| L5506 |
2.13 GHz |
60 W |
$423 |
| 2 (2) |
E5502 |
1.86 GHz |
80 W |
$188 |
| Bloomfield |
UP Server[26] |
4 (8) |
LGA-1366 |
Xeon[27] |
W3580 |
133 MHz |
3.33 GHz |
Yes |
130 W |
1x QPI 6.4 GT/s |
3x DDR3-1333 |
n/a |
8 MB |
August 9, 2009 |
$999 |
| W3570 |
3.2 GHz |
March 29, 2009[27] |
$999 |
| W3550 |
3.06 GHz |
1x QPI 4.8 GT/s |
3x DDR3-1066 |
August 9, 2009 |
$562 |
| W3540 |
2.93 GHz |
March 29, 2009[27] |
$562 |
| W3520 |
2.66 GHz |
$284 |
| Lynnfield |
LGA 1156 |
X3470 |
2.93 GHz |
95 W |
DMI |
2x DDR3-1333 |
|
September 8, 2009 |
$589 |
| X3460 |
2.8 GHz |
$316 |
| X3450 |
2.66 GHz |
$241 |
| X3440 |
2.53 GHz |
$215 |
| L3426 |
1.86 GHz |
45 W |
$284 |
| 4 (4) |
X3430 |
2.4 GHz |
95 W |
$189 |
| Bloomfield |
Enthusiast Desktop[28] |
4 (8) |
LGA-1366 |
Core i7 Extreme |
975[29] |
133 MHz |
3.33 GHz |
2.66 GHz |
Yes |
130 W |
1x QPI 6.4 GT/s |
3x DDR3-1066 |
n/a |
8 MB |
May 31, 2009 |
$999 |
| 965 |
3.2 GHz |
November 17, 2008 |
$999 |
| Core i7 |
960[30] |
3.2 GHz |
2.13 GHz |
1x QPI 4.8 GT/s |
October 20, 2009 |
$562 |
| 950[29] |
3.06 GHz |
May 31, 2009 |
$562 |
| 940 |
2.93 GHz |
November 17, 2008 |
$562 |
| 930 |
2.8 GHz |
February 28, 2010 |
$294 |
| 920 |
2.66 GHz |
November 17, 2008 |
$284 |
| Lynnfield |
Performance Desktop |
4 (8) |
LGA 1156 |
870[31] |
133 MHz |
2.93 GHz |
2.4 GHz |
Yes |
95 W |
DMI |
2x DDR3-1333 |
1x16 / 2x8 |
8 MB |
September 8, 2009 |
$562 |
| 860 |
2.8 GHz |
$284 |
| 860S |
2.53 GHz |
|
82 W |
January 7, 2010 |
$337 |
| 4 (4) |
Core i5 |
750[32] |
2.66 GHz |
2.13 GHz |
95 W |
September 8, 2009 |
$196 |
| 750S |
2.4 GHz |
|
82 W |
January 7, 2010 |
$259 |
| Clarksfield |
Extreme/Performance Mobile |
4 (8) |
mPGA-989 |
Core i7 Extreme |
920XM |
2.0 GHz |
|
55 W |
September 23, 2009 |
$1054 |
| Core i7 |
820QM |
1.73 GHz |
45 W |
$546 |
| 720QM |
1.6 GHz |
6 MB |
$364 |
- 1 Though there is only one memory controller and it has only three channels, Intel states the Gainestown processors have six memory channels. Gainestown processors have dual QPI links and have a separate set of memory registers for each link[33]; in effect, a multiplexed six-channel system.
The Havendale and Auburndale variants (which contained Gilo and Ironlake) have been cancelled.[34]
32 nm processors
| Codename |
Market |
Cores
(Threads) |
Socket |
Brand |
Processor No. |
Clock rate |
Turbo |
TDP |
Interfaces |
L3 cache |
Release |
1k Unit Price |
| Base |
Core |
GPU |
Chipset |
Memory |
PCIe |
| Westmere EP[35] |
DP Server |
6 (12) |
LGA-1366 |
Xeon |
X5680 |
133 MHz |
3.33 GHz |
n/a |
Yes |
130 W |
2x QPI 6.4 GT/s |
3x DDR3-1333 |
n/a |
12 MB |
March 16, 2010 |
$1663 |
| X5670 |
2.93 GHz |
95 W |
$1440 |
| X5660 |
2.8 GHz |
95 W |
$1219 |
| X5650 |
2.66 GHz |
95 W |
$996 |
| E5645 |
2.4 GHz |
80 W |
2x QPI 5.86 GT/s |
$958 |
| L5640 |
2.26 GHz |
60 W |
$996 |
| L5638 |
2.0 GHz |
60 W |
$958 |
| 4 (8) |
X5677 |
3.46 GHz |
130 W |
2x QPI 6.4 GT/s |
$1663 |
| X5667 |
3.06 GHz |
95 W |
$1440 |
| E5640 |
2.66 GHz |
80 W |
2x QPI 5.86 GT/s |
3x DDR3-1066 |
$774 |
| E5630 |
2.53 GHz |
80 W |
$551 |
| E5620 |
2.4 GHz |
80 W |
$387 |
| L5630 |
2.13 GHz |
40 W |
$551 |
| L5618 |
1.86 GHz |
40 W |
$530 |
| 4 (4) |
L5609 |
1.86 GHz |
No |
40 W |
2x QPI 4.8 GT/s |
$440 |
| Gulftown |
UP Server |
6 (12) |
LGA-1366 |
Xeon |
W3680 |
133 MHz |
3.33 GHz |
n/a |
Yes |
130 W |
1x QPI 6.4 GT/s |
3x DDR3-1333 |
n/a |
12 MB |
March 16, 2010[36] |
$999 |
| Extreme/Performance Desktop |
6 (12) |
LGA-1366 |
Core i7 Extreme |
980X |
133 MHz |
3.33 GHz |
n/a |
Yes |
130 W |
1x QPI 6.4 GT/s |
3x DDR3-1066 |
n/a |
12 MB |
March 16, 2010[37] |
$999 |
| Clarkdale[38] |
Mainstream/Value Desktop |
2 (4) |
LGA-1156 |
Core i5 |
670 |
133 MHz |
3.46 GHz |
733 MHz |
Yes |
73 W |
DMI |
2x DDR3-1333 |
1 x16 |
4 MB |
January 7, 2010 |
$284 |
| 661 |
3.33 GHz |
900 MHz |
87 W |
$196 |
| 660 |
733 MHz |
73 W |
| 650 |
3.2 GHz |
$176 |
| Core i3 |
540 |
3.06 GHz |
No |
$133 |
| 530 |
2.93 GHz |
$113 |
| 2 (2) |
Pentium |
G6950 |
2.8 GHz |
533 MHz |
2x DDR3-1066 |
3 MB |
$87 |
| Arrandale[39] |
Mainstream/Value Mobile |
2 (4) |
mPGA-989 |
Core i7 |
620M |
133 MHz |
2.66 GHz |
766 MHz |
Yes |
35 W |
DMI |
2x DDR3-1066 |
1 x16 |
4 MB |
January 7, 2010 |
$332 |
| 640LM |
2.13 GHz |
566 MHz |
25 W |
$332 |
| 620LM |
2.0 GHz |
$300 |
| 640UM |
1.2 GHz |
500 MHz |
18 W |
2x DDR3-800 |
$305 |
| 620UM |
1.06 GHz |
$278 |
| Core i5 |
540M |
2.53 GHz |
766 MHz |
35 W |
2x DDR3-1066 |
3 MB |
$257 |
| 520M |
2.4 GHz |
$225 |
| 520UM |
1.06 GHz |
500 MHz |
18 W |
2x DDR3-800 |
$241 |
| 430M |
2.26 GHz |
766 MHz |
35 W |
2x DDR3-1066 |
OEM |
| Core i3 |
350M |
2.26 GHz |
667 MHz |
No |
| 330M |
2.13 GHz |
| 2 (2) |
Celeron |
P4500[40] |
1.86 Ghz |
500 Mhz |
|
2 MB |
Q2, 2010 |
|
For the desktop, Gulftown is to be an "Extreme Edition" CPU and so will coexist with Bloomfield.[41] It will have Turbo Boost and similar clock speeds to Bloomfield.[42]
Lynnfield and Clarksfield may make the 32 nm transition in the middle of 2010[39], sometime after Q2[41], while Beckton will move to 32 nm at the end of 2010.[43] The 32 nm CPUs will not have significantly different clock speeds compared to 45 nm CPUs.[44]
Clarkdale and Arrandale contain the 32 nm dual core processor Hillel and the 45 nm integrated graphics device Ironlake, and support switchable graphics.[34][44][45] The lowest-power variant of Arrandale may have a 10 W CPU TDP, and a maximum clock speed of 1.6 GHz.[46]
A successor to Bloomfield and entry level server chips are also expected in Q2 2010.[34][39][43]
Westmere
Westmere (formerly Nehalem-C) is the name given to the 32 nm die shrink of Nehalem. The first Westmere-based processors were launched on January 7, 2010 as the Core i3, Core i5, and dual-core mobile Core i7.
Westmere's features and improvements from Nehalem have been reported as follows:
- Native six-core, and possibly dual-die hex-core (12-cores), processors.[47]
- The successor to Bloomfield and Gainestown is six-core.
- A new set of instructions that gives over 3x the encryption and decryption rate of Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) processes compared to before.[48]
- Delivers seven new instructions (AES instruction set or AES-NI) that will be used by the AES algorithm. Also an instruction called PCLMULQDQ (see CLMUL instruction set) that will perform carry-less multiplication for use in cryptography.[49] These instructions will allow the processor to perform hardware-accelerated encryption, not only resulting in faster execution but also protecting against software targeted attacks.
- AES-NI may be included in the integrated graphics of Westmere.
- Integrated graphics, released at the same time as the processor.
- Improved virtualization latency.[50]
- New virtualization capability: "VMX Unrestricted mode support," which allows 16-bit guests to run (real mode and big real mode).
- Support for "Huge Pages" of 1GB in size.
Successor
The successor to Nehalem and Westmere will be Sandy Bridge, scheduled for release in 2011, according to Intel roadmaps.[51] The successor to Sandy Bridge will be Haswell, scheduled for release in 2012. It will come with a new cache subsystem, a FMA (fused multiply-add) unit, and a vector coprocessor.[16]
References
- ^ http://www.metacafe.com/watch/830178/i_am_nehalem/
- ^ Intel Corporation (2007-03-28). "http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20070328fact.htm". Press release.
- ^ Gruener, Wolfgang (2008-08-10). "Nehalem = i7: Intel unveils new Core processor brand". TG Daily. http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/38818/135/.
- ^ Hillis, Scott (2008-05-21). "Intel says Nehalem chips on track for '08 2nd half". Reuters. http://uk.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUKN2140939320080521.
- ^ Lal Shimpi, Anand (2007-09-18). "IDF 2007 – Day 1: Nehalem, Intel's GPUs, 32nm and More". AnandTech. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3101&p=2.
- ^ "Roadmaps of AMD and Intel CPU in 2010". Extra Reading Material. December 24, 2009. http://blogs.iium.edu.my/jaiz/2009/12/24/roadmaps-of-amd-and-intel-cpu-in-2010/.
- ^ Crothers, Brooke (2009-03-03). "Apple beats Intel to Nehalem-EP chip launch". http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10187569-64.html.
- ^ Morgan, Timothy (2009-02-10). "Intel confirms Nehalem Xeons imminent". http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/10/intel_confirms_nehalem_imminent/.
- ^ Intel Unveils Plans for Six-Core Nehalem-EX – InternetNews.com
- ^ Laird, Jeremy (2007-09-19). "IDF: Not all Intel Nehalem CPUs single-die". Tech.co.uk. http://www.tech.co.uk/computing/upgrades-and-peripherals/processors/news/idf-not-all-intel-nehalem-cpus-single-die?articleid=629416659.
- ^ Laird, Jeremy (2007-07-19). "IDF: Intel reveals eight-core PC processor". TechRadar UK. http://www.tech.co.uk/computing/upgrades-and-peripherals/processors/news/idf-intel-reveals-eight-core-pc-processor?articleid=1878171680.
- ^ a b Lal Shimpi (2008-03-17). "Opening the Kimono: Intel Details Nehalem and Tempts with Larrabee". AnandTech. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3264.
- ^ Gelsinger, Patrick P. (2008-03-17). "Intel Architecture Press Briefing" (PDF). Intel. http://download.intel.com/pressroom/archive/reference/Gelsinger_briefing_0308.pdf.
- ^ a b "Intel's dual teamed approached to micro-architecture development" (in Japanese). PC Watch. 2008-01-29. http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2008/0129/kaigai412.htm.
- ^ Lal Shimpi, Anand (2008-06-05). "The Nehalem Preview: Intel Does It Again". AnandTech. http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3326&p=9.
- ^ a b Doc Teraboule (2008-04-08). "IDF 2008 Shanghaï – From Nehalem to Haswell" (in French). Canard PC. http://www.canardplus.com/dossier-35-200-Processeur_de_Nehalem_a_Haswell.html. Retrieved 2009-03-01.
- ^ Nguyen, Tuan (2008-07-09). "'Nehalem' 2.93 GHz Benches Revealed". Tom's Hardware. http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/intel-nehalem-core,news-28701.html.
- ^ "Intel Bloomfield 2.66 GHz: First Comprehensive Evaluation". techPowerUp!. 2008-07-09. http://www.techpowerup.com/?65297.
- ^ "Intel does it again". AnandTech. 2008-06-05. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3326&p=5.
- ^ Botezatu, Bogdan (2008-04-22). "Intel: No Overclocking for Mainstream Nehalems". Softpedia. http://news.softpedia.com/news/Intel-No-Overclocking-for-Mainstream-Nehalems-84019.shtml.
- ^ http://intelmdds.pcnalert.com/MDDS/MddsView.aspx
- ^ Nebojsa Novakovic (2009-02-12). "Intel's next bunch of fun CPUs moves to 2010". CNN International. http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/opinion/976/1050976/intel-bunch-fun-cpus-moves-2010. Retrieved 2009-03-01.
- ^ "Intel Xeon Processor 5500 Series Product brief, (Document Number: 321579-001US)". Intel. 2009-04-01. http://download.intel.com/products/processor/xeon/dc55kprodbrief.pdf. Retrieved 2009-04-10.
- ^ "Core i7 to make leap to Xeon in early 2009". Legacy.macnn.com. http://legacy.macnn.com/articles/08/11/13/xeon.i7.in.early.2009/. Retrieved 2008-11-24.
- ^ Fuad Abazovic (2009-01-28). "Nehalem based Xeon comes Mar 29th". Fudzilla.com. http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11717&Itemid=1. Retrieved 2009-01-28.
- ^ "Intel Xeon Processor 3500 Series". Intel. 2009-04-01. http://www.intel.com/cd/channel/reseller/asmo-na/eng/products/server/processors/3500/feature/index.htm. Retrieved 2009-04-10.
- ^ a b c Teglet, Traian (2008-11-13). "Intel to Add New Nehalem Xeon Processor". softpedia. http://news.softpedia.com/news/Intel-to-Add-New-Nehalem-Xeon-Processors-97856.shtml. Retrieved 2008-11-13.
- ^ "Intel Core i7 Processor Extreme Datasheet, Volume 2, (Document Number: 320835-002)". Intel. 2008-11-01. http://download.intel.com/design/processor/datashts/320835.pdf. Retrieved 2009-03-24.
- ^ a b Worrel, Jon (2009-02-09). "Core i7 950 and 975 to replace 940 and 965". Fudzilla. http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11906&Itemid=1. Retrieved 2009-02-10.
- ^ http://www.guru3d.com/news/intel-to-launch-new-core-i7-960-and-celerons/
- ^ "Intel Core i5-750". AnandTech. 2009-06-17. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3585.
- ^ "Intel Quietly Announces Core i5". Xtreview. 2009-06-26. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3585.
- ^ "Intel Xeon Processor 5500 Series Datasheet Volume 2". Intel. March 2009. http://www.intel.com/Assets/PDF/datasheet/321322.pdf. Retrieved 2009-05-01.
- ^ a b c Jansen, Ng (2009-02-10). "Intel Replaces "Havendale" and "Auburndale" With 32nm Die Shrinks". DailyTech. http://www.dailytech.com/Intel+Replaces+Havendale+and+Auburndale+With+32nm+Die+Shrinks/article14225.htm. Retrieved 2009-03-01.
- ^ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/16/intel_xeon_5600_launch/
- ^ http://sanfrancisco.dbusinessnews.com/viewnews.php?article=bwire/20100316005652r1.xml
- ^ http://sanfrancisco.dbusinessnews.com/viewnews.php?article=bwire/20100316005652r1.xml
- ^ "Intel Clarkdale Processor". XTREVIEW. 2009-02-09. http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-7818-view-Intel-clarkdale-processor.html. Retrieved 2009-03-01.
- ^ a b c Ng, Jansen (10 February 2009). ""Gulftown" is the Flagship of 32nm "Westmere" Line". DailyTech. http://www.dailytech.com/Gulftown+is+the+Flagship+of+32nm+Westmere+Line/article14227.htm. Retrieved 2009-02-10.
- ^ http://www.techfuels.com/latest-hardware-news/22999-intel-celeron-release-32nm-architecture-arrandale.html
- ^ a b http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13657&Itemid=1
- ^ http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/13821/1/
- ^ a b Ng, Jansen (2009-02-10). "Intel Aims for Efficiency With New Server Roadmap". DailyTech. http://www.dailytech.com/Intel+Aims+for+Efficiency+With+New+Server+Roadmap/article14224.htm. Retrieved 2009-03-01.
- ^ a b Bell, Brandon (2009-02-10). "Intel CPU Roadmap 2009–2010". FS Media, Inc. http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/intel_32nm_westmere_roadmap/page2.asp. Retrieved 2009-03-01.
- ^ "CPU list". http://www.hwinfo.sk/Lists/cpu.htm.
- ^ http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13566&Itemid=1
- ^ http://brightsideofnews.com/news/2009/4/16/intel-says-no-to-28nm2c-focuses-on-22nm-ivy-bridgehaswell--larrabee.aspx
- ^ Smalley, Tim (2007-09-19). "Westmere is Nehalem's successor". bit-tech.net. http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2007/09/19/westmere_is_nehalem_successor/1.
- ^ "Carry-Less Multiplication and Its Usage for Computing The GCM Mode – Intel Software Network". 2008-04-11. http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/carry-less-multiplication-and-its-usage-for-computing-the-gcm-mode. Retrieved 2009-03-01.
- ^ Fuad Abazovic (2008-09-16). "Westmere 32nm to improve Nehalem features". Fudzilla.com. http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9448&Itemid=1. Retrieved 2009-03-01.
- ^ "The Intel Tick-Tock Model of Architecture & Silicon Cadence". Intel Corporation. http://www.intel.com/technology/tick-tock/index.htm.
Further reading
- "IDF: Intel Clarkdale Up Close and Personal". X-bit Labs. 2009-09-24. http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/clarkdale-sneakpeek.html.
- "Intel Core i7 Processors: Nehalem and X58 Have Arrived". Hot Hardware. 2008-11-03. http://hothardware.com/Articles/Intel-Core-i7-Processors-Nehalem-and-X58-Have-Arrived/.
- "Intel Core i7 CPU & Nehalem Architecture Review". hardCOREware.net. 2008-11-03. http://www.hardcoreware.net/reviews/review-372-1.htm.
- "Intel Nehalem Core i7 Series Complete Review". PC Perspective. 2008-11-03. http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=634.
- "Intel Nehalem Core i7 940 Review". Xtreview. 2008-10-01. http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-6524-view-Intel-core-i-7-940-review.html.
- Altavilla, Dave (2008-03-17). "Intel Showcases Dunnington, Nehalem and Larrabee Processors". HotHardware. http://www.hothardware.com/Articles/Intel_Showcases_Dunnington_Nehalem_and_Larrabee_Processors/.
- Shrout, Ryan (2008-03-28). "Intel Slides and Nehalem architecture information". PC Perspective. http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=382&type=expert.
- Stokes, Jon (2007-03-28). "Intel drops a Nehalem bomb on AMD's Fusion: integrated graphics, on-die memory controller, SMT". Ars Technica. http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070328-intel-aims-nehalem-at-amds-fusion-integrated-graphics-on-die-memory-controller-smt.html.
- Lal Shimpi, Anand (2007-09-18). "Nehalem: Single die, 8-cores, 731M transistors". AnandTech. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3101&p=2.
- Holland, Maggie (2007-09-19). "IDF 2007: Intel debuts Nehalem". IT Pro. http://www.itpro.co.uk/news/125370/idf-2007-intel-debuts-nehalem.html.
- "Intel takes the silicon out of chips". Jerusalem Post. 2007-11-13. http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?c=JPArticle&cid=1192380801327&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull.
- "Everything we know about Nehalem" (in Spanish). CHW.net. 2008-01-05. http://www.chw.net/Articulos/Intel/Todo-lo-que-sabemos-de-Intel-Nehalem-200801051919.html.
- "Bloomfield will cost less than 400 dollars". Xtreview. 2008-02-01. http://xtreview.com/addcomment-id-4164-view-Bloomfield-will-cost-less-than-400-dollars.html.
- Stokes, Jon (2008-04-09). "What you need to know about Intel's Nehalem CPU". Ars Technica. http://arstechnica.com/articles/paedia/cpu/what-you-need-to-know-about-nehalem.ars.
- Torres, Gabriel (2008-03-17). "Details on the Forthcoming Intel Nehalem Processor". Hardware Secrets. http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/535.
- Kanter, David (2008-04-02). "Real World Technologies article on Nehalem's microarchitecture". Real World Technologies. http://realworldtech.com/includes/templates/articles.cfm?ArticleID=RWT040208182719&mode=print.
- Shimpi, Anand Lal (2008-06-05). "The Nehalem Preview: Intel Does It Again". AnandTech. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3326.
- Shimpi, Anand Lal (2008-08-21). "Nehalem – Everything You Need to Know about Intel's New Architecture". AnandTech. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3382.
- "Intel Nehalem-Architektur". Hardware-Infos. 2008-09-20. http://www.hardware-infos.com/berichte.php?bericht=36.
- "First Look at Nehalem Microarchitecture". X-bit Labs. 2008-11-02. http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/nehalem-microarchitecture.html.
External links
| Intel processors |
|
| Discontinued |
|
|
| Current |
|
|
| Upcoming |
|
|
| Lists |
|
|
| Microarchitectures |
|
|
|
P5 based cores |
|
|
0.90 μm
|
|
|
|
0.60 μm
|
|
|
|
0.35 μm
|
|
|
|
0.25 μm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P6 based cores |
|
| 0.50 μm |
|
|
| 0.35 μm |
|
|
| 0.25 μm |
|
|
| 180 nm |
|
|
| 130 nm |
|
|
| 90 nm |
|
|
| 65 nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NetBurst based cores |
|
| 180 nm |
|
|
| 130 nm |
|
|
| 90 nm |
|
|
| 65 nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core based cores |
|
| 65 nm |
|
|
| 45 nm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nehalem
|
|
Nehalem based cores |
|
| 45 nm |
|
|
| 32 nm |
|
|
|
|
Future
|
|
|
|