Philip V of France: Wikis

Advertisements
  
  
  

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Did you know ...


More interesting facts on Philip V of France

Include this on your site/blog:

Encyclopedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Philip V the Tall
King of France and Navarre
Count of Champagne and Burgundy
Contemporary picture of Philip from the L'arbre généalogique Bernard Gui, Généalogie des rois de France'
Reign 20 November 1316 – 3 January 1322
Coronation 9 January 1317,
Predecessor John I
Successor Charles IV
Spouse Joan II, Countess of Burgundy
Issue
Joan III, Countess of Burgundy
Margaret I, Countess of Burgundy
Isabella of France
House House of Capet
Father Philip IV of France
Mother Joan I of Navarre
Born c.1293
Lyon, France
Died 3 January 1322 [aged 29]
Longchamp, France
Burial Saint Denis Basilica

Philip V (1292 – 3 January 1322),[1] called Philip the Tall (French: le Long), was King of France and Navarre (as Philip II) and Count of Champagne from 1316 to his death, and the second to last of the House of Capet. Considered a wise and politically astute ruler, Philip took the throne under questionable circumstances, but he became a "strong and popular" king over the course of his reign. Notable as a prominent figure in the late crusading movement, Philip died while embroiled in the administrative reform of southern France.

Contents

Personality and Marriage

Philip was born in Lyon, the second son of King Philip IV of France and Queen Joan I of Navarre, assuming the title of the Count of Poitou. Modern historians have described Philip V as a man of "considerable intelligence and sensitivity", and the "wisest and politically most apt" of Philip IV's three sons.[2] Philip was influenced both by the troubles and unrest that his father had encountered during 1314, and the difficulties that his older brother - Louis X, known as "the Quarreler" had faced during the intervening few years.[3] At the heart of both Philip IV and Louis X's problems were taxes, and the difficulty in raising them outside of crises.[4]

Philip married Joan, the Countess of Burgundy and the eldest daughter of Otto IV, Count of Burgundy, in 1307.[5] The original plan had been for Louis X to marry Joan, but this was altered after Louis was engaged to Margaret.[6] Modern scholars have found little evidence as to whether the marriage was a happy one, but the pair had a considerable number of children in a short space of time,[7] and Philip was exceptionally generous to Joan by the standards of the day.[8] Philip went to great lengths not only to endow Joan with lands and money but to try to ensure that these gifts were irrevocable in the event of his early death.[9] Amongst the various gifts were a palace, villages, additional money for jewels and her servants, the property of all the Jews in Burgundy and the entire county of Burgundy itself, which he gave Joan in 1318.[10]

Joan was implicated in Queen Margaret's adultery case during 1314; Margaret was accused and convicted of adultery with two knights, upon the testimony of their sister-in-law, Isabella.[11] Joan was suspected of having secretly known about the adultery; placed under house arrest at Dourdan as punishment, it was then implied that Joan was guilty of adultery herself.[12] With Philiip's support she continued to protest her innocence and by 1315 her name had been cleared by the Paris Parlement, partially through Philip's influence, and she was allowed to return to court.[13] It is unclear why Philip stood by her in the way that he did. One theory has been that he was concerned that if he was to abandon Joan, he might also lose Burgundy; another theory suggests that his slightly formulaic love letters to his wife should be taken at face value, and that he was in fact very deeply in love.[14]

Accession and the Salic Law

Philip engineered a hasty coronation, shown in this picture, after the death of his nephew, the young John I, in order to build support for his bid for the French throne in 1316-7.

Philip's older brother, Louis X, died in 1316 leaving the pregnant Clementia of Hungary as his widow.[15] There were several potential candidates for the role of regent, including Charles of Valois and Odo IV, the Duke of Burgundy, but Philip successfully out-manouvred them, being appointed regent himself.[16] Philip remained as regent for the remainder of the pregnancy and for a few days after the birth of his nephew John I - the infant only lived for five days before dying.[17]

The heir to the throne was now a subject of some dispute. Princess Joan, the remaining daughter of Louis X by the late Queen Margaret,[18] was one obvious candidate, but suspicion still hung over her as a result of the scandal in 1314, including concerns over her actual parentage.[19] In addition, the Salic law had been reaffirmed in recent years, which would have meant that the throne would pass over Joan in any event, but this interpretation of the law was not necessary accepted by all the nobility.[20]

Philip engaged in some rapid political negotiations and convinced Charles of Valois, who along with Odo IV was championing Joan's rights, to switch sides and support him instead.[21] On the 9 January 1317, with Charles' support, Philip was hastily coronated at Rheims. The majority of the nobility, however, refused to attend, there were demonstrations in Champagne, Artois and Burgundy[22] and Philip called a rapid assembly of the nobility on 2 February in Paris.[23] Philip laid down the principle that Joan, as a woman, could not inherit the throne of France, played heavily upon the fact that he was now the anointed king, and consolidated what some authors have described as his effective "usurpation" of power.[24]

The next year, Philip continued to strengthen his position. He married his eldest daughter, Joan to the powerful Odo IV, bringing the Duke over to his own party.[25] Joan, however, did ultimately accede to the throne of Navarre, which did not hold to the Salic law.[26] Philip then built his reign around the notion of reform - "reclaiming rights, revenues and territories" that had been wrongly lost to the crown in recent years.[27]

Domestic reform

Philip took steps to reform the French currency during the course of his reign, including these silver Tournois coins.

Domestically, Philip proved a "strong and popular" king,[28] despite inheriting an uncertain situation and an ongoing sequence of poor harvests.[29] He followed in the steps of his father, Philip IV, in trying to place the French crown on a solid fiscal footing and revoked many of the unpopular decisions of his predecessor and older brother, Louis X. He also instituted government reforms, reformed the currency and worked to standardize weights and measures.[30] Amongst Philip's key appointments was the later cardinal Pierre Bertrand, who would play a key role in successive French royal governments in subsequent years.[31]

Starting in 1317, Philip reissued an act first passed by his father in 1311, condemning the alienation, of theft, of royal resources and offices in the provinces.[32] By 1318, his political situation strengthened, Philip went further, setting out in a new act a distinction between the French royal domain - the core set of lands and titles that belonged permanently to the crown - and those lands and titles that had been forfeited to the crown for one reason or another.[33] If the French crown was to bestow or grant new lands to nobles, Philip declared, they would usually be given only from the second source: this was a double-edged announcement, at once reinforcing the core, unalienable powers of the crown, whilst also reassuring nobles that their lands were sacrosanct unless they were forfeited to the crown in punishment for a crime or misdemeanour.[34] Philip was responsible for the creation of the cours des comptes in 1320, a court responsible for auditing the royal accounts to ensure proper payment;[35] the courts still exist today. In practice, Philip did not entirely keep to his self-declared principles on grants of royal lands and titles, but was far more conservative in such matters than his immediate predecessors.[36]

Resolution of the Flanders conflict and England

Philip pursued a successful diplomatic and dynastic solution to the long running tensions with Flanders.

Philip was able to achieve a successful resolution of the ongoing Flanders problem. The Count of Flanders ruled an "immensely wealthy state"[37] which largely led an autonomous existence on the edge of the French state; the French king was generally regarded as having suzerainty over Flanders, but in recent years the relationship had become strained.[38] Philip IV had been defeated at Courtrai in 1302 attempting to reassert French control, where he was defeated by Robert II of Artois,[39] and despite the later French victory at the Battle of Mons-en-Pévèle the relationship remained tense.

Robert III, Robert II's grandson, had continued to resist France militarily, but by Philip's accession to the throne had found himself increasingly isolated politically in Flanders itself.[40] Meanwhile, the French position had become strained by the need to maintain a wartime footing. Louis X had prohibited exports of grain and other material to Flanders in 1315, resulting in a profitable smuggling industry that in turn discouraged legal trade with the French crown along the border region; Louis was forced to directly requisition food for his forces, resulting in a string of complaints from local lords and the Church.[41] Philip began to reinstate a proper recompensation scheme in 1317, but the situation remained unstable.[42]

Both Philip and Robert turned away from seeking a military solution in favour of a political compromise.[43] Accordingly Robert made an accommodation with Philip in June 1320, under which Robert would confirm his young grandson, Louis, as his designated heir, in return for Louis being pledged in marriage to Philip's second daughter, Margaret. This would provide Robert, and then Louis, with strong French support within Flander.[44] Louis was, to a great extent, already under Philip's influence.[45] Louis had been brought up in Nevers in central France, and at Philip's court.[46] and was culturally effectively a French prince.[47] This arrangement was a considerable success for Philip's policy, although over time Louis' clear French loyalties and lack of political links within Flanders itself would lead to political upheaval and peasant revolt.[48]

Philip also faced difficulties with Edward II of England. Like the Count of Flanders, Edward in his role as the ruler of Gascony owed homage to the king of France, but as a king in his own right, and as the head of a largely autonomous Gascon province, was disinclined to do so.[49] Edward had not given homage to Louis X, and initially declined to do so to Philip, who had a reputation as being more favourable to the English than Louis X.[50] In 1319 Philip allowed Edward to give homage by proxy, an honour by the standards of the day, but expected him to do so in person in 1320.[51] Edward arrived in Amiens to do so, only to find that Philip was now insisting on Edward also giving an oath of personal fealty to him - an act going beyond that of normal feudal homage.[52] Edward gave homage but refused to swear fealty; nonetheless, this marked a period of increased French pressure on England over Gascony.

The Crusades

Pope John XXII, initially a close ally of Philip in the late crusading movement in Christian Europe, joined with him in condemning the violent Shepherds' Crusade in 1320.

Philip was also to play a role in the ongoing crusade movement during the period. Pope John XXII, the second of the Avignon popes had been elected at a conclave assembled in Lyons during 1316 by Philip himself, and set out his renewed desire to see fresh crusades.[53] Philip IV had agreed a joint plan for a new French led crusade at the Council of Vienne in 1312, with his son Philip, a "committed crusader,"[54] taking the cross himself in 1313.[55] Once king himself, Philip was obligated to carry out these plans and asked John for and received additional funds after 1316.[56] Both Philip and John agreed, however, that a French crusade was impossible whilst the military situation in Flanders remained unstable.[57] Nonetheless, John continued to assure the Armenians that Philip would shortly lead a crusade to relieve them.[58] An attempt to send a naval vanguard from the south of France under Louis I of Clermont failed, however, with the forces being destroyed in a battle off Genoa in 1319.[59] Over the winter of 1319-20 Philip convened a number of meetings with French military leaders in preparation for a potential second expedition,[60] that in turn informed Bishop William Durand's famous treatise on crusading.[61] By the end of Philip's reign, however, both John and he had fallen out over the issue of new monies and commitments to how they were spent, and both their attentions were focused on managing the challenge of the Shepherds' Crusade.[62]

The Shepherds' Crusade, or the Pastoreaux, emerged out of Normandy in 1320. One argument for the timing of this event has been that the repeated calls for popular crusades by Philip and his predecessors, combined with the absence of any actual large scale expeditions, ultimately boiled over into this popular, but uncontrolled, crusade.[63] Philip's intent for a new crusade had certainly become widely known by the spring of 1320 and the emerging peace in Flanders and the north of France had left a large number of displaced peasants and soldiers. [64] The result was a large and violent anti-Semitic movement threatening local Jews, royal castles,[65] the wealthier clergy[66] and Paris itself.[67] The movement was ultimately condemned by Pope John, who doubted whether the movement had any real intent to carry out a crusade.[68] Philip was forced to move against it, crushing the movement militarily and driving the remnants south across the Pyrenees into Aragon.[69]

Death and legacy

Philip fell ill in Poitiers during the summer of the 1321 leper scare, partially the result of his reform plans for the south of the kingdom; after a respite, he died at Paris in August.

In 1321 an alleged conspiracy - the "leper scare" - was discovered in France; the accusation, apparently unfounded, was that lepers had been poisoning the wells of various towns, and that this activity had been orchestrated by the Jewish minority,[70] secretly commissioned by foreign Muslims.[71] The scare took hold in the febrile atmosphere left by the Shepherds' crusade of the following year and the legacy of the poor harvests of the previous decade.[72]

The French Jews were, by 1321, closely connected to the French crown; Philip had given orders that royal officials assist Jewish money lenders in recovering Christian debts, and some local officials were arguing that the crown was due to inherit the estates of dead Jewish merchants.[73] Following the events of 1320, Philip was involved in fining those who had attacked Jews during the Shepherds' Crusade, which in practice added further to the dislike of this minority in France.[74] Rumours and allegations about lepers themselves had been circulated in 1320 as well, and some had been arrested during the Crusade.[75]

Philip was in Poitiers in June involved in a tour of the south aimed at reform of the southern fiscal system, when word arrived of the scare. Philip issued an early edict demanding that any leper found guilty was to be burnt; their goods would be forfeit to the crown.[76] The King's southern tour and reform plans, although administratively sound by modern standards, had created much local opposition and modern historians have linked the King's role in Poiters with the sudden outbreak of violence.[77] This all put Philip in a difficult position; he could not openly side with those claiming wrong doing by the lepers, Jews and Muslims without encouraging further, unnecessary violence - on the other hand, if he did not ally himself to the cause, he encouraged further unsanctioned violence, weakening his royal position.[78] In August, Philip was continuing to progress his reform plans when he fell ill from multiple illnesses.[79] After a brief respite, he died at Longchamp, Paris.[80] He was interred in Saint Denis Basilica. Some Jews did leave France as a result of the leper scare, but Philip had successfully resisted signing any formal edict, which limited the impact to some degree.[81]

By the Salic law that Philip had reaffirmed in 1316, without a living male heir Philip was succeeded by his younger brother, Charles IV. Charles was also to die without male issue, resulting ultimately in Edward III's claim to the French throne and the subsequent Hundred Years War (1337-1453).[82]

Family

In 1307 he was married to Jeanne II, Countess of Burgundy (daughter and heiress of Otto IV, count of Burgundy) and they had five daughters and two sons:

  1. Joan (1308 - 1349). Countess of Burgundy and Artois in her own right and consort of Eudes IV, Duke of Burgundy. The County and Duchy of Burgundy were united due to their marriage.
  2. Marguerite (1310 - 1382). Consort of Louis I of Flanders. Countess of Burgundy and Artois in her own right.
  3. Isabella (c. 1312 - April, 1348). Consort to Guigues VIII de La Tour du Pin, Dauphin de Viennois.
  4. Blanche of France, 1313-1358, died unmarried and childless.
  5. Philip, 1313-March 1321.
  6. Louis, who lived 1316-18 February 1317
  7. A daughter, 1322.

References

French Monarchy
Direct Capetians
France Ancient.svg
Philip IV
   Louis X
   Philip V
   Isabella, Queen of England
   Charles IV
Grandchildren
    Joan II of Navarre
    John I
    Joan III, Countess and Duchess of Burgundy
    Margaret I, Countess of Burgundy
    Edward III of England
    Mary of France
    Blanche of France, Duchess of Orléans
Philip V
  1. ^ Rose, p.89.
  2. ^ Brown, p.126.
  3. ^ Brown, p.127.
  4. ^ Brown, p.127.
  5. ^ Wagner, p.250.
  6. ^ Brown, p.130.
  7. ^ Brown, p.134.
  8. ^ Brown, p.130.
  9. ^ Brown, pp.138-141.
  10. ^ Brown, pp.141-4.
  11. ^ Drees, p.398; Weir, 2005.
  12. ^ Brown, p.138.
  13. ^ Weir, 2005.
  14. ^ Brown, p.138.
  15. ^ Rose, p.89.
  16. ^ Wagner, p.250.
  17. ^ Rose, p.89.
  18. ^ Rose, p.89.
  19. ^ Wagner, p.250.
  20. ^ Wagner, p.250.
  21. ^ Wagner, p.250.
  22. ^ Fryde, p.139.
  23. ^ Wagner, p.250.
  24. ^ Wagner, p.250.
  25. ^ Rose, p.89.
  26. ^ Rose, p.89.
  27. ^ Brown, p.126.
  28. ^ Wagner, p.250.
  29. ^ Brown, p.126.
  30. ^ Wagner, p.250.
  31. ^ Drees, p.45.
  32. ^ Brown, p.127.
  33. ^ Brown, p.127.
  34. ^ Brown, p.127.
  35. ^ Duby, p.309.
  36. ^ Brown, 129.
  37. ^ Holmes, p.16.
  38. ^ Holmes, p.16.
  39. ^ Holmes, p.16.
  40. ^ TeBrake, p.47.
  41. ^ Jordan, pp.169-170.
  42. ^ Jordan, p.170.
  43. ^ Jordan, p.170.
  44. ^ TeBrake, p.47.
  45. ^ TeBrake, p.47.
  46. ^ TeBrake, p.46.
  47. ^ TeBrake, pp.46-7.
  48. ^ TeBrake, p.50.
  49. ^ Fryde, p.139.
  50. ^ Fryde, p.139.
  51. ^ Fryde, p.139.
  52. ^ Fryde, p.140.
  53. ^ Housley 1986, p.20.
  54. ^ Riley-Smith, p.266.
  55. ^ Riley-Smith, p.266.
  56. ^ Housley 1986, p.20.
  57. ^ Housley 1986, p.21.
  58. ^ Housley 1986, p.21.
  59. ^ Housley 1986, p.22.
  60. ^ Riley-Smith, p.266.
  61. ^ Housley 1992, p.31.
  62. ^ Housley 1986, p.22.
  63. ^ Barber, pp.159-162.
  64. ^ Jordan, p.170.
  65. ^ Nirenburg, p.45.
  66. ^ Housley, 1992, p.32.
  67. ^ Jordan, p.170.
  68. ^ Housley 1986, p.145.
  69. ^ Jordan, p.170.
  70. ^ Rose, p.89.
  71. ^ Jordan, p.171.
  72. ^ Jordan, p.171.
  73. ^ Nirenburg, p.50.
  74. ^ Nirenberg, p.51.
  75. ^ Nirenberg, p.53.
  76. ^ Nirenberg, p.55.
  77. ^ Nirenberg, p.60.
  78. ^ Nirenberg, p.65.
  79. ^ Nirenberg, p.60.
  80. ^ Rose, p.89.
  81. ^ Nirenburg, p.67.
  82. ^ Rose, p.89.

Bibliography

  • Barber, Malcolm. (1981) "The Pastoureaux of 1320." Journal of Ecclesiastical History. 32 (1981): 143-166.
  • Brown, Elizabeth, A. R. (2000) The King's Conundrum: Endowing Queens and Loyal Servants, Ensuring Salvation, and Protecting the Patrimony in Fourteenth-Century France, in Burrow and Wei (eds) 2000.
  • Burrow, John Anthony and Ian P. Wei (eds). (2000) Medieval Futures: Attitudes to the Future in the Middle Ages. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press.
  • Drees, Clayton J. (2001) The Late Medieval Age of Crisis and Renewal, 1300-1500: a Biographical Dictionary. Westport: Greenwood Press.
  • Duby, George. (1993) France in the Middle Ages 987-1460: from Hugh Capet to Joan of Arc. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Fryde, Natalie. (2003) The Tyranny and Fall of Edward II 1321-1326. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Holmes, George. (2000) Europe, Hierarchy and Revolt, 1320-1450, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Housley, Norman. (1986) The Avignon papacy and the Crusades, 1305-1378. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Housley, Norman. (1992) The later Crusades, 1274-1580: from Lyons to Alcazar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jordan, William Chester. (1996) The Great Famine: Northern Europe in the early Fourteenth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Nirenberg, David. (1996) Communities of Violence: Persecution of Minorities in the Middle Ages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Riley-Smith, Jonathan. (2005) The Crusades: a History. London: Continuum.
  • Rose, Hugh James. (1857) A New General Biographical Dictionary, Volume 11. London: Fellows.
  • TeBrake, William Henry. (1994) A Plague of Insurrection: Popular Politics and Peasant Revolt in Flanders, 1323-1328. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Wagner, John. A. (2006) Encyclopedia of the Hundred Years War. Westport: Greenwood Press.
  • Weir, Alison. (2005) Queen Isabella: Treachery, Adultery and Murder in Medieval England. New York: Ballantine Books.

External links

Philip V of France
Born: c. 1292-1293 Died: 3 January 1322
Regnal titles
Preceded by
John I
King of France
20 November 1316 – 3 January 1322
Succeeded by
Charles IV
King of Navarre
(as 'Philip II')

20 November 1316 – 3 January 1322
French royalty
Preceded by
Louis, King of Navarre
Heir to the Throne
as Heir presumptive
29 November 1314 — 20 November 1316
Succeeded by
Philip
French nobility
Preceded by
Vacant
(Alphonse of Toulouse)
Count of Poitou
1311–20 November 1316
Succeeded by
Merged into crown
(eventually John II of France)
Preceded by
Mahaut of Artois
Count Palatine of Burgundy by marriage
with Jeanne II of Burgundy
as 'Philip II'

1315–3 January 1322
Succeeded by
Eudes IV, Duke of Burgundy
Preceded by
John I
Count of Champagne
(as 'Philip II')

20 November 1316 – 3 January 1322
Succeeded by
Charles IV
Advertisements

Advertisements






Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message