The Full Wiki

Page Act of 1875: Wikis


Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Page Act of 1875 (Sect. 141, 18 Stat. 477, 1873-March 1875) was the first restrictive federal immigration law and prohibited the entry of classes of immigrants considered undesirable.[1] The law classified as undesirable any individual from China, Japan, or any Oriental country who was coming to America to be a contract laborer, any Asian woman who would engage in prostitution, and all people considered to be convicts in their own country.

The law was named after Horace F. Page, a Republican Congressman in the United States House of Representatives who introduced the bill and “sought to end the danger of cheap Chinese labor and immoral Chinese women".[2] The Page Act was supposed to strengthen the ban against “coolie” laborers, by imposing a fine of up to $2,000 and maximum jail sentence of one year upon anyone who tried to bring a person from China, Japan, or any oriental country to the United States “without their free and voluntary consent, for the purpose of holding them to a term of service”.[3] However, these provisions, as well as those regarding convicts “had little effect at the time”.[4] On the other hand, the bar on female Asian immigrants was heavily enforced and proved to be a barrier for all Asian women trying to immigrate, especially Chinese.


Factors that influenced the creation of the Page Act

The first Chinese immigrants to the United States were overwhelmingly males, the majority of whom began arriving in 1848 as a part of the California Gold Rush.[5] They intended to make money in the United States and then return to their country, so even though more than half had wives and families, they stayed in China.[5] However, anti-Chinese sentiment could already be found in discriminatory laws in 1852 that limited Chinese possibilities.[5] The California state legislature assumed that Chinese men were forced to work under long-term service contracts, when in reality immigrants to America were not coolies, but borrowed money from brokers for their trip and paid the money back plus interest through work at their first job.[6]. Without enough money to send for their wives, a prostitution industry developed in the male Chinese immigrant community and became a serious issue to white Americans living in San Francisco. Laws specifically directed at Chinese women immigrants were created even though prostitution was fairly common in the American West among many nationalities. Those in favor of Chinese exclusion were not worried about the experiences and needs of poor Chinese girls that were being sold or tricked into prostitution, but about “the fate of white men, white families, and a nation constructed as white”.[7] Chinese men hurt white men’s ability to earn money, “while Chinese women caused disease and immorality among white men”.[8] Both Chinese male “coolies” and Chinese female prostitutes were linked to slavery, which added to the American animosity toward them since slavery and involuntary servitude was abolished in 1865.[9] Male-laborers were central to the anti-Chinese movement, so one might expect lawmakers to focus on excluding men from immigration, but instead they concentrated on women in order to protect the rigid American system of monogamous marriages.[10] Therefore, the number of immigrants (majority male) entering the U.S. from China during the Page Act’s enforcement “exceeded the total for any other seven year period, before passage of the Exclusion Act in 1882, by at least thirteen thousand,” but the female population dropped from 6.4 percent in 1870 to 4.6 percent in 1880.[11]

Furthermore, the American Medical Association seriously believed that Chinese immigrants “carried distinct germs to which they were immune, but from which whites would die if exposed”.[12] This fear became concentrated on Chinese women, because some white Americans believed that germs and disease could most easily be transmitted to white men through sexual labor of Chinese prostitutes.[12] Additionally, during difficult times in China, women and girls were sold into “domestic service, concubinage, or prostitution”.[13] Some Chinese men had a wife as well as a concubine, usually a lower class woman obtained through purchase and recognized as a legal member of the family.[13] A woman’s status depended on her sexual relationship with Chinese men; “first wives enjoyed the highest status, followed by second wives and concubines, followed in turn by several classes of prostitutes”.[10] Immigration officials found it difficult to distinguish between the different types of women and did not accept the Chinese culture, so they were convinced that “virtually all immigrant Chinese women were enslaved prostitutes”.[13] Furthermore, the polygamy and prostitution that the Chinese practiced made Congress believe that they were unfit for self-governance or assimilation.[14] An additional concern was that the children of Chinese couples would become U.S. citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment and their cultural practices would become a part of American democracy.[14] As a result, the Page Law responded to “what were believed to be serious threats to white values, lives, and futures".[12] California state laws could not exclude women for being Chinese, so they were crafted as regulations of public morals, yet the laws were still struck down as “impermissible encroachment on federal immigration power".[15] However, the Page Law sailed through Congress without any expressed concerns of having a federal law that racially restricted immigration or violated the Burlingame Treaty of 1868 (which allowed free migration and emigration of Chinese) because Americans were focused on protecting the social ideals of marriage and morality.[16]


The American consul in Hong Kong from 1875-1877, David H. Bailey, was put in charge of regulating which Chinese women were actual wives of laborers, allowed to travel to the United States, as opposed to prostitutes. Bailey set up support for the process with the British colonial authorities and the Tung Wah Hospital Committee, an “association of the most prominent Chinese businessmen in Hong Kong".[17] Before a Chinese woman could immigrate to the United States she had to submit “an official declaration of purpose in emigration and personal morality statement, accompanied by an application for clearance and a fee to the American Consul".[18] The declaration was then sent to the Tung Wah Hospital Committee who would do a careful examination and then report back to Bailey about the character of each woman.[17] Also, a list of the potential emigrants was sent to the British Colonial government in Hong Kong for investigation. In addition, the day before a ship sailed to America, Chinese women reported to the American consul for a series of questioning which included the following questions:

Have you entered into contract or agreement with any person or persons whomsoever, for a term of service, within the United States for lewd and immoral purposes? Do you wish of your own free and voluntary will to go to the United States? Do you go to the United States for the purposes of prostitution? Are you married or single? What are you going to the United States for? What is to be your occupation there? Have you lived in a house of prostitution in Hong Kong, Macao, or China? Have you engaged in prostitution in either of the above places? Are you a virtuous woman? Do you intend to live a virtuous life in the United States? Do you know that you are at liberty now to go to the United States, or remain in your own country, and that you cannot be forced to go away from your home?[19]

The Chinese women who “passed” these questions according to the American consul were then sent to be interrogated by the harbor master of the British colonial government.[19] He would ask the women the same questions in an effort to catch liars, but if the women were approved they were then allowed to board the steamer to America. Once on board the ship, the women were questioned again. The first year that Bailey was assigned to differentiate wives from prostitutes he did not yet have the assistance of the Tung Wah Hospital Committee, and 173 women were allowed to sail to California, he was disappointed with that figure and granted only 77 women passage in 1877.[20] In 1878, under the authority of American consul Sheldon Loring, 354 women arrived in the U.S. which was a substantial amount compared to John S. Mosby’s grant of less than 200 women to be sent to the U.S. from 1879-1882.[21] Upon their arrival in San Francisco, Colonel Bee, the American consul for the Chinese would observe the documents with photographs of each woman included and ask her the same questions she had heard in Hong Kong.[22] If women changed their answers to the questions, did not match their pictures, or had incomplete paperwork, they could be detained, and sent back to Hong Kong.[23] As a result, from 1875-1882 at least one hundred and possibly several hundred women were returned to China.[23] The entire process was “shaped by the larger, explicitly racist assumption” that Chinese women, like Chinese men were dishonest.[24]

Photographs were used as a means to identify the Chinese women through each stage of the examination process in order to ensure that unqualified women would not be substituted for a woman who was properly questioned at any point in time.[25] Chinese women were subject to this method of identification prior to any other immigrant group because of the “threat of their sexuality to the United States”.[25] In addition to all the questioning that took place in regard to a woman’s character, there were also in depth questions about Chinese women’s fathers and husbands. Therefore, these women were subject not only to racism but also to sexist and classist beliefs because officials “accepted that male intentions and actions were more likely to determine a woman’s sexual future than her own actions and intentions”.[25] Chinese women had to demonstrate that they grew up in respectable families and that their husbands could afford to support them in the United States.[24] Also, “the appearance of the body and clothing supposedly offered a range of possible clues about inner character, on which some officials drew when trying to differentiate prostitutes from real wives”.[26] Bodily clues used to examine Chinese women included bound feet, “prettiness, youth, demeanor,” and how they walked.[27] However, the task of differentiating “real” wives from prostitutes was virtually impossible.[28] Men, on the other hand, faced more lenient restriction practices and were not required to “carry photographs, nor to match photographs that had been sent in advance to San Francisco Port authorities”.[29]

Effects on Chinese families and future immigrants to the U.S.

Most Chinese women that immigrated to the U.S. in the 1860s and the 1870s were “second wives, concubines in polygamous marriages, or prostitutes,” but Americans were wrong to believe that all Chinese women worked as prostitutes.[9] Enforcement of the Page Act resulted not only in the reduction of prostitutes but also the “virtually complete exclusion of Chinese women from the United States”.[30] In 1882 alone, during the few months before the enactment of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and the beginning of its enforcement, 39,579 Chinese entered the U.S., and only 136 of them were women.[31] Therefore, Chinese were unable to create families within the U.S.[31] The Page Act was so successful in preventing Chinese women from immigration and consequently keeping the ratio of females to males low that the law “paradoxically encouraged the very vice it purported to be fighting: prostitution”.[32] Not until after WWII was an appropriate gender balance established because between 1946 and 1952 almost 90 percent of all Chinese immigrants were women.[32]

The sojourner mentality of the Chinese limited the number of wives that chose to immigrate as well as the financial cost of the trip; however, documents relating to the enforcement of the Page Act suggest that some women were able to overcome the barriers and join their husbands, but without this law the numbers might have been much higher.[33] According to historian George Peffer, “all the evidence suggests that the women who survived this ordeal were most likely the wives of Chinese laborers” because they would have possessed the determination needed to endure the questioning, while importers of prostitutes “might have been reluctant to risk prosecution”.[33] Yet, this fact is difficult to conclusively prove especially since Peffer himself noted that the cost of immigration as well as possible bribes paid to American consuls would have created a greater hardship for the “wives of immigrants who possessed limited resources, than for the wealthy tongs” who sent prostitutes to the U.S.[34] Therefore, although the Chinese Exclusion Act was extremely important in transforming Chinese into a “declining immigrant group, it was the Page Law that exacerbated the problem of life without families in America’s Chinatowns”.[33] Moreover, the Page Act created the policing of immigrants around sexuality which “gradually became extended to every immigrant who sought to enter America,” and today remains a central feature of immigration restriction.[35]


  1. ^ Abrams, Kerry, “Polygamy, Prostitution, and the Federalization of Immigration Law,” Colombia Law Review 105.3 (Apr. 2005): 641-716.
  2. ^ George Anthony Peffer, “Forbidden Families: Emigration Experiences of Chinese Women Under the Page Law, 1875-1882,” Journal of American Ethnic History 6.1 (Fall 1986): 28-46. p.28.
  3. ^ An Act Supplementary to the Acts in Relation to Immigration (Page Law) sect. 141, 18 Stat. 477 (1873-March 1875).
  4. ^ Eithne Luibheid, Entry Denied: Controlling Sexuality at the Border (Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2002) 31.
  5. ^ a b c Luibheid 32.
  6. ^ Abrams 651.
  7. ^ Luibheid 34.
  8. ^ Luibheid 35.
  9. ^ a b Abrams 657.
  10. ^ a b Abrams 653.
  11. ^ Peffer 29.
  12. ^ a b c Luibheid 37.
  13. ^ a b c Luibheid 40.
  14. ^ a b Abrams 642.
  15. ^ Abrams 643 and 644.
  16. ^ Abrams 644 and 650.
  17. ^ a b Peffer 33.
  18. ^ Luibheid 41.
  19. ^ a b Peffer 32.
  20. ^ Peffer 32 and 38.
  21. ^ Peffer 38.
  22. ^ Luibheid 42.
  23. ^ a b Luibheid 43.
  24. ^ a b Luibheid 44.
  25. ^ a b c Luibheid 45.
  26. ^ Luibheid 50.
  27. ^ Luibheid 49.
  28. ^ Luibheid 53.
  29. ^ Luibheid 46.
  30. ^ Abrams 698.
  31. ^ a b Abrams 701.
  32. ^ a b Abrams 702.
  33. ^ a b c Peffer 43.
  34. ^ Peffer 34.
  35. ^ Luibheid 32 and 53.

Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address