The Full Wiki

More info on Search-and-destroy

Search-and-destroy: Wikis


Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Encyclopedia

(Redirected to Search and destroy article)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

US soldiers search Vietnamese homes for Vietcong guerrillas.

Search and Destroy, or Seek and Destroy, or even simply S&D, refers to a military strategy that became a notorious component of the Vietnam War. The idea was to insert ground forces into hostile territory, search out the enemy, destroy them, and withdraw immediately afterwards. A strategy that was the result of a new weapon, the helicopter; which resulted into a new form of warfare, the fielding of air cavalry[1] a strategy to be ideally suited for counter-guerrilla / jungle warfare. The complementary conventional strategy, which entailed attacking and conquering an enemy position, then fortifying and holding it indefinitely, was known as Clear and Hold or Clear and Secure. In theory, since the traditional methods of "taking ground" could not be used in this war, a war of attrition would be used; eliminating the enemy by the use of "searching" for them, then "destroying" them, and the "body count" would be the measuring tool to determine the accountability of the strategy of "search and destroy."

It became an offensive, crucial to General William Westmoreland’s second phase. In his three phase strategy, the first consisted of slowing down the Viet Cong Forces; the second was to resume the offensive and destroy the enemy; and the third to restore the area under South Vietnamese government control. The Zippo missions were mainly assigned to the second phase around 1966 and 1967, along with operations “Clear and Secure.”

Search and destroy missions entailed sending out platoons, companies or larger detachments of US troops from a fortified position to locate and destroy Vietcong or NVA units in the countryside. These missions most commonly involved hiking out into the "boonies" and setting an ambush in the brush, near a suspected VC trail. The ambush typically involved the use of fixed Claymore Antipersonnel Mines, crossing lines of small arms fire, mortar support, and possibly additional artillery support called in via radio from a nearby firebase.

In February 1967, the largest Zippo mission was operated in the Iron Triangle, located between Saigon and Routes 13 and 25. The area consisted of a mass centre of Viet Cong logistics and headquarters, where they had been operating plans for Saigon. The offensive began with Operation Junction City where the American units assigned had destroyed hundreds of tons of rice, killed 720 guerrillas, and captured 213 prisoners. By destroying the headquarters, they disrupted any enemy plans for Saigon. Both Search and Destroy and Clearing missions stretched into the third phase beginning in 1968. The number of missions mounted, especially after the U.S. was hit by the General Vo Nguyen Giap’s Tet offensive attack of 1968. As the war grew more aggressive, so did the missions, to the point where there was lack of precision between Search and Destroy, and Clear and Secure operations.

Search and destroy missions had many flaws. First, there was lack of precision between “clearing” and search and destroy missions. Thus “clearing” missions, which were less aggressive, eventually morphed into a more violent and brutal form of tactics just as search and destroy missions were. With the lack of precision between “clearing” and search and destroy missions, pacification was not pushed. Guenter Lewey, a Professor of Political Science at the University of Massachusetts argued that the Generals and war planners severely underestimated the enemy’s abilities to match and exceed U.S. forces.[2] Large numbers of Viet Cong troops would be killed or captured, however they were quickly replaced. Although enemy forces were pushed out of certain territories, as soon as the American forces left the areas, the North Vietnamese returned with more reinforcement. Zippo missions were counterproductive towards the U.S. objective in South Vietnam. They destroyed the countryside and rice paddies, weakening the economic productivity and creating inflation in South Vietnam. They created millions of refugees who lost their homes due to the missions that called for the destroying and setting fire to their bamboo houses. Moreover, with many refugees, and a damaged economic system, the missions hurt the political and social system in South Vietnam.

They also caused many American and Vietnamese casualties. In one of the first Search and Destroy missions northwest of Dau Tieng, named Operation Attleboro, the report states 155 U.S. soldiers were killed, where North Vietnamese lost 1,106. In Operation Junction City, the report states 282 U.S. soldiers killed where the Viet Cong lost 1,728 guerrillas.

References

  1. ^ Starry, p. 221
  2. ^ George C. Herring, American Strategy in Vietnam: The Postwar Debate.
  • Starry, Donn A. GEN. Mounted Combat In Vietnam; Vietnam Studies. Department of the Army, 1978.

guerrillas.]]

Search and Destroy, Seek and Destroy, or even simply S&D, refers to a military strategy that became a notorious component of the Vietnam War. The idea was to insert ground forces into hostile territory, search out the enemy, destroy them, and withdraw immediately afterward. The strategy was the result of a new technology, the helicopter, which resulted in a new form of warfare, the fielding of air cavalry,[1] and was thought to be ideally suited to counter-guerrilla jungle warfare. The complementary conventional strategy, which entailed attacking and conquering an enemy position, then fortifying and holding it indefinitely, was known as "clear and hold" or "clear and secure." In theory, since the traditional methods of "taking ground" could not be used in this war, a war of attrition would be used, eliminating the enemy by the use of "searching" for them, then "destroying" them, and the "body count" would be the measuring tool to determine the success of the strategy of "search and destroy." It is common practice among military forces to enforce strict rules on a search and destroy mission.

It became an offensive tool, crucial to General William Westmoreland’s second phase. In his three phase strategy, the first consisted of slowing down the Viet Cong Forces; the second was to resume the offensive and destroy the enemy; the third was to restore the area under South Vietnamese government control. The Zippo missions were mainly assigned to the second phase around 1966 and 1967, along with operations “Clear and Secure.”

Search and destroy missions entailed sending out platoons, companies, or larger detachments of US troops from a fortified position to locate and destroy Vietcong or NVA units in the countryside. These missions most commonly involved hiking out into the "boonies" and setting an ambush in the brush, near a suspected VC trail. The ambush typically involved the use of fixed Claymore Antipersonnel Mines, crossing lines of small arms fire, mortar support, and possibly additional artillery support called in via radio from a nearby firebase.

In February 1967, the largest Zippo mission was operated in the Iron Triangle, located between Saigon and Routes 13 and 25. The area consisted of a mass centre of Viet Cong logistics and headquarters, where they had been operating plans for Saigon. The offensive began with Operation Junction City, where the American units assigned had destroyed hundreds of tons of rice, killed 720 guerrillas, and captured 213 prisoners. By destroying the headquarters, they disrupted any enemy plans for Saigon. Both Search and Destroy and Clearing missions stretched into the third phase beginning in 1968. The number of missions mounted, especially after the U.S. was hit by General Vo Nguyen Giap’s Tet offensive attack of 1968. As the war grew more aggressive, so did the missions, to the point where there was lack of distinction between Search and Destroy, and Clear and Secure operations.

Search and destroy missions had many flaws. First, there was lack of distinction between “clearing” and search and destroy missions. Thus “clearing” missions, which were less aggressive, eventually morphed into a more violent and brutal form of tactic just as search and destroy missions were. With the lack of distinction between “clearing” and search and destroy missions, pacification was not pushed. Guenter Lewey, a Professor of Political Science at the University of Massachusetts, argued that the generals and war planners severely underestimated the enemy’s abilities to match and exceed U.S. forces.[2] Large numbers of Viet Cong troops would be killed or captured, but they were quickly replaced. Although enemy forces were pushed out of certain territories, as soon as the American forces left the areas, the North Vietnamese returned with more reinforcement. Zippo missions were counterproductive towards the U.S. objective in South Vietnam. They destroyed the countryside and rice paddies, weakening the economic productivity and creating inflation in South Vietnam. They created millions of refugees who lost their homes due to the missions that called for the destruction and setting fire to their bamboo houses. Moreover, with many refugees, and a damaged economic system, the missions hurt the political and social system in South Vietnam.

They also caused many American and Vietnamese casualties. In one of the first Search and Destroy missions northwest of Dau Tieng, named Operation Attleboro, the report states that 155 U.S. soldiers were killed, while the North Vietnamese lost 1,106. In Operation Junction City, the report states that 282 U.S. soldiers were killed while the Viet Cong lost 1,728 guerrillas.

References

  1. ^ Starry, p. 221
  2. ^ George C. Herring, American Strategy in Vietnam: The Postwar Debate.
  • Starry, Donn A. GEN. Mounted Combat In Vietnam; Vietnam Studies. Department of the Army, 1978.

Redirecting to Search and destroy








Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message