The Full Wiki

More info on Robert Brady (writer)

Robert Brady (writer): Wikis

Advertisements
  

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Encyclopedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Robert Brady (1627-1700) was an English academic and historical writer supporting the royalist position in the reigns of Charles II of England and James II of England. He was also a physician.

Biography

Brady was son of Thomas Brady, an attorney of Denver, Norfolk. He was educated in Downham, Norfolk and at Caius College, Cambridge.[1] He was made Master of Caius College, in 1660, on the English Restoration. In the 1670s he hoped to write for the prominent politicians Joseph Williamson and Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 1st Earl of Shaftesbury, but they declined the offer. It was only when William Sancroft became Archbishop of Canterbury that Brady found a patron.[2]

Brady held from 1677 the position of Regius Professor of Physic at Cambridge. He sat as Member of Parliament for the University in 1681 and 1685.[3]

In historical controversy, he was opposed to William Petyt and James Tyrrell, along what would become Tory versus Whig lines, then forming in the Exclusion crisis of the 1680s. Brady is regarded as holding to an uncompromising royalist position.[4] Others on the Whig side were William Atwood, Edward Cooke, and Sir John Somers.

J. P. Kenyon takes him as a pioneer among the royalist scholars of English medieval history, who were working towards a formulation akin to our contemporary view.[5] John Pocock[6] regards as "unforgettably damaging" the effect the (proto)-Tory Brady and others made, in attacking the doctrine of the "Ancient Constitution" as a failed description of the real circumstances of political arrangements in the England of the Middle Ages. On the narrow point of the actual legal effects of the Norman Conquest, Brady had been anticipated by Samuel Daniel, in views that are quite close to modern scholars.[7] He moved from there to argue for absolutism,[8] and that Magna Carta was not a major charter for popular freedom.[9] Brady's ideas drew on Henry Spelman and Robert Filmer.[2]

David C. Douglas remarks that although his motivations as a scholar were at least as political as those of his opponents, his techniques were so far superior that his work remained of importance.[10] Brady was aided in his later work by a position from 1686 in the archives of the Tower of London.[2][11]

Bibliography

  • A Full and Clear Answer to a Book Written by William Petit, Esq. (1681)
  • An Introduction to the Old English History (1684)
  • A Complete History of England (1685)
  • An Historical Treatise of Cities and Burghs (1690)

References

  1. ^ Brady, Robert in Venn, J. & J. A., Alumni Cantabrigienses, Cambridge University Press, 10 vols, 1922–1958.
  2. ^ a b c Andrew Pyle (editor), Dictionary of Seventeenth Century British Philosophers (2000), article pp. 117-8.
  3. ^ Concise Dictionary of National Biography
  4. ^ Colin Kidd, British Identities Before Nationalism: Ethnicity and Nationhood in the Atlantic World, 1600-1800 (1999), p. 79.
  5. ^ J. P. Kenyon, Revolution Principles (1977), p. 36.
  6. ^ John Greville Agard Pocock, The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition (2003), p. 444.
  7. ^ Patrick Wormald, The Making of English Law: King Alfred to the Twelfth Century (2001), p. 8.
  8. ^ J. H. Burns, Mark Goldie, The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450-1700 (1994), p. 364.
  9. ^ http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=674&chapter=77319&layout=html&Itemid=27
  10. ^ David C. Douglas, English Scholars (1939), p. 155.
  11. ^ David Bates, Anne Curry, England and Normandy in the Middle Ages (1994), p. 7.
Advertisements

Advertisements






Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message