The Full Wiki

Preeclampsia: Wikis


Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Encyclopedia

(Redirected to Pre-eclampsia article)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pre-eclampsia
Classification and external resources
ICD-10 O11., O13., O14.
ICD-9 642.4-642.7
DiseasesDB 10494
MedlinePlus 000898
eMedicine med/1905 ped/1885
MeSH D011225

Pre-eclampsia (US: preeclampsia) is a medical condition where hypertension arises in pregnancy (pregnancy-induced hypertension) in association with significant amounts of protein in the urine. Pre-eclampsia refers to a set of symptoms rather than any causative factor, and there are many different causes for the condition. It appears likely that there are substances from the placenta that can cause endothelial dysfunction in the maternal blood vessels of susceptible women.[1] While blood pressure elevation is the most visible sign of the disease, it involves generalized damage to the maternal endothelium, kidneys, and liver, with the release of vasoconstrictive factors being secondary to the original damage.

Pre-eclampsia may develop from 20 weeks gestation (it is considered early onset before 32 weeks, which is associated with increased morbidity). Its progress differs among patients; most cases are diagnosed pre-term. Pre-eclampsia may also occur up to six weeks post-partum. Apart from Caesarean section or induction of labor (and therefore delivery of the placenta), there is no known cure. It is the most common of the dangerous pregnancy complications; it may affect both the mother and the unborn child.[1]

Contents

Diagnosis

Pre-eclampsia is diagnosed when a pregnant woman develops high blood pressure (two separate readings taken at least 4 hours apart of 140/90 or more) and 300 mg of protein in a 24-hour urine sample (proteinuria). A rise in baseline BP of 30 systolic or 15 diastolic, while not meeting the absolute criteria of 140/90 is still considered important to note but no longer diagnostic. Swelling, or edema, (especially in the hands and face) was originally considered an important sign for a diagnosis of pre-eclampsia, but in current medical practice only hypertension and proteinuria are necessary for a diagnosis. However, pitting edema (unusual swelling, particularly of the hands, feet, or face, notable by leaving an indentation when pressed on) can be significant, and should be reported to a health care provider.

"Severe preeclampsia" involves a BP over 160/110,[2][3] and additional symptoms.

Pre-eclampsia may progress to eclampsia, characterized by the appearance of tonic-clonic seizures. This happens only very rarely.

Although eclampsia is potentially fatal, pre-eclampsia is often asymptomatic, hence its detection depends on signs or investigations. Nonetheless, one symptom is crucially important because it is so often misinterpreted. The epigastric pain, which reflects hepatic involvement and is typical of the HELLP syndrome, may easily be confused with heartburn, a very common problem of pregnancy. However, it is not burning in quality, does not spread upwards towards the throat, is associated with hepatic tenderness, may radiate through to the back, and is not relieved by giving antacids. It is often very severe, described by sufferers as the worst pain that they have ever experienced. Affected women are not uncommonly referred to general surgeons as suffering from an acute abdomen, for example acute cholecystitis.

In general, none of the signs of pre-eclampsia is specific; even convulsions in pregnancy are more likely to have causes other than eclampsia in modern practice. Diagnosis, therefore, depends on finding a coincidence of several pre-eclamptic features, the final proof being their regression after delivery.

Some women develop high blood pressure without the proteinuria (protein in urine); this is called Pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) or gestational hypertension. Both pre-eclampsia and PIH are regarded as very serious conditions and require careful monitoring of mother and fetus.

Epidemiology

Pre-eclampsia occurs in as many as 10% of pregnancies, usually in the second or third trimester, and after the 32nd week. Some women will experience pre-eclampsia as early as 20 weeks, though this is rare. It is much more common in women who are pregnant for the first time,[4] and its frequency drops significantly in second pregnancies. While change of paternity in a subsequent pregnancy is now thought to lower risk except in those with a family history of hypertensive pregnancy,[5] since increasing maternal age raises risk[6] it has been difficult to evaluate how significant paternity change actually is and studies are providing conflicting data on this point.

Pre-eclampsia is also more common in women who have preexisting hypertension, diabetes, autoimmune diseases like lupus, various inherited thrombophilias like Factor V Leiden, or renal disease, in women with a family history of pre-eclampsia, obese women, and in women with a multiple gestation (twins, triplets, and more). The single most significant risk for developing pre-eclampsia is having had pre-eclampsia in a previous pregnancy.

Pre-eclampsia may also occur in the immediate post-partum period. This is referred to as "postpartum pre-eclampsia." The most dangerous time for the mother is the 24–48 hours postpartum and careful attention should be paid to pre-eclampsia signs and symptoms.[7]

Causes

The pre-eclampsia syndrome is thought in many cases to be caused by a shallowly implanted placenta which becomes hypoxic, leading to an immune reaction characterized by secretion of upregulated inflammatory mediators from the placenta, and acting on the vascular endothelium. The shallow implantation is thought to stem from the maternal immune system's response to the placenta. This theory emphasizes the role of the maternal immune system, and refers to evidence suggesting a lack of established immunological tolerance in pregnancy, resulting in an immune response against paternal antigens from the fetus and its placenta.[8] In some cases of pre-eclampsia it is thought that the mother lacks the receptors for the proteins the placenta is using to downregulate the maternal immune system's response to it.[9] This view is also consistent with evidence showing many miscarriages to be an immunological disorder where the mother's immune system "unleashes a destructive attack on the tissues of the developing fetus."[10]

In many cases of the pre-eclampsia syndrome, however, the maternal response to the placenta appears to have allowed for normal implantation. It is possible that women with higher baseline levels of inflammation stemming from underlying conditions such as chronic hypertension or autoimmune disease may have less tolerance for the inflammatory burden of pregnancy.

If severe, preeclampsia progresses to fulminant pre-eclampsia, with headaches, visual disturbances, and epigastric pain, and further to HELLP syndrome and eclampsia. Placental abruption is associated with hypertensive pregnancies. These are life-threatening conditions for both the developing baby and the mother.

Many theories have attempted to explain why preeclampsia arises, and have linked the syndrome to the presence of the following:

  • endothelial cell injury
  • immune rejection of the placenta
  • compromised placental perfusion
  • altered vascular reactivity
  • imbalance between prostacyclin and thromboxane
  • decreased glomerular filtration rate with retention of salt and water
  • decreased intravascular volume
  • increased central nervous system irritability
  • disseminated intravascular coagulation
  • uterine muscle stretch (ischemia)
  • dietary factors, including vitamin deficiency
  • genetic factors[11]
  • air pollution[12]
  • obesity [13]

The current understanding of the syndrome is as a two-stage process, with a highly variable first stage which predisposes the placenta to hypoxia, followed by the release of soluble factors which result in many of the other observed phenomena. Many of the older theories can be subsumed under this umbrella, as the soluble factors have been shown to cause, for example, endothelial cell injury, altered vascular reactivity, the classic lesion of glomerular endotheliosis, decreased intravascular volume, inflammation, etc. Underlying maternal susceptibility to the damage is likely implicated as well.

Pathogenesis

Although much research into the etiology and mechanism of pre-eclampsia has taken place, its exact pathogenesis remains uncertain. Some studies support notions of inadequate blood supply to the placenta making it release particular hormones or chemical agents that, in mothers predisposed to the condition, leads to damage of the endothelium (lining of blood vessels), alterations in metabolism, inflammation, and other possible reactions.[1]

Some studies suggest that hypoxia resulting from inadequate perfusion upregulates sFlt-1, a VEGF and PlGF antagonist, leading to a damaged maternal endothelium and restriction of placental growth.[14] In addition, endoglin, a TGF-beta antagonist, is elevated in pregnant women who develop preeclampsia.[15] Soluble endoglin is likely upregulated by the placenta in response to an upregulation of cell-surface endoglin produced by the maternal immune system, although there is also the potential that sEng is produced by the maternal endothelium. Levels of both sFlt-1 and sEng increase as severity of disease increases, with levels of sEng surpassing levels of sFlt-1 in HELLP syndrome cases. Recent data indicate that Gadd45a stress signaling regulates elevated sFlt-1 expression in preeclampsia.[16]

Both sFlt-1 and sEng are upregulated in all pregnant women to some extent, supporting the idea that hypertensive disease in pregnancy is a normal pregnancy adaptation gone awry. As natural killer cells are intimately involved in placentation and as placentation involves a degree of maternal tolerance for a foreign placenta which requires maternal resources for its support, it is not surprising that the maternal immune system might respond more negatively to the arrival of some placentae under certain circumstances, such as a placenta which is more invasive than normal. Initial maternal rejection of the placental cytotrophoblasts may be the cause of the inadequately remodeled spiral arteries in those cases of preeclampsia associated with shallow implantation, leading to downstream hypoxia and the appearance of maternal symptoms in response to upregulated sFlt-1 and sEng. (See parent-offspring conflict.)

It has been documented that fetal cells such as fetal erythroblasts as well as cell-free fetal DNA are increased in the maternal circulation in women who develop preeclampsia. These findings have given rise to the hypothesis that preeclampsia is a disease process by which a placental lesion such as hypoxia allows increased fetal material into maternal circulation that leads to an immune response and endothelial damage ultimately resulting in preeclampsia and eclampsia.

Differential diagnosis

Preeclampsia-eclampsia can mimic and be confused with many other diseases, including chronic hypertension, chronic renal disease, primary seizure disorders, gallbladder and pancreatic disease, immune or thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, antiphospholipid syndrome and hemolytic-uremic syndrome. It must always be considered a possibility in any pregnant woman beyond 20 weeks of gestation. It is particularly difficult to diagnose when preexisting disease such as hypertension is present.[17]

Complications

Eclampsia can occur after the onset of pre-eclampsia. Eclampsia, which is a more serious condition, complicates 1 in 2000 maternities in the United Kingdom and carries a maternal mortality of 1.8 percent.[18] The HELLP syndrome is more common, probably about 1 in 500 maternities, but may be as dangerous as eclampsia itself. These two major maternal crises can present unheralded by prodromal signs of pre-eclampsia.

Cerebral hemorrhage is a lesion that can kill women with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia. In that cerebral hemorrhage is a known complication of severe hypertension in other contexts, it must be assumed that this is a major predisposing factor in this situation, although this has not been proved. Adult respiratory distress syndrome appears to have become more common, it is not known whether this is a consequence of modern methods of respiratory support rather than of the disease itself.

Treatment and prevention

The only known treatments for eclampsia or advancing pre-eclampsia are abortion or delivery, either by labor induction or Caesarean section. However, post-partum pre-eclampsia may occur up to 6 weeks following delivery even if symptoms were not present during the pregnancy. Post-partum pre-eclampsia is dangerous to the health of the mother since she may ignore or dismiss symptoms as simple post-delivery headaches and edema. Hypertension can sometimes be controlled with anti-hypertensive medication, but any effect this might have on the progress of the underlying disease is unknown.

Women with underlying inflammatory disorders such as chronic hypertension or autoimmune diseases would likely benefit from aggressive treatment of those conditions prior to conception, tamping down the overactive immune system.[citation needed]

Thrombophilias may be weakly linked to pre-eclampsia. There are no high quality studies to suggest that blood thinners will prevent pre-eclampsia in thrombophilic women.[19]

Smoking reduces risk of preeclampsia[20][21] (though smoking is discouraged in pregnancy in general.)

Magnesium sulfate

In some cases, women with preeclampsia or eclampsia can be stabilized temporarily with magnesium sulfate intravenously to forestall seizures while steroid injections are administered to promote fetal lung maturation. Magnesium sulfate as a possible treatment was considered at least as far back as 1955,[22] but only in recent years did its use in the UK replace the use of diazepam or phenytoin.[23] Evidence for the use of magnesium sulfate came from the international MAGPIE study.[24] When induced delivery needs to take place before 37 weeks gestation, it is accepted that there are additional risks to the baby from premature birth that will require additional monitoring and care.

Dietary and nutritional factors

Studies of protein/calorie supplementation have found no effect on preeclampsia rates, and dietary protein restriction does not appear to increase preeclampsia rates.[25] No mechanism by which protein or calorie intake would affect either placentation or inflammation has been proposed.

Studies conducted on the effect of supplementation with antioxidants such as vitamin C and E found no change in pre-eclampsia rates.[26] However, Drs. Padayatty and Levine with the NIH criticized the studies for overlooking several key factors that would have been important to the success of the supplementation.[27]

Low levels of vitamin D may be a risk factor for preeclampsia,[28] and calcium supplementation in women with low-calcium diets found no change in preeclampsia rates but did find a decrease in the rate of severe preeclamptic complications.[29] Low selenium status is associated with higher incidence of pre-eclampsia.[30][31] Some other vitamin may also play a role.[32]

The late Dr. Thomas Brewer, OBGYN, believed in the role that diet can play in contributing to pre-eclampsia, especially HELLP syndrome. Although Dr. Brewer's approach has been seen as unconventional by western medicine because there is no evidence for it, some pregnancy practitioners adhere religiously to his recommendations.[citation needed] Women who previously had pre-eclampsia or HELLP present anecdotes claiming that following Dr. Brewer's guidelines has allowed them to go on to have healthy pregnancies, even in cases where their physicians believed their pre-eclampsia could reoccur.[citation needed] Subsequent pregnancies are known to be at lower risk of pre-eclampsia.[citation needed] The Brewer dietary theory is over 40 years old but lacks peer-reviewed support; modern research provides no role for diet in placentation or in tolerance induction.[citation needed]

Aspirin supplementation

Aspirin supplementation is still being evaluated as to dosage, timing, and population and may provide a slight preventative benefit in some women; however, significant research has been done on aspirin and the results thus far are unimpressive.[33]

Exercise

There is insufficient evidence to recommend either exercise[34] or bedrest[35] as preventative measures.

Induction of paternal tolerance

Many studies have also suggested the importance of a woman's immunological tolerance to her baby's father, whose genes are present in the young fetus and its placenta and which may pose a challenge to her immune system.[8][36] As the theory is further investigated,[37] researchers are increasingly studying the importance of a woman's continued exposure to her partner's semen as early as several years before conception. One study published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology involved several hundreds of women and found that "women with a short period of cohabitation (less than 4 months) who used barrier methods for contraception had a substantially elevated risk for the development of pre-eclampsia compared with women with more than 12 months of cohabitation before conception."[38] However, the results from a study conducted in 2004 show that the theory is still not conclusive. In that study, the researchers found that after adjustment and stratification, the effect of barrier contraceptive use on the development of pre-eclampsia had disappeared, with both arms having identical rates of pre-eclampsia.[39] Although the study has since then been criticized for its subjective adjustment of data, it remains important because it demonstrates that there is still some contention over the degree to which failure of tolerance induction can be attributed to prior exposure to the partner's sperm.

Continued exposure to a partner's semen has a strong protective effect against pre-eclampsia, largely due to the absorption of several immune modulating factors present in seminal fluid.[40][41]

Long periods of sexual cohabitation with the same partner fathering a woman's child significantly decreased her chances of suffering pre-eclampsia.[38][41] As one early study described, "although preeclampsia is a disease of first pregnancies, the protective effect of multiparity is lost with change of partner."[42] The study also concluded that although women with changing partners are strongly advised to use condoms to prevent sexually transmitted diseases, "a certain period of sperm exposure within a stable relation, when pregnancy is aimed for, is associated with protection against preeclampsia."[42]

Several other studies have since investigated the strongly decreased incidence of pre-eclampsia in women who had received blood transfusions from their partner, those with long, preceding histories of sex without barrier contraceptives, and in women who had been regularly performing oral sex,[43][44] with one study concluding that "induction of allogeneic tolerance to the paternal HLA molecules of the fetus may be crucial. Data collected strongly suggests that exposure, and especially oral exposure to soluble HLA from semen can lead to transplantation tolerance."[44]

Other studies have investigated the roles of semen in the female reproductive tracts of mice, showing that "insemination elicits inflammatory changes in female reproductive tissues,"[45] concluding that the changes "likely lead to immunological priming to paternal antigens or influence pregnancy outcomes." A similar series of studies confirmed the importance of immune modulation in female mice through the absorption of specific immune factors in semen, including TGF-Beta, lack of which is also being investigated as a cause of miscarriage in women and infertility in men.

According to the theory, the fetus both contain "foreign" proteins from paternal genes, but regular, preceding and coincident exposure to the father's semen may promote immune acceptance and subsequent implantation, a process which is significantly supported by as many as 93 currently identified immune regulating factors in seminal fluid.[8][36]

Having already noted the importance of a woman's immunological tolerance to her baby's paternal genes, several Dutch reproductive biologists decided to take their research a step further. Consistent with the fact that human immune systems tolerate things better when they enter the body via the mouth, the Dutch researchers conducted a series of studies that confirmed a surprisingly strong correlation between a diminished incidence of pre-eclampsia and a woman's practice of oral sex, and noted that the protective effects were strongest if she swallowed her partner's semen.[43][44][46][47][48][49] The researchers concluded that while any exposure to a partner's semen during sexual activity appears to decrease a woman's chances for the various immunological disorders that can occur during pregnancy, immunological tolerance could be most quickly established through oral introduction and gastrointestinal absorption of semen.[44][46] Recognizing that some of the studies potentially included the presence of confounding factors, such as the possibility that women who regularly perform oral sex and swallow semen also engage in more frequent intercourse, the researchers also noted that, either way, "the data still overwhelmingly supports the main theory" behind all their studies—that repeated exposure to semen establishes the maternal immunological tolerance necessary for a safe and successful pregnancy.[41][46]

A team from the University of Adelaide has also investigated to see if men who have fathered pregnancies which have ended in miscarriage or pre-eclampsia had low seminal levels of critical immune modulating factors such as TGF-Beta. The team has found that certain men, dubbed "dangerous males," are several times more likely to father pregnancies that would end in either preeclampsia or miscarriage.[41] Among other things, most of the "dangerous males" seemed to lack sufficient levels of the seminal immune factors necessary to induce immunological tolerance in their partners.[50]

Administration of immune factors

As the theory of immune intolerance as a cause of pre-eclampsia has become accepted, women who suffer repeated pre-eclampsia, miscarriages, or In Vitro Fertilization failures could potentially be administered key immune factors such as TGF-beta along with the father's foreign proteins, possibly either orally, as a sublingual spray, or as a vaginal gel to be applied onto the vaginal wall before intercourse.[41]

In 2006, researchers at the University of Adelaide developed a gel containing TGF-Beta for use in human populations.[51] Later, GroPep, the company which was awarded the patent on a TGF-Beta3 variant, conducted trials where the miscarriage rate was halved in the mice studied. According to a GroPep news release later published, "a faulty immune response is implicated in the etiology of as many as 50% of all miscarriages."[52] Their drug, PV903, was "targeted to treat recurrent miscarriages caused by an abnormal immune response to the foetus, a condition for which there is no current [drug] treatment." [52] Stage I clinical trials of their vaginal gel were partly successful, succeeding in establishing the safety of the drug, but failing in their aim of increasing the number of specific immune cells measured in circulation, the necessary condition for affecting a desired immunological desensitization.[52][53] The trials were later criticized for failing to recognize the synergistic effects of a large variety of immune factors naturally present in seminal fluid, which, acting together and with the localized presence of the foreign paternal proteins, modulate the female immune response so as to allow for implantation, and then the subsequent immune acceptance of the (foreign) fetus throughout a successful pregnancy. GroPep was later acquired by the biotechnology giant, Novozymes. The development of the PV903 drug has since then been placed on hold.

References

  1. ^ a b c Drife JO, Magowan (eds). Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, chapter 39, pp 367-370. ISBN 0-7020-1775-2.
  2. ^ "MATERNITY GUIDE - Labor & Delivery". http://familymed.uthscsa.edu/residency/maternityguide/labor&delivery.htm. Retrieved 2010-01-02. 
  3. ^ "Preeclampsia and High Blood Pressure During Pregnancy : University of Michigan Health System". http://health.med.umich.edu/healthcontent.cfm?xyzpdqabc=0&id=6&action=detail&AEProductID=HW_Knowledgebase&AEArticleID=hw2834. Retrieved 2010-01-02. 
  4. ^ Robbins and Cotran, Pathological Basis of Disease, 7th ed.
  5. ^ Hjartardottir S, Leifsson BG, Geirsson RT, Steinthorsdottir V (2004). "Paternity change and the recurrence risk in familial hypertensive disorder in pregnancy". Hypertension in Pregnancy 23 (2): 219–25. doi:10.1081/PRG-120037889. PMID 15369654. 
  6. ^ Zhang J (July 2007). "Partner change, birth interval and risk of pre-eclampsia: a paradoxical triangle". Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 21 (Suppl 1): 31–5. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00835.x. PMID 17593195. 
  7. ^ Munjuluri N, Lipman M, Valentine A, Hardiman P, Maclean AB (November 2005). "Postpartum eclampsia of late onset". BMJ 331 (7524): 1070–1. doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7524.1070. PMID 16269495. 
  8. ^ a b c Burne, Jerome (2006-01-30). "Give Sperm a Fighting Chance". The Times. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/our_experts/article721663.ece. Retrieved 2007-11-16. 
  9. ^ Moffett A, Hiby SE (April 2007). "How Does the maternal immune system contribute to the development of pre-eclampsia?". Placenta 28 (Suppl A): S51–6. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2006.11.008. PMID 17292469. 
  10. ^ "Immune system 'causes miscarriage'". BBC News. 2000-01-20. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/1803978.stm. Retrieved 2007-11-26. 
  11. ^ Courtney Reynolds, MD, William C. Mabie, MD, & Baha M. Sibai, MD (2006). "Preeclampsia". Pregnancy - Hypertensive Disorders. Armenian Medical Network. http://www.health.am/pregnancy/preeclampsia/. Retrieved 2006-11-23. 
  12. ^ Jun Wu, Cizao Ren, Ralph J. Delfino, Judith Chung, Michelle Wilhelm, & Beate Ritz (2009). "Association Between Local Traffic-Generated Air Pollution and Preeclampsia and Preterm Delivery in the South Coast Air Basin of California". Environmental Health Perspectives. http://www.ehponline.org/members/2009/0800334/0800334.pdf. Retrieved 2009-07-05. 
  13. ^ "Excess Weight Raises Pregnancy Risks". Medline Plus. 2010. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_95206.html. Retrieved 2010-02-15. 
  14. ^ Maynard SE, Min JY, Merchan J, et al. (March 2003). "Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia". The Journal of Clinical Investigation 111 (5): 649–58. doi:10.1172/JCI17189. PMID 12618519. 
  15. ^ Venkatesha S, Toporsian M, Lam C, et al. (June 2006). "Soluble endoglin contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia". Nature Medicine 12 (6): 642–9. doi:10.1038/nm1429. PMID 16751767. 
  16. ^ Xiong Y, Liebermann DA, Tront JS, et al. (September 2009). "Gadd45a stress signaling regulates sFlt-1 expression in preeclampsia". Journal of Cellular Physiology 220 (3): 632–9. doi:10.1002/jcp.21800. PMID 19452502. 
  17. ^ "Preeclampsia-Eclampsia". Diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Armenian Medical Network. 2003. http://www.health.am/gyneco/more/preeclampsia_eclampsia/. Retrieved 2005-11-23. 
  18. ^ Douglas KA, Redman CW (November 1994). "Eclampsia in the United Kingdom". BMJ 309 (6966): 1395–400. PMID 7819845. PMC 2541348. http://bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=7819845. 
  19. ^ Rodger, AJOG, 2008
  20. ^ Janakiraman V, Gantz M, Maynard S, El-Mohandes A (June 2009). "Association of cotinine levels and preeclampsia among African-American women". Nicotine Tob. Res. 11 (6): 679–84. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntp049. PMID 19395687. http://ntr.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=19395687. 
  21. ^ Jeyabalan A, Powers RW, Durica AR, Harger GF, Roberts JM, Ness RB (August 2008). "Cigarette smoke exposure and angiogenic factors in pregnancy and preeclampsia". Am. J. Hypertens. 21 (8): 943–7. doi:10.1038/ajh.2008.219. PMID 18566591. PMC 2613772. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ajh.2008.219. 
  22. ^ PRITCHARD JA (February 1955). "The use of the magnesium ion in the management of eclamptogenic toxemias". Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics 100 (2): 131–40. PMID 13238166. 
  23. ^ Compare descriptions in 1977 between a British and American paper.
    * Hibbard BM, Rosen M (January 1977). "The management of severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia". British Journal of Anaesthesia 49 (1): 3–9. doi:10.1093/bja/49.1.3. PMID 831744. 
    * Andersen WA, Harbert GM (October 1977). "Conservative management of pre-eclamptic and eclamptic patients: a re-evaluation". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 129 (3): 260–7. PMID 900196. 
  24. ^ The Magpie Trial Follow Up Study Management Group (March 2004). "The Magpie Trial follow up study: outcome after discharge from hospital for women and children recruited to a trial comparing magnesium sulphate with placebo for pre-eclampsia [ISRCTN86938761"]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 4 (1): 5. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-4-5. PMID 15113445. 
  25. ^ Kramer MS, Kakuma R (2003). "Energy and protein intake in pregnancy". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (4): CD000032. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000032. PMID 14583907. 
  26. ^ Rumbold AR, Crowther CA, Haslam RR, Dekker GA, Robinson JS (April 2006). "Vitamins C and E and the risks of preeclampsia and perinatal complications". The New England Journal of Medicine 354 (17): 1796–806. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa054186. PMID 16641396. 
  27. ^ Padayatty SJ, Levine M (September 2006). "Vitamins C and E and the prevention of preeclampsia". The New England Journal of Medicine 355 (10): 1065; author reply 1066. doi:10.1056/NEJMc061414. PMID 16957157. 
  28. ^ Bodnar LM, Catov JM, Simhan HN, Holick MF, Powers RW, Roberts JM (September 2007). "Maternal vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of preeclampsia". The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 92 (9): 3517–22. doi:10.1210/jc.2007-0718. PMID 17535985. 
  29. ^ Villar J, Abdel-Aleem H, Merialdi M, et al. (March 2006). "World Health Organization randomized trial of calcium supplementation among low calcium intake pregnant women". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 194 (3): 639–49. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.068. PMID 16522392. 
  30. ^ Rayman MP, Bode P, Redman CW (November 2003). "Low selenium status is associated with the occurrence of the pregnancy disease preeclampsia in women from the United Kingdom". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 189 (5): 1343–9. doi:10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00723-3. PMID 14634566. 
  31. ^ Vanderlelie J, Venardos K, Perkins AV (November 2004). "Selenium deficiency as a model of experimental pre-eclampsia in rats". Reproduction 128 (5): 635–41. doi:10.1530/rep.1.00260. PMID 15509710. 
  32. ^ Rumiris D, Purwosunu Y, Wibowo N, Farina A, Sekizawa A (2006). "Lower rate of preeclampsia after antioxidant supplementation in pregnant women with low antioxidant status". Hypertension in Pregnancy 25 (3): 241–53. doi:10.1080/10641950600913016. PMID 17065044. 
  33. ^ Duley L, Henderson-Smart DJ, Knight M, King JF (2004). "Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1): CD004659. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004659. PMID 14974075. 
  34. ^ Meher S, Duley L (2006). "Exercise or other physical activity for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2): CD005942. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005942. PMID 16625645. 
  35. ^ Meher S, Duley L (2006). "Rest during pregnancy for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications in women with normal blood pressure". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2): CD005939. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005939. PMID 16625644. 
  36. ^ a b "Sex Primes Women for Sperm". BBC News. 2002-02-06. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/1803978.stm. Retrieved 2007-11-19. 
  37. ^ Waite LL, Atwood AK, Taylor RN (May 2002). "Preeclampsia, an implantation disorder". Reviews in Endocrine & Metabolic Disorders 3 (2): 151–8. doi:10.1023/A:1015411113468. PMID 12007292. 
  38. ^ a b Einarsson JI, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Gardner MO (May 2003). "Sperm exposure and development of preeclampsia". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 188 (5): 1241–3. doi:10.1067/mob.2003.401. PMID 12748491. 
  39. ^ Ness RB, Markovic N, Harger G, Day R (2004). "Barrier methods, length of preconception intercourse, and preeclampsia". Hypertension in Pregnancy 23 (3): 227–35. doi:10.1081/PRG-200030293. PMID 15617622. 
  40. ^ Sarah Robertson. "Research Goals --> Role of seminal fluid signalling in the female reproductive tract". http://health.adelaide.edu.au/og/people/robertsons.html. 
  41. ^ a b c d e Robertson SA, Bromfield JJ, Tremellen KP (August 2003). "Seminal 'priming' for protection from pre-eclampsia-a unifying hypothesis". Journal of Reproductive Immunology 59 (2): 253–65. doi:10.1016/S0165-0378(03)00052-4. PMID 12896827. 
  42. ^ a b Dekker GA, Robillard PY, Hulsey TC (June 1998). "Immune maladaptation in the etiology of preeclampsia: a review of corroborative epidemiologic studies". Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 53 (6): 377–82. doi:10.1097/00006254-199806000-00023. PMID 9618714. 
  43. ^ a b Bonney EA (December 2007). "Preeclampsia: a view through the danger model". Journal of Reproductive Immunology 76 (1-2): 68–74. doi:10.1016/j.jri.2007.03.006. PMID 17482268. 
  44. ^ a b c d Koelman CA, Coumans AB, Nijman HW, Doxiadis II, Dekker GA, Claas FH (March 2000). "Correlation between oral sex and a low incidence of preeclampsia: a role for soluble HLA in seminal fluid?". Journal of Reproductive Immunology 46 (2): 155–66. doi:10.1016/S0165-0378(99)00062-5. PMID 10706945. 
  45. ^ Johansson M, Bromfield JJ, Jasper MJ, Robertson SA (June 2004). "Semen activates the female immune response during early pregnancy in mice". Immunology 112 (2): 290–300. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2567.2004.01876.x. PMID 15147572. 
  46. ^ a b c Fox, Douglas (2002-02-09). "Gentle Persuasion". The New Scientist. http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg17323294.200-gentle-persuasion.html. Retrieved 2007-06-17. 
  47. ^ Mattar R, Soares RV, Daher S (February 2005). "Sexual behavior and recurrent spontaneous abortion". International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 88 (2): 154–5. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.11.006. PMID 15694097. 
  48. ^ Danielle Cavallucci, and Yvonne K. Fulbright (2008). Your Orgasmic Pregnancy. Alameda, CA: Hunter House Inc. Publishers. p. 90. ISBN 0897935012.  http://books.google.com/books?id=othN_A1w2BYC&pg=PA90&lpg=PA90
  49. ^ Jelto Drenth (2005). The Origin of the World. London: Reaktion Books. pp. 114–115. ISBN 1861892101. http://books.google.com/books?id=aauFT9jPNRoC&pg=PA115. 
  50. ^ Dekker G (2002). "The partner's role in the etiology of preeclampsia". Journal of Reproductive Immunology 57 (1-2): 203–15. doi:10.1016/S0165-0378(02)00039-6. PMID 12385843. 
  51. ^ "Reproductive health researchers develop infertility drug technology," Thursday, 16 February 2006, http://www.adelaide.edu.au/news/news9761.html
  52. ^ a b c News Release; 14 September 2006; GROPEP COMPLETES PHASE 1a INFERTILITY TRIAL; http://www.bioinnovationsa.com.au/resources/123/GroPep%20Press%20Release%20(Sep-06)%20140906.pdf
  53. ^ "GroPep trial mixed"; September 15, 2006; http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,20413971-913,00.html

External links








Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message