The Full Wiki

Ring current: Wikis

Advertisements
  

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Encyclopedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A ring current is an electric current carried by charged particles trapped in a planet's magnetosphere. It is caused by the longitudinal drift of energetic (10–200 keV) particles.

Contents

Earth's ring current

Schematic view of the different current systems which shape the Earth's magnetosphere.

Earth's ring current is responsible for shielding the lower latitudes of the Earth from magnetospheric electric fields. It therefore has a large effect on the electrodynamics of geomagnetic storms. The ring current system consists of a band, at a distance of 3 to 5 RE,[1] which lies in the equatorial plane and circulates clockwise around the Earth (when viewed from the north). The particles of this region produce a magnetic field in opposition to the Earth's magnetic field and so an Earthly observer would observe a decrease in the magnetic field in this area.

The ring current energy is mainly carried around by the ions, most of which are protons. However, one also sees alpha particles in the ring current, a type of ion that is plentiful in the solar wind. In addition, a certain percentage are O+ oxygen ions, similar to those in the ionosphere of Earth, though much more energetic. This mixture of ions suggests that ring current particles probably come from more than one source. Ring current particle energies range from 0.05 MeV to 1 MeV.

The ring current and geomagnetic storms

During a geomagnetic storm, the number of particles in the ring current will increase. As a result there is a decrease in the effects of geomagnetic field.

See also

References

  1. ^ Martin Walt (1994). Introduction to Geomagnetically Trapped Radiation.  
  • Janet U. Kozyra and Michael W. Liemohn (2003). "Ring Current Energy Input and Decay". Space Science Reviews 109: 105–131.  
Advertisements

Advertisements






Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message