The Full Wiki

Reverse Standards Conversion: Wikis

Advertisements
  

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Encyclopedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reverse Standards Conversion or RSC is a process developed by a team led by James Insell at the BBC for the restoration of video recordings which have already been converted between different video standards using early conversion techniques.

Contents

Historical justifications for its use

Many programmes produced by the BBC in PAL in the 60s and 70s were converted to NTSC for distribution to non-625 line markets. For many reasons, including the cost of video tape at the time, the original PAL master was often overwritten with new material or was simply discarded. This often left the NTSC version as the only remaining copy.

PAL -> NTSC conversion (c. 1968)

PAL and NTSC have a differing number of lines of resolution and also use a different field rate. Traditional standards conversion techniques adopted interpolation as a way to cater for the differences between line resolution and field frequency.

What the original BBC converter tried to do (using the limited technology of the day) was to minimise judder by choosing either one 50 Hz field or a 1/2-1/2 mix of two 50 Hz fields, whichever was "nearer" to the temporal position of the target 60 Hz field. This gives a sequence like this (Nx = 60 Hz field x, Py = 50 Hz field y):

  • N0 = P0 (ideal = 0, error = 0)
  • N1 = P1 (ideal = 0.83, error = 0.17)
  • N2 = (P1 + P2) / 2 (ideal = 1.67, error = -0.17)
  • N3 = (P2 + P3) / 2 (ideal = 2.5, error = 0)
  • N4 = (P3 + P4) / 2 (ideal = 3.33, error = 0.17)
  • N5 = P4 (ideal = 4.17, error = -0.17)
  • N6 = P5 (ideal = 5, error = 0, start of next group)

Simply taking the nearest raw field would produce a peak to peak "error" of 0.83, instead of 0.33.

This approach of interpolation results in some of the image data present in the PAL source material being merged between lines / fields of the resultant NTSC version.

Double conversion problems

Attempts to convert the NTSC version back to PAL format using traditional conversion processes yielded unsatisfactory results. Such double conversions produce artifacts that manifest themselves as jerkiness in the picture where movement is present, and in soft-looking pictures.

Using interpolation processes to convert source material twice-over (in this example, PAL->NTSC->PAL) causes the artefacts previously mentioned to be exacerbated.

Summary

RSC was developed as an alternative to double-conversion. Use of RSC bypasses the generation of the artefacts that would be introduced in a normal NTSC->PAL conversion, and actually reverses the early standards conversion method used to create the NTSC copies. RSC is the result of reverse engineering the method of conversion inherent in the old traditional BBC PAL -> NTSC converter.

RSC attempts to separate the information from the merged lines and fields of the NTSC conversion. One of the problems inherent in this is that of increased noise. RSC employs techniques to minimise the resultant noise - both in the separation process itself, and in preparation of the NTSC material prior to processing through use of HF linear filtering.

Programmes recovered by this process

Early examples of material processed for commercial re-release using RSC are the Doctor Who stories The Claws of Axos (1971) and Inferno (1970). The resulting DVD release of The Claws of Axos also contained a documentary about the Reverse Standards Conversion process. It includes a split screen comparison between the source NTSC version and the final RSC processed version. The Inferno DVD does not feature this comparison. The process has since made it to a Doctor Who DVD once more for Episodes 1 - 3 of "The Sea Devils" (1972). All stories needing RSC have been processed and are ready for release.

See also

Television standards conversion

Further reading

Related research

Advertisements

Advertisements






Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message