Pope Benedict XVI Islam controversy: Wikis

Advertisements
  

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Encyclopedia

(Redirected to Regensburg lecture article)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pope Benedict XVI, January 2006

The Regensburg lecture was a lecture delivered on 12 September 2006 by Pope Benedict XVI at the University of Regensburg in Germany, where he had once served as professor of theology. It was entitled "Glaube, Vernunft und Universität — Erinnerungen und Reflexionen" (German: Faith, Reason and the University — Memories and Reflections). The lecture is considered to be among the most important papal statements on world affairs since John Paul II's 1995 address to the United Nations, and sparked international reactions and controversy.

In his lecture, the pope, speaking in German, quoted an unfavorable remark about Islam made in the 14th century by Manuel II Palaiologos, a Byzantine emperor. As the English translation of the pope's lecture disseminated across the world, many Islamic politicians and religious leaders protested irately against what they said was an insulting mischaracterization of Islam.[1][2]

Mass street protests were mounted in many Islamic countries. In an act identified by the Pope as "their [The Muslims'] attempt to cover up the many controversial commands in the Qur'an", the Majlis-e-Shoora (Pakistani parliament) unanimously called on the Pope to retract "this objectionable statement".[3] The pope maintained that the comment he had quoted did not reflect his own views, and he offered an apology to Muslims.

The controversial comment originally appeared in the Dialogue Held With A Certain Persian, the Worthy Mouterizes, in Anakara of Galatia[4], written in 1391 as an expression of the views of the Byzantine emperor Manuel II Palaiologos, one of the last Christian rulers before the Fall of Constantinople to the Muslim Ottoman Empire, on such issues as forced conversion, holy war, and the relationship between faith and reason. The passage, in the English translation published by the Vatican, is as follows:

Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.[5]

The pope had consulted a bilingual critical edition of this dialogue in the original Greek and with French translation.

Contents

Pope Benedict XVI's lecture

Part of a series on
Controversies related to Islam and Muslims

Criticism of Islam

Islam · Muhammad · Qur'an · Islamism

Issues

Dhimmi · Eurabia · Islamism · Sharia
Jihad · Pan-Islamism · Qutbism
Apostasy in Islam
Divisions of the world in Islam
Islam and domestic violence
Islam and antisemitism
Islam and slavery
Freedom of religion in Iran
Homosexuality and Islam
Islamophobia · Attitudes towards terrorism

Activities

Islamic terrorism
Muslim persecution of Buddhists
Persecution of Bahá'ís
Muslim persecution of Christians
Persecution of Hindus
Wadda Ghallooghaaraa
Chhotaa Ghallooghaaraa
Persecution of Shia Muslims
The Satanic Verses controversy
Namus · Honor killings
Death by stoning

Notable modern critics

Ayaan Hirsi Ali · Irshad Manji
Daniel Pipes · Philippe de Villiers
Alexandre del Valle · Ibn Warraq
Geert Wilders · Oriana Fallaci
Robert Spencer · Theo van Gogh
Afshin Ellian · Salman Rushdie
Ahmad Kasravi · Taha Hussein
Turan Dursun · Wafa Sultan
Lord Pearson

Related events since 2001

The lecture on faith and reason, with references ranging from ancient Jewish and Greek thinking to Protestant theology and modern secularity, focused mainly on Christianity and what Pope Benedict called the tendency to "exclude the question of God" from reason. Islam features in a part of the lecture: the Pope quoted a strong criticism of Islam, which he described as being of a "startling brusqueness, a brusqueness which leaves us astounded".

The author of this criticism was the Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Palaiologos (or Paleologus) in a 1391 dialogue with an "educated Persian" (who remained unnamed in the Pope's lecture), as well as observations on this argument made by Theodore Khoury, the scholar whose edition of the dialog in question the pontiff was referencing. Pope Benedict used Manuel II's argument in order to draw a distinction between a Christian view, as expressed by Manuel II, that "not acting reasonably is contrary to God's nature", and an allegedly Islamic view, as explained by Khoury, that God transcends concepts such as rationality, and his will, as Ibn Hazm stated, is not constrained by any principle, including rationality.

In part of his explication of this distinction, Pope Benedict referred to a specific aspect of Islam that Manuel II considered irrational, namely the practice of forced conversion. Specifically, the Pope (making clear that they were the Emperor's words, not his own) quoted Manuel II Palaiologos as saying: "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only bad and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."

The pontiff was comparing apparently contradictory passages from the Qur'an, one being that "There is no compulsion in religion", the other being that it is acceptable to "spread the faith through violence". The pontiff argued the latter teaching to be unreasonable and advocated that religious conversion should take place through the use of reason. His larger point here was that, generally speaking, in Christianity, God is understood to act in accordance with reason, while in Islam, God's absolute transcendence means that "God is not bound even by his own word", and can act in ways contrary to reason, including self-contradiction. At the end of his lecture, the Pope said, "It is to the great logos, to this breadth of reason, that we invite our partners in the dialogue of cultures."

Advertisements

Key paragraphs

Quoted below are the three paragraphs (of sixteen total) which discuss Islam in Pope Benedict's lecture:

I was reminded of all this recently, when I read the edition by Professor Theodore Khoury (Münster) of part of the dialogue carried on — perhaps in 1391 in the winter barracks near Ankara — by the erudite Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus and an educated Persian on the subject of Christianity and Islam, and the truth of both. It was presumably the emperor himself who set down this dialogue, during the siege of Constantinople between 1394 and 1402; and this would explain why his arguments are given in greater detail than those of his Persian interlocutor. The dialogue ranges widely over the structures of faith contained in the Bible and in the Qur'an, and deals especially with the image of God and of man, while necessarily returning repeatedly to the relationship between — as they were called — three "Laws" or "rules of life": the Old Testament, the New Testament and the Qur'an. It is not my intention to discuss this question in the present lecture; here I would like to discuss only one point — itself rather marginal to the dialogue as a whole — which, in the context of the issue of "faith and reason", I found interesting and which can serve as the starting-point for my reflections on this issue.

In the seventh conversation edited by Professor Khoury, the emperor touches on the theme of the holy war. The emperor must have known that sura 2, 256 reads: "There is no compulsion in religion". According to the experts, this is one of the suras of the early period, when Mohammed was still powerless and under threat. But naturally the emperor also knew the instructions, developed later and recorded in the Qur'an, concerning holy war. Without descending to details, such as the difference in treatment accorded to those who have the "Book" and the "infidels", he addresses his interlocutor with a startling brusqueness on the central question about the relationship between religion and violence in general, saying: "Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached". The emperor, after having expressed himself so forcefully, goes on to explain in detail the reasons why spreading the faith through violence is something unreasonable. Violence is incompatible with the nature of God and the nature of the soul. "God", he says, "is not pleased by blood — and not acting reasonably is contrary to God's nature. Faith is born of the soul, not the body. Whoever would lead someone to faith needs the ability to speak well and to reason properly, without violence and threats… To convince a reasonable soul, one does not need a strong arm, or weapons of any kind, or any other means of threatening a person with death…

The decisive statement in this argument against violent conversion is this: not to act in accordance with reason is contrary to God's nature. The editor, Theodore Khoury, observes: "For the emperor, as a Byzantine shaped by Greek philosophy, this statement is self-evident. But for Muslim teaching, God is absolutely transcendent. His will is not bound up with any of our categories, even that of rationality." Here Khoury quotes a work of the noted French Muslim R. Arnaldez, who points out that Ibn Hazn went so far as to state that God is not bound even by his own word, and that nothing would oblige him to reveal the truth to us. Were it God's will, we would even have to practice idolatry.[5]

Translation differences

The original German text of the Pope's lecture as published at the Vatican website differs slightly in several respects from the English translation, despite both versions being official (though "provisional") Vatican versions. It is unknown whether this had an impact on perceptions of the speech.

As for the emperor's quote employed by the Pope, the translation "evil and inhuman" is doubtful. What the Pope said in German, according to the audio recording of his address and the subsequent German text, was "nur Schlechtes und Inhumanes finden".[6] The German adjective schlecht means "bad"; the English word evil would usually correspond to böse. The German adjective inhuman normally translates as inhumane which in English is subtly different from inhuman. As for meaning, therefore, "find only things which are bad and inhumane" seems to be a more accurate English translation of the Pope's utterance. (As a grammatical advisory, the use of initial capital letters indicates the two words are nouns. In this case they are adjectives being used as nouns, hence the introduction of the word "things" into the English translation.)

Another difference between the German original and the Vatican's English translation is the place where the word "jihad" has been omitted from the English: the original statement "The emperor touches on the theme of jihad, holy war" (kommt der Kaiser auf das Thema des Djihad, des heiligen Krieges zu sprechen) became in the English rendition "The emperor touches on the theme of the [sic] holy war." (In this context, the use of the word "the" before "holy war" is a grammatical mistake.)

Initial reactions

Political leaders

Africa

  •  EgyptForeign minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit: " This was a very unfortunate statement and it is a statement that shows that there is a lack of understanding of real Islam. And because of this we are hopeful that such statements and such positions would not be stated in order to not allow tension and distrust and recriminations to brew between the Muslim as well as the west." The Vatican envoy was also summoned.[2]

Americas

Asia

  •  Iran – The Guardian Council said the Pope was part of "a series of Western conspiracy against Islam" and had "linked Islam to violence and challenged Jihad at a time when he apparently closed his eyes to the crimes being perpetrated against defenseless Muslims by the leaders of power and hypocrisy under flag of Christianity and Jewish religion".[9] President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad stated that "Regarding the issue of the Pope's comments, we respect the pope and all of those who are interested in peace and justice."[10]
  •  IraqGovernment spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh said that "The Pope's remarks reflect his misunderstanding of the principles of Islam and its teachings that call for forgiveness, compassion and mercy," but also called on Iraqis not to harm "our Christian brothers."[11]
  •  IndonesiaPresident Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono stated that the Pope's comments were "unwise and inappropriate,"[12] but also that "Indonesian Muslims should have wisdom, patience, and self-restraint to address this sensitive issue....We need them so that harmony among people is not at stake."[13]
  •  MalaysiaPrime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said, "The Pope must not take lightly the spread of outrage that has been created. The Vatican must now take full responsibility over the matter and carry out the necessary steps to rectify the mistake."[2]
  •  PakistanPresident Pervez Musharraf, in a speech at the United Nations, called for legislation against "defamation of Islam."[15] Pakistan's parliament, issued a statement saying "The derogatory remarks of the Pope about the philosophy of jihad and Prophet Muhammad have injured sentiments across the Muslim world and pose the danger of spreading acrimony among the religions." Pakistan's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam said, "Anyone who describes Islam as a religion as intolerant encourages violence."[16]
  •  TurkeyPrime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said: "I believe it is a must for (the Pope) to retract his erroneous, ugly and unfortunate remarks and apologise both to the Islamic world and Muslims. …I hope he rapidly amends the mistake he has made so as not to overshadow the dialogue between civilizations and religions.[18]

Australia

  •  AustraliaPrime Minister John Howard has backed the Pope's comments, saying that angry response from the Islamic world is "disproportionate, strange and disappointing". He also stated that Muslims should "move on", adding that, "I don't, at the moment, note terrorist groups killing people and invoking the authority of the Catholic Church".[20]

Europe

  •  GermanyChancellor Angela Merkel said: "Whoever criticises the Pope misunderstood the aim of his speech… It was an invitation to dialogue between religions and the Pope expressedly spoke in favour of this dialogue, which is something I also support and consider urgent and necessary."[22]
  •  ItalyPrime Minister Romano Prodi said: "There cannot be any controversy... Religious dialogue and respect for every faith are essential today and religion does not justify any type of violence."[23]
  •  Vatican City - The director of the Vatican press office stated: "Pope Benedict's remarks about jihad may have been taken out of context but they were not an aberration. On the contrary, they stem from his thinking about Islam and the West in the one and a half years since he became Pope. It was certainly not the intention of the Holy Father to undertake a comprehensive study of the jihad and of Muslim ideas on the subject, still less to offend the sensibilities of Muslim faithful. Quite the contrary, what emerges clearly from the Holy Father’s discourses is a warning, addressed to Western culture, to avoid 'the contempt for God and the cynicism that considers mockery of the sacred to be an exercise of freedom.'"[25][26]

International

  • Flag of OIC.svg The Organisation of the Islamic Conference said "The OIC hopes that this sudden campaign does not reflect a new trend for the Vatican policy toward the Islamic religion… and it expects the Vatican to express its real vision of Islam", called it "character assassination of the Prophet Mohammed" and a "smear campaign."[27], and asked the United Nations Human Rights Council to address the Pope's remarks.[28]
  •  European Union – A European Commission spokesman objected to "picking quotes out of context", and said the commission would not "clarify or interpret" the speech, because they consider it "a theological contribution to a theological debate." He added that "reactions which are disproportionate and which are tantamount to rejecting freedom of speech are unacceptable."[29]

Religious leaders

Catholic

  • Cardinal Jean-Marie Lustiger said "We are faced with a media-driven phenomenon bordering on the absurd... If the game consists in unleashing the crowd’s vindictiveness on words that it has not understood, then the conditions for dialogue with Islam are no longer met."[30]
  • Abbot Primate Notker Wolf, head of the worldwide Roman Catholic Benedictine Confederation of the Order of Saint Benedict, said that the Pope used Manuel's dialogue with a Persian to make an indirect reference to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. "I have heard he plans to write a letter to the Pope," Wolf added. "I think this would be a good opportunity to take up the gauntlet, so to speak, and really discuss things."[31]
  • Cardinal George Pell of Australia has backed the Pope's comments, saying he does not "rule out the link between Islam and violence" and that "The violent reaction in many parts of the Islamic world justified one of Pope Benedict's main fears".[32]
  • Cardinal Secretary of State Bertone said: "Addressing the world's other religious faiths is part of the Church's mission... We must all return to the original source of human life, which is love."[33]

Other Christian

  • Shenouda III, the Coptic Pope of Alexandria while admitting that he hadn't heard the exact words used by Pope Benedict XVI, said that "any remarks which offend Islam and Muslims are against the teachings of Christ."[34]
  • Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury and head Anglican Primate of All England of the Anglican Church, said: "There are elements in Islam that can be used to justify violence, just as there are in Christianity and Judaism."[35]
  • Former Archbishop of Canterbury George Carey dismissed Muslim charges that the Pope had "rubbished" Islam and stated that "Muslims, as well as Christians, must learn to enter into dialogue without crying 'foul'."[36]

Muslim

  • On 13 October 2006, one month to the day after Pope Benedict XVI’s address, 38 Islamic authorities and scholars from around the world, representing all denominations and schools of thought, joined together to deliver an answer to the Pope in the spirit of open intellectual exchange and mutual understanding, speaking about the true teachings of Islam.[37]
  • On 13 October 2007, 138 Muslim scholars, clerics and intellectuals unanimously came together for the first time since the days of Muhammed to declare the common ground between Christianity and Islam in their letter titled 'In A Common Word Between Us and You'. The letter was addressed to the leaders of all the world’s churches, and to Christians everywhere.[38]
  • On 28 September 2006, Muslim scholar of Islam and Comparative Religion studies, Dr. Zakir Naik invited Pope Benedict XVI for open interfaith dialogue.[39][40][41]
  • Ali Bardakoğlu, the head of the Religious Affairs Directorate of Turkey, commented that the Pope's statements "were extraordinarily worrying, very unfortunate, both in the name of Christianity, and in the name of shared humanity," and called on Pope Benedict to either retract or apologize for his conduct. He added "if there is a religious antagonism in the West, it's the responsibility of the logic-ignoring Christian church", citing historical incidents of religious oppression in Europe and the Americas. He also implied that the Pope should consider cancelling his trip to Turkey that was originally planned for November 2006.[42] Bardako?lu later admitted to not having read the Pope's lecture before making his statements.[43]
  • Mohammed Mahdi Akef from the Muslim Brotherhood said the remarks "threaten world peace" and "pour oil on the fire and ignite the wrath of the whole Islamic world to prove the claims of enmity of politicians and religious men in the West to whatever is Islamic."[44]
  • Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, Egyptian Muslim cleric and head of Islamic Scholars' Association; " Our hands are outstretched and our religion calls for peace, not for war, for love not for hatred, for tolerance, not for fanaticism, for knowing each other and not for disavowing each other. We condemn this and we want to know the explanation of this and what is intended by this. We call on the pope, the pontiff, to apologise to the Islamic nation because he has insulted its religion and Prophet, its faith and Sharia without any justification."[46]
  • Ahmad Khatami, one of Iran's most influential clerics asked the Pope to "fall on his knees in front of a senior Muslim cleric and try to understand Islam."[47]
  • Aga Khan IV, leader of the Ismaili branch of Islam said: "I have two reactions to the pope's lecture: There is my concern about the degradation of relations and, at the same time, I see an opportunity. A chance to talk about a serious, important issue: the relationship between faith and logic"[48]
  • Tariq Ramadan, an influential visiting fellow in the University of Oxford, said "Most did not read the pope's speech; others had relied on a sketchy summary according to which the pope had linked Islam and violence.. certain groups or governments manipulate crises of this kind as a safety valve for both their restive populations and their own political agenda.. the mass protests... end up providing a living proof that Muslims cannot engage in reasonable debate and that verbal aggression and violence are more the rule than the exception."[49]

Jewish

  • In a letter to the Muslim scholar Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, Sephardic Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar criticized Benedict's remarks, writing: "our way is to honour every religion and every nation according to their paths, as it is written in the book of prophets: 'because every nation will go in the name of its Lord.'"[50]

The Rabbi went on to denounce Islamic violence against Christians, stating that "Our Muslim brothers would add respect to their religion if they outdid themselves and overcame the feelings of humiliation." [51]

Non-religious commentary

  • In an article published in CounterPunch, author Tariq Ali said, "The Bavarian is a razor-sharp reactionary cleric. I think he knew what he was saying and why. In a neo-liberal world suffering from environmental degradation, poverty, hunger, repression, a 'planet of slums' (in the graphic phrase of Mike Davis), the Pope chooses to insult the founder of a rival faith. The reaction in the Muslim world was predictable, but depressingly insufficient."[52]
  • A different view was taken by Christopher Hitchens, who wrote in "Fighting Words" for Slate web magazine that Pope Benedict "...has managed to do a moderate amount of harm—and absolutely no good—to the very tense and distraught discussion now in progress between Europe and Islam." Hitchens also presented what he feels is a problem with the focus of the Pope's speech with respect to Reason: "...now its new reactionary leader has really 'offended' the Muslim world, while simultaneously asking us to distrust the only reliable weapon—reason—that we possess in these dark times. A fine day's work, and one that we could well have done without."[53]
  • Hans Köchler, head of the Department of Philosophy at the University of Innsbruck and a leading advocate of civilizational dialogue, wrote in a commentary: "In his lecture preaching the compatibility of reason and faith, Benedict XVI, the scholar, deliberately overlooks the fact that the insights of Greek philosophy – its commitment to the λόγος – have been brought to medieval Christian Europe by the great Muslim thinkers of the Middle Ages. What he calls the 'encounter between the Biblical message and Greek thought' ... was, to a large extent, the result of the influence of Muslim philosophers – at a time when European Christians were totally ignorant of classical Greek philosophy."[54]

Subsequent Vatican statements

Official Vatican declaration

On 16 September 2006, Tarcisio Bertone, the Secretary of State of the Holy See, released a declaration explaining that the "position of the Pope concerning Islam is unequivocally that expressed by the conciliar document Nostra Aetate" and that "the Pope's option in favour of inter-religious and inter-cultural dialogue is equally unequivocal."[55]

As for the opinion of the Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus which he quoted during his Regensburg talk, the Holy Father did not mean, nor does he mean, to make that opinion his own in any way. He simply used it as a means to undertake — in an academic context, and as is evident from a complete and attentive reading of the text — certain reflections on the theme of the relationship between religion and violence in general, and to conclude with a clear and radical rejection of the religious motivation for violence, from whatever side it may come. [The Pope] sincerely regrets that certain passages of his address could have sounded offensive to the sensitivities of the Muslim faithful and should have been interpreted in a manner that in no way corresponds to his intentions.[56][57](emphasis in the original)

Response to official declaration

For many Muslim leaders, the declaration on 16 September was insufficient to rectify the situation. A representative for the Muslim Brotherhood rejected the Vatican statement, noting "Has he presented a personal apology for statements by which he clearly is convinced? No."[58] Grand Mufti Abdul-Azeez ibn Abdullaah Aal ash-Shaikh, Saudi Arabia's highest religious authority, called the pope's declaration "lies", adding that they "show that reconciliation between religions is impossible."[59] On the other hand, the Muslim Council of Britain had a more favourable view of the declaration, issuing their own statement on 16 September that the Pope's expression of "sincere regret" was "a good first step."[60]

Pope's Angelus

On 17 September, before his regular weekly Sunday Angelus prayer, Pope Benedict XVI stated the following:

At this time, I wish also to add that I am deeply sorry for the reactions in some countries to a few passages of my address at the University of Regensburg, which were considered offensive to the sensibility of Muslims. These in fact were a quotation from a medieval text, which do not in any way express my personal thought. Yesterday, the Cardinal Secretary of State published a statement in this regard in which he explained the true meaning of my words. I hope that this serves to appease hearts and to clarify the true meaning of my address, which in its totality was and is an invitation to frank and sincere dialogue, with great mutual respect.[61]

Reactions to Angelus

The Angelus speech initially received a mixed yet predominantly negative response.[62] Mohammed Sayed Tantawi, Grand Imam of Al-Azhar Mosque, Cairo, a Sunni institution, stated "We have no objection if the Pope holds another speech and declares publicly that what the Byzantine emperor had said was wrong. At the same time, the Pope has to apologize frankly and justify what he said," Mohammed Habib, deputy leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt's main Islamic opposition group originally, not long after the Pope's Sunday statements, called them a sufficient apology. However, later in the day, he retracted that statement, saying, "The Pope's comments that downplayed his earlier remarks are not enough. We will not accept anything less than an apology,"[63] Mohammed Habib also said: "It does not rise to the level of a clear apology and, based on this, we're calling on the Pope of the Vatican to issue a clear apology that will decisively end any confusion.[64]

This sentiment was shared by the governments of Malaysia ("inadequate to calm the anger"),[65] and Jordan ("a step forward", but "not sufficient"),[66] by Turkish State Minister Mehmet Aydın ("you either have to say this 'I'm sorry' in a proper way or not say it at all. Are you sorry for saying such a thing or because of its consequences?") and scholar Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who called for a "peaceful international day of rage" on his popular TV show on Al Jazeera: "[The Pope's latest statements] were no apology. They were an accusation against Muslims that they didn't understand his words."[67]

Later comments were more favourable of the Pope.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said: "We respect the Pope and all those interested in peace and justice,"[68] and said he accepted the Vatican view that the pontiff’s words had been "misinterpreted" and "taken out of context".[69]

Malaysia’s Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said: "I suppose we could accept this. We hope that there would be no other statements that would anger Muslims."[70]

Ali Bardakoğlu, the head of Turkey’s Religious Affairs Directorate said that Benedict’s "expression of sadness is a sign that he would work for world peace."[71]

Australian Muslim leader Ameer Ali said Australian Muslims must "accept the Pope's apology" over remarks that offended Islam and "move on".[72] Filipino Muslims expressed support for Pope Benedict's apology and blamed certain media outlets for increasing the tensions between Muslims and Catholics.[73]

Diplomatic initiative

On 25 September 2006, Pope Benedict XVI held an audience with Muslim diplomats, ambassadors of Muslim countries and members of the Consulta Islamica, the Italian government appointed consultative body on Islamic affairs. The meeting was an effort to mend relations with the Muslim community. Pope Benedict's spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, said the meeting at Castel Gandolfo, the Pope's summer residence, was "certainly a sign that dialogue is returning to normal after moments of … misunderstanding."[74]

During the session, Pope Benedict XVI reiterated his conviction that the dialogue between Muslims and Christians is "a vital necessity" for the good of a world marked by relativism, one that "excludes the transcendence and universality of reason."[75] At this meeting, Pope Benedict expressed "all the esteem and the profound respect that (he has) for Muslim believers."[76] Among the ambassadors invited were those from Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Morocco, as well as many other nations and Islamic groups.[77]

Change of text

Pope Benedict has taken another step to placate anger in the Islamic world over his remarks on holy war, making additions to his original text by re-affirming that a quotation from a 14th century Byzantine emperor was not his personal opinion. The original text said the emperor's remark was made "somewhat brusquely." The new version says that it was made with "a brusqueness that we find unacceptable." Pope Benedict added in a footnote:

In the Muslim world, this quotation has unfortunately been taken as an expression of my personal position, thus arousing understandable indignation. I hope that the reader of my text can see immediately that this sentence does not express my personal view of the Quran, for which I have the respect due to the holy book of a great religion.[5]

He said he cited the text as part of an examination of the "relationship between faith and reason."[78]

Open letters from top Muslim clerics

On 12 October 2006, 100 of the most respected and influential Muslim scholars and clerics, including the Grand Mufti of Egypt, Russia, Bosnia, Croatia, Kosovo, Turkey, Uzbekistan and Oman, as well as clerics and academics from the Middle East, Asia, North Africa, Europe and North America, published an Open Letter to the Pope.[79] All the eight schools of thought and jurisprudence in Islam are represented by the signatories. The 38 signatories to the letter declare that they accept the Pope's "personal expression of sorrow and assurance that the controversial quote did not reflect his personal opinion" and responded to some of the main substantive issues raised in the Pope's treatment of a debate between the medieval Emperor Manuel II Palaiologos and an "educated Persian," including reason and faith; forced conversion; "jihad" vs. "holy war"; and the relationship between Christianity and Islam.[80]

The open letters also provided a surprising answer to Manuel II Palaiologos' question, "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." It is:

What the emperor failed to realize — aside from the fact... that no such command has ever existed in Islam — is that the Prophet never claimed to be bringing anything fundamentally new.

On 11 October 2007, one year after the release of the open letter to the Pope, a larger group of 138 Muslim scholars, clerics and intellectuals sent another open letter, titled A Common Word Between Us and You, to Pope Benedict and the leaders of other Christian denominations. This letter emphasized that Christians and Muslims worship the same God, and share many values, including living in peace with one's neighbours.[81]

Protests, attacks and threats

Security was discreetly stepped up around and inside the Vatican City, because of concerns about the possibility of acts of violence.[82] Thousands of people took part in many protests.[83]

At least five churches were attacked by Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza. In the West Bank city of Nablus, firebombings left black scorch marks on the walls and windows of the city's Anglican and Greek Orthodox churches. At least five firebombs hit the Anglican church and its door was later set ablaze. A group called the Lions of Monotheism who said they were carried out to protest the pope's speech.[84]

Later that day, four masked gunmen doused the main doors of Nablus' Roman and Greek Catholic churches with lighter fluid, then set them afire. They also opened fire on the buildings, striking both with bullets. In Gaza City, militants opened fire from a car at a Greek Orthodox church, striking the facade. Explosive devices were set off at the same Gaza church on Friday, causing minor damage. There were no claims of responsibility for the last three attacks.[85][86]

Several organizations, such as Al-Qaeda and the Mujahideen Shura Council threatened in a joint statement: "you and the West are doomed as you can see from the defeat in Iraq, Afghanistan, Chechnya, and elsewhere. ... We will break up the cross, spill the liquor and impose the jizya tax, then the only thing acceptable is a conversion (to Islam) or (being killed by) the sword. ... God enable us to slit their throats, and make their money and descendants the bounty of the Mujahideen."[21][87]

Employees of Ankara's Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı (Presidency of Religious Affairs), the state body that organizes Muslim worship in Turkey, asked the authorities on September 19 to open legal proceedings against Pope Benedict XVI and to arrest him when he visits the country in November 2006. They said the Pontiff had violated Turkish laws upholding freedom of belief and thought by "insulting" Islam and the Prophet Muhammad.[88]

Outside Westminster Cathedral, on 18 September2006, around a hundred protestors held banners which included calls for the Pope's execution, "Pope go to Hell" and "Jesus is the slave of Allah", "Islam will conquer Rome," and "May Allah curse the Pope." [89][90]

The Lashkar-e-Taiba in Pakistan has issued a fatwā asking the Muslim community to kill Pope Benedict for his "blasphemous statement" about Mohammad.[91]

Nun killed

On 17 September 2006, two Somali gunmen shot and killed a 65 year-old Italian nun, Sister Leonella Scogbati, working at the Austrian-run children's hospital in the city of Mogadishu, with her Somali bodyguard.[92] A senior Somali Islamist, speaking on condition of anonymity, said: "There is a very high possibility the people who killed her were angered by the Catholic Pope's recent comments against Islam"; anyway, he offered no specific evidence for that motive [93].

Sheikh Mukhtar Robow, member of the Islamic Courts Union, said there was a "concrete possibility" that the murder of the nun was "a reprisal for the Pope’s remarks on Islam".[94] However, several humanitarian workers and Christian volunteers have already been murdered by Islamic gunmen in Somalia lately, including Italian bishop Salvatore Colombo shot dead during celebrating mass in Mogadishu in 1989 [95], Graziella Fumagalli, an Italian medical doctor, killed in 1995 in the anti-TBC Center she was running [96]; Annalena Tonelli assassinated in 2003 in a unique relief center in Borama, after 33 years of service to the poorest [97], and Dick and Enid Eyeington[98] in 2003.

Attacks on Christians in Iraq

In Iraq, the flags of Germany, Israel, and the United States, and Christian crosses and effigies of Pope Benedict were burned in Basra.[99]

Iraq has one of the largest Christian minorities in the Middle East, where Assyrians number about 1 million. Since the Pope's comments, several churches have been bombed; however, many were being bombed since before the Pope's comments starting with the US invasion in 2003 in the power vacuum created by the fall of Saddam Hussein. A previously unknown Baghdad-based group, Kataab Ashbal Al Islam Al Salafi (Islamic Salafist Boy Scout Battalions) threatened to kill all Christians in Iraq if the Pope does not apologize to Muhammad within three days.[100] Christian Leaders in Iraq have asked their parishioners not to leave their homes, after two Christians were stabbed and killed in Baghdad.[101]

There have been reports of writing in church doors stating "If the Pope does not apologise, we will bomb all churches, kill more Christians and steal their property and money." [102]

The Iraqi militia Jaish al-Mujahedin (Holy Warriors' Army) announced its intention to "destroy their cross in the heart of Rome… and to hit the Vatican."[103]

Despite the Pope's comments dying down in the media, attacks on Assyrian Christians continued and on 9 October, Islamic extremist group kidnapped priest Paulos Iskander. The relatives of a Christian priest who was beheaded 3 days later in Mosul, have said that his Muslim captors had demanded his church condemn the pope's recent comments about Islam and pay a $350,000 ransom.[104]

Controversial Statements about Qur'an Chapter 2

Another point of controversy, widely covered in Arab media,[105][106][107][108] but much less so in Western media,[109] was the Pope's assessment that sura (i.e. Chapter) 2 in the Qur'an, which includes the verse "There is no compulsion in religion", was "one of the suras of the early period, when Muhammad was still powerless and under threat", and that instructions "concerning holy war" had come later.

Many scholars of Islam have taken this as a classification of the sura as stemming from the earlier Meccan period and have shown the Pope to be mistaken by pointing out that Surah 2 was revealed in various stages and that this verse was revealed after Muhammad's hijra from Mecca, during his period of stay in Medina and hence is from the Medinan period which was the final stage of the revelation of the Qur'an when the Muslims were becoming numerous and increasingly powerful and safe from the immediate dangers that had overshadowed them for 13 years in Mecca. The scholars also point out that the Pope failed to mention that even if this verse was revealed when the Muslims were weak, they could have easily abrogated it with another verse which gave them permission to forcefully convert people once they finally conquered Mecca; this, however, did not happen.[110].

Assessment of the lecture's purpose

In contrast to the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy - which is now deemed a precursor to the controversy over the Pope's lecture - the media focus was not on the issues of free speech or injured religious sensitivities. Underlying the widely talked about question of whether or not the Pope should apologize, and whether or not his subsequent statements even constituted an apology, several competing and separate interpretations of his intentions have been proffered. These are, broadly and in no particular order:

  • Responses to the speech ignore the fact that the Vatican advised against the US led invasion of Iraq, supports Tukey's entry into the EU [111], supports allowing muslims in France the freedom to wear headscarves [112], and has been part of a long campaign to promote basic human rights for Christians in Muslim dominated countries where they are persecuted / killed (Sudan, Somalia, post-war Iraq) or marginalized (most of the rest of the Islamic world including secular Turkey).
  • The lecture was claimed by many Catholic apologists to not be directed at Islam at all and the incendiary passages were purely circumstantial to the lecture's real intention, which was to counter the demotion of theology in the university environment in particular and of faith in a society plagued by postmodern relativism and irrationality in general.[113][114][115]
  • Pope Benedict's lecture was a "calculated risk," a move designed to win the hearts of the Christians of the Eastern Orthodox Church who are surrounded by Muslims and whom Pope Benedict would be visiting in November, 2006. Given what he sees as close theological affinities between these two churches and other personal characteristics specific to Pope Benedict (traditional liturgy; criticism of scientific interpretation of scripture), "some form of reunion is not only feasible; from Benedict's point of view, it is highly desirable."[116][117]
  • Pope Benedict's lecture portends a parting from the Vatican's previous policies on dialogue with Islam, away from promoting harmony at all costs towards more reciprocity; that is, he wants the Muslim world opened up for Christian missions in the same way that Europe is open to Muslims and conversion out of Islam to be a legal or social possibility. In this view, according to the Pope, the position of Christians in Muslim-majority countries must be improved. However, observers state that Europe is not run by the as a Christian state but from the principles of liberal secularism which can be traced to the Age of Enlightenment, which was inspired in part by the region's Christian principles though sometimes at odds with Church authorities. It was also the Papal Fleet at the Battle of Lepanto that protected Europe's growth by preventing a massive Ottoman invasion of Europe in 1571. European countries must allow all people regardless of religion the ability to build places of worship due to the secular nature of European constitutions. Some European countries disallow the wearing of muslim scarves, something the Catholic church has condemned these governments for [112]. One must also be aware that most Muslim countries are ruled by secular dictatorships, though many also allow Islamic law Sharia to govern.

See also

Further reading

  • Schall, James V. The Regensburg Lecture. St. Augustine's Press, 2007. [176 page book by Catholic political philosopher.]

References

  1. ^ BBC Article. In quotes: Muslim reaction to Pope last accessed 17 September 17, 2006
  2. ^ a b c BBC News Article:Pope sorry for offending Muslims, last accessed 17 September 17, 2006
  3. ^ Telegraph
  4. ^ "The Pope, Jihad and "Dialogue"", The American Thinker, 19 September 2005
  5. ^ a b c "Lecture of the Holy Father - Faith, Reason and the University Memories and Reflections", Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 12 September 2006
  6. ^ "Lecture of the Holy Father - Faith, Reason and the University Memories and Reflections", Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 12 September 2006 (German)
  7. ^ "Ambassador recalled over Pope row". Agence France-Presse, 17 September 2006.
  8. ^ "Muslims seek fuller apology". The Boston Globe, 20 September 2006.
  9. ^ "Guardian Council condemns Pope's anti-Islam statement". Islamic Republic News Agency, 17 September 2006
  10. ^ Iranian president expresses respect for pope, The Jerusalem Post, 19 September 2006
  11. ^ "Iraq calls for calm after Pope's remarks". Reuters, 16 September 2006
  12. ^ "Pope says he's sorry about strong reaction, says speech didn't reflect his personal opinion", The Jakarta Post, 17 September 2006
  13. ^ Amid criticism and violence the first balanced views about the Pope’s speech appear
  14. ^ On 15 September 2006, In quotes: Muslim reaction to Pope. BBC News. Retrieved on 13 August 2007.
  15. ^ Pakistan calls for ban on 'defamation of Islam' in veiled attack on pope,AFP, 19 September 2006
  16. ^ "Pakistan's Parliament Condemns Pope",Fox News Channel, 17 September 2006
  17. ^ "Pope Apologizes for Uproar Over His Remarks". The New York Times. 2006-09-16. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/17/world/europe/17cnd-pope.html?ex=1316145600&en=bd45a56d2f9e575a&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&pagewanted=print. 
  18. ^ "Turkish PM urges pope to apologise for Islam remarks", Turkishpress.com, 16 September 2006
  19. ^ McShane, Roger (17 September 2006). "Apopelogy". http://www.slate.com/id/2149848/. Retrieved 17 September 2006. 
  20. ^ Interview with John Howard
  21. ^ a b "Al-Qaeda threatens jihad over Pope's remarks". The Times. 2006-09-17. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2363459_1,00.html. 
  22. ^ "Merkel defends Pope amid Muslim fury", Reuters, 16 September 2006
  23. ^ "Prodi, religions must be committed to Dialogue", Agenzia Giornalistica Italia, 16 September 2006
  24. ^ "Le ministre suisse de l'Intérieur défend Benoît XVI", Associated Press, 17 September 2006 (French)
  25. ^ "Homily on faith, logic and holy war was seen as a slur on Islam", The Times, 16 September 2006
  26. ^ "Islam not condemned in papal speech, Vatican spokesman says", Catholic World News, 13 September 2006
  27. ^ "Pope Offends Muslims Worldwide", ABC News, 15 September 2006
  28. ^ " Muslim countries ask U.N. Human Rights Council to address Pope's remarks", AP, 18 September 2006
  29. ^ " Brussels defends Pope's freedom of expression", EUObserver, 18 September 2006
  30. ^ "Many Muslims Say Pope’s Apology Is Inadequate", The New York Times, 18 September 2006
  31. ^ "Pope invites Muslims to dialogue, slams 'holy wars'", ANTARA, 13 September 2006
  32. ^ Cardinal adds to islam-violence debate
  33. ^ "Church has a role to guide other faiths: Cardinal Bertone", Catholic World News, 13 September 2006
  34. ^ "Christian Leader Joins Muslims in Denouncing Pope's Remarks", Foxnews.com, 16 September 2006
  35. ^ "Archbishop backs Vatican apology". The Guardian. 2006-09-18. http://www.guardian.co.uk/pope/story/0,,1875206,00.html. 
  36. ^ "European leaders back Benedict", The Jerusalem Post, 16 September 2006
  37. ^ Open Letter to his holiness Pope Benedict XVI (PDF)
  38. ^ A Common Word, Official Website
  39. ^ >""Dr Zakir Naik invites Pope Benedict XVI for open interfaith dialogue"". PakTribune. 2006-09-29. http://www.paktribune.com/news/index.shtml?155694. 
  40. ^ Pope Benedict’s Provocative Utterances! by Latheef Farook, South Asia News Agency, October 18, 2006
  41. ^ Dead link
  42. ^ "Turkish cleric attacks pope's Islam remarks", Associated Press, 14 September, 2006 (German)
  43. ^ "Türkischer Kritiker hatte Rede nicht gelesen" Der Spiegel, 16 September 2006 (German)
  44. ^ "Pope backpedals on 'jihad' remarks: Benedict XVI says he did not intend to offend Muslims". Associated Press. 2006-09-15. http://cbs4.com/topstories/local_story_258111544.html. 
  45. ^ "Malaysia demands apology", The Sydney Morning Herald, 16 September 2006
  46. ^ "Muslim reaction to Pope", BBC News, 16 September 2006
  47. ^ "Pope tells Muslims he is 'deeply sorry' for crisis", Malaysia Star, 17 September 2006
  48. ^ SPIEGEL interview with Aga Khan - Der Spiegel. 12 October 2006
  49. ^ A struggle over Europe's religious identity - Tariq Ramadan for the International Herald Tribune. 20 September 2006
  50. ^ "Sephardic chief rabbi criticizes pope's remarks", Haaretz, 17 September 2006
  51. ^ [1]
  52. ^ Papal insults – A Bavarian Provocation by Tariq Ali for CounterPunch. 17 September 2006
  53. ^ Papal BullJoseph Ratzinger's latest offense. by Christopher Hitchens for Slate. 18 September 2006
  54. ^ Religion, Reason and Violence: Pope Benedict XVI and Islam - Hans Köchler, Statement for the International Progress Organization. 16 September 2006
  55. ^ "Traduzione In Lingua Inglesse", Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 16 September 2006
  56. ^ "Pope apologises to Muslims", Reuters, 16 September 2006
  57. ^ "Pope 'sincerely regrets' he offended Muslims", Associated Press, 16 September 2006
  58. ^ "Pope statement not enough — Muslim Brotherhood", Reuters, 16 September 2006
  59. ^ "«Hässliche, unglückliche Äußerungen»: Erdogan fordert Entschuldigung des Papstes", Netzeitung, 17 September 2006 (German)
  60. ^ "Pope praised for making apology", BBC, 16 September 2006
  61. ^ "Sunday Angelus", Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 17 September 2006
  62. ^ "Mixed response to new Pope apology". The Guardian. 2006-09-18. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uklatest/story/0,,-6087503,00.html. 
  63. ^ "Pope 'deeply sorry' for Muslim fury". CNN. 2006-09-17. http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/09/17/pope.islam/index.html. 
  64. ^ "Pope apology 'not good enough'". Herald Sun. 2006-09-17. http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,20430473-5005961,00.html. 
  65. ^ "Iranian Leader Urges More Papal Protests". AP. 2006-09-18. http://www.forbes.com/business/healthcare/feeds/ap/2006/09/18/ap3025810.html. 
  66. ^ "Pope has joined US crusade, says Iran". The Guardian. 2006-09-19. http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,1875811,00.html. 
  67. ^ "Pope's Apology Rejected by Some, Accepted by Others". Der Spiegel. 2006-09-18. http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,437636,00.html. 
  68. ^ "Ahmadinejad 'respects' Pope". Gulf News. 2006-09-19. http://www.gulfnews.com/region/Iran/10068652.html. 
  69. ^ "The Pope is in danger, warns failed assassin of John Paul II". The Times. 2006-09-19. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2365442,00.html. 
  70. ^ "Iran, Malaysia Satisfied with Pope's Expression of Regret". Zaman. 2006-09-20. http://www.zaman.com/?bl=international&alt=&trh=20060920&hn=36652. 
  71. ^ "THE POPE'S ACT OF CONTRITION". Amherst Times. 2006-09-20. http://www.amhersttimes.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2814&Itemid=27. 
  72. ^ "Muslims 'must accept Pope apology'". The Age. 2006-09-19. http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/muslims-must-accept-pope-apology/2006/09/19/1158431691905.html. 
  73. ^ "Benedict to meet Muslim ambassadors today"
  74. ^ Pope, Muslims Meet in Bid to Defuse Anger
  75. ^ ASIANEWS Pope: dialogue between Muslims and Christians "a vital necessity"
  76. ^ "Address to the Ambassadors of Countries with a Muslim majority and Muslim communities in Italy" by Pope Benedict XVI, 25 September 2006
  77. ^ Pope: 'Total and profound respect for Muslims', CNN, 25 September 2006
  78. ^ Pope makes additions to text on Islam
  79. ^ H.E. Ambassador Dr. Akbar Ahmed et al. (2006). "Open Letter to his Holiness Pope Benedict XVI" (PDF). Egypt State Information Service. Center for Inter-Civilizational Dialogue Inc. http://www.sis.gov.eg/PDF/En/Arts&Culture/0726070000000000010001.pdf. Retrieved 2009-07-23. 
  80. ^ "Muslim clerics reach out to Pope". BBC. 2006-10-14. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6050156.stm. 
  81. ^ "Muslim scholars reach out to Pope". BBC News. 2007-10-11. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7038992.stm. Retrieved 2007-10-11. 
  82. ^ "Vatican braces for Muslim anger" BBC, 15 September 2006
  83. ^ "Egyptian Muslims stage demonstration against Pope remarks" People's Daily Online 16 September 2006
  84. ^ "Report: Rome tightens pope's security after fury over Islam remarks", Haaretz, 16 September 2006
  85. ^ "Five churches bombed and attacked" Associated Press 16 September 2006
  86. ^ Pope Protesters Firebomb 4 West Bank Churches, Open Fire at Fifth
  87. ^ "Iranian leader urges more papal protests". Yahoo! News. 2006-09-18. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060919/ap_on_re_mi_ea/muslims_pope. 
  88. ^ "Turk workers urge pope's arrest" CNN, 19 September 2006]
  89. ^ The Pope must die, says Muslim
  90. ^ Just outside Westminster Cathedral today...
  91. ^ LET issues fatwa to kill the pope. International terrorism monitor, paper no.133, by B.Raman. 2 October 2006
  92. ^ "Gunmen Slay Italian Nun", AFP, 17 September 2006
  93. ^ "Nun's death may be linked to Pope: Somali Islamist", Reuters
  94. ^ "Nun shot dead as Pope fails to calm militant Muslims", Timesonline, 18 September 2006
  95. ^ http://www.atma-o-jibon.org/italiano4/rit_bellaspiga5.htm
  96. ^ http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-17894764.html
  97. ^ http://www.awdalnews.com/wmview.php?ArtID=3854
  98. ^ http://www.somalilandtimes.net/200/028.shtml
  99. ^ In pictures: Fresh anti-Pope protests, BBC News
  100. ^ "Christian Killed in Iraq in Response to Pope's Speech: Islamic Website", Assyrian International News Agency, 16 September 2006
  101. ^ "Second Assyrian Christian Killed in Retaliation for Pope's Remarks", Assyrian International News Agency, 17 September 2006
  102. ^ Violence against Christians grows in Iraq, Ekklesia, 29 September 2006
  103. ^ "Vatikan verschärft Sicherheitsvorkehrungen", Der Spiegel, 16 September 2006 (German)
  104. ^ Iraq priest "killed over pope speech", Aljazeera.net, 12 October 2006
  105. ^ The other side of the coin. What's after the Pope's lecture? By Saifuddin Tajuddin. Al Sharq Al Awsat, 28 September 2006 (in Arabic)
  106. ^ The Pope and his speech. From infallibility to naïve simplification…!, by Atallah Muhajirani, Al Sharq Al Awsat, 26 September 2006 (in Arabic)
  107. ^ The challenge of Vatican's leader, by Al Sadiq Al Mahdi, Al Sharq Al Awsat, 24 September 2006 (in Arabic)
  108. ^ The Pope, the Emperor and the Persian sage, by Amir Tahiri, Al Sharq Al Awsat, 22 September 2006 (in Arabic)
  109. ^ Serious errors of both fact and judgment, by Ruth Gledhill, The Times, 16 September 2006
  110. ^ Lapsus ratisbonæ, by Pablo Tornielli. (Spanish)
  111. ^ [2]
  112. ^ a b [3]
  113. ^ However, observers note that the Pope insisted on keeping such comments in his speech even after his handlers advised him against it. According to Israeli analyst Uri Avnery, this "quote serves exactly the requirements of .... George Bush II. He, too, wants to unite the Christian world against the mainly Muslim "Axis of Evil". Moreover, the Turks are again knocking on the doors of Europe, this time peacefully. It is well known that the Pope supports the forces that object to the entry of Turkey into the European Union." The Pope has actually called for allowing Turkey into the European Union and spoke against the US invasion of Iraq. Moreover, this non-Christian analyst cited above, Uri Avnery, fails to understand that Catholics and Evangelicals are philosophically fundamentally different and disagree on many issues. The blatantly false comment by Uri Avnery could also be seen as an attempt to ignore the deeply seated conflict in the Islamic world with Israel and blame everything on the Pope who hasn't commanded a military force in nearly 500 years. From Faith, Adding a Blunt Footnote on Jihad'], The New York Times, 13 September 2006]
  114. ^ 'Benedict XVI's background is theological, not diplomatic', The Jerusalem Post, 18 September 2006
  115. ^ 'The Pope Was Right', Los Angeles Times, 20 September 2006]
  116. ^ Sailing to Byzantium, International Herald Tribune, 29 September 2006
  117. ^ Calculated Risk, Deutsche Welle, 27 September 2006

External links


, January 2006]] The Pope Benedict XVI Islam controversy arose from a lecture delivered on 12 September 2006 by Pope Benedict XVI at the University of Regensburg in Germany. The pope, speaking in German, quoted an unfavorable remark about Islam made in the 14th century by a Byzantine emperor. As the English translation of the pope's lecture disseminated across the world, many Islamic politicians and religious leaders protested irately against what they said was an insulting mischaracterization of Islam.[1][2] Mass street protests were mounted in many Islamic countries. In an act identified by the Pope as "their[The Muslims'] attempt to cover up the many controversial commands in the Qur'an", the Pakistani parliament unanimously called on the Pope to retract "this objectionable statement".[3] The pope maintained that the comment he had quoted did not reflect his own views, and he offered an apology to Muslims.

The pope delivered his lecture, entitled "Faith, Reason and the University — Memories and Reflections", at a university where he had once served as professor of theology. The controversial comment originally appeared in the “Dialogue Held With A Certain Persian, the Worthy Mouterizes, in Anakara of Galatia[4], written in 1391 as an expression of the views of the Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus, one of the last Christian rulers before the Fall of Constantinople to the Muslim Ottoman Empire, on such issues as forced conversion, holy war, and the relationship between faith and reason. The passage, in the English translation published by the Vatican, is as follows:

Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.[5]
The pope had consulted a bilingual critical edition of this dialogue in the original Greek and with French translation.

Contents

Pope Benedict XVI's lecture

Part of a series on
Controversies related to Islam and Muslims

Criticism of Islam

Islam · Muhammad · Qur'an · Islamism

Issues

Dhimmi · Eurabia · Islamism · Sharia
Jihad · Pan-Islamism · Qutbism
Intolerance · Hate Crimes
Divisions of the world in Islam
Persecution of Bahá'ís
Persecution of Shia Muslims
Freedom of religion in Iran
Religious minorities in Iran
First Sikh Holocaust (1746)
Islamophobia · Attitudes towards terrorism

Activities

Apostasy in Islam
Islamic terrorism
Homosexuality and Islam
The Satanic Verses controversy
Islam and domestic violence
Namus Death by stoning

Notable modern critics

Ayaan Hirsi Ali · Irshad Manji
Daniel Pipes · Ibn Warraq
Alexandre del Valle · Philippe de Villiers
Geert Wilders · Oriana Fallaci
Robert Spencer · Theo van Gogh
Atatürk
Afshin Ellian · Salman Rushdie
Ahmad Kasravi · Taha Hussein

Muslim related events since 2001

September 11 attacks
War on Terrorism
Mecca girls' school fire
Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons
Qur'an desecration controversy
Beheadings of three Christian girls
CPT hostage crisis
Fox journalists kidnapping
Egyptian ID card controversy
Qatif girl rape case
Flying Imams controversy
French headscarf ban
Imam Rapito affair
Knighthood of Salman Rushdie
Pope Benedict XVI Islam controversy
Sudanese teddy bear blasphemy case
Muhammad cartoons
Fitna (film)
The Jewel of Medina

The lecture on "faith and reason", with references ranging from ancient Jewish and Greek thinking to Protestant theology and modern secularity, focused mainly on Christianity and what Pope Benedict called the tendency to "exclude the question of God" from reason. Islam features in a part of the lecture: the Pope quoted a strong criticism of Islam, which he described as being of a "startling brusqueness, a brusqueness which leaves us astounded". The author of this criticism was the Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Palaiologos (or Paleologus) in a 1391 dialogue with an "educated Persian" (who remained unnamed in the Pope's lecture), as well as observations on this argument made by Theodore Khoury, the scholar whose edition of the dialog in question the pontiff was referencing. Pope Benedict used Manuel II's argument in order to draw a distinction between an allegedly Christian view, as expressed by Manuel II, that "not acting reasonably is contrary to God's nature", and an allegedly Islamic view, as explained by Khoury, that God transcends concepts such as rationality, and his will, as Ibn Hazm stated, is not constrained by any principle, including rationality.

In part of his explication of this distinction, Pope Benedict referred to a specific aspect of Islam that Manuel II considered irrational, namely the practice of forced conversion. Specifically, the Pope (making clear that they were the Emperor's words, not his own) quoted Manuel II Palaiologos as saying: "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only bad and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." The pontiff was comparing apparently contradictory passages from the Quran, one being that "There is no compulsion in religion", the other being that it is acceptable to "spread the faith through violence". The pontiff argued the latter teaching to be unreasonable and advocated that religious conversion should take place through the use of reason. His larger point here was that, generally speaking, in Christianity, God is understood to act in accordance with reason, while in Islam, God's absolute transcendence means that "God is not bound even by his own word", and can act in ways contrary to reason, including self-contradiction. At the end of his lecture, the Pope said, "It is to the great logos, to this breadth of reason, that we invite our partners in the dialogue of cultures."

Key paragraphs

Quoted below are the three paragraphs (of sixteen total) which discuss Islam in Pope Benedict's lecture:

I was reminded of all this recently, when I read the edition by Professor Theodore Khoury (Münster) of part of the dialogue carried on — perhaps in 1391 in the winter barracks near Ankara — by the erudite Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus and an educated Persian on the subject of Christianity and Islam, and the truth of both. It was presumably the emperor himself who set down this dialogue, during the siege of Constantinople between 1394 and 1402; and this would explain why his arguments are given in greater detail than those of his Persian interlocutor. The dialogue ranges widely over the structures of faith contained in the Bible and in the Qur'an, and deals especially with the image of God and of man, while necessarily returning repeatedly to the relationship between — as they were called — three "Laws" or "rules of life": the Old Testament, the New Testament and the Qur'an. It is not my intention to discuss this question in the present lecture; here I would like to discuss only one point — itself rather marginal to the dialogue as a whole — which, in the context of the issue of "faith and reason", I found interesting and which can serve as the starting-point for my reflections on this issue.

In the seventh conversation edited by Professor Khoury, the emperor touches on the theme of the holy war. The emperor must have known that sura 2, 256 reads: "There is no compulsion in religion". According to the experts, this is one of the suras of the early period, when Mohammed was still powerless and under threat. But naturally the emperor also knew the instructions, developed later and recorded in the Qur'an, concerning holy war. Without descending to details, such as the difference in treatment accorded to those who have the "Book" and the "infidels", he addresses his interlocutor with a startling brusqueness on the central question about the relationship between religion and violence in general, saying: "Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached". The emperor, after having expressed himself so forcefully, goes on to explain in detail the reasons why spreading the faith through violence is something unreasonable. Violence is incompatible with the nature of God and the nature of the soul. "God", he says, "is not pleased by blood — and not acting reasonably is contrary to God's nature. Faith is born of the soul, not the body. Whoever would lead someone to faith needs the ability to speak well and to reason properly, without violence and threats… To convince a reasonable soul, one does not need a strong arm, or weapons of any kind, or any other means of threatening a person with death…

The decisive statement in this argument against violent conversion is this: not to act in accordance with reason is contrary to God's nature. The editor, Theodore Khoury, observes: "For the emperor, as a Byzantine shaped by Greek philosophy, this statement is self-evident. But for Muslim teaching, God is absolutely transcendent. His will is not bound up with any of our categories, even that of rationality." Here Khoury quotes a work of the noted French Muslim R. Arnaldez, who points out that Ibn Hazn went so far as to state that God is not bound even by his own word, and that nothing would oblige him to reveal the truth to us. Were it God's will, we would even have to practice idolatry.[5]

Translation differences

The original German text of the Pope's lecture as published at the Vatican website differs slightly in several respects from the English translation, despite both versions being official (though "provisional") Vatican versions. It is unknown whether this had an impact on perceptions of the speech.

As for the emperor's quote employed by the Pope, the translation "evil and inhuman" is doubtful. What the Pope said in German, according to the audio recording of his address and the subsequent German text, was "nur Schlechtes und Inhumanes finden".[6] The German adjective schlecht means "bad"; the English word evil would usually correspond to böse. The German adjective inhuman normally translates as inhumane which in English is subtly different from inhuman. As for meaning, therefore, "find only things which are bad and inhumane" seems to be a more accurate English translation of the Pope's utterance. (As a grammatical advisory, the use of initial capital letters indicates the two words are nouns. In this case they are adjectives being used as nouns, hence the introduction of the word "things" into the English translation.)

Another difference between the German original and the Vatican's English translation is the place where the word "jihad" has been omitted from the English: the original statement "The emperor touches on the theme of jihad, holy war" (kommt der Kaiser auf das Thema des Djihad, des heiligen Krieges zu sprechen) became in the English rendition "The emperor touches on the theme of the [sic] holy war." (In this context, the use of the word "the" before "holy war" is a grammatical mistake.)

Initial reactions

Political leaders

Africa

  •  Egypt – Foreign minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit: " This was a very unfortunate statement and it is a statement that shows that there is a lack of understanding of real Islam. And because of this we are hopeful that such statements and such positions would not be stated in order to not allow tension and distrust and recriminations to brew between the Muslim as well as the west." The Vatican envoy was also summoned.[2]
  •  Morocco – Morocco recalled its ambassador to the Vatican.[7]

Americas

  •  United States - Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice praised the Pontiff's "love of humanity," and said: "We all need to understand that offense can sometimes be taken when perhaps we don't see it." [8]

Asia

  • Template:Country data Iran – The Guardian Council said the Pope was part of "a series of Western conspiracy against Islam" and had "linked Islam to violence and challenged Jihad at a time when he apparently closed his eyes to the crimes being perpetrated against defenseless Muslims by the leaders of power and hypocrisy under flag of Christianity and Jewish religion".[9] President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad stated that "Regarding the issue of the Pope's comments, we respect the pope and all of those who are interested in peace and justice."[10]
  • Template:Country data Iraq – Government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh said that "The Pope's remarks reflect his misunderstanding of the principles of Islam and its teachings that call for forgiveness, compassion and mercy," but also called on Iraqis not to harm "our Christian brothers."[11]
  • Template:Country data Indonesia – President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono stated that the Pope's comments were "unwise and inappropriate," [12] but also that "Indonesian Muslims should have wisdom, patience, and self-restraint to address this sensitive issue....We need them so that harmony among people is not at stake."[13]
  •  Malaysia – Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said, "The Pope must not take lightly the spread of outrage that has been created. The Vatican must now take full responsibility over the matter and carry out the necessary steps to rectify the mistake."[2]
  •  Pakistan – President Pervez Musharraf, in a speech at the United Nations, called for legislation against "defamation of Islam."[15] Pakistan's parliament, issued a statement saying "The derogatory remarks of the Pope about the philosophy of jihad and Prophet Muhammad have injured sentiments across the Muslim world and pose the danger of spreading acrimony among the religions." Pakistan's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam said, "Anyone who describes Islam as a religion as intolerant encourages violence."[16]
  •  Palestinian AuthorityHamas leader and Prime Minister Ismail Haniya condemned the Pope's remarks: "In the name of the Palestinian people, we condemn the pope’s remarks on Islam. These remarks go against the truth and touch the heart of our faith." He also denounced the Palestinian attacks on churches in the West Bank and Gaza.[17]
  •  Turkey – Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said: "I believe it is a must for (the Pope) to retract his erroneous, ugly and unfortunate remarks and apologise both to the Islamic world and Muslims. …I hope he rapidly amends the mistake he has made so as not to overshadow the dialogue between civilizations and religions." [18]

Australia

  •  AustraliaPrime Minister John Howard has backed the Pope's comments, saying that angry response from the Islamic world is "disproportionate, strange and disappointing". He also stated that Muslims should "move on", adding that, "I don't, at the moment, note terrorist groups killing people and invoking the authority of the Catholic Church".[20] (Quote taken out of context - refer to source)

Europe

  •  France – President Jacques Chirac warned against "anything that increases tensions between peoples or religions".[21]
  •  Germany – Chancellor Angela Merkel said: "Whoever criticises the Pope misunderstood the aim of his speech… It was an invitation to dialogue between religions and the Pope expressedly spoke in favour of this dialogue, which is something I also support and consider urgent and necessary."[22]
  •  Italy – Prime Minister Romano Prodi said: "There cannot be any controversy... Religious dialogue and respect for every faith are essential today and religion does not justify any type of violence."[23]
  •  Vatican City - The director of the Vatican press office stated: "Pope Benedict’s remarks about jihad may have been taken out of context but they were not an aberration. On the contrary, they stem from his thinking about Islam and the West in the one and a half years since he became Pope. It was certainly not the intention of the Holy Father to undertake a comprehensive study of the jihad and of Muslim ideas on the subject, still less to offend the sensibilities of Muslim faithful. Quite the contrary, what emerges clearly from the Holy Father’s discourses is a warning, addressed to Western culture, to avoid 'the contempt for God and the cynicism that considers mockery of the sacred to be an exercise of freedom.'"[25][26]

International

  • The Organisation of the Islamic Conference said "The OIC hopes that this sudden campaign does not reflect a new trend for the Vatican policy toward the Islamic religion… and it expects the Vatican to express its real vision of Islam", called it "character assassination of the Prophet Mohammed" and a "smear campaign."[27], and asked the United Nations Human Rights Council to address the Pope's remarks.[28]
  •  European Union – A EU Commission spokesman objected to "picking quotes out of context", and said the commission would not "clarify or interpret" the speech, because they consider it "a theological contribution to a theological debate." He added that "reactions which are disproportionate and which are tantamount to rejecting freedom of speech are unacceptable."[29]

Religious leaders

Catholic

  • Cardinal Jean-Marie Lustiger said “We are faced with a media-driven phenomenon bordering on the absurd... If the game consists in unleashing the crowd’s vindictiveness on words that it has not understood, then the conditions for dialogue with Islam are no longer met.”[30]
  • Abbot Primate Notker Wolf, head of the worldwide Roman Catholic Benedictine Confederation of the Order of Saint Benedict, said that the Pope used Manuel's dialogue with a Persian to make an indirect reference to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. "I have heard he plans to write a letter to the Pope," Wolf added. "I think this would be a good opportunity to take up the gauntlet, so to speak, and really discuss things."[31]
  • Cardinal George Pell of Australia has backed the Pope's comments, saying he does not "rule out the link between Islam and violence" and that "The violent reaction in many parts of the Islamic world justified one of Pope Benedict's main fears".[32]
  • Cardinal Secretary of State Bertone said: "Addressing the world's other religious faiths is part of the Church's mission... We must all return to the original source of human life, which is love."[33]

Other Christian

  • Shenouda III, the Coptic Pope of Alexandria while admitting that he hadn't heard the exact words used by Pope Benedict XVI, said that "any remarks which offend Islam and Muslims are against the teachings of Christ."[34]
  • Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury and head Anglican Primate of All England of the Anglican Church, said: "There are elements in Islam that can be used to justify violence, just as there are in Christianity and Judaism."[35]
  • Former Archbishop of Canterbury George Carey dismissed Muslim charges that the Pope had "rubbished" Islam and stated that "Muslims, as well as Christians, must learn to enter into dialogue without crying 'foul'."[36]

Muslim

  • On October 13, 2006, one month to the day after Pope Benedict XVI’s address, 38 Islamic authorities and scholars from around the world, representing all denominations and schools of thought, joined together to deliver an answer to the Pope in the spirit of open intellectual exchange and mutual understanding, speaking about the true teachings of Islam[37]
  • On October 13th, 2007, 138 Muslim scholars, clerics and intellectuals unanimously came together for the first time since the days of the Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) to declare the common ground between Christianity and Islam in their letter titled 'In A Common Word Between Us and You'. The letter was addressed to the leaders of all the world’s churches, and to Christians everywhere.[38]
  • Ali Bardakoğlu, the head of the Religious Affairs Directorate of Turkey, commented that the Pope's statements "were extraordinarily worrying, very unfortunate, both in the name of Christianity, and in the name of shared humanity," and called on Pope Benedict to either retract or apologize for his conduct. He added "if there is a religious antagonism in the West, it's the responsibility of the logic-ignoring Christian church", citing historical incidents of religious oppression in Europe and the Americas. He also implied that the Pope should consider cancelling his trip to Turkey that was originally planned for November 2006.[42] Bardakoğlu later admitted to not having read the Pope's lecture before making his statements.[43]
  • Mohammed Mahdi Akef from the Muslim Brotherhood said the remarks "threaten world peace" and "pour oil on the fire and ignite the wrath of the whole Islamic world to prove the claims of enmity of politicians and religious men in the West to whatever is Islamic."[44]
  • Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, Egyptian Muslim cleric and head of Islamic Scholars' Association; " Our hands are outstretched and our religion calls for peace, not for war, for love not for hatred, for tolerance, not for fanaticism, for knowing each other and not for disavowing each other. We condemn this and we want to know the explanation of this and what is intended by this. We call on the pope, the pontiff, to apologise to the Islamic nation because he has insulted its religion and Prophet, its faith and Sharia without any justification."[46]
  • Ahmad Khatami, one of Iran's most influential clerics asked the Pope to "fall on his knees in front of a senior Muslim cleric and try to understand Islam."[47]
  • Aga Khan IV, leader of the Ismaili branch of Islam said: "I have two reactions to the pope's lecture: There is my concern about the degradation of relations and, at the same time, I see an opportunity. A chance to talk about a serious, important issue: the relationship between faith and logic"[48]

Jewish

  • In a letter to the Muslim scholar Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi, Sephardic Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar criticized Benedict's remarks, writing: "our way is to honour every religion and every nation according to their paths, as it is written in the book of prophets: 'because every nation will go in the name of its Lord.'"[49]

Non-religious commentary

  • In an article published in CounterPunch, author Tariq Ali said, "The Bavarian is a razor-sharp reactionary cleric. I think he knew what he was saying and why. In a neo-liberal world suffering from environmental degradation, poverty, hunger, repression, a ‘planet of slums’ (in the graphic phrase of Mike Davis), the Pope chooses to insult the founder of a rival faith. The reaction in the Muslim world was predictable, but depressingly insufficient."[50]
  • A different view was taken by Christopher Hitchens, who wrote in "Fighting Words" for Slate web magazine that Pope Benedict "...has managed to do a moderate amount of harm—and absolutely no good—to the very tense and distraught discussion now in progress between Europe and Islam." Hitchens also presented what he feels is a problem with the focus of the Pope's speech with respect to Reason: "...now its new reactionary leader has really 'offended' the Muslim world, while simultaneously asking us to distrust the only reliable weapon—reason—that we possess in these dark times. A fine day's work, and one that we could well have done without."[51]
  • Hans Köchler, head of the Department of Philosophy at the University of Innsbruck and a leading advocate of civilizational dialogue, wrote in a commentary: "In his lecture preaching the compatibility of reason and faith, Benedict XVI, the scholar, deliberately overlooks the fact that the insights of Greek philosophy – its commitment to the λόγος – have been brought to medieval Christian Europe by the great Muslim thinkers of the Middle Ages. What he calls the 'encounter between the Biblical message and Greek thought' ... was, to a large extent, the result of the influence of Muslim philosophers – at a time when European Christians were totally ignorant of classical Greek philosophy."."[52]
  • Tariq Ramadan, an influential visiting fellow in the University of Oxford, said "Most did not read the pope's speech; others had relied on a sketchy summary according to which the pope had linked Islam and violence.. certain groups or governments manipulate crises of this kind as a safety valve for both their restive populations and their own political agenda.. the mass protests... end up providing a living proof that Muslims cannot engage in reasonable debate and that verbal aggression and violence are more the rule than the exception."[53]

Subsequent Vatican statements

Official Vatican declaration

On 16 September 2006, Tarcisio Cardinal Bertone, the Secretary of State of the Holy See, released a declaration explaining that the "position of the Pope concerning Islam is unequivocally that expressed by the conciliar document Nostra Aetate" and that "the Pope's option in favour of inter-religious and inter-cultural dialogue is equally unequivocal."[54]

As for the opinion of the Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus which he quoted during his Regensburg talk, the Holy Father did not mean, nor does he mean, to make that opinion his own in any way. He simply used it as a means to undertake — in an academic context, and as is evident from a complete and attentive reading of the text — certain reflections on the theme of the relationship between religion and violence in general, and to conclude with a clear and radical rejection of the religious motivation for violence, from whatever side it may come. [The Pope] sincerely regrets that certain passages of his address could have sounded offensive to the sensitivities of the Muslim faithful and should have been interpreted in a manner that in no way corresponds to his intentions.[55][56] (emphasis in the original)

Response to official declaration

For many Muslim leaders, the declaration on 16 September was insufficient to rectify the situation. A representative for the Muslim Brotherhood rejected the Vatican statement, noting "Has he presented a personal apology for statements by which he clearly is convinced? No."[57] Grand Mufti Shaikh Abdul-Azeez ibn Abdullaah Aal ash-Shaikh, Saudi Arabia's highest religious authority, called the pope's declaration "lies", adding that they "show that reconciliation between religions is impossible."[58] On the other hand, the Muslim Council of Britain had a more favourable view of the declaration, issuing their own statement on 16 September that the Pope's expression of "sincere regret" was "a good first step."[59]

Pope's Angelus

On 17 September, before his regular weekly Sunday Angelus prayer, Pope Benedict XVI stated the following:

At this time, I wish also to add that I am deeply sorry for the reactions in some countries to a few passages of my address at the University of Regensburg, which were considered offensive to the sensibility of Muslims. These in fact were a quotation from a medieval text, which do not in any way express my personal thought. Yesterday, the Cardinal Secretary of State published a statement in this regard in which he explained the true meaning of my words. I hope that this serves to appease hearts and to clarify the true meaning of my address, which in its totality was and is an invitation to frank and sincere dialogue, with great mutual respect.[60]

Reactions to Angelus

The Angelus speech initially received a mixed yet predominantly negative response.[61] Mohammed Sayed Tantawi, Grand Sheikh of Al-Azhar Mosque, Cairo, a Sunni institution, stated "We have no objection if the Pope holds another speech and declares publicly that what the Byzantine emperor had said was wrong. At the same time, the Pope has to apologize frankly and justify what he said," Mohammed el-Sayed Habib, deputy leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt's main Islamic opposition group originally, not long after the Pope's Sunday statements, called them a sufficient apology. However, later in the day, he retracted that statement, saying, "The Pope's comments that downplayed his earlier remarks are not enough. We will not accept anything less than an apology,"[62] Mohammed Habib also said: "It does not rise to the level of a clear apology and, based on this, we're calling on the Pope of the Vatican to issue a clear apology that will decisively end any confusion.[63] This sentiment was shared by the governments of Malaysia ("inadequate to calm the anger")[64] and Jordan ("a step forward", but "not sufficient")[65] , by Turkish State Minister Mehmet Aydin ("you either have to say this 'I'm sorry' in a proper way or not say it at all. Are you sorry for saying such a thing or because of its consequences?") and scholar Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who called for a "peaceful international day of rage" on his popular TV show on Al-Jazeera: "[The Pope's latest statements] were no apology. They were an accusation against Muslims that they didn't understand his words."[66]

Later comments were more favourable of the Pope. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said: "We respect the Pope and all those interested in peace and justice," [67] and said he accepted the Vatican view that the pontiff’s words had been "misinterpreted" and "taken out of context". [68] Malaysia’s Prime Minister Ahmad Badavi said: "I suppose we could accept this. We hope that there would be no other statements that would anger Muslims." [69] Ali Bardakoğlu, the head of Turkey’s Religious Affairs Directorate said that Benedict’s "expression of sadness is a sign that he would work for world peace." [70] Australian Muslim leader Ameer Ali said Australian Muslims must "accept the Pope's apology" over remarks that offended Islam and "move on". [71] Filipino Muslims expressed support for Pope Benedict's apology and blamed certain media outlets for increasing the tensions between Muslims and Catholics.[72]

Diplomatic initiative

On September 25 2006, Pope Benedict XVI held an audience with Muslim diplomats, ambassadors of Muslim countries and members of the Consulta Islamica, the Italian government appointed consultative body on Islamic affairs. The meeting was an effort to mend relations with the Muslim community. Pope Benedict's spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, said the meeting at the Pope's summer residence was "certainly a sign that dialogue is returning to normal after moments of … misunderstanding."[73] During the session, Pope Benedict XVI reiterated his conviction that the dialogue between Muslims and Christians is “a vital necessity” for the good of a world marked by relativism, one that “excludes the transcendence and universality of reason.” [74] At this meeting, Pope Benedict expressed "all the esteem and the profound respect that (he has) for Muslim believers."[75] Among the ambassadors invited were those from Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Morocco, as well as many other nations and Islamic groups.[76]

Change of text

Pope Benedict has taken another step to placate anger in the Islamic world over his remarks on holy war, making additions to his original text by re-affirming that a quotation from a 14th century Byzantine emperor was not his personal opinion. The original text said the emperor's remark was made "somewhat brusquely." The new version says that it was made with "a brusqueness that we find unacceptable." Pope Benedict added in a footnote, "In the Muslim world, this quotation has unfortunately been taken as an expression of my personal position, thus arousing understandable indignation. I hope that the reader of my text can see immediately that this sentence does not express my personal view of the Quran, for which I have the respect due to the holy book of a great religion." He said he cited the text as part of an examination of the "relationship between faith and reason."[77]

Open letters from top Muslim clerics

On October 12, 2006, 100 of the most respected and influential Muslim scholars and clerics, including the Grand Mufti of Egypt, Russia, Bosnia, Croatia, Kosovo, Turkey, Uzbekistan and Oman, as well as clerics and academics from the Middle East, Asia, North Africa, Europe and North America, published an Open Letter to the Pope.[78] All the eight schools of thought and jurisprudence in Islam are represented by the signatories. The 38 signatories to the letter declare that they accept the Pope's "personal expression of sorrow and assurance that the controversial quote did not reflect his personal opinion" and responded to some of the main substantive issues raised in the Pope's treatment of a debate between the medieval Emperor Manuel II Paleologus and an “educated Persian,” including reason and faith; forced conversion; “jihad” vs. “holy war”; and the relationship between Christianity and Islam.[79]

The open letters also provided a surprising answer to Manuel II Paleologus' question, "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." It is:

What the emperor failed to realize — aside from the fact... that no such command has ever existed in Islam — is that the Prophet never claimed to be bringing anything fundamentally new.

On October 11, 2007, one year after the release of the open letter to the Pope, a larger group of 138 Muslim scholars, clerics and intellectuals sent another open letter, titled A Common Word Between Us and You, to Pope Benedict and the leaders of other Christian denominations. This letter emphasized that Christians and Muslims worship the same God, and share many values, including living in peace with one's neighbors.[80]

Protests, attacks and threats

Security has been discreetly stepped up around and inside the Vatican City, because of concerns about the possibility of acts of violence.[81] Thousands of people took part in many protests. [82]

At least five churches were attacked by Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza. In the West Bank city of Nablus, firebombings left black scorch marks on the walls and windows of the city's Anglican and Greek Orthodox churches. At least five firebombs hit the Anglican church and its door was later set ablaze. A group called the Lions of Monotheism who said they were carried out to protest the pope's speech.[83] Later that day, four masked gunmen doused the main doors of Nablus' Roman and Greek Catholic churches with lighter fluid, then set them afire. They also opened fire on the buildings, striking both with bullets. In Gaza City, militants opened fire from a car at a Greek Orthodox church, striking the facade. Explosive devices were set off at the same Gaza church on Friday, causing minor damage. There were no claims of responsibility for the last three attacks.[84][85]

Several organizations, such as Al-Qaeda and the Mujahideen Shura Council threatened in a joint statement: "you and the West are doomed as you can see from the defeat in Iraq, Afghanistan, Chechnya, and elsewhere. ... We will break up the cross, spill the liquor and impose the jizya tax, then the only thing acceptable is a conversion (to Islam) or (being killed by) the sword. ... God enable us to slit their throats, and make their money and descendants the bounty of the Mujahideen."[21][86]

Employees of Ankara's Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı, the state body that organizes Muslim worship in Turkey, asked the authorities on September 19 to open legal proceedings against Pope Benedict XVI and to arrest him when he visits the country in November 2006. They said the Pontiff had violated Turkish laws upholding freedom of belief and thought by "insulting" Islam and the Prophet Muhammad. [87]

Outside Westminster Cathedral, on September 18 2006, around a hundred protestors held banners which included calls for the Pope's execution, "Pope go to Hell" and "Jesus is the slave of Allah", "Islam will conquer Rome," and "May Allah curse the Pope." [88][89]

The Lashkar-e-Toiba in Pakistan has issued a Fatwa asking the Muslim community to kill Pope Benedict for his "blasphemous statement" about the Prophet Mohammad.[90]

Nun killed

On 17 September 2006 two Somali gunmen shot and killed a 65 year-old Italian nun, Sister Leonella Scogbati, working at the Austrian-run children's hospital in the city of Mogadishu, with her Somali bodyguard.[91] A senior Somali Islamist, speaking on condition of anonymity, said: "There is a very high possibility the people who killed her were angered by the Catholic Pope's recent comments against Islam"; however, he offered no specific evidence for that motive [92]. Sheikh Mukhtar Robow, member of the Supreme Islamic Courts Council, said there was a "concrete possibility" that the murder of the nun was "a reprisal for the Pope’s remarks on Islam".[93] Somali Islamist officials vowed to punish the killers, and two men have been arrested.[94]

Attacks on Christians in Iraq

In Iraq, the flags of Germany, Israel, and the United States, and Christian crosses and effigies of Pope Benedict were burned in Basra.[95]

Iraq has one of the largest Christian minorities in the middle east, where Assyrians number about 1 million. Since the Pope's comments, several churches have been bombed. A previously unknown Baghdad-based group, Kataab Ashbal Al Islam Al Salafi (Islamic Salafist Boy Scout Battalions) threatened to kill all Christians in Iraq if the Pope does not apologize to Muhammad within three days.[96] Christian Leaders in Iraq have asked their parishioners not to leave their homes, after two Christians were stabbed and killed in Baghdad.[97]

There have been reports of writing in church doors stating "If the Pope does not apologise, we will bomb all churches, kill more Christians and steal their property and money." [98]

The Iraqi militia Jaish al-Mujahedin (Holy Warriors' Army) announced its intention to "destroy their cross in the heart of Rome… and to hit the Vatican."[99]

Despite the Pope's comments dying down in the media, attacks on Assyrian Christians continued and on October 9, Islamic extremist group kidnapped priest Paulos Iskander. The relatives of a Christian priest who was beheaded 3 days later in Mosul, have said that his Muslim captors had demanded his church condemn the pope's recent comments about Islam and pay a $350,000 ransom. [100]

Controversial Statements about Qur'an Chapter 2

Another point of controversy, widely covered in Arab media [101][102][103][104], but much less so in Western media[105], was the Pope's assessment that Surah (i.e. Chapter) 2 in the Qur'an, which includes the verse "There is no compulsion in religion", was "one of the suras of the early period, when Mohamed was still powerless and under threat", and that instructions "concerning holy war" had come later.

Many scholars of Islam have taken this as a classification of the sura as stemming from the earlier Meccan period and have shown the Pope to be mistaken by pointing out that Surah 2 was revealed in various stages and that this verse was revealed after the Prophet Muhammad's hijra from Mecca, during his period of stay in Madinah and hence is from the Madinan period which was the final stage of the revelation of the Qur'an when the Muslims were becoming numerous and increasingly powerful and safe from the immediate dangers that had overshadowed them for 13 years in Mecca. The scholars also point out that the Pope failed to mention that even if this verse was revealed when the Muslims were weak, they could have easily abrogated it with another verse which gave them permission to forcefully convert people once they finally conquered Mecca; this, however, did not happen.[106].

Assessment of the lecture's purpose

In contrast to the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy - which is now deemed a precursor to the controversy over the Pope's lecture - the media focus was not on the issues of free speech or injured religious sensitivities. Underlying the widely talked about question of whether or not the Pope should apologize, and whether or not his subsequent statements even constituted an apology, several competing and separate interpretations of his intentions have been proffered. These are, broadly and in no particular order:

  • The lecture was claimed by many Catholic apologists to not be directed at Islam at all and the incendiary passages were purely circumstantial to the lecture's real intention, which was to counter the demotion of theology in the university environment in particular and of faith in a society plagued by postmodern relativism & irrationality in general.[107][108][109]
  • Pope Benedict's lecture was a "calculated risk," a move designed to win the hearts of the Christians of the Eastern Orthodox Church who are surrounded by Muslims and whom Pope Benedict would be visiting in November, 2006. Given what he sees as close theological affinities between these two churches and other personal characteristics specific to Pope Benedict (traditional liturgy; criticism of scientific interpretation of scripture), "some form of reunion is not only feasible; from Benedict's point of view, it is highly desirable."[110][111]
  • Pope Benedict's lecture portends a parting from the Vatican's previous policies on dialogue with Islam, away from promoting harmony at all costs towards more reciprocity; that is, he wants the Muslim world opened up for Christian missions in the same way that Europe is open to Muslims and conversion out of Islam to be a legal or social possibility. In this view, according to the Pope, the position of Christians in Muslim-majority countries must be improved. However, observers state that Europe is not run by the principles of Christianity but from the principles of liberal secularism which can be traced to the Enlightenmet which was a movement born out of a rejection of Church rule. Thus European countries must allow all people regardless of religion the ability to build places of worship due to the secular nature of European constitutions. One must also be aware that most Muslim countries are ruled by secular dictatorships. However, Islam expressly prohibited any persecution of the "peoples of the book". In Islamic society, a special place was reserved for Jews and Christians. They did not enjoy completely all the rights of Muslims, but they neither had to fulfill any obligations (such as zakat and military service) that Muslims had to fulfill. They had to pay a special poll-tax, but were exempted from paying the zakat and in joining in military service—a quid pro quo that was quite acceptable to many Christians and Jews under Islamic rule. [112]

See also

References

  1. BBC Article. In quotes: Muslim reaction to Pope last accessed September 17, 2006
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 BBC News Article:Pope sorry for offending Muslims, last accessed September 17, 2006
  3. Telegraph
  4. "The Pope, Jihad and "Dialogue"", The American Thinker, 19 September, 2005
  5. 5.0 5.1 "Lecture of the Holy Father - Faith, Reason and the University Memories and Reflections", Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 12 September, 2006
  6. "Lecture of the Holy Father - Faith, Reason and the University Memories and Reflections", Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 12 September, 2006 (German)
  7. "Ambassador recalled over Pope row". Agence France-Presse, 17 September 2006.
  8. "Muslims seek fuller apology". The Boston Globe, 20 September 2006.
  9. "Guardian Council condemns Pope's anti-Islam statement". IRNA, 17 September 2006
  10. Iranian president expresses respect for pope, The Jerusalem Post, September 19, 2006
  11. "Iraq calls for calm after Pope's remarks". Reuters, 16 September 2006
  12. "Pope says he's sorry about strong reaction, says speech didn't reflect his personal opinion", The Jakarta Post, 17 September 2006
  13. Amid criticism and violence the first balanced views about the Pope’s speech appear
  14. On September 15, 2006, In quotes: Muslim reaction to Pope. BBC News. Retrieved on August 13 2007.
  15. Pakistan calls for ban on 'defamation of Islam' in veiled attack on pope,AFP, 19 September 2006
  16. "Pakistan's Parliament Condemns Pope",Fox News, 17 September 2006
  17. "Pope Apologizes for Uproar Over His Remarks". The New York Times. 2006-09-16. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/17/world/europe/17cnd-pope.html?ex=1316145600&en=bd45a56d2f9e575a&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&pagewanted=print. 
  18. "Turkish PM urges pope to apologise for Islam remarks", Turkishpress.com, 16 September, 2006
  19. McShane, Roger (17 September 2006). "Apopelogy". http://www.slate.com/id/2149848/. Retrieved on 17 September 2006. 
  20. Interview with John Howard (quote taken out of context - refer to source)
  21. 21.0 21.1 "Al-Qaeda threatens jihad over Pope's remarks". The Times. 2006-09-17. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2363459_1,00.html. 
  22. "Merkel defends Pope amid Muslim fury", Reuters, 16 September 2006
  23. "Prodi, religions must be committed to Dialogue", Agenzia Giornalistica Italia, 16 September, 2006
  24. "Le ministre suisse de l'Intérieur défend Benoît XVI", Associated Press, 17 September 2006 (French)
  25. "Homily on faith, logic and holy war was seen as a slur on Islam", The Times, 16 September 2006
  26. "Islam not condemned in papal speech, Vatican spokesman says", Catholic World News, 13 September 2006
  27. "Pope Offends Muslims Worldwide", ABC News, 15 September 2006
  28. " Muslim countries ask U.N. Human Rights Council to address Pope's remarks", AP, 18 September 2006
  29. " Brussels defends Pope's freedom of expression", EU Observer, 18 September 2006
  30. "Many Muslims Say Pope’s Apology Is Inadequate", New York Times, 18 September 2006
  31. "Pope invites Muslims to dialogue, slams 'holy wars'", ANTARA, 13 September 2006
  32. Cardinal adds to islam-violence debate
  33. "Church has a role to guide other faiths: Cardinal Bertone", Catholic World News, 13 September 2006
  34. "Christian Leader Joins Muslims in Denouncing Pope's Remarks", JAP, 16 September 2006
  35. "Archbishop backs Vatican apology". The Guardian. 2006-09-18. http://www.guardian.co.uk/pope/story/0,,1875206,00.html. 
  36. "European leaders back Benedict", Jerusalem Post, 16 September 2006
  37. Open Letter to his holiness Pope Benedict XVI (PDF)
  38. A Common Word, Official Website
  39. >""Dr Zakir Naik invites Pope Benedict XVI for open interfaith dialogue"". PakTribune. 2006-09-29. http://www.paktribune.com/news/index.shtml?155694. 
  40. http://sanagency.com/18Oct06.html Pope Benedict’s Provocative Utterances!] by Latheef Farook, South Asia News Agency, October 18, 2006
  41. [1]
  42. "Turkish cleric attacks pope's Islam remarks", Associated Press, 14 September, 2006 (German)
  43. "Türkischer Kritiker hatte Rede nicht gelesen" Der Spiegel, September 16, 2006 (German)
  44. "Pope backpedals on 'jihad' remarks: Benedict XVI says he did not intend to offend Muslims". Associated Press. 2006-09-15. http://cbs4.com/topstories/local_story_258111544.html. 
  45. "Malaysia demands apology", Sydney Morning Herald, 16 September, 2006
  46. "Muslim reaction to Pope", BBC News, 16 September, 2006
  47. "Pope tells Muslims he is 'deeply sorry' for crisis", Malaysia Star, September 17, 2006
  48. SPIEGEL interview with Aga Khan - Der Spiegel. 12 October, 2006
  49. "Sephardic chief rabbi criticizes pope's remarks", Haaretz, 17 September, 2006
  50. Papal insults – A Bavarian Provocation by Tariq Ali for CounterPunch. 17 September, 2006
  51. Papal BullJoseph Ratzinger's latest offense. by Christopher Hitchens for Slate. 18 September, 2006
  52. Religion, Reason and Violence: Pope Benedict XVI and Islam - Hans Köchler, Statement for the International Progress Organization. 16 September, 2006
  53. A struggle over Europe's religious identity - Tariq Ramadan for the International Herald Tribune. 20 September, 2006
  54. "Traduzione In Lingua Inglesse", Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 16 September, 2006
  55. "Pope apologises to Muslims", Reuters, 16 September, 2006
  56. "Pope 'sincerely regrets' he offended Muslims", Associated Press, 16 September, 2006
  57. "Pope statement not enough — Muslim Brotherhood", Reuters, 16 September 2006
  58. "«Hässliche, unglückliche Äußerungen»: Erdogan fordert Entschuldigung des Papstes", Netzeitung, 17 September, 2006 (German)
  59. "Pope praised for making apology", BBC, 16 September 2006
  60. "Sunday Angelus", Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 17 September, 2006
  61. "Mixed response to new Pope apology". The Guardian. 2006-09-18. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uklatest/story/0,,-6087503,00.html. 
  62. "Pope 'deeply sorry' for Muslim fury". CNN. 2006-09-17. http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe/09/17/pope.islam/index.html. 
  63. "Pope apology 'not good enough'". Herald Sun. 2006-09-17. http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,20430473-5005961,00.html. 
  64. "Iranian Leader Urges More Papal Protests". AP. 2006-09-18. http://www.forbes.com/business/healthcare/feeds/ap/2006/09/18/ap3025810.html. 
  65. "Pope has joined US crusade, says Iran". The Guardian. 2006-09-19. http://www.guardian.co.uk/frontpage/story/0,,1875811,00.html. 
  66. "Pope's Apology Rejected by Some, Accepted by Others". Der Spiegel. 2006-09-18. http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,437636,00.html. 
  67. "Ahmadinejad 'respects' Pope". Gulfnews. 2006-09-19. http://www.gulfnews.com/region/Iran/10068652.html. 
  68. "The Pope is in danger, warns failed assassin of John Paul II". The Times. 2006-09-19. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2365442,00.html. 
  69. "Iran, Malaysia Satisfied with Pope's Expression of Regret". Zaman. 2006-09-20. http://www.zaman.com/?bl=international&alt=&trh=20060920&hn=36652. 
  70. "THE POPE'S ACT OF CONTRITION". Amherst Times. 2006-09-20. http://www.amhersttimes.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2814&Itemid=27. 
  71. "Muslims 'must accept Pope apology'". The Age. 2006-09-19. http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/muslims-must-accept-pope-apology/2006/09/19/1158431691905.html. 
  72. "Benedict to meet Muslim ambassadors today"
  73. Pope, Muslims Meet in Bid to Defuse Anger
  74. ASIANEWS Pope: dialogue between Muslims and Christians “a vital necessity”
  75. "Address to the Ambassadors of Countries with a Muslim majority and Muslim communities in Italy" by Pope Benedict XVI, 25 September 2006
  76. Pope: 'Total and profound respect for Muslims', CNN, 25 September 2006
  77. Pope makes additions to text on Islam
  78. H.E. Ambassador Dr. Akbar Ahmed et al. (2006). "Vatican Report written and signed by leading muslim scholars and leaders in response to pope benedict xvi’s remarks on islam at the regensburg lecture on september 12, 2006" (PDF). Islamica Magazine. Center for Inter-Civilizational Dialogue Inc. http://www.islamicamagazine.com/issue18/openletter18_lowres.pdf. Retrieved on 2008-01-07.  (Copy of letter without large images)
  79. "Muslim clerics reach out to Pope". BBC. 2006-10-14. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6050156.stm. 
  80. "Muslim scholars reach out to Pope". BBC News. 2007-10-11. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7038992.stm. Retrieved on 2007-10-11. 
  81. "Vatican braces for Muslim anger" BBC, 15 September 2006
  82. "Egyptian Muslims stage demonstration against Pope remarks" People's Daily Online 16 September, 2006
  83. "Report: Rome tightens pope's security after fury over Islam remarks", Haaretz, 16 September 2006
  84. "Five churches bombed and attacked" Associated Press 16 September 2006
  85. [2]
  86. "Iranian leader urges more papal protests". Yahoo! News. 2006-09-18. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060919/ap_on_re_mi_ea/muslims_pope. 
  87. " Turk workers urge pope's arrest" CNN, 19 September 2006
  88. The Pope must die, says Muslim
  89. Just outside Westminster Cathedral today...
  90. LET issues fatwa to kill the pope. International terrorism monitor, paper no.133, by B.Raman. 2 October 2006
  91. "Gunmen Slay Italian Nun", AFP, 17 September 2006
  92. "Nun's death may be linked to Pope: Somali Islamist", Reuters
  93. "Nun shot dead as Pope fails to calm militant Muslims", Timesonline 18 September 2006
  94. "Somalia Islamists vow to punish nun's killers", gulfnews 19 September 2006
  95. In pictures: Fresh anti-Pope protests, BBC News
  96. "Christian Killed in Iraq in Response to Pope's Speech: Islamic Website", Assyrian International News Agency, 16 September 2006
  97. "Second Assyrian Christian Killed in Retaliation for Pope's Remarks", Assyrian International News Agency, 17 September 2006
  98. Violence against Christians grows in Iraq, Ekklesia, 29 September 2006
  99. "Vatikan verschärft Sicherheitsvorkehrungen", Der Spiegel, 16 September 2006 (German)
  100. Iraq priest "killed over pope speech", Aljazeera.net, 12 October 2006
  101. The other side of the coin. What's after the Pope's lecture? By Saifuddin Tajuddin. Al Sharq Al Awsat, 28 September 2006 (in Arabic)
  102. The Pope and his speech. From infallibility to naïve simplification…!, by Atallah Muhajirani, Al Sharq Al Awsat, 26 September 2006 (in Arabic)
  103. The challenge of Vatican's leader, by Al Sadiq Al Mahdi, Al Sharq Al Awsat, 24 September 2006 (in Arabic)
  104. The Pope, the Emperor and the Persian sage, by Amir Tahiri, Al Sharq Al Awsat, 22 September 2006 (in Arabic)
  105. Serious errors of both fact and judgment, by Ruth Gledhill, The Times, 16 September 2006
  106. Lapsus ratisbonæ, by Pablo Tornielli. (Spanish)
  107. However, observers note that the Pope (who is opposed to letting in the militantly secular country of Turkey in the E.U.) insisted on keeping such comments in his speech even after his handlers advised him against it. According to Israeli analyst Uri Averny, this "quote serves exactly the requirements of .... George Bush II. He, too, wants to unite the Christian world against the mainly Muslim "Axis of Evil". Moreover, the Turks are again knocking on the doors of Europe, this time peacefully. It is well known that the Pope supports the forces that object to the entry of Turkey into the European Union." From Faith, Adding a Blunt Footnote on Jihad'], New York Times, 13 September 2006]
  108. 'Benedict XVI's background is theological, not diplomatic', Jerusalem Post, 18 September 2006]
  109. 'The Pope Was Right', Los Angeles Times, 20 September 2006]
  110. Sailing to Byzantium, International Herald Tribune, 29 September 2006
  111. Calculated Risk, Deutsche Welle, 27 September 2006
  112. 'Pope Benedict's long mission to confront radical Islam', The Guardian, 17 September 2006]

External links


Advertisements






Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message