The Full Wiki

Servius Tullius: Wikis


Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A 16th century depiction of Servius Tullius.
For the personal name, see Servius (praenomen).

Servius Tullius was the sixth legendary king of ancient Rome and the second king of the Etruscan dynasty. The traditional dates of his reign are 578-535 BC. Described in one account as originally a slave, he is said to have married a daughter of Lucius Tarquinius Priscus, and succeeded him after the latter's assassination in 579 BC. He was the first king to come to power without the consultation of the plebeians, having gained the throne by the contrivance of Tanaquil, his mother-in-law. In this account (found in Livy) Tullius was anointed as a young child to become king, after a ring of fire was seen around his head. He was then raised as a prince.

Incidentally, Livy did not believe that Servius Tullius was born a slave. Livy postulated that Tullius' mother was a princess from Corniculum, a Latin town which had been sacked by the Romans (Livy 4.3.11; cf. Festus 182L). His mother was captured and to pay homage to her regal origins she was allowed to live in the palace. Another version, quoted in a speech to the Senate by Claudius, represented him as a soldier of fortune originally named Macstarna, from Etruria, who attached himself to Caelius Vibenna. After various adventures Caelius was beaten but Macstarna came to Rome with the remnants of his army. Macstarna named the Caelian Hill after his deceased friend, but some suppose Caelius Vibenna to have placed a settlement there.

The servile stories can probably be discounted as folk-aetiologic; that is, Livy and others were trying to explain the name Servius, which looks like an adjective of servus, "slave." The adjective, however is servilis, and there is some evidence to support the Macstarna story, which comes from the Oratio Claudii Caesaris of the Lugdunum Tablet and represents an Etruscan explanation being told by the emperor Claudius (a savant in matters Etruscan). The evidence is a painting of Etruscan heroes in the Francois Tomb at Vulci. A figure labelled Mastarna and others labelled the Vibenna brothers (Caile and Avle Vipinas) appear there. If Macstarna was Servius, the questions remain as to why he changed his name, and why he chose that name.

After military campaigns against Veii and the Etruscans, he improved the administrative and political organization of Rome. He undertook building projects and expanded the city to include the Quirinal, Viminal and Esquiline hills. Favoring the goddess, Fortuna (perhaps he was thinking of the fate of Vibenna), he built several temples to her as well as to Diana. He also built a palace for himself on the Esquiline.

However, as time passed, Servius increasingly favoured the most impoverished people in order to obtain favours from the plebs. His legislation was extremely distasteful to the patrician order, and his reign of forty-four years was brought to a close by a conspiracy in 535 BC headed by his son-in-law Tarquinius Superbus and his own daughter Tullia. The street in which the chariot was driven over Servius ever after bore the name of the "Vicus Sceleratus" (Street of Infamy). It is alleged in Livy that his daughter was driving the chariot that ran over his dying body to add insult to injury.


Social reforms

According to traditional Roman history (i.e. as recorded in the works of Livy and Plutarch, among others), Servius Tullius is credited with reforming the army and also radically transforming the Roman constitution. Note that the term "constitution" in this case does not refer to a foundational document like the U.S. Constitution, but rather to the collective unwritten organizational structures and functions of the state: composition of the tribes, army, senate and voting assemblies, tax collection, conduct of official censuses, etc.

Constitutional change

Servius altered the constitution so as to make full use of its able and willing plebs. Moreover, he must have had enough support among the gentes to do that. Some hypothesize a slow evolution, but that seems unlikely, considering the resentment to his reforms and his sudden murder.

Servius integrated the population, which had become enlarged by Rome's successful conquests, into the comitia centuriata, which became the central legislative body instead of the comitia curiata.

Suffrage now depended on wealth as determined by a census. The gentes were wealthy and powerful before Servius and they still were. The significance of the Servian reforms is that he opened the ranks of the powerful to the nouveau riche and also gave every free male a say in self-government, no matter in how soft a voice.

First census

King Servius Tullius, according to the Roman historians, initiated the first census. The noun comes from the participle of the Latin verb, censere, "to judge" or "to estimate". The census was an estimation of the total personal assets of Rome. Servius Tullius used it as a gauge of military capability.

The Roman census as practiced by Servius was quite different from our census, which aims at counting and locating people. Servius made sure those functions were performed, but he was primarily interested in property assessments. Dividing the populace into classes according to their wealth, he used the census to determine the number of potential soldiers and the amount of arms and equipment they could provide to Rome, as the army at that time was primarily funded by private, not public resources. Servius wanted to know who could fund what, who was bearing an unfair burden, and who may have been shirking their responsibilities to the kingdom.

Neither the census nor the classification significantly altered social status in Rome. Servius ordered that Roman senators must own at least 800,000 sesterces to sit in the Senate, although the senators already all owned that and much more. Similarly, Roman equites or knights, needed to own at least 400,000 sesterces, but there is no record of equites being disenfranchised because of a lack of property or assets. Instead, business went on as usual at Rome; the central difference being that some of the richer outsiders could now attend the Assembly and had to be treated as citizens, a circumstance the patricii found hard to accept (with some notable exceptions, including Servius himself).

Today the census is conducted by hiring large numbers of census takers. However, in Servius' time, the administration of the state was the responsibility of its citizens. People were assembled by tribe in the Campus Martius; each man had to state under oath to the registrar, or censor, or his assistants his name, address, social rank, family members, servants, tenants, and property. This information was then recorded by the registrar.

Servius intended the process to be repeated every five years, but the growing population of Rome made that impossible. It has been estimated that Servius enrolled about 80,000 men (not the population of Rome, but only of free males). By the time of Augustus, the census had reached four million.


Servius did not invent the concept of class. The prior reforms of Solon at Athens had been along similar lines, creating new tribes and dividing the citizens by wealth so as to break the monopoly of the ancient families, whose exclusive powers were strangling the business of state.

The word classis appears at about the time of Servius and may well have been innovated by Servius. The centuria, or century, also appears at this time.

Classis comes from Indo-European *clad-ti, "that which is called out." But who or what was called and why? Here we might be guided by a type of special assembly, summoned or "called out" for a purpose by calatores, "callers." The comitia calata met once a month to hear and act upon the decisions made by the pontiffs concerning the legal days of the calendar month. The classis was a calling of a different sort of assembly, the comitia centuriata, which took over most of the functions of the subsequently supernumerary comitia curiata.

After completing his history-making first census, Servius used the information from it to divide the new, expanded populace by wealth, age and occupation. Once a class existed, it was further subdivided into peculiar institutions called centuriae, or centuries, which look as though they ought to be units of 100 men (centum is 100), but that was never the case. Perhaps 100 is simply a number symbolic of a large group.

In any case, even at the inception of the concept, the patricii, including Servius, had discovered the principle of the gerrymander. If voting is by district and there is one vote per district, then you can effectively invalidate large numbers of people by redistricting so as to put them all in one district.

The comitia centuriata met when summoned by the senate and later the consuls to vote on legislation, one vote per century. Whichever class had the most centuries met first. If they failed to reach a unanimous vote, other classes were convened. Obviously the class with the most centuries met most frequently and had the most power. The classes are as follows:

  • 1st, or classici: Men with 100,000 sesterces in assets. 40 centuries of men 45 and older, from which urban police were to be selected, and 40 centuries of men 17-45, prospective soldiers.
  • 2nd: 75,000 sesterces in assets. 10 centuries of older men and 10 of younger.
  • 3rd: 50,000 sesterces in assets. 10 of older, 10 of younger.
  • 4th: 25,000 sesterces in assets. 10 older, 10 younger.
  • 5th: 11,000 sesterces in assets. 30 centuries of specific types of workmen, such as 3 of carpenters.
  • 6th, or proletarii: No estate. One century.

The classes below the classici were the infra classem. The fixed parameters were the number of centuries, regardless of population density. It can easily be seen that if a century contained 100 men it was only by accident. And yet, no one has questioned the derivation of century from centum. Such a system biased the voting in favor of the classici, who contained 80 centuries.

There is some question about whether the top of Roman society was included in the classes at all. One sesterce is two and one half asses. Thus the senatorial requirement was 2 million asses, far above the minimum of the classici, and the equestrian requirement was one million asses, which puts them no lower than the second class. And yet, the junior officers of the army, who were well-to-do youngsters, commanded soldiers of all classes. Romans preferred the same laws to apply to everyone, indicating that the classici must have included most of the gentes, but the question remains open.

New tribal division

Before Servius Tullius, society at Rome was divided into three tribus: the Ramnes, the Tities, and the Luceres. Originally they represented the entire populus Romanus. In tradition, the Ramnes were Latini who lived on the Palatine, the Tities were Sabini who lived on the Quirinal and Viminal, and the Luceres were Etrusci who lived on the Caelian. These tribes consisted of 200 gentes, each of which contributed one senator ("old man") to the deliberative and consultative body of the senatus. They advised the rex (king) and devised laws. Laws, however, required the approval of the 30 curiae into which the three tribes were divided. These bodies met from time to time and voted, probably one curia at a time, and probably by voice ("yea" or "nay"). This was the comitia curiata, "the going together of the curiae."

The senators were in fact the patres (fathers) of the clans. In time Rome was flooded with other people than members of the gens, who lived in districts around the ones cited. They had no say in the government. It is significant that they were not originally the Etruscan word populace, but were the plebs, an Indo-European word, root *ple-, "fill", in the sense of multitude. These were Italics. In contrast they called the clans the patricii, "of the fathers."

By the time of Servius the patricii had become the minority, excluding the better part of the city from governing themselves. What Servius did to correct the imbalance is to move the pomerium, the sacred boundary of the city, to add to the existing hill districts, thus completing the "Septimontium". The space enclosed he divided into four urban tribes, the Suburana, Esquilina, Collina, and Palatina. According to Livy the taxes, the "tribute," derived from the word "tribe."

The new tribal division brought new families into the social structure. It isn't clear that they received their own curiae; probably not, as Servius innovated a new class system. The classes met on the same field and took over most functions of the curiae, and yet the curiae continued to exist.


Servius Tullius is often accused in retrospect of being a militarist on the grounds that he organized society along military lines. Such critics view the army as having had a Centuria structure of (theoretically) 100 men per unit, and view Servius as having transmitted that structure to an unwilling populace. However, it now seems clear that the centuria system actually began in the civilian populace, and was then adopted by the army. This circumstance would account for the military centuria as never really having been 100 men at any time in its history.

Having classified manpower resources so that he could inventory it, Servius used the same classifications to establish an order of battle. The military selection process picked men from civilian centuriae and slipped them into military ones. Their function in the military depended on their age, experience, and the equipment they could afford; the wealthier men of combat age were armed as hoplites, heavy infantry with helmet, greaves, breastplate, shields (clipeus), and spears (hastae).[1] A class thus became a line of battle in the phalanx formation.[2]

Specialists were chosen from the 5th class. Officers were not part of the class selection process but were picked beforehand, often by vote of the civilian century. The centuries must have had a local character like that of the army of the North in the American civil war.

Servian Wall

Servius Tullius supposedly built a great wall around Rome, as the previous walls were not large enough for the growing city. In modern Rome, a portion of remaining wall is said to be part of the Servian Wall. The walls that can be seen are the walls of Rome rebuilt after the sack of Rome in 390/387 BC by the Gauls. Many doubt whether he really did enlarge the walls.



  1. ^ Lendon, J.E., Soldiers & Ghosts: A History of Battle in Classical Antiquity, Yale University Press (2005), ISBN 0300119798, 9780300119794, p. 182: The phalanx was known to the Romans in pre-republic days, whose best fighting men were armed identically to early Greek hoplites.
  2. ^ Lendon, J.E., Soldiers & Ghosts: A History of Battle in Classical Antiquity, Yale University Press (2005), ISBN 0300119798, 9780300119794, p. 182

External links

Regnal titles
Preceded by
Lucius Tarquinius Priscus
King of Rome
Succeeded by
Lucius Tarquinius Superbus

1911 encyclopedia

Up to date as of January 14, 2010

From LoveToKnow 1911

SERVIUS TULLIUS, sixth legendary king of Rome (57 8 - 534 B.C.). According to one account he was the son of the household genius (Lar) and a slave named Ocrisia, of the household of Tarquinius Priscus. He married a daughter of Tarquinius and succeeded to the throne by the contrivance of his mother-in-law, Tanaquil, who was skilled in divination and foresaw his greatness. Another legend, alluded to in a speech by the emperor Claudius (fragments of which were discovered on a bronze tablet dug up at Lyons in 1524), represented him as an Etruscan soldier of fortune named Mastarna, who attached himself to Caeles Vibenna (Caelius Vivenna), the founder of an Etruscan city on the Caelian Hill (see also Tacitus, Annals, iv. 65). An important event of his reign was the conclusion of an alliance with the Latins, whereby Rome and the cities of Latium became members of one great league, whose common sanctuary was the temple of Diana on the Aventine. His reign of forty-four years was brought to a close by a conspiracy headed by his son-in-law, Tarquinius Superbus.

The legend of Servius presents certain similarities to that of the founder of Rome. His miraculous birth, commemorated by Servius himself in the festival established by him in honour of the Lares, recalls that of Romulus. Again, as Romulus was the author of the patrician groundwork of the constitution, so Servius was regarded as the originator of a new classification of the people, which laid the foundation of the gradual political enfranchisement of the plebeians (for the constitutional alterations with which his name is associated, see Rome: Ancient History; for the Servian Wall see Rome: Archaeology). 'His ' supposed Latin descent is contradicted by the Etruscan tradition alluded to above (on which see V. Gardthausen, Mastarna oder Servius Tullius, 1882), and his insertion among the kings of Rome is due to the need of providing an initiator of subsequent republican institutions. The treaty with the Latins is mentioned by Dionysius of Halicarnassus alone, who had not seen it himself; indeed, it is doubtful whether it was then in existence, and in any case, considering the changes which the language had undergone, it would have been unintelligible. It is also suspicious that no list of the members of the league is given, contrary to the usual custom.

For a critical examination of the story see Schwegler, Romische Geschichte, bks. xvi., xvii.; Sir G. Cornewall Lewis, Credibility of early Roman History, ch. xi.; W. Ihne, History of Rome, i.; E. Pais, Storia di Roma, i. (1898); and Ancient Legends of Roman History (Eng. trans., 1906), where he comes to the conclusion that "instead of being the sixth rex of Rome, he was originally the rex serous, the priest of the cult of Diana Aricina transferred to the Aventine, the priest of the protecting goddess of fugitive slaves"; C. Pascal, Patti e legende di Roma antica (Florence, 1903); also O. Gilbert, Geschichte and Topographie der Stadt Rom im Altertum (1883-1885), and J. B. Carter, The Religion of Numa (1906), on the reorganization of Servius.

<< Maurus Servius Honoratus

Servo-Bulgarian War >>

Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address