# Schwarzschild metric: Wikis

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

# Encyclopedia

General relativity $G_{\mu \nu} + \Lambda g_{\mu \nu}= {8\pi G\over c^4} T_{\mu \nu}$
Einstein field equations
Introduction
Mathematical formulation
Resources
Solutions
Schwarzschild
Reissner-Nordström · Gödel
Kerr · Kerr-Newman
Kasner · Milne · Robertson-Walker
pp-wave

In Einstein's theory of general relativity, the Schwarzschild solution (or the Schwarzschild vacuum) describes the gravitational field outside a spherical, non-rotating mass such as a (non-rotating) star, planet, or black hole. It is also a good approximation to the gravitational field of a slowly rotating body like the Earth or Sun. The cosmological constant is assumed to equal zero.

According to Birkhoff's theorem, the Schwarzschild solution is the most general spherically symmetric, vacuum solution of the Einstein field equations. A Schwarzschild black hole or static black hole is a black hole that has no charge or angular momentum. A Schwarzschild black hole has a Schwarzschild metric, and cannot be distinguished from any other Schwarzschild black hole except by its mass.

The Schwarzschild solution is named in honour of its discoverer Karl Schwarzschild, who found the solution in 1915, only about a month after the publication of Einstein's theory of general relativity. It was the first exact solution of the Einstein field equations other than the trivial flat space solution. Schwarzschild had little time to think about his solution. He died shortly after his paper was published, as a result of a disease he contracted while serving in the German army during World War I.

The Schwarzschild black hole is characterized by a surrounding spherical surface, called the event horizon, which is situated at the Schwarzschild radius, often called the radius of a black hole. Any non-rotating and non-charged mass that is smaller than the Schwarzschild radius forms a black hole. The solution of the Einstein field equations is valid for any mass M, so in principle (according to general relativity theory) a Schwarzschild black hole of any mass could exist if conditions became sufficiently favorable to allow for its formation.

## The Schwarzschild metric

In Schwarzschild coordinates, the Schwarzschild metric has the form: $c^2 {d \tau}^{2} = \left(1 - \frac{r_s}{r} \right) c^2 dt^2 - \frac{dr^2}{\displaystyle{1-\frac{r_s}{r}}} - r^2 \left(d\theta^2 + \sin^2\theta \, d\varphi^2\right)$

where

τ is the proper time (time measured by a clock moving with the particle) in seconds,
c is the speed of light in meters per second,
t is the time coordinate (measured by a stationary clock at infinity) in seconds,
r is the radial coordinate (circumference of a circle centered on the star divided by 2π) in meters,
θ is the colatitude (angle from North) in radians,
φ is the longitude in radians, and
rs is the Schwarzschild radius (in meters) of the massive body, which is related to its mass M by $r_{s} = \frac{2GM}{c^{2}}$
where G is the gravitational constant.

The analogue of this solution in classical Newtonian theory of gravity corresponds to the gravitational field around a point particle.

In practice, the ratio rs/r is almost always extremely small. For example, the Schwarzschild radius rs of the Earth is roughly 9 mm (³⁄8 inch), whereas a satellite in a geosynchronous orbit has a radius r that is roughly four billion times larger, at 42,164 km (26,200 miles). Even at the surface of the Earth, the corrections to Newtonian gravity are only one part in a billion. The ratio only becomes large close to black holes and other ultra-dense objects such as neutron stars.

The Schwarzschild metric is a solution of Einstein's field equations in empty space, meaning that it is valid only outside the gravitating body. That is, for a spherical body of radius R the solution is valid for r > R. To describe the gravitational field both inside and outside the gravitating body the Schwarzschild solution must be matched with some suitable interior solution at r = R.

## Alternative (isotropic) formulations of the Schwarzschild metric

The original form of the Schwarzschild metric involves anisotropic coordinates, in terms of which the velocity of light is not the same for the radial and transverse directions (pointed out by A S Eddington). Eddington gave alternative formulations of the Schwarzschild metric in terms of isotropic coordinates (provided r >= 2GM/c2 ).

The metric in isotropic spherical coordinates where r1 is defined by $r = r_1 \left(1+\frac{GM}{2c^2 r_1}\right)^{2}$ : $c^2 {d \tau}^{2} = c^2 dt^2 \left(1-\frac{GM}{2c^2 r_1}\right)^{2}/\left(1+\frac{GM}{2c^2 r_1}\right)^{2} - \left(1+\frac{GM}{2c^2 r_1}\right)^{4}\left(dr_1^2 + r_1^2 d\theta^2 + r_1^2 \sin^2\theta \, d\varphi^2\right)$ . . .

Then for isotropic rectangular coordinates x, y, z, where

x = r1sinθcosφ . ., y = r1sinθsinφ . ., z = r1cosθ . ., and (x2 + y2 + z2)1 / 2 = r1 ,

the metric then becomes $c^2 {d \tau}^{2} = c^2 dt^2 \left(1-\frac{GM}{2c^2 r_1}\right)^{2}/\left(1+\frac{GM}{2c^2 r_1}\right)^{2} - \left(1+\frac{GM}{2c^2 r_1}\right)^{4}(dx^2+dy^2+dz^2)$ . . .

In the terms of these coordinates, the velocity of light at any point is the same in all directions, but it varies with radial distance r1 (from the point mass at the origin of coordinates), where it has the value: $c \left(1-\frac{GM}{2c^2 r_1}\right)/\left(1+\frac{GM}{2c^2 r_1}\right)^{3}$ . . .

## Singularities and black holes

The Schwarzschild solution appears to have singularities at r = 0 and r = rs; some of the metric components blow up at these radii. Since the Schwarzschild metric is only expected to be valid for radii larger than the radius R of the gravitating body, there is no problem as long as R > rs. For ordinary stars and planets this is always the case. For example, the radius of the Sun is approximately 700,000 km, while its Schwarzschild radius is only 3 km.

One might naturally wonder what happens when the radius R becomes less than or equal to the Schwarzschild radius rs. It turns out that the Schwarzschild solution still makes sense in this case, although it has some rather odd properties. The apparent singularity at r = rs is an illusion; it is an example of what is called a coordinate singularity. As the name implies, the singularity arises from a bad choice of coordinates or coordinate conditions. By choosing another set of suitable coordinates one can show that the metric is well-defined at the Schwarzschild radius. See, for example, Lemaitre coordinates, Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates, Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates or Novikov coordinates.

The case r = 0 is different, however. If one asks that the solution be valid for all r one runs into a true physical singularity, or gravitational singularity, at the origin. To see that this is a true singularity one must look at quantities that are independent of the choice of coordinates. One such important quantity is the Kretschmann invariant, which is given by $R^{abcd}R_{abcd}= \frac{12 r_s^2}{r^6}$ or $\frac{48 m^2}{r^6}.$

At r = 0 the curvature blows up (becomes infinite) indicating the presence of a singularity. At this point the metric, and space-time itself, is no longer well-defined. For a long time it was thought that such a solution was non-physical. However, a greater understanding of general relativity led to the realization that such singularities were a generic feature of the theory and not just an exotic special case. Such solutions are now believed to exist and are termed black holes.

The Schwarzschild solution, taken to be valid for all r > 0, is called a Schwarzschild black hole. It is a perfectly valid solution of the Einstein field equations, although it has some rather bizarre properties. For r < rs the Schwarzschild radial coordinate r becomes timelike and the time coordinate t becomes spacelike. A curve at constant r is no longer a possible worldline of a particle or observer, not even if a force is exerted to try to keep it there; this occurs because spacetime has been curved so much that the direction of cause and effect (the particle's future light cone) points into the singularity. The surface r = rs demarcates what is called the event horizon of the black hole. It represents the point past which light can no longer escape the gravitational field. Any physical object whose radius R becomes less than or equal to the Schwarzschild radius will undergo gravitational collapse and become a black hole.

## Flamm's paraboloid  A plot of Flamm's paraboloid. It should not be confused with the unrelated concept of a gravity well.

The spatial curvature of the Schwarzschild solution for r > rs can be visualized as follows. Consider a constant time equatorial slice through the Schwarzschild solution (θ = π/2, t = constant) and let the position of a particle moving in this plane be described with the remaining Schwarzschild coordinates (r, φ). Imagine now that there is an additional Euclidean dimension w, which has no physical reality (it is not part of spacetime). Then replace the (r, φ) plane with a surface dimpled in the w direction according to the equation (Flamm's paraboloid) $w = 2 \sqrt{r_{s} \left( r - r_{s} \right)}.$

This surface has the property that distances measured within it match distances in the Schwarzschild metric, because with the definition of w above, $dw^2 + dr^2 + r^2 d\varphi^2 = -c^2 d\tau^2 = \frac{dr^2}{1 - \frac{r_s}{r}} + r^2 d\varphi^2$

Thus, Flamm's paraboloid is useful for visualizing the spatial curvature of the Schwarzschild metric. It should not, however, be confused with a gravity well. No ordinary (massive or massless) particle can have a worldline lying on the paraboloid, since all distances on it are spacelike (this is a cross-section at one moment of time, so all particles moving across it must have infinite velocity). Even a tachyon would not move along the path that one might naively expect from a "rubber sheet" analogy: in particular, if the dimple is drawn pointing upward rather than downward, the tachyon's path still curves toward the central mass, not away. See the gravity well article for more information.

Flamm's paraboloid may be derived as follows. The Euclidean metric in the cylindrical coordinates (r, φ, w) is written $\mathrm{d}s^2 = \mathrm{d}w^2 + \mathrm{d}r^2 + r^2 \mathrm{d}\phi^2.\,$

Letting the surface be described by the function w = w(r), the Euclidean metric can be written as $\mathrm{d}s^2 = \left[ 1 + \left(\frac{\mathrm{d}w}{\mathrm{d}r}\right)^2 \right] \mathrm{d}r^2 + r^2\mathrm{d}\phi^2,$

Comparing this with the Schwarzschild metric in the equatorial plane (θ = π/2) at a fixed time (t = constant, dt = 0) $\mathrm{d}s^2 = \left(1-\frac{r_{s}}{r} \right)^{-1} \mathrm{d}r^2 + r^2\mathrm{d}\phi^2,$

yields an integral expression for w(r): $w(r) = \int \frac{\mathrm{d}r}{\sqrt{\frac{r}{r_{s}}-1}} = 2 r_{s} \sqrt{\frac{r}{r_{s}}- 1} + \mbox{constant}$

whose solution is Flamm's paraboloid.

## Orbital motion

A particle orbiting in the Schwarzschild metric can have a stable circular orbit with r > 3rs. Circular orbits with r between 3rs / 2 and 3rs are unstable, and no circular orbits exist for r < 3rs / 2. The circular orbit of minimum radius 3rs / 2 corresponds to an orbital velocity approaching the speed of light. It is possible for a particle to have a constant value of r between rs and 3rs / 2, but only if some force acts to keep it there.

Noncircular orbits, such as Mercury's, dwell longer at small radii than would be expected classically. This can be seen as a less extreme version of the more dramatic case in which a particle passes through the event horizon and dwells inside it forever. Intermediate between the case of Mercury and the case of an object falling past the event horizon, there are exotic possibilities such as "knife-edge" orbits, in which the satellite can be made to execute an arbitrarily large number of nearly circular orbits, after which it flies back outward.

## Quotes

"Es ist immer angenehm, über strenge Lösungen einfacher Form zu verfügen." (It is always pleasant to have exact solutions in simple form at your disposal.) – Karl Schwarzschild, 1916.

## Notes

1. ^ Landau 1975.
2. ^ Ehlers (1997), "Examples of Newtonian limits of relativistic spacetimes", Classical and Quantum Gravity 14: A119–A126, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/1A/010
3. ^ a b A S Eddington, "The Mathematical Theory of Relativity", 2nd edition 1924 (Cambridge University press), at sec.43, p.93. (In the formulae taken from the Eddington source, symbol usage has been adapted to the conventions used in the main section above.)
4. ^ H. A. Buchdahl, "Isotropic coordinates and Schwarzschild metric", International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol.24 (1985) pp.731-739.

## References

• Schwarzschild, K. (1916). Über das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einstein'schen Theorie. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 1, 189-196.
• Schwarzschild, K. (1916). Über das Gravitationsfeld einer Kugel aus inkompressibler Flüssigkeit. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 1, 424-?.
• Flamm, L (1916). "Beiträge zur Einstein'schen Gravitationstheorie". Physikalische Zeitschrift 17: 448–?.
• Ronald Adler, Maurice Bazin, Menahem Schiffer, Introduction to General Relativity (Second Edition), (1975) McGraw-Hill New York; ISBN 0-07-000423-4. See chapter 6.
• Lev Davidovich Landau and Evgeny Mikhailovich Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, Fourth Revised English Edition, Course of Theoretical Physics, Volume 2, (1951) Pergamon Press, Oxford; ISBN 0-08-025072-6. See chapter 12.
• Charles W. Misner, Kip S. Thorne, John Archibald Wheeler, Gravitation, (1970) W.H. Freeman, New York; ISBN 0-7167-0344-0. See chapters 31 and 32.
• Steven Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, (1972) John Wiley & Sons, New York; ISBN 0-471-92567-5. See chapter 8.