Electrical resistivity (also known as specific electrical resistance or volume resistivity) is a measure of how strongly a material opposes the flow of electric current. A low resistivity indicates a material that readily allows the movement of electrical charge. The SI unit of electrical resistivity is the ohm metre (Ω m).
Contents 
Electrical resistivity ρ (Greek: rho) is defined by,
where
The electrical resistivity ρ can also be given by,
where
Finally, electrical resistivity is also defined as the inverse of the conductivity σ (sigma), of the material, or
The reason resistivity has the units of ohmmetres rather than the more intuitive ohm per metre (Ω/m) can perhaps best be seen by transposing the definition to make resistance the subject;
The resistance of a given sample will increase with the length, but decrease with the cross sectional area. If one uses the common hydraulic analogy, pushing 5 gallons per minute through a garden hose would meet with some resistance. 5 gpm through a 4" diameter pipe would be relatively easy, requiring less pressure. Cross sectional area reduces resistance. Similarly, a 12 ft garden hose will fill a 5 gallon bucket in a certain amount of time. Filling the same bucket from the same spigot but with 500 feet of hose will fill the bucket in a significantly longer time. Length increases resistance.
Resistance is measured in ohms. Length over Area has units of 1/distance. To end up with ohms, resistivity must be in the units of "ohms × distance" (SI ohmmetre, US ohminch).
This table shows the resistivity and temperature coefficient of various materials at 20 °C (68 °F)
Material  Resistivity (Ω·m) at 20 °C  Temperature coefficient* [K^{−1}]  Reference 

Silver  1.59×10^{−8}  0.0038  ^{[1]}^{[2]} 
Copper  1.72×10^{−8}  0.0039  ^{[2]} 
Gold  2.44×10^{−8}  0.0034  ^{[1]} 
Aluminium  2.82×10^{−8}  0.0039  ^{[1]} 
Calcium  3.36x10^{−8}  ?  
Tungsten  5.60×10^{−8}  0.0045  ^{[1]} 
Zinc  5.90×10^{−8}  0.0037  ^{[3]} 
Nickel  6.99×10^{−8}  ?  
Iron  1.0×10^{−7}  0.005  ^{[1]} 
Tin  1.09×10^{−7}  0.0045  
Platinum  1.06×10^{−7}  0.00392  ^{[1]} 
Lead  2.2×10^{−7}  0.0039  ^{[1]} 
Manganin  4.82×10^{−7}  0.000002  ^{[4]} 
Constantan  4.9×10^{−7}  0.000 008  ^{[5]} 
Mercury  9.8×10^{−7}  0.0009  ^{[4]} 
Nichrome^{[6]}  1.10×10^{−6}  0.0004  ^{[1]} 
Carbon^{[7]}  3.5×10^{−5}  −0.0005  ^{[1]} 
Germanium^{[7]}  4.6×10^{−1}  −0.048  ^{[1]}^{[2]} 
Silicon^{[7]}  6.40×10^{2}  −0.075  ^{[1]} 
Glass  10^{10} to 10^{14}  ?  ^{[1]}^{[2]} 
Hard rubber  approx. 10^{13}  ?  ^{[1]} 
Sulfur  10^{15}  ?  ^{[1]} 
Paraffin  10^{17}  ?  
Quartz (fused)  7.5×10^{17}  ?  ^{[1]} 
PET  10^{20}  ?  
Teflon  10^{22} to 10^{24}  ? 
*The numbers in this column increase or decrease the significand portion of the resistivity. For example, at 30 °C (303 K), the resistivity of silver is 1.65×10^{−8}. This is calculated as Δρ = α ΔT ρ_{o} where ρ_{o} is the resistivity at 20 °C (in this case) and α is the temperature coefficient.
Now, given the two extreme examples in this table, why is Teflon such an excellent resistor and Silver such an efficient conductor?
As for Teflon, one need simply observe the chemical structure of Teflon (a synthetic polymer) to gain a grasp of the situation—it is essentially a chain of carbon atoms with each carbon bonded to two other carbons and two fluorine atoms. Fluorine (which virtually surrounds the relatively conductive carbon atoms) is the most electronegative of the elements, a neutral fluorine needs only one more electron to fill its valence shell—thus, while fluorine readily accepts electrons, it does not give them back without a fight. See electron affinity and ionization energy (periodic) tables for more elucidation here—this all relates to reduction potentials and the nature of redox reactions as a whole, though the correlation is not always direct because reduction potential data gives information about whole molecules, not atomic elements.
As to the reasons for silver's extremely low resistivity (high conductivity), consider the nature of metals as a whole—George Gamow tidily summed up the nature of the metals' dealings with electrons in his science popularizing book, One, Two, Three...Infinity (1947): "The metallic substances differ from all other materials by the fact that the outer shells of their atoms are bound rather loosely, and often let one of their electrons go free. Thus the interior of a metal is filled up with a large number of unattached electrons that travel aimlessly around like a crowd of displaced persons. When a metal wire is subjected to electric force applied on its opposite ends, these free electrons rush in the direction of the force, thus forming what we call an electric current."
In general, electrical resistivity of metals increases with temperature, while the resistivity of semiconductors decreases with increasing temperature. In both cases, electron–phonon interactions can play a key role. At high temperatures, the resistance of a metal increases linearly with temperature. As the temperature of a metal is reduced, the temperature dependence of resistivity follows a power law function of temperature. Mathematically the temperature dependence of the resistivity ρ of a metal is given by the Bloch–Grüneisen formula:
where ρ(0) is the residual resistivity due to defect scattering, A is a constant that depends on the velocity of electrons at the fermi surface, the Debye radius and the number density of electrons in the metal. Θ_{R} is the Debye temperature as obtained from resistivity measurements and matches very closely with the values of Debye temperature obtained from specific heat measurements. n is an integer that depends upon the nature of interaction:
As the temperature of the metal is sufficiently reduced (so as to 'freeze' all the phonons), the resistivity usually reaches a constant value, known as the residual resistivity. This value depends not only on the type of metal, but on its purity and thermal history. The value of the residual resistivity of a metal is decided by its impurity concentration. Some materials lose all electrical resistivity at sufficiently low temperatures, due to an effect known as superconductivity.
An even better approximation of the temperature dependence of the resistivity of a semiconductor is given by the Steinhart–Hart equation:
where A, B and C are the socalled Steinhart–Hart coefficients.
This equation is used to calibrate thermistors.
In noncrystalline semiconductors, conduction can occur by charges quantum tunnelling from one localised site to another. This is known as variable range hopping and has the characteristic form of , where n=2,3,4 depending on the dimensionality of the system.
When analyzing the response of materials to alternating electric fields, as is done in certain types of tomography, it is necessary to replace resistivity with a complex quantity called impeditivity (in analogy to electrical impedance). Impeditivity is the sum of a real component, the resistivity, and an imaginary component, the reactivity (in analogy to reactance) [1].
In some applications where the weight of an item is very important resistivity density products are more important than absolute low resistivity it is often possible to make the conductor thicker to make up for a higher resistivity; and then a low resistivity density product material (or equivalently a high conductance to density ratio) is desirable. For example, for long distance overhead power lines— aluminium is frequently used rather than copper because it is lighter for the same conductance.
In practice, calcium and the alkali metals are rarely used for conductors due to their high reactivity with water and oxygen.
Material  Resistivity (nΩ·m)  Density (g/cm³)  Resistivitydensity product (nΩ·m·g/cm³) 

Sodium  47.7  0.97  46 
Lithium  92.8  0.53  49 
Calcium  33.6  1.55  52 
Potassium  72.0  0.89  64 
Aluminium  26.50  2.70  72 
Copper  16.78  8.96  150 
Silver  15.87  10.49  166 
