Smoking ban: Wikis


Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An internationally recognizable "No Smoking" sign.
A "No Smoking" sign on most passenger flights around the world

Smoking bans are public policies, including criminal laws and occupational safety and health regulations, which prohibit tobacco smoking in workplaces and/or other public spaces. Legislation may also define smoking as more generally being the carrying or possessing of any lit tobacco product.[1]



The rationale for smoke-free laws is to protect people from the effects of second-hand smoke, which include an increased risk of heart disease, cancer, emphysema, and other diseases.[2][3] Laws implementing bans on indoor smoking have been introduced by many countries in various forms over the years, with some legislators citing scientific evidence that shows tobacco smoking is harmful to the smokers themselves and to those inhaling second-hand smoke.

In addition, such laws may lower health care costs in the short term (but may actually increase them in the long term),[4] improve work productivity, and lower the overall cost of labor in a community, thus making a community more attractive for employers. In Indiana, the state's economic development agency wrote into its 2006 plan for acceleration of economic growth an encouragement to cities and towns to adopt local smoke-free workplace laws as a means of promoting job growth in communities.

Additional rationales for smoking restrictions include reduced risk of fire in areas with explosive hazards; cleanliness in places where food, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, or precision instruments and machinery are produced; decreased legal liability; potentially reduced energy use via decreased ventilation needs; reduced quantities of litter; healthier environments; and giving smokers incentive to quit.[5]

The World Health Organization considers smoke-free laws to have an influence to reduce demand for tobacco by creating an environment where smoking becomes increasingly more difficult and to help shift social norms away from the acceptance of smoking in everyday life. Along with tax measures, cessation measures, and education, smoking ban policy is currently viewed as an important element in lowering smoking rates and promoting public health. When correctly and strictly implemented it is seen as one important policy agenda goal to change human behavior away from unhealthy behavior and towards a healthy lifestyle.[6]

Medical and scientific basis for bans

Research has generated evidence that secondhand smoke causes the same problems as direct smoking, including lung cancer, cardiovascular disease, and lung ailments such as emphysema, bronchitis, and asthma.[7] Specifically, meta-analyses show that lifelong non-smokers with partners who smoke in the home have a 20–30% greater risk of lung cancer than non-smokers who live with non-smokers. Non-smokers exposed to cigarette smoke in the workplace have an increased lung cancer risk of 16–19%.[8]

A study issued in 2002 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer of the World Health Organization concluded that non-smokers are exposed to the same carcinogens as active smokers.[9] Sidestream smoke[10] contains 69 known carcinogens, particularly benzopyrene[11] and other polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, and radioactive decay products, such as polonium 210[citation needed]. Several well-established carcinogens have been shown by the tobacco companies' own research to be present at higher concentrations in secondhand smoke than in mainstream smoke.[12]

Scientific organizations confirming the effects of secondhand smoke include the U.S. National Cancer Institute,[13] the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,[14] the U.S. National Institutes of Health,[15] the Surgeon General of the United States,[16] and the World Health Organization.[17]

Air quality

Bans on smoking in bars and restaurants can substantially improve the air quality in such establishments. For example, one study listed on the website of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states that New York's statewide law to eliminate smoking in enclosed workplaces and public places substantially reduced RSP (respirable suspended particles) levels in western New York hospitality venues. RSP levels were reduced in every venue that permitted smoking before the law was implemented, including venues in which only second-hand smoke from an adjacent room was observed at baseline.[18] The CDC concluded that their results were similar to other studies which also showed substantially improved indoor air quality after smoking bans.

A 2004 study showed New Jersey bars and restaurants had more than nine times the levels of indoor air pollution of neighboring New York City, which had enacted its ban.[19]

Research has also shown that improved air quality translates to decreased toxin exposure among employees.[20] For example, among employees of the Norwegian establishments that enacted smoking bans, tests showed improved (decreased) levels of nicotine in the urine of both smoking and non-smoking workers (as compared with measurements prior to the ban).[21]

Public Health Law Research

Public Health Law Research[22], an independent organization, published in 2009 an evidence brief summarizing the research assessing the effect of a specific law or policy on public health. There is strong evidence supporting smoking bans and restrictions as effective public health interventions aimed at decreasing exposure to secondhand smoke. [23]


One of the world's earliest smoking bans was a 1575 Mexican ecclesiastical council ban that forbid the use of tobacco in any church in Mexico and Spanish colonies in the Caribbean. The Ottoman sultan Murad IV prohibited smoking in his empire in 1633. The Pope also banned smoking in the Church, Pope Urban VII in 1590 and Urban VIII in 1624. Pope Urban VII in particular threatened to excommunicate anyone who "took tobacco in the porchway of or inside a church, whether it be by chewing it, smoking it with a pipe or sniffing it in powdered form through the nose".[24] The earliest citywide European smoking bans were enacted shortly thereafter. Such bans were enacted in Bavaria, Kursachsen, and certain parts of Austria in the late 1600s. Smoking was banned in Berlin in 1723, in Königsberg in 1742, and in Stettin in 1744. These bans were repealed in the revolutions of 1848.[25] The first building in the world to have a smoke-free policy was the Old Government Building in Wellington, New Zealand in 1876. This was over concerns about the threat of fire, as it is the second largest wooden building in the world.[26][citation needed] The first modern, nationwide tobacco ban was imposed by the Nazi Party in every German university, post office, military hospital, and Nazi Party office, under the auspices of Karl Astel's Institute for Tobacco Hazards Research, created in 1941 under orders from Adolf Hitler.[27] Major anti-tobacco campaigns were widely broadcast by the Nazis until the demise of the regime in 1945.[28]

In the latter part of the 20th century, as research on the risks of secondhand tobacco smoke became public, the tobacco industry launched "courtesy awareness" campaigns. Fearing reduced sales, the industry created a media and legislative program that focused on "accommodation". Tolerance and courtesy were encouraged as a way to ease heightened tensions between smokers and those around them, while avoiding smoking bans. In the USA, states were encouraged to pass laws providing separate smoking sections.[29]

In 1975, the US state of Minnesota enacted the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act, making it the first state to ban smoking in most public spaces. At first, restaurants were required to have No Smoking sections, and bars were exempt from the Act.[30] As of October 1, 2007, Minnesota enacted a ban on smoking in all restaurants and bars statewide, called the Freedom to Breathe Act of 2007.[31]

In 1990, the city of San Luis Obispo, California, became the first city in the world to ban indoor smoking at all public places, including bars and restaurants.[32]

In America, the success of the ban enacted by the state of California in 1998 encouraged other states such as New York to implement bans. California's smoking ban included a controversial ban of smoking in bars, extending the statewide workplace smoking ban enacted in 1994. As of April 2009 there were 37 states with some form of smoking ban.[33] Some areas in California began making entire cities smoke-free, which would include every place except residential homes. More than 20 cities in California enacted park and beach smoking bans.

On March 29, 2004, the Republic of Ireland implemented a ban on smoking in the workplace. In Norway similar legislation was put into force on July 1 the same year. The whole of the United Kingdom became subject to a ban on smoking in enclosed public places in 2007, when England became the final region to have the legislation come into effect. The age limit for buying tobacco was also raised from 16 to 18 on October 1, 2007. In 2007, Chandigarh became the first city in India to become 'smoke-free'. Smoking was banned in public indoor venues in Victoria, Australia on July 1, 2007.

Smoking bans by country

A "Smoking Area" sign, commonly seen in restaurants and bars, this sign now lies discarded in store room of a London pub

A great number of mostly developed countries have enacted bans on smoking in public places or workplaces since the early 2000s, often in conjunction with a reduction in the proportion of the population who smoke. Some jurisdictions also ban smoking in private vehicles. In many mostly developing countries, where tobacco consumption is high, smoking bans are unheard of or unenforced.

The only country to have banned the sale and smoking of tobacco in public entirely is Bhutan.[34] Also, according to Asharq Al-Awsat Newspaper, The Holy City of Al-Madinah in the western province of Saudi Arabia is considered to be the largest area in the world with a smoking ban[35].


A government survey in Sydney found that the proportion of the population attending pubs and clubs rose after the introduction of a ban on smoking in enclosed places.[36] However, a ClubsNSW report in August 2008 blamed the smoking ban for New South Wales clubs suffering their worst fall in income ever, amounting to a decline of $385 million. Income for clubs was down 11% in New South Wales. Sydney CBD club income fell 21.7% and western Sydney clubs lost 15.5%.[37]


The smoking ban could be a factor of the increase of bar bankruptcies in the first half of 2008.[38]


Smoking bans were introduced in German hotels, restaurants, and bars in 2008 and early 2009. The restaurant industry has claimed that many businesses in the states which introduced a smoking ban in late 2007 (Lower Saxony, Baden-Württemberg, and Hessen) witnessed lowered profits. The German Hotel and Restaurant Association (DEHOGA) claimed that the ban deterred people from going out for a drink or meal, stating that 15% of establishments that adopted a smoking ban in 2007 saw turnover fall by around 50%.[39]


In the Republic of Ireland, the main opposition was from publicans. Ireland was the world's first country to introduce a full workplace smoking ban. The Irish workplace ban was introduced with the intention of protecting workers from passive smoking ("second-hand smoke") and to discourage smoking in a nation with a high percentage of smokers. Many pubs introduced "outdoor" arrangements (generally heated areas with shelters) though many customers now choose to drink at home or at parties, which has had the effect of aiding the off licence trade.[citation needed]

Ireland's Office of Tobacco Control website indicates that "an evaluation of the official hospitality sector data shows there has been no adverse economic effect from the introduction of this measure (the March 2004 national ban on smoking in bars, restaurants, etc). It has been claimed that the ban was a significant contributing factor to the closure of hundreds of small rural pubs, with almost 440 fewer licenses renewed in 2006 than in 2005.[40]

United Kingdom

The ban came into force in Wales on 2 April 2007.[41] Six months after the ban's implementation in Wales, the Licensed Victuallers Association (LVA), which represents pub operators across Wales, claimed pubs had lost up to 20% of their trade. The LVA says some businesses were on the brink of closure, others had already closed down, and there was little optimism trade would eventually return to pre-ban levels.[42]

In September 2007, Japan Tobacco announced it would be closing its cigar factory in Cardiff, Wales, resulting in the loss of 184 jobs. It would move its operations to Northern Ireland with the creation of 95 jobs. It was indicated by the company that a 50% fall in tobacco sales since 1999 had led to the closure of the factory, and that this had been accelerated by the smoking ban.[43]

Three months after the ban in England came into force, The Rank Group, owners of Mecca Bingo Halls and Grosvenor Casinos, claimed that coupled with the Gambling Act 2005 which imposed restrictions on the number of £500 jackpot fruit machines, the smoking ban had had a detrimental impact upon its profits.[44]

Bingo hall customers have declined by 600,000 since the ban's introduction. Combined with the negative impact on revenue of the smoking ban, and government tax rules, one third of bingo halls are facing closure.[45]

The British Beer and Pub Association (BBPA), which represents pubs and breweries across the UK claimed beer sales are at their lowest level since the 1930s. The BBPA sustained a fall in sales of 7% during 2007 to the smoking ban.[46]

According to a survey conducted by pub and bar trade magazine The Publican, the anticipated increase in sales of food following the smoking ban has not occurred. The trade magazine's survey of 303 pubs in the United Kingdom found the average customer spent £14.86 on food and drink at dinner in 2007, virtually identical to 2006.[47]

A survey conducted by BII (formerly British Institute of Innkeeping) and the Federation of Licensed Victuallers' Associations (FLVA) concluded that sales had decreased by 7.3% in the 5 months since the smoking ban's introduction on 1 July 2007. Of the 2,708 responses to the survey, 58% of licensees said they had seen smokers visiting less regularly, while 73% had seen their smoking customers spending less time at the pub.[48]

The smoking ban has been partly blamed for Sports Cafe bars group going into administration.[49]

Britain's largest pub operator, Punch Taverns, have reported an estimated 5% decline in trading throughout the traditionally busy Christmas period, which the company attributes to diminishing consumer confidence and the effects of the smoking ban.[50]

In June 2008, a spokeswoman for Punch Taverns said the change had given the industry the opportunity to attract new customers and concentrate on growth areas such as food - which is more profitable than drink sales. Gerard Tempest, marketing director for Whitbread Hotels and Restaurants, said: "The ban has had no real negative effect. Our staff are happier and we are seeing many more families." Rupert Clevely of Geronimo Inns said drink sales had risen by more than 5%, with a double-digit rise in food sales.[51]

A report issued by the All-Party Parliamentary Beer Group of the British Parliament in March 2009 and based on data from CGA Strategy Ltd [9] found that there were 61,677 pubs in England, Scotland and Wales in February 2009, down 3,037 in 20 months [10].

United States

In the USA, smokers and hospitality businesses initially argued that businesses would suffer from smoking bans. However, a 2006 review by the U.S. Surgeon General found that smoking bans were unlikely to harm businesses in practice, and that many restaurants and bars might see increased business.[52][53]

The state of California enacted a statewide smoking ban effective January 1, 1995, banning the activity in all enclosed workplaces in California and within 20 feet of such places, including restaurants and bars (bars were excluded until January 1, 1998). In 2002, an amendment to the Florida Constitution prohibited smoking in all enclosed indoor workplaces, except stand-alone bars, tobacco stores, private homes when no business was being conducted there, and designated guest rooms at lodging establishments. In 2003, New York City amended its anti-smoking law to include all restaurants and bars, including those in private clubs, making it, along with the California ban, one of the toughest in the United States. The city's Department of Health found in a 2004 study that air pollution levels had decreased sixfold in bars and restaurants after the ban went into effect, and that New Yorkers had reported less second-hand smoke in the workplace. The study also found the city's restaurants and bars prospered despite the smoking ban, with increases in jobs, liquor licenses, and business tax payments. The President of the New York nightlife association stated that business had been harmed and that the Department of Health had included all restaurants in the figures, including "Starbucks and McDonald's".[54] A 2006 study by the state of New York found similar results; business had improved despite the smoking ban.[55] According to the 2004 Zagat Survey, which polled nearly 30,000 New York City restaurant patrons, respondents said by a margin of almost 6 to 1 that they eat out more often now because of the city's smoke-free policy.[56] Similar smoking bans modeled after NYC's were soon implemented in neighboring states and further beyond; New York State in July 2003, Connecticut in January 2004, New Jersey in April 2006, Ohio in Fall 2007, and Virginia[57] in 2009 . On July 1, 2008, Iowa also passed smoking ban legislation, which took a step further and banned smoking from state properties, including public colleges such as the University of Iowa.Overall, approximately 140 college campuses[58] across the Untied States have become smoke free

Some individuals have reported far different results. Michael Pakko of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis has posted several analyses of the negative economic impact of smoking bans on restaurants and bars, including generally,[59] in Columbia, Missouri,[60] and at Delaware gambling facilities.[61]

Cigarette advertising

In many parts of the world, tobacco advertising and sponsorship of sporting events is prohibited. The ban on tobacco advertising and sponsorship in the European Union in 2005 has prompted Formula One Management to look for venues that permit display of the livery of tobacco sponsors, and has led to some of the races on the calendar being canceled in favor of tobacco-friendly markets. As of 2008, only one Formula One team, Scuderia Ferrari, receives sponsorship from a tobacco company. Marlboro branding appears on its cars in two races; Monaco and China, as neither bans tobacco advertising.

MotoGP team Ducati Marlboro receives sponsorship from a Marlboro branding which appears at races in Qatar and China. On 1 July 2009 Ireland banned the advertising and display of tobacco products in all retail outlets. This means that shops will have to store cigarettes in closed containers out of sight of customers.

Public support for smoking bans

A 2007 Gallup poll found that 54% of Americans favored a complete ban inside of restaurants, 34% favored a ban in all hotel rooms, and 29% favored a ban inside of bars.[62]

Another Gallup poll, of over 26,500 Europeans, conducted in December 2008, found that "a majority of EU citizens support smoke-free public places, such as offices, restaurants and bars." The poll further found that "support for workplace smoking restrictions is slightly higher than support for such restrictions in restaurants (84% vs. 79%). Two-thirds support smoke-free bars, pubs and clubs." The support is highest in countries which have implemented strict smoking bans: "Citizens in Italy are the most prone to accept smoking restrictions in bars, pubs and clubs (93% – 87% “totally in favor”). Sweden and Ireland join Italy at the higher end of the scale with approximately eight out of 10 respondents supporting smoke-free bars, pubs and clubs (70% in both countries is totally in favor)."[63]

Effects of bans

Safety issues and effects on mental health

Enforcement of a ban can cause resentment among smokers, with potentially serious consequences. In July 2009 a Turkish restaurant owner was murdered by a customer after attempting to enforce the recently implemented smoking ban.[64] Resentment on the part of smokers over enforcement of a ban, or on the part of non-smokers over violation non-enforcement of a ban, is sometimes referred to as "smoke rage".

Effects on health

Several studies have documented health and economic benefits related to smoking bans. In the first 18 months after Pueblo, Colorado enacted a 2003 smoking ban, hospital admissions for heart attacks dropped by 27% while admissions in neighbouring towns without smoking bans showed no change. The decline in heart attacks was attributed to the smoking ban, which reduced exposure to secondhand smoke.[65] A similar study in Helena, Montana found a 40% reduction in heart attacks following the imposition of a smoking ban.[66] However, a larger and more recent study found that workplace bans in the USA are not associated with statistically significant short-term declines in mortality or hospital admissions for myocardial infarction or other diseases.[67]

Researchers at the University of Dundee found significant improvements in bar workers' lung function and inflammatory markers attributed to a smoking ban; the benefits were particularly pronounced for bar workers with asthma.[68] The Bar Workers' Health and Environment Tobacco Smoke Exposure (BHETSE) study found the percentage of all workers reporting respiratory symptoms, such as wheezing, shortness of breath, cough and phlegm production, fell from 69% to 57%.[69] A group of researchers from Turin, Italy found that a smoking ban had significantly reduced heart attacks in the city, and attributed most of the reduction to decreased secondhand-smoke exposure.[70] A comprehensive smoking ban in New York was found to have prevented 3,813 hospital admissions for heart attacks in 2004, and to have saved $56 million in health-care costs for the year.[71]

Effects on tobacco use

One report stated that cigarette sales in Ireland and Scotland increased after a smoking ban.[72] In contrast, another report states that in Ireland, cigarette sales fell by 16% in the six months after the ban's introduction.[73] In the UK, cigarette sales fell by 11% during July 2007, the first month of the smoking ban in England, compared with July 2006.[74]

A 1992 document from Phillip Morris summarized the tobacco industry's concern about the effects of a ban: "Total prohibition of smoking in the workplace strongly effects [sic] tobacco industry volume. Smokers facing these restrictions consume 11%–15% less than average and quit at a rate that is 84% higher than average."[75]

In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported a leveling off of smoking rates in recent years despite a large number of ever more severe smoking bans and large tax increases. It has also been suggested that a "backstop" of hardcore smokers has been reached: those unmotivated and increasingly defiant in the face of further legislation.[76]

In Sweden, use of snus, as an alternative to smoking, has risen steadily since the smoking ban.[77]

Smoking bans may make it easier for smokers to quit. A survey suggests 22% of UK smokers may quit in response to a smoking ban in enclosed public places.[78]

Restaurant smoking bans may help stop young people from becoming habitual smokers. A study of Massachusetts youths, found that those in towns with bans were 35 percent less likely to be habitual smokers.[79][80]

Effects on businesses

Smoking is prohibited on some streets in Japan. Smokers utilize smoking lounges, such as this one in Tokyo.
A sign stating "No smoking while walking" in Taito, Tokyo

Many studies have been published in the health industry literature on the economic effect of smoke-free policies. The majority have found that there is no negative economic impact associated with bans and many findings that there may be a positive effect on local businesses.[81] A 2003 review of 97 such studies of the economic effects of a smoking ban on the hospitality industry found that the "best-designed" studies concluded that smoking bans did not harm businesses.[82]

Studies funded by the bar and restaurant associations sometimes find that smoking legislation has a negative effect on restaurant and bar profits. Such associations have also criticized studies which found that such legislation had no impact.[83]

The following are some examples: the Dallas Restaurant Association funded a study that showed a $11.8 million decline in alcohol sales ranging from 9 to 50% in Denton, Texas. A 2004 study by Ridgewood Economic Associates LTD funded by the Empire State Restaurant and Tavern Association found a loss of 2000 jobs, $28.5 million dollar loss in wages, and a loss of $37 million in New York State product.[84] A 2004 study for the National Restaurant Association of the United States conducted by Deloitte and Touche found a significant negative impact. The restaurant Association of Maryland found sales tax receipts for establishments falling 11% in their study. Carroll and Associates found bars sales decreased by 18.7% to 24.3% in a number of Ontario markets following a bar smoking ban.[85] The Buckeye Liquor Permit Holders Association reported that liquor sales were down over $67 million dollars while sales for home consumption increased and asked for the bar smoking ban to be amended in Ohio.[86]

Effects on musical instruments

Bellows-driven instruments – such as the accordion, concertina, melodeon and Uilleann (or Irish) bagpipes – reportedly need less frequent cleaning and maintenance as a result of the Irish smoking ban.[87]

Effects on tourism

Some areas with a large tourism trade are concerned about the impact of a smoking ban on their tourism market. In Hawaii, for example, several tourism monitoring agencies reported that the ban may have had a significant negative impact on tourism, based on government numbers and industry feedback.[88] Overall tourism was down 6% and the key Japanese market was down 12% in Hawaii.[89]

Effects of prison smoking bans

Prisons have increasingly been banning tobacco smoking.[90] In the United States, some states with smoke-free prison policies only ban indoor smoking whereas others ban smoking on the entire prison grounds.[91] In July, 2004 the Federal Bureau of Prisons adopted a smoke-free policy for its facilities.[92] A 1993 Supreme Court ruling acknowledged that a prisoner's exposure to second-hand smoke could be regarded as cruel and unusual punishment (which would be in violation of the Eighth Amendment).[93] But a 1997 ruling in Massachusetts established that prison smoking bans do not constitute cruel and unusual punishment.[94] Many officials view prison smoking bans as a means of reducing health-care costs.[95]

Prison officials and guards are often concerned based on previous events in other prisons concerning riots, fostering a cigarette black market within the prison, and other problems resulting from a total prison smoking ban. Prisons have experienced riots when placing smoking bans into effect resulting in prisoners setting fires, destroying prison property, persons being assaulted, injured, and stabbed. One prison in Canada had some guards reporting breathing difficulties from the fumes of prisoners smoking artificial cigarettes made from nicotine patches lit by creating sparks from inserting metal objects into electrical outlets.[96][97] For example in 2008, the Orsainville Detention Centre near Quebec City, withdrew its smoking ban following a riot. But the feared increase in tension and violence expected in association with smoking bans has generally not been seen.[94]


The introduction of smoking bans produced protests[98] and predictions of widespread non-compliance, and media stories regarding the rise of clandestine smokeasies, including in New York City,[99] Ireland,[100][101] Germany,[102] Illinois,[103] the United Kingdom,[104] Utah,[105] and Washington, D.C..[106]

In reality, however, high levels of compliance with bans (in excess of 90 per cent) have been reported in most jurisdictions including New York [107], Ireland [108], Italy [109] and Scotland[110]. Poor compliance was reported in Kolkata[111].

Criticism of bans

Smoking bans have been criticised on a number of grounds:

Government interference with personal lifestyle or property rights

Critics of smoking bans, including comedian Dave Chappelle, artist Joe Jackson,[112] actress Natasha Richardson, and essayist and political critic Christopher Hitchens,[113][114] have claimed that bans are misguided efforts of retrograde Puritans.[citation needed] Typically, this argument is based on John Stuart Mill's harm principle, interpreting smoking bans as ban on tobacco consumption instead of ban on harming other people.

Other critics emphasize the property rights of business owners, drawing a distinction between public places (such as government buildings) and privately-owned establishments (such as bars and restaurants). Citing economic efficiency, some economists suggest that the basic institutions of private property rights and contractual freedom are capable of resolving conflicts between the preferences of smokers and those who seek a smoke-free environment, without government intrusion.[115]


Businesses affected by smoking bans have filed lawsuits claiming that bans are unconstitutional or otherwise illegal. In the United States, some cite unequal protection under the law while others cite loss of business without compensation, as well as other types of challenges. Some localities where hospitality businesses filed lawsuits against the State or local government include, Nevada, Montana, Iowa, Colorado, Kentucky, New York, South Carolina, and Hawaii.[116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123] Such lawsuits have generally been unsuccessful.

Bans may move smoking elsewhere

Bans on smoking in offices and other enclosed public places often result in smokers going outside to smoke, frequently congregating outside doorways. Many jurisdictions that have banned smoking in enclosed public places have extended the ban to cover areas within a fixed distance of entrances to buildings.[124]

The former British Cabinet Member John Reid claimed that bans on smoking in public places may lead to more smoking at home.[125] However, both the House of Commons Health committee and the Royal College of Physicians disagreed, with the former finding no evidence to support Reid's claim after studying Ireland,[125] and the latter finding that smoke-free households increased from 22% to 37% between 1996 and 2003.[126]

In January 2010, the mayor of Boston, Massachusetts, Thomas Menino, proposed a smoking ban inside public housing apartments under the jurisdiction of the Boston Housing Authority.[127]

Local bans lead to increase in DUI fatalities

In May 2008, research published by Adams and Cotti in the Journal of Public Economics examined statistics of drunken-driving fatalities and accidents in areas where smoking bans in bars have been implemented and found that fatal drunken-driving accidents increased by about 13 percent, or about 2.5 such accidents per year for a typical county.[128]

Effects of funding on research literature

As in other areas of research, the effect of funding on research literature has been discussed with respect to smoking bans. Most commonly, studies which found few or no positive and/or negative effects of smoking bans and which were funded by tobacco companies have been delegitimized because they were seen as biased in favor of their funders.[129]

Professor of Economics at the California State Polytechnic University-San Luis Obispo, Michael L. Marlow, defended "tobacco-sponsored" studies arguing that all studies merited "scrutiny and a degree of skepticism," irrespective of their funding. He wished for the basic assumption that every author were "fair minded and trustworthy, and deserves being heard out" and for less attention to research funding when evaluating the results of a study. Marlow suggests that studies funded by tobacco companies are viewed and dismissed as "deceitful,"[130] i.e. as being driven by (conscious) bad intention.

Alternatives to bans

Incentives for voluntarily smoke-free establishments

Some smoking ban opponents concede that in many localities, the number of smoke-free bars and restaurants is insufficient to meet the needs and wants of residents who prefer a smoke-free environment. In order to encourage the creation of more smoke-free businesses, some experts and politicians support tax credits and other financial incentives for businesses that enact non-smoking policies. During the debates over the Washington, DC smoking ban, city council member Carol Schwartz proposed legislation[131] that would have enacted either a substantial tax credit for businesses that chose to ban smoking or a significant additional licensing fee for bars and restaurants that wished to allow smoking. Proponents of such policies claim that they would help to increase the options for customers and employees who prefer a smoke-free bar or restaurant without infringing on the rights of business owners. Opponents of such tax measures counter that only a complete ban can fully protect patrons and employees.

Tradable smoking pollution permits

One solution to the problem of smoking externalities favoured by some economists is a system of tradable smoking pollution permits, similar to other emissions trading (cap-and-trade) pollution permits systems used by the Environmental Protection Agency in recent decades to curb other types of pollution. The proposal has been suggested by Profs. Robert Haveman and John Mullahy of the University of Wisconsin–Madison.[132]

Emissions trading systems are generally favored by economists as a market-based alternative to direct regulation, because they yield a given reduction in pollution at lower cost, and may permit a reduction in administrative costs.

Tradable pollution permits as a market-based alternative to smoking bans can be applied as follows: Lawmakers decide the optimal level of smoking establishments for an area. Permits are then auctioned off or otherwise allocated. Nonsmoking establishments with unused permits can sell them on the open market to smoking establishments. In essence, businesses are required to purchase the property rights over the clean air space of their business before their customers can smoke.


Critics of bans suggest ventilation is a means of reducing the harmful effects of passive smoking. A study conducted by the School of Technology of the University of Glamorgan in Wales, United Kingdom, published in the Building Services Journal stated that ventilation systems can dramatically improve indoor air quality.[133]

A study by Repace titled "Can Displacement Ventilation control SecondHand ETS?". The conclusion is a no, ventilation is no substitute for a smoking ban.[134]

A published 2008 hospitality air quality study conducted by the Hawaii Department of Health found the the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 24 hour permissible exposure limits for respirable suspended particles known as PM-2.5 were only exceeded in bars and restaurants that were totally enclosed and had no ventilation. The study states that PM-2.5 is a "useful marker for the 4000 compounds" in environmental tobacco smoke.[135] In addition these results showed that even the highest concentrations found in unventilated bars which in some cases significantly exceeding the EPA standards of 0.065 milligrams per cubic meter, were no greater than 1/5th of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration permissible standards of five milligrams per cubic meter of air.[136]

The tobacco industry has focused on proposing ventilation as an alternative to smoking bans, though this approach has not been widely adopted in the U.S. due to the cost and complexity of widespread implementation of ventilation devices.[137] The Italian smoking ban permits dedicated smoking rooms with automatic doors and smoke extractors. Nevertheless, few Italian establishments are creating smoking rooms due to the additional cost.[138]


A number of States in the United States have "preemption clauses" within State law which block local communities from passing smoking ban ordinances more strict than the State laws on the books. The rationale is to prevent local communities from passing smoking bans that are viewed as excessive by that State's legislature. Other States have "anti-preemption clauses" that allow local communities to pass smoking ban ordinances that their legislature found unacceptable.[139]

Hardship exemptions

In some communities, establishments were able to prove that they did in fact suffer substantial financial loss as a direct result of a smoking ban and received hardship waivers from the governing entity which passed the ban.[140]

See also


Other substances


  1. ^ "36-601.01 - Smoke-free Arizona act". Arizona Revised Statutes Title 36 - Public Health and Safety. Arizona State Legislature. Retrieved 2009-06-18. 
  2. ^ "Smokefree legislation consultation response, The Institute of Public Health in Ireland". Archived from the original on 2007-10-08. Retrieved 2006-09-05. 
  3. ^ "New health bill will ban smoking in majority of workplaces". Retrieved 2006-09-05.  (UK Health Secretary: The smoking ban "is a huge step forward for public health and will help reduce deaths from cancer, heart disease and other smoking related diseases") See also WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control; First international treaty on public health, adopted by 192 countries and signed by 168. See in particular Article 8 Protection from exposure to tobacco smoke.
  4. ^ Barendregt JJ, Bonneux L, van der Maas PJ (October 1997). "The health care costs of smoking". N Engl J Med 337 (15): 1052–7. doi:10.1056/NEJM199710093371506. PMID 9321534. 
  5. ^ "New health bill will ban smoking in majority of workplaces". 28 October 2005. Retrieved 2006-09-05. 
  6. ^ "WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control". World Health Organization. Retrieved 2009-06-17. 
  7. ^ Boyle P, Autier P, Bartelink H, et al. (July 2003). "European Code Against Cancer and scientific justification: third version (2003)". Ann Oncol 14 (7): 973–1005. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdg305. PMID 12853336. Retrieved 2009-06-18. 
  8. ^ Sasco AJ, Secretan MB, Straif K. (2004). "Tobacco smoking and cancer: a brief review of recent epidemiological evidence". Lung Cancer 45 (Suppl 2): S3–9. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.07.998. PMID 15552776. 
  9. ^ "Disparity in Protecting Food Service Staff from Secondhand Smoke Shows Need for Comprehensive Smoke-Free Policies, Say Groups". Press release. 13 April 2004. 
  10. ^ [1]
  11. ^ "Involuntary smoking". Retrieved 2006-07-15. 
  12. ^ Schick S, Glantz S. (2005). "Philip Morris toxicological experiments with fresh sidestream smoke: more toxic than mainstream smoke". Tob Control. 14 (6): 396–404. doi:10.1136/tc.2005.011288. PMID 16319363. 
  13. ^ Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke: A monograph from the U.S. National Cancer Institute. Retrieved August 6, 2007.
  14. ^ Secondhand Smoke Fact Sheet, from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed August 6, 2007.
  15. ^ Environmental Tobacco Smoke. From the 11th Report on Carcinogens of the National Institutes of Health. Retrieved August 6, 2007.
  16. ^ The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General. Dated June 27, 2006. Retrieved August 6, 2007.
  17. ^ Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking: A monograph of the International Agency for Research on Cancer of the World Health Organization. Retrieved August 6, 2007.
  18. ^ "Indoor Air Quality in Hospitality Venues Before and After Implementation of a Clean Indoor Air Law --- Western New York, 2003". Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 12 November 2004. pp. 1038–1041. 
  19. ^ "Study Finds That New Jersey Bars and Restaurants Have Nine Times More Air Pollution than Those in Smoke-Free New York". 
  20. ^ Nina Athey-Pollard (16 March 2006), "Smoking ban leads to healthier bar staff", Chemical Science (RSC Publishing), 
  21. ^ Ellingsen DG, Fladseth G, Daae HL, et al. (March 2006). "Airborne exposure and biological monitoring of bar and restaurant workers before and after the introduction of a smoking ban". J Environ Monit 8 (3): 362–8. doi:10.1039/b600050a. PMID 16528420. 
  22. ^ Public Health Law Research
  23. ^ Workplace Smoking Bans and Restrictions, Public Health Law Research 2009
  24. ^ Lader, Malcolm Harold; Henningfield, Jack E.; Martin Jarvis (1985). Nicotine, an old-fashioned addiction. London: Burke Publishing. pp. 96–8. ISBN 0-222-01216-1. 
  25. ^ Proctor, RN (Fall 1997). "The Nazi war on tobacco: ideology, evidence, and possible cancer consequences". Bull Hist Med 71 (3): 435–88. doi:10.1353/bhm.1997.0139. PMID 9302840. 
  26. ^ Department of Conservation
  27. ^ Proctor RN (February 2001). "Commentary: Schairer and Schöniger's forgotten tobacco epidemiology and the Nazi quest for racial purity". Int J Epidemiol 30 (1): 31–4. doi:10.1093/ije/30.1.31. PMID 11171846. 
  28. ^ Proctor RN (December 1996). "The anti-tobacco campaign of the Nazis: a little known aspect of public health in Germany, 1933-45". BMJ 313 (7070): 1450–3. PMID 8973234. PMC 2352989. 
  29. ^ Daragan K, Fisher S, Keane D, Lattanzio T, Laufer D, Pontarelli J, Trach B, Walls T (1994-06-30). "Preemption/Accommodation presentation" (PDF). Legacy Tobacco Documents Library. University of California at San Francisco. Retrieved 2006-11-23. 
  30. ^ "Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act - Freedom to Breathe". Minnesota Department of Health. 
  31. ^ Martiga Lohn (13 May 2007). "Minnesota lawmakers approve smoking ban". Associated Press. Boston Globe. 
  32. ^ David E. Garth (29 January 2001). "Letter to Nebraska Senators from San Luis Obispo Chamber of Commerce in favor of Smokefree Legislation". Retrieved 2007-04-07. 
  33. ^ "How many Smokefree Laws?" (PDF). American Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation. 6 October 2006. Retrieved 2006-11-23. 
  34. ^ ITC - Bhutan
  35. ^ [2] from, Asharq Al-Awsat, 21 Sept. 2007
  36. ^ "No smoke signals a boom for pubs, clubs - National -". Retrieved 2007-09-01. 
  37. ^ The Australian
  38. ^ (French)
  39. ^ Germany's Smoking Ban Spreads Through States, Deutsche Welle, 14 January, 2007
  40. ^ "Rural pubs will suffer from smoking ban". 
  41. ^ "Third of pubs 'not ready for ban'". BBC News. 2007-03-02. Retrieved 2010-01-04. 
  42. ^ "ic Wales (". 
  43. ^ ""184 tobacco jobs go at city plant." - BBC News". 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-09-27. 
  44. ^ No smoke makes Rank fire off profit warning 14 October 2007, The Daily Telegraph
  45. ^ CLUBS FACING AXE AS SMOKING BAN BITES 21 October 2007, The Sunday Mirror
  46. ^ Pub beer sales slump to low point 20 November 2007, BBC News
  47. ^ Smoke Ban Fails To Boost Pub Meal Sales 26 November 2007, SKY News
  48. ^ Smoking ban 'costs pub takings' 17 December 2007, BBC News
  49. ^ Sports Cafe shuts doors as ban on smoking partly to blame 15 January 2008, Liverpool Daily Post
  50. ^ Punch first to report smoke damage 17 January 2008, The Guardian
  51. ^ Smoking ban a success say some pubs
  52. ^ "The Health Consequences of Involuntary Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Report of the Surgeon General". Retrieved 2006-06-27. 
  53. ^ "Richard Roesler: Surgeon general: No safe level of secondhand smoke.". Archived from the original on 2006-07-13. Retrieved 2006-06-27. 
  54. ^ Bars and Restaurants Thrive Amid Smoking Ban, Study Says 29 March 2003, The New York Times
  55. ^ Carl Campanile (2006-07-25). "Cig ban no bar burden - biz up despite law". New York Post. Retrieved 2008-04-07. 
  56. ^ "Disparity in Protecting Food Service Staff from Secondhand Smoke Shows Need for Comprehensive Smoke-Free Policies, Say Groups (inactive as of 4/8/08)". 
  57. ^ [3]
  58. ^ [4]
  59. ^ "Michael Pakko, "On the Economic Impact of Smoking Bans", Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Regional Economic Development, Volume 2, no. 2 (2006)" (PDF). Retrieved 2009-06-22. 
  60. ^ Michael Pakko, "The Economic Impact of a Smoking Ban in Columbia, Missouri: A Preliminary Analysis of Sales Tax Data" (Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis: December 11, 2007)
  61. ^ "Michael Pakko, "No Smoking at the Slot Machines: The Effect of a Smoke-Free Law on Delaware Gaming Revenues" (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis: December, 2005)" (PDF). Retrieved 2009-06-22.  See also: Pakko MR (February 2006). "Smoke-free law did affect revenue from gaming in Delaware". Tob Control 15 (1): 68–9; author reply 69. doi:10.1136/tc.2005.012443. PMID 16436409. 
  62. ^ More Smokers Feeling Harassed by Smoking Bans
  63. ^ The Gallup Organization (March 2009). "Survey on Tobacco - Analytical Report". European Commission. Retrieved 2009-05-24. 
  64. ^ Hurriyet, 30 July 2009, also reported by Reuters: "Smoking-ban murder", 31 July 2009,
  65. ^ Bartecchi C, Alsever RN, Nevin-Woods C, et al. (October 2006). "Reduction in the incidence of acute myocardial infarction associated with a citywide smoking ordinance". Circulation 114 (14): 1490–6. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.615245. PMID 17000911. 
  66. ^ Sargent RP, Shepard RM, Glantz SA (April 2004). "Reduced incidence of admissions for myocardial infarction associated with public smoking ban: before and after study". BMJ 328 (7446): 977–80. doi:10.1136/bmj.38055.715683.55. PMID 15066887. Lay summary. 
  67. ^ Kanaka D. Shetty, Thomas DeLeire, Chapin White, Jayanta Bhattacharya. Changes in U.S. Hospitalization and Mortality Rates Following Smoking Bans. National Bureau of Economic Research. 
  68. ^ Menzies D, Nair A, Williamson PA, et al. (October 2006). "Respiratory symptoms, pulmonary function, and markers of inflammation among bar workers before and after a legislative ban on smoking in public places". JAMA 296 (14): 1742–8. doi:10.1001/jama.296.14.1742. PMID 17032987. Retrieved 2010-01-04. Lay summary. 
  69. ^ Ban sees bar staff 'breathe easy'
  70. ^ Barone-Adesi F, Vizzini L, Merletti F, Richiardi L (October 2006). "Short-term effects of Italian smoking regulation on rates of hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction". Eur. Heart J. 27 (20): 2468–72. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl201. PMID 16940340. 
  71. ^ Juster HR, Loomis BR, Hinman TM, et al. (November 2007). "Declines in hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction in New York state after implementation of a comprehensive smoking ban". Am J Public Health 97 (11): 2035–9. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2006.099994. PMID 17901438. 
  72. ^ "Cigarette sales up 5% despite smoking ban". 
  73. ^ "Cigarette sales drop 7% in a month". 
  74. ^ BBC Cigarette sales 'slump after ban' 2 October 2007
  75. ^ John Heironimus (1992-01-21). "Impact of Workplace Restrictions on Consumption and Incidence" (PDF). Retrieved 2006-12-26. 
  76. ^ Washington Post
  77. ^ (sv) SVD: Folkhälsoinstitutet: Snus ger cancer
  78. ^ BBC News A fifth of smokers 'plan to quit' 8 March 2006
  79. ^ Restaurant smoking bans stop teens getting the habit New Scientist Issue 2655, 10 May 2008, page 4
  80. ^ Siegel M, Albers AB, Cheng DM, Hamilton WL, Biener L (May 2008). "Local restaurant smoking regulations and the adolescent smoking initiation process: results of a multilevel contextual analysis among Massachusetts youth". Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 162 (5): 477–83. doi:10.1001/archpedi.162.5.477. PMID 18458195. 
  81. ^ Eriksen M, Chaloupka F (2007). "The economic impact of clean indoor air laws". CA Cancer J Clin 57 (6): 367–78. doi:10.3322/CA.57.6.367. PMID 17989131. 
  82. ^ Scollo M, Lal A, Hyland A, Glantz S (2003). "Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry". Tob Control 12: 13–20. doi:10.1136/tc.12.1.13. PMID 12612356. 
  83. ^ "Economic impacts" Tavern League of Wisconsin(broken link)
  84. ^ "The Economic Impact of the New York State Smoking Ban on New York’s Bars" Tavern League of Wisconsin
  85. ^ "Evans Report Summary (Canada)" Tavern League of Wisconsin (broken link)
  86. ^ Home
  87. ^ John F. Garvey, Paul McElwaine, Thomas S. Monaghan, and Walter T. McNicholas Confessions of an accordion cleaner – a marker of improved air quality since the Irish smoking ban BMJ 24 September 2007
  88. ^ "Hawaii Tourism Slumps on Heels of Smoking Ban". Send2Press Newswire. March 12, 2007.  Tourist office's aloha ashtrays raise a stink, August 28, 2007
  89. ^ Hawaii Tourism Slumps on Heels of Smoking Ban - Travel and Tourism News from Send2Press Newswire Mar 12, 2007
  90. ^ Polito, John R.. "Prison Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Cessation and Nicotine Cessation". Retrieved 2009-05-23. 
  91. ^ Young, Christie Getto (2009-04-20). "100% SMOKEFREE CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES" (PDF). American NonSmokers' Rights Foundation. Retrieved 2009-05-23. 
  92. ^ Zoroya, Gregg (2004-07-21). "Smoking bans spread to prisons". USA TODAY. Retrieved 2009-05-23. 
  93. ^ "HELLING et al. v. McKINNEY". Supreme Court collection. Cornell University Law School. Retrieved 2009-05-23. 
  94. ^ a b Young, Christie Getto. "Prison smoking ban is not cruel and unusual punishment". Tobacco Control Resource Center, Inc., Northeastern University. Retrieved 2009-05-23. 
  95. ^ Agar, John (2009-01-31). "State's prison smoking ban to save health-care costs, end prisoner 'luxury'". Grand Rapids News (The Grand Rapids Press). Retrieved 2009-05-23. 
  96. ^ The Smokers Club, Inc. - Prison Ban Casualty
  97. ^ Prisoner riot reverses smoking ban |
  98. ^ AFP: Dutch cafe owners rally against smoking ban
  99. ^ "Waiting to inhale", The New York Times, January 4, 2004 See also: "Lighting-up time: Big Apple meets Big Smoke," The Times, April 1, 2005. See also "Gangsters will be the real winners in smoking ban," Scottish Daily Record, January 7, 2005. "Smoked out?" The Buffalo News, February 18, 2004."N.Y. restaurants cutting trans fat from menus," The Washington Times, December 6, 2006. "The Guide to the Guides," The Observer (United Kingdom), January 30, 2005. "A year after New York smoking ban, debate still rages over effects," The Philadelphia Inquirer, March 31, 2004. "Late Night Cracks in City's Ban," New York Post, March 4, 2004. "On The Run," The New York Times, June 8, 2003.
  100. ^ "Beware of complacency as 'smoke-easies' appear", The Irish News, June 12, 2007
  101. ^ ""Warning over 'smoke-easy' lock-ins," The Scotsman, August 29, 2006". 
  102. ^ ""'Nazi' claim as Germans rebel over smoking ban," The Observer, January 20, 2008".,,2243763,00.html.  ""German Don Quixotes Tilt against Smoking Ban", Der Spiegel, January 11, 2008".,1518,527908,00.html. 
  103. ^ Eric Petersen, "Three Schaumburg businesses violate new smoking ban," The Arlington Heights Daily Herald, March, 2007 See also: ""Smoking ban holds up, despite opposition", The Telegraph, February 23, 2008". 
  104. ^ ""Stand-off!", The Huddersfield Daily Examiner, January 17, 2008".  "Defiant bar owner finds 'loophole' to flout smoking ban," The Daily Mail, August 3, 2007 ""My local smoke-easy", The New Statesman, February 7, 2008".  ""The Big Smoke-easy," The Publican, February 21, 2008". 
  105. ^ "Everyone Head for the Smoke-Easy", Utah Statesman, December 12, 2006
  106. ^ "Smoke-easies offer cover from puff police; Aficionados just want a place to light up, relax," The Washington Times, November 20, 2003
  107. ^ "". 
  108. ^ "Record compliance with smoking ban - The Irish Times - Mon, Jun 22, 2009". 
  109. ^ "Times Higher Education - Italian smoking ban leads to drop in heart attacks". 
  110. ^ "Scottish Government: Web page currently unavailable.". 
  111. ^ "Smoking ban up in smoke in Kolkata". 
  112. ^ "The Official Website of Joe Jackson". Retrieved 2007-04-12. 
  113. ^ The American Spectator : Smoking Room
  114. ^ Is the smoking ban a good idea? | Society | The Guardian
  115. ^ "Valentin Petkantchin, "Should cigarettes be banned in public places?" (Montreal Economic Institute: April, 2005)" (PDF). Retrieved 2009-06-22. 
  116. ^ Judge Rules Nevada Smoking Ban is Constitutional - Las Vegas Now |
  117. ^ Montana Gaming Group, effect of public smoking ban on Montana businesses | smoking ban in public areas | Helena Montana smoking ban | environmental tobacco smoke | economic da...
  118. ^ Seven businesses sue over smoking ban
  119. ^ Anti-smoking law challenged | The Honolulu Advertiser | Hawaii's Newspaper
  120. ^ Colorado AG Asks State Smoking Ban Lawsuit Be Dismissed [06/23/06-4]
  121. ^ Lawsuit Challenges Louisville's Smoking Ban - Louisville News Story - WLKY Louisville
  122. ^
  123. ^ Health board stands by smoking ban,: Lawsuit alleges group overstepped its authority | Article from Charleston Gazette | HighBeam Research
  124. ^ "Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights – Australia". 
  125. ^ a b "MPs to challenge ministers' veto on total smoking ban".,,1669527,00.html. Retrieved 2006-10-07. 
  126. ^ "Smoking ban in public places also cuts smoking at home". Retrieved 2006-10-07. 
  127. ^ Smiley, Colneth, Jr., "Puffers fuming over planned ban", Boston Herald, Sunday, January 31, 2010
  128. ^ "Drunk driving after the passage of smoking bans in bars". 
  129. ^ e.g. mentioned on p. 167 in [5] Econ Journal Watch, Volume 5, Number 2, pp. 163-168. (retrieved 19 November 2009)
  130. ^ Marlow, Michael L. 2008. Honestly, Who Else Would Fund Such Research? Reflections of a Non-Smoking Scholar. Econ Journal Watch 5(2): 240- 268. [6]
  131. ^ "Press Advisory - Statement of Councilmember Carol Schwartz at the June 14, 2005 Smoke-Free Hearing". 2005-06-14. Retrieved 2008-07-31. 
  132. ^
  133. ^ Building Services Journal No ifs or butts March 2005
  134. ^ "Can Displacement Ventilation Control Secondhand ETS?". 
  135. ^ [7]
  136. ^ TABLE Z-1 Limits for Air Contaminants. - 1910.1000 TABLE Z-1
  137. ^ Drope J, Bialous SA, Glantz SA (2004). "Tobacco industry efforts to present ventilation as an alternative to smoke-free environments in North America". Tobacco control 13 Suppl 1: i41–7. doi:10.1136/tc.2003.004101. PMID 14985616. 
  138. ^ BBC News Italians fume over cigarette curb 10 January 2005
  139. ^ Allegheny County smoking ban put on hold
  140. ^ Hector's wants longer exemption See also: D.C. Grants First Exemption to Smoking Ban [8] The Gazette, Gaithersburg, MD,


External links

Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address