Snowball Earth: Wikis


Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Snowball Earth refers to the hypothesis that the Earth's surface became nearly or entirely frozen over at least once during three periods between 650 and 750 million years ago. The geological community generally accepts this hypothesis because it best explains sedimentary deposits generally regarded as of glacial origin at tropical paleolatitudes and other enigmatic features in the geological record. Opponents to the hypothesis contested the implications of the geological evidence for global glaciation, the geophysical feasibility of an ice- or slush-covered ocean,[1][2] and the difficulty of escaping an all-frozen condition. There are a number of unanswered questions, including whether the Earth was a full snowball or a "slushball" with a thin equatorial band of open (or seasonally open) water.

Snowball Period
(millions of years ago)

A recent estimate of the timing and duration of Proterozoic glacial periods. Note that great uncertainty surrounds the dating of pre-Gaskiers glaciations. The status of the Kaigas is not clear; its dating is very insecure and many workers do not recognise it as a glaciation. From Smith 2009.[3]

The geological time frame under consideration comes immediately before the sudden multiplication of life forms on earth known as the Cambrian explosion and may have triggered multi-cellular life on earth.



Sir Douglas Mawson (1882–1958), an Australian geologist and Antarctic explorer, spent much of his career studying the Neoproterozoic stratigraphy of South Australia where he identified thick and extensive glacial sediments and late in his career speculated on the possibility of global glaciation.[4]

Mawson's ideas of global glaciation, however, were based on the mistaken assumption that the geographic position of Australia, and that of other continents where low-latitude glacial deposits are found, has remained constant through time. With the advancement of the continental drift hypothesis, and eventually plate tectonic theory, came an easier explanation for the glaciogenic sediments—they were deposited at a point in time when the continents were at higher latitudes.

In 1964, the idea of global-scale glaciation reemerged when W. Brian Harland published a paper in which he presented palaeomagnetic data showing that glacial tillites in Svalbard and Greenland were deposited at tropical latitudes.[5] From this palaeomagnetic data, and the sedimentological evidence that the glacial sediments interrupt successions of rocks commonly associated with tropical to temperate latitudes, he argued for an ice age that was so extreme that it resulted in the deposition of marine glacial rocks in the tropics.

In the 1960s, Mikhail Budyko, a Russian climatologist, developed a simple energy-balance climate model to investigate the effect of ice cover on global climate. Using this model, Budyko found that if ice sheets advanced far enough out of the polar regions a feedback ensued where the increased reflectiveness (albedo) of the ice led to further cooling and the formation of more ice until the entire Earth was covered in ice and stabilized in a new ice-covered equilibrium.[6] While Budyko's model showed that this ice-albedo stability could happen, he concluded that it had never happened, because his model offered no way to escape from such a scenario.

The term "Snowball Earth" was coined by Joseph Kirschvink, a professor of geobiology at the California Institute of Technology, in a short paper published in 1992 within a lengthy volume concerning the biology of the Proterozoic eon.[7] The major contributions from this work were: (1) the recognition that the presence of banded iron formations is consistent with such a glacial episode and (2) the introduction of a mechanism with which to escape from an ice-covered Earth—the accumulation of CO2 from volcanic outgassing leading to an ultra-greenhouse effect.

Interest in the Snowball Earth increased dramatically after Paul F. Hoffman, professor of geology at Harvard University, and coauthors applied Kirschvink's ideas to a succession of Neoproterozoic sediments in Namibia, elaborated upon the hypothesis by incorporating such observations as the occurrence of cap carbonates, and published their results in the journal Science in 1998.[8]

Currently, aspects of the hypothesis remain controversial and it is being debated under the auspices of the International Geoscience Programme (IGCP) Project 512: Neoproterozoic Ice Ages.[9]

In March 2010, the journal Science published an article "Calibrating the Cryogenian" which concluded that "Ice was therefore grounded below sea level at very low paleolatitudes, which implies that the Sturtian glaciation was global in extent".[10] A popular account of this conclusion was published in ScienceDaily.[11]


The Snowball Earth hypothesis was originally devised to explain the apparent presence of glaciers at tropical latitudes.[12] Modelling suggested that once glaciers spread to within 30° of the equator, an ice-albedo feedback would result in the ice rapidly advancing to the equator.*[13] Therefore, the presence of glacial deposits seemingly within the tropics appeared to point to global ice cover.

Critical to an assessment of the validity of the theory, therefore, is an understanding of the reliability and significance of the evidence that led to the belief that ice ever reached the tropics. This evidence must prove two things:

  1. that a bed contains sedimentary structures that could only have been created by glacial activity;
  2. that the bed lay within the tropics when it was deposited.

During a period of global glaciation, it must also be demonstrated that

3. glaciers were active at different global locations at the same time, and that no other deposits of the same age are in existence.

This latter point is very difficult to prove. Before the Ediacaran, the biostratigraphic markers usually used to correlate rocks are absent; therefore there is no way to prove that rocks in different places across the globe were deposited at the same time. The best we can do is to estimate the age of the rocks using radiometric methods, which are rarely accurate to better than a million years or so.[14]

The first two points are often the source of contention on a case-to-case basis. Many glacial features can also be created by non-glacial means, and estimating the latitude of landmasses even as little as 200 million years ago can be riddled with difficulties.[15]



One reconstruction of continental locations during Snowball Earth, showing where glacial deposits have been found.[16]

The Snowball Earth hypothesis was first posited in order to explain what were then considered to be glacial deposits near the equator.

Since continents drift with time, ascertaining their position at a given point in history is far from trivial. In addition to considerations of how the continents would have fitted together, the latitude at which a rock was deposited can be constrained by palaeomagnetism.

When sedimentary rocks form, magnetic minerals within them tend to align themselves with the Earth's magnetic field. Through the precise measurement of this palaeomagnetism, it is possible to estimate the latitude (but not the longitude) where the rock matrix was deposited. Paleomagnetic measurements have indicated that some sediments of glacial origin in the Neoproterozoic rock record were deposited within 10 degrees of the equator,[17] although the accuracy of this reconstruction is in question.[14] This palaeomagnetic location of apparently glacial sediments (such as dropstones) has been taken to suggest that glaciers extended to sea-level in the tropical latitudes. It is not clear whether this can be taken to imply a global glaciation, or the existence of localised, possibly land-locked, glacial regimes.[18] Others have even suggested that most data do not constrain any glacial deposits to within 25° of the equator.[19]

Skeptics suggest that the palaeomagnetic data could be corrupted if the Earth's magnetic field was substantially different from today's. Depending on the rate of cooling of the Earth's core, it is possible that during the Proterozoic, its magnetic field did not approximate a dipolar distribution, with a North and South pole roughly aligning with the planet's axis as they do today. Instead, a hotter core may have circulated more vigorously and given rise to 4, 8 or more poles. Paleomagnetic data would then have to be re-interpreted as particles could align pointing to a 'West Pole' rather than the North Pole.

Another weakness of reliance on palaeomagnetic data is the difficulty in determining whether the magnetic signal recorded is original, or whether it has been reset by later activity. For example, a mountain-building orogeny releases hot water as a by-product of metamorphic reactions; this water can circulate to rocks thousands of kilometers away and reset their magnetic signature. This makes the authenticity of rocks older than a few million years difficult to determine without painstaking mineralogical observations.[20]

There is currently only one deposit, the Elatina deposit of Australia, that was indubitably deposited at low latitudes; its depositional date is well constrained, and the signal is demonstrably original.[21]

Low latitude glacial deposits

Diamictite of the Neoproterozoic Pocatello Formation, a 'snowball earth'—type deposit

Sedimentary rocks that are deposited by glaciers have distinctive features that enable their identification. Long before the advent of the Snowball Earth hypothesis many Neoproterozoic sediments had been interpreted as having a glacial origin, including some apparently at tropical latitudes at the time of their deposition. However, it is worth remembering that many sedimentary features traditionally associated with glaciers can also be formed by other means.[22] Thus the glacial origin of many of the key occurrences for Snowball Earth has been contested.[14] As of 2007, there is only one "very reliable" – still challenged[14] – datum point identifying tropical tillites,[17] which makes statements of equatorial ice cover somewhat presumptuous. Evidence of possible glacial origin of sediment includes:

  • Dropstones (stones dropped into marine sediments), which can be deposited by glaciers or other phenomena.[23]
  • Varves (annual sediment layers in periglacial lakes), which can form at higher temperatures.[24]
  • Glacial striations (formed by embedded rocks scraped against bedrock): similar striations are from time to time formed by mudflows or tectonic movements.[25]
  • Diamictites (poorly sorted conglomerates). Originally described as glacial till, most were in fact formed by debris flows.[14]

Open-water deposits

It appears that some deposits formed during the Snowball period could only have been formed in the presence of an active hydrological cycle. Bands of glacial deposits up to hundreds of meters thick, separated by small (meters) bands of non-glacial sediments, demonstrate that glaciers were melting and re-forming repeatedly; solid oceans would not permit this scale of deposition.[26] It is considered possible that ice streams such as seen in Antarctica today could be responsible for these sequences. Further, sedimentary features that could only form in open water, for example wave-formed ripples, far-traveled ice-rafted debris and indicators of photosynthetic activity, can be found throughout sediments dating from the 'Snowball Earth' periods. While these may represent 'oases' of meltwater on a completely frozen Earth,[27] computer modelling suggests that large areas of the ocean must have remained ice free arguing that a "hard" snowball is not plausible in terms of energy balance and general circulation models.[28]

Carbon isotope ratios

There are two stable isotopes of carbon in sea water: carbon-12 (12C) and the rare carbon-13 (13C), which makes up about 1.109 percent of all carbon isotopes.

Biochemical processes, of which photosynthesis is one, tend to preferentially incorporate the lighter 12C isotope. Thus ocean-dwelling photosynthesizers, both protists and algae, tend to be very slightly depleted in 13C, relative to the abundance found in the primary volcanic sources of the Earth's carbon. Therefore, an ocean with photosynthetic life will have a higher 12C/13C ratio within organic remains, and a lower ratio in corresponding ocean water. The organic component of the lithified sediments will forever remain very slightly, but measurably, depleted in 13C.

During the proposed episode of Snowball Earth, there are rapid and extreme negative excursions in the ratio of 13C to 12C.[29] This is consistent with a deep freeze that killed off most or nearly all photosynthetic life – although other mechanisms, such as clathrate release, can also cause such perturbations. Close analysis of the timing of 13C 'spikes' in deposits across the globe allows the recognition of four, possibly five, glacial events in the late Neoproterozoic.[30] However, the stratigraphic record of Oman presents a large negative carbon isotope excursion (within the Shuram[31] Formation) away from any glacial evidence[32] strongly questioning systematic association of negative isotopic excursion and glacial events[33].

Banded iron formations

2.1 billion year old rock with black-band ironstone

Banded iron formations (BIF) are sedimentary rocks of layered iron oxide and iron-poor chert. In the presence of oxygen, iron naturally rusts and becomes insoluble in water. The banded iron formations are commonly very old and their deposition is often related to the oxidation of the Earth's atmosphere during the Paleoproterozoic era, when dissolved iron in the ocean came in contact with photosynthetically-produced oxygen and precipitated out as iron oxide.

The bands were produced at the tipping point between an anoxic and an oxygenated ocean. Since today's atmosphere is oxygen rich (nearly 21 percent by volume) and in contact with the oceans, it is not possible to accumulate enough iron oxide to deposit a banded formation. The only extensive iron formations that were deposited after the Paleoproterozoic (after 1.8 billion years ago) are associated with Cryogenian glacial deposits.

For such iron-rich rocks to be deposited there would have to be anoxia in the ocean, so that much dissolved iron (as ferrous oxide) could accumulate before it met an oxidant that would precipitate it as ferric oxide. For the ocean to become anoxic it must have limited gas exchange with the oxygenated atmosphere. Proponents of the hypothesis argue that the reappearance of BIF in the sedimentary record is a result of limited oxygen levels in an ocean sealed by sea ice,[7] while opponents suggest that the rarity of the BIF deposits may indicate that they formed in inland seas.

Being isolated from the oceans, such lakes may have been stagnant and anoxic at depth, much like today's Black Sea; a sufficient input of iron could provide the necessary conditions for BIF formation.[14] A further difficulty in suggesting that BIFs marked the end of the glaciation is that they are found interbedded with glacial sediments.[18] BIFs are also strikingly absent during the Marinoan glaciation.[citation needed]

Cap carbonate rocks

Volcanoes may have had a role in replenishing CO2, possibly ending the global ice age that was the Snowball Earth during the Cryogenian Period.

Around the top of Neoproterozoic glacial deposits there is commonly a sharp transition into a chemically precipitated sedimentary limestone or dolostone metres to tens of metres thick.[34] These cap carbonates sometimes occur in sedimentary successions that have no other carbonate rocks, suggesting that their deposition is result of a profound aberration in ocean chemistry.[35]

These cap carbonates have unusual chemical composition, as well as strange sedimentary structures that are often interpreted as large ripples.[36] The formation of such sedimentary rocks could be caused by a large influx of positively-charged ions, as would be produced by rapid weathering during the extreme greenhouse following a Snowball Earth event. The δ13C isotopic signature of the cap carbonates is near -5‰, consistent with the value of the mantle — such a low value is usually/could be taken to signify an absence of life, since photosynthesis usually acts to raise the value; alternatively the release of methane deposits could have lowered it from a higher value, and counterbalance the effects of photosynthesis.

The precise mechanism involved in the formation of cap carbonates is not clear, but the most cited explanation suggests that at the melting of a Snowball Earth, water would dissolve the abundant CO2 from the atmosphere to form carbonic acid, which would fall as acid rain. This would weather exposed silicate and carbonate rock (including readily-attacked glacial debris), releasing large amounts of calcium, which when washed into the ocean would form distinctively textured layers of carbonate sedimentary rock. Such an abiotic "cap carbonate" sediment can be found on top of the glacial till that gave rise to the Snowball Earth hypothesis.

However, there are some problems with the designation of a glacial origin to cap carbonates. Firstly, the high carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere would cause the oceans to become acidic, and dissolve any carbonates contained within — starkly at odds with the deposition of cap carbonates. Further, the thickness of some cap carbonates is far above what could reasonably be produced in the relatively quick deglaciations. The cause is further weakened by the lack of cap carbonates above many sequences of clear glacial origin at a similar time and the occurrence of similar carbonates within the sequences of proposed glacial origin.[14] An alternative mechanism, which may have produced the Doushantuo cap carbonate at least, is the rapid, widespread release of methane. This accounts for incredibly low — as low as 48‰ — δ13C values — as well as unusual sedimentary features which appear to have been formed by the flow of gas through the sediments.[37]

Changing acidity

Isotopes of the element boron suggest that the pH of the oceans dropped dramatically before and after the Marinoan glaciation.[38] This may indicate a build up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, some of which would dissolve into the oceans to form carbonic acid. Although the boron variations may be evidence of extreme climate change, they need not imply a global glaciation.

Space dust

The Earth's surface is very depleted in the element iridium, which primarily resides in the Earth's core. The only significant source of the element at the surface is cosmic particles that reach Earth. During a Snowball Earth, iridium would accumulate on the ice sheets, and when the ice melted the resulting layer of sediment would be rich in iridium. An iridium anomaly has been discovered at the base of the cap carbonate formations, and has been used to suggest that the glacial episode lasted for at least 3 million years,[39] but this does not necessarily imply a global extent to the glaciation; indeed a similar anomaly could be explained by the impact of a large extra-planetary object, such as a meteor.[40]

Cyclic climate fluctuations

Using the ratio of mobile cations to those that remain in soils during chemical weathering (the chemical index of alteration), it has been shown that chemical weathering varied in a cyclic fashion within a glacial succession, increasing during interglacial periods and decreasing during cold and arid glacial periods.[41] This pattern, if a true reflection of events, suggests that the "snowball Earths" bore a stronger resemblance to Pleistocene ice age cycles than to a completely frozen Earth.

What's more, glacial sediments of the Portaskaig formation in Scotland clearly show interbedded cycles of glacial and shallow marine sediments.[42] The significance of these deposits is highly reliant upon their dating. Glacial sediments are difficult to date, and the closest dated bed to the Portaskaig group is 8 km stratigraphically above the beds of interest. Its dating to 600Ma means the beds can be tentatively correlated to the Sturtian glaciation, but they may represent the advance or retreat of a Snowball Earth.

^ Further modelling shows that ice can in fact get as close as 25° or closer to the equator without initiating total glaciation.[20]


One computer simulation of conditions during the Snowball Earth period.[16]

The initiation of a Snowball Earth event would involve some initial cooling mechanism, which would result in an increase in the Earth's coverage of snow and ice. The increase in Earth's coverage of snow and ice would increase the Earth's albedo, which would result in positive feedback for cooling. If enough snow and ice accumulates, runaway cooling would result. This positive feedback is facilitated by an equatorial continental distribution, which would allow ice to accumulate in the regions closer to the equator, where solar radiation is most direct.

The eruption of a super volcano could act as a trigger. A reduction in the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases such as methane and/or carbon dioxide could also act as a trigger.

Alternatively, changes in solar energy output or perturbations of the Earth's orbit could also act as a trigger. Regardless of the trigger, initial cooling results in an increase in the area of the Earth's surface covered by snow and ice, and the additional snow and ice reflects more solar energy back to space, further cooling the Earth and further increasing the area of the Earth's surface covered by snow and ice. This positive feedback loop could eventually produce a frozen equator as cold as modern-day Antarctica.

Global warming associated with large accumulations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere over millions of years, emitted primarily by volcanic activity, is the proposed trigger for melting a Snowball Earth. Due to positive feedback for melting, the eventual melting of the snow and ice covering most of the Earth's surface would require as few as 1,000 years.

Modeling disputes

While the presence of glaciers is not disputed, the idea that the entire planet was covered in ice is more contentious, leading some scientists to posit a "slushball Earth", in which a band of ice-free, or ice-thin, waters remains around the equator, allowing for a continued hydrologic cycle.

This theory appeals to scientists who observe certain features of the sedimentary record that can only be formed under open water, or rapidly moving ice (which would require somewhere ice-free to move to). Recent research observed geochemical cyclicity in clastic rocks, showing that the "Snowball" periods were punctuated by warm spells, similar to ice age cycles in recent Earth history. Attempts to construct computer models of a Snowball Earth have also struggled to accommodate global ice cover without fundamental changes in the laws and constants which govern the planet.

A less extreme snowball earth hypothesis involves continually evolving continental configurations and changes in ocean circulation.[43] Synthesised evidence has produced models indicating a “slushball Earth”,[44] where the stratigraphic record does not permit postulating complete global glaciations.[43] Kirschivink's original hypothesis[7] had recognised that warm tropical puddles would be expected to exist in a snowball earth.

The snowball Earth hypothesis does not explain the alteration of glacial and interglacial events, nor the oscillation of glacial sheet margins[45]; hence the slushball Earth model appears to be a better fit than the snowball Earth model.

Initiating "Snowball Earth"

A tropical distribution of the continents is, perhaps counter-intuitively, necessary to allow the initiation of a Snowball Earth.[46] Firstly, tropical continents are more reflective than open ocean, and so absorb less of the sun's heat: most absorption of solar energy on Earth today occurs in tropical oceans.[47]

Further, tropical continents are subject to more rainfall, which leads to increased river discharge — and erosion. When exposed to air, silicate rocks undergo weathering reactions which remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. These reactions proceed in the general form: Rock-forming mineral + CO2 + H2O → cations + bicarbonate + SiO2. An example of such a reaction is the weathering of wollastonite:

CaSiO3 + 2CO2 + H2O → Ca2+ + SiO2 + 2HCO3-

The released calcium cations react with the dissolved bicarbonate in the ocean to form calcium carbonate as a chemically precipitated sedimentary rock. This transfers carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, from the air into the geosphere, and, in steady-state on geologic time scales, offsets the carbon dioxide emitted from volcanoes into the atmosphere.

A paucity of suitable sediments for analysis makes precise continental distribution during the Neoproterozoic difficult to establish.[48] Some reconstructions point towards polar continents — which have been a feature of all other major glaciations, providing a point upon which ice can nucleate. Changes in ocean circulation patterns may then have provided the trigger of snowball Earth.[49]

Additional factors that may have contributed to the onset of the Neoproterozoic Snowball include the introduction of atmospheric free oxygen, which may have reached sufficient quantities to react with methane in the atmosphere, oxidizing it to carbon dioxide, a much weaker greenhouse gas,[50] and a younger — thus fainter — sun, which would have emitted 6 percent less radiation in the Neoproterozoic.[14]

Normally, as the Earth gets colder due to natural climatic fluctuations and changes in incoming solar radiation, the cooling slows these weathering reactions. As a result, less carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere and the Earth warms as this greenhouse gas accumulates — this 'negative feedback' process limits the magnitude of cooling. During the Cryogenian period, however, the Earth's continents were all at tropical latitudes, which made this moderating process less effective, as high weathering rates continued on land even as the Earth cooled. This let ice advance beyond the polar regions. Once ice advanced to within 30° of the equator,[51] a positive feedback could ensue such that the increased reflectiveness (albedo) of the ice led to further cooling and the formation of more ice, until the whole Earth is ice covered.

Polar continents, due to low rates of evaporation, are too dry to allow substantial carbon deposition — restricting the amount of atmospheric carbon dioxide that can be removed from the carbon cycle. A gradual rise of the proportion of the isotope carbon-13 relative to carbon-12 in sediments pre-dating "global" glaciation indicates that CO2 draw-down before snowball Earths was a slow and continuous process.[52]

The start of Snowball Earths are always marked by a sharp downturn in the δ13C value of sediments,[53] a hallmark that may be attributed to a crash in biological productivity as a result of the cold temperatures and ice-covered oceans.

During the frozen period

Global ice sheets may have delayed or prevented the establishment of multicellular life.[citation needed]

Global temperature fell so low that the equator was as cold as modern-day Antarctica.[54] This low temperature was maintained by the reflective ice, its high albedo resulting in most incoming solar energy being reflected into space. A lack of heat-retaining clouds, caused by water vapor freezing out of the atmosphere, amplified this effect

Breaking out of global glaciation

The carbon dioxide levels necessary to unfreeze the Earth have been estimated as being 350 times what they are today, about 13% of the atmosphere.[55] Since the Earth was almost completely covered with ice, carbon dioxide could not be withdrawn from the atmosphere by release of alkaline metal ions weathering out of siliceous rocks. Over 4 to 30 million years, enough CO2 and methane, mainly emitted by volcanoes, would accumulate to finally cause enough greenhouse effect to make surface ice melt in the tropics until a band of permanently ice-free land and water developed;[56] this would be darker than the ice, and thus absorb more energy from the sun — initiating a "positive feedback."

On the continents, the melting of glaciers would release massive amounts of glacial deposit, which would erode and weather. The resulting sediments supplied to the ocean would be high in nutrients such as phosphorus, which combined with the abundance of CO2 would trigger a cyanobacteria population explosion, which would cause a relatively rapid reoxygenation of the atmosphere, which may have contributed to the rise of the Ediacaran biota and the subsequent Cambrian explosion — a higher oxygen concentration allowing large multicellular lifeforms to develop. This positive feedback loop would melt the ice in geological short order, perhaps less than 1,000 years; replenishment of atmospheric oxygen and depletion of the CO2 levels would take further millennia.

Destabilization of substantial deposits of methane hydrates locked up in low-latitude permafrost may also have acted as a trigger and/or strong positive feedback for deglaciation and warming.[57]

It is possible that carbon dioxide levels fell enough for Earth to freeze again; this cycle may have repeated until the continents had drifted to more polar latitudes.[58]

Scientific dispute

The leading[citation needed] argument against the hypothesis is evidence of fluctuation in ice cover and melting during "Snowball Earth" deposits. Evidence for such melting comes from evidence of glacial dropstones,[26] geochemical evidence of climate cyclicity,[41] and interbedded glacial and shallow marine sediments.[42] A longer record from Oman, constrained to 13°N, covers the period from 712 to 545 million years ago — a time span containing the Sturtian and Marinoan glaciations — and shows both glacial and ice-free deposition.[59]

There have been difficulties in recreating a snowball Earth with global climate models. Simple GCMs with mixed-layer oceans can be made to freeze to the equator; a more sophisticated model with a full dynamic ocean (though only a primitive sea ice model) failed to form sea ice to the equator.[60] In addition, the levels of CO2 necessary to melt a global ice cover have been calculated to be 130,000 ppm,[55] which is considered by some to be unreasonably large.

Strontium isotopic data have been found to be at odds with proposed snowball Earth models of silicate weathering shutdown during glaciation and rapid rates immediately post-glaciation. Therefore, methane release from permafrost during marine transgression was proposed to be the source of the large measured carbon excursion in the time immediately after glaciation.[61]

"Zipper rift" hypothesis

Some scholars suggest that the Neoproterozoic Snowball Earth was in fact no different from any other glaciation in Earth's history, and that efforts to find a single cause are likely to end in failure.[14] The "Zipper rift" hypothesis proposes two pulses of continental "unzipping" — first, the breakup of the supercontinent Rodinia, forming the proto-Pacific ocean; then the splitting of the continent Baltica from Laurentia, forming the proto-Atlantic — coincided with the glaciated periods. The associated tectonic uplift would form high plateaus, just as the East African rift is responsible for high topography; this high ground could then host glaciers.

Banded iron formations have been taken as unavoidable evidence for global ice cover, since they require dissolved iron ions and anoxic waters to form; however, the limited extent of the Neoproterozoic banded iron deposits means that they may not have formed in frozen oceans, but instead in inland seas. Such seas can experience a wide range of chemistries; high rates of evaporation could concentrate iron ions, and a periodic lack of circulation could allow anoxic bottom water to form.

Continental rifting, with associated subsidence, tends to produce such landlocked water bodies. This rifting, and associated subsidence, would produce the space for the fast deposition of sediments, negating the need for an immense and rapid melting to raise the global sea levels.

High-obliquity hypothesis

A competing theory to explain the presence of ice on the equatorial continents was that the Earth's axial tilt was quite high, in the vicinity of 60°, which would place the Earth's land in high "latitudes", although supporting evidence is scarce.[62] A less extreme possibility would be that it was merely the Earth's magnetic pole that wandered to this inclination, as the magnetic readings which suggested ice-filled continents depends on the magnetic and rotational poles being relatively similar. In either of these two situations, the freeze would be limited to relatively small areas, as is the case today; severe changes to the Earth's climate are not necessary.

Inertial interchange true polar wander

The evidence for low latitude glacial deposits during the supposed Snowball Earth episodes has been reinterpreted via the concept of inertial interchange true polar wander (IITPW).[63][64] This theory, created to explain palaeomagnetic data, suggests that the continents drifted far faster during the late Neoproterozoic, allowing glacial deposits to form at the poles before continents returned to the equator, when palaeomagnetic beds were laid down. While the physics behind the proposition is sound, the removal of one flawed data point from the original study rendered the application of the concept in these circumstances unwarranted.[65]

Several alternative explanations for the evidence have been proposed.

Survival of life through frozen periods

A black smoker, a type of hydrothermal vent

A tremendous glaciation would curtail plant life on Earth, thus letting the atmospheric oxygen be drastically depleted and perhaps even disappear, and thus allow non-oxidized iron-rich rocks to form.

Detractors argue that this kind of glaciation would have made life extinct entirely. However, microfossils such as stromatolites and oncolites prove that in shallow marine environments at least life did not suffer any perturbation. Instead life developed a trophic complexity and survived the cold period unscathed.[66] Proponents counter that it may have been possible for life to survive in these ways:

  • Reservoirs of anaerobic and low-oxygen life powered by chemicals in deep oceanic hydrothermal vents surviving in Earth's deep oceans and crust; but photosynthesis would not have been possible there.
  • As eggs and dormant cells and spores deep-frozen into ice right through the most severe phases of the frozen period.
  • Under the ice layer, in chemolithotrophic (mineral-metabolizing) ecosystems theoretically resembling those in existence in modern glacier beds, high-alpine and Arctic talus permafrost, and basal glacial ice. This is especially plausible in areas of volcanism or geothermal activity.[67]
  • In deep ocean regions far from the supercontinent Rodinia or its remnants as it broke apart and drifted on the tectonic plates, which may have allowed for some small regions of open water preserving small quantities of life with access to light and CO2 for photosynthesizers (not multicellular plants, which did not yet exist) to generate traces of oxygen that were enough to sustain some oxygen-dependent organisms. This would happen even if the sea froze over completely if small parts of the ice were thin enough to admit light.
  • In nunatak areas in the tropics, where daytime tropical sun or volcanic heat heated bare rock sheltered from cold wind and made small temporary melt pools, which would freeze over at sunset.
  • In pockets of liquid water within and under the ice caps, similar to Lake Vostok in Antarctica. In theory, this system may resemble microbial communities living in the perennially frozen lakes of the Antarctic dry valleys. Photosynthesis can occur under ice up to 100 m thick, and at the temperatures predicted by models equatorial sublimation would prevent equatorial ice thickness from exceeding 10 m.[68]
  • In small oases of liquid water, as would be found near geothermal hotspots resembling Iceland today.[69]

However, organisms and ecosystems, as far as it can be determined by the fossil record, do not appear to have undergone the significant change that would be expected by a mass extinction. With the advent of more precise dating, a phytoplankton extinction event which had been associated with Snowball Earth was shown to precede glaciations by 16 million years.[70] Even if life were to cling on in all the ecological refuges listed above, a whole-Earth glaciation would result in a biota with a noticeably different diversity and composition. This change in diversity and composition has not yet been observed[71]– in fact, the organisms which should be most susceptible to climatic variation emerge unscathed from the Snowball Earth.[40]


A Snowball Earth has profound implications in the history of life on Earth. While many refugia have been postulated, global ice cover would certainly have ravaged ecosystems dependent on sunlight. Geochemical evidence from rocks associated with low-latitude glacial deposits have been interpreted to show a crash in oceanic life during the glacials.

The melting of the ice may have presented many new opportunities for diversification, and may indeed have driven the rapid evolution which took place at the end of the Cryogenian period.

Effect on early evolution

Dickinsonia costata, an Ediacaran organism of unknown affinity, with a quilted appearance.

The Neoproterozoic was a time of remarkable diversification of multicellular organisms, including animals. Organism size and complexity increased considerably after the end of the Snowball glaciations. This development of multicellular organisms may have been the result of increased evolutionary pressures resulting from multiple icehouse-hothouse cycles; in this sense, Snowball Earth episodes may have "pumped" evolution. Alternatively, fluctuating nutrient levels and rising oxygen may have played a part. Interestingly, another major glacial episode may have ended just a few million years before the Cambrian explosion.

Mechanistically, the impact of snowball Earth (in particular the later glaciations) on complex life is likely to have occurred through the process of kin selection. Organ-scale differentiation, in particular the terminal (irreversible) differentiation present in animals, requires the individual cell (and the genes contained within it) to "sacrifice" their ability to reproduce, so that the colony is not disrupted. From the short-term perspective of the gene, more offspring will be gained (in the short term) by causing the cell in which it is contained to ignore any signals received from the colony, and to reproduce at the maximum rate, regardless of the implications for the wider group. Today, this incentive explains the formation of tumours in animals and plants.

Such costly, "altruistic" differentiation can be adaptive (maximise the number of surviving offspring) to individual genes if the consequence of altruism (terminal cellular differentiation) benefits other copies of such genes. (Note that "altruism" refers only to the reproductive cost of the trait, and implies no sentience or foresight). Because relatives share genes, genes causing altruism (such as organ scale differentiation) can spread if it occurs between relatives, see kin selection.

It has been argued[72] that because snowball Earth would undoubtedly have decimated the population size of any given species, the extremely small populations that resulted would all have been descended from a small number of individuals (see founder effect), and consequently the average relatedness between any two individuals (in this case individual cells) would have been exceptionally high as a result of glaciations. Altruism is known to increase from rarity when relatedness (R) exceeds the ratio of the cost (C) to the altruist (in this case, the cell giving up its own reproduction by differentiating), to the benefit (B) to the recipient of altruism (the germ line of the colony, that reproduces as a result of the differentiation), i.e. R > C/B (see Hamilton's rule). The evolutionary pressure of the high relatedness caused by the glaciations may have been sufficient to overcome the reproductive cost of forming a complex animal, for the first time in Earth's history.

Occurrence and timing of Snowball Earths


There are three or four significant ice ages during the late Neoproterozoic. Of these, the Marinoan was the most significant, and the Sturtian glaciations were also truly widespread.[73] Even the leading Snowball proponent Hoffman agrees that the ~million year long Gaskiers glaciation did not lead to global glaciation,[46] although it was probably as intense as the late Ordovician glaciation. The status of the Kaigas "glaciation" or "cooling event" is currently unclear; some workers do not recognise it as a glacial, others suspect that it may reflect poorly dated strata of Sturtian association, and others believe it may indeed be a third ice age.[74] It was certainly less significant than the Sturtian or Marinoan glaciations, and probably not global in extent. Emerging evidence suggests that the Earth underwent a number of glaciations during the Neoproterozoic, which would stand strongly at odds with the Snowball hypothesis.[75]


The Snowball Earth hypothesis has been invoked to explain glacial deposits in the Huronian supergroup of Canada though the palaeomagnetic evidence that suggests ice sheets at low latitudes is contested.[76][77] The glacial sediments of the Makganyene formation of South Africa are slightly younger than the Huronian glacial deposits (~2.25 billion years old) and were deposited at tropical latitudes.[78] It has been proposed that rise of free oxygen that occurred during this part of the Paleoproterozoic removed methane in the atmosphere through oxidation. As the Sun was notably weaker at the time, the Earth's climate may have relied on methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, to maintain surface temperatures above freezing.

In the absence of this methane greenhouse, temperatures plunged and a snowball event could have occurred.[77]

Karoo Ice Age

Before the theory of continental drift, glacial deposits in Carboniferous strata in tropical continents areas such as India and South America led to speculation that the Karoo Ice Age glaciation reached into the tropics. However, a continental reconstruction shows that ice was in fact constrained to the polar parts of the supercontinent Gondwana.

Current field work


Stephen Warren, a professor from the University of Washington in Seattle, will lead a small team of U.S. researchers to Antarctica for the 2009-10 and 2010-11 summer field seasons to add more data in support of the Snowball Earth hypothesis. A project funded by the National Science Foundation, the project will study different ice types found in Antarctica that may have existed during the previous Snowball Earth events, specifically to learn more about their albedo, or reflectivity, information important in understanding the processes involved in the exteme glaciation. The team will spend time on the sea ice in McMurdo Sound and in Garwood Valley in the McMurdo Dry Valleys the first season. The second season will be spent in the Transantarctic Mountains.[79]

See also


  1. ^ Kirschvink, J.L. (1992). "Late Proterozoic low-latitude global glaciation: The snowball Earth". in Schopf, JW, and Klein, C. (PDF). The Proterozoic Biosphere: A Multidisciplinary Study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 51–2. 
  2. ^ Allen, Philip A.; Etienne, James L. (2008). "Sedimentary challenge to Snowball Earth". Nature Geoscience 1: 817. doi:10.1038/ngeo355. 
  3. ^ Smith, A.G., Neoproterozoic timescales and stratigraphy, Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2009; v. 326; p. 27-54; DOI: 10.1144/SP326.2
  4. ^ A. R. Alderman; C. E. Tilley (1960). "Douglas Mawson, 1882-1958". Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Societyl 5: 119–127. doi:10.1098/rsbm.1960.0011. 
  5. ^ W. B. Harland (1964). "Critical evidence for a great infra-Cambrian glaciation". International Journal of Earth Sciences 54 (1): 45–61. 
  6. ^ M.I. Budyko (1969). "Effect of solar radiation variation on climate of Earth". Tellus 21 (5): 611–1969. 
  7. ^ a b c Kirschvink, Joseph (1992). "Late Proterozoic low-latitude global glaciation: the Snowball Earth". in J. W. Schopf; C. Klein. The Proterozoic Biosphere: A Multidisciplinary Study. Cambridge University Press. 
  8. ^ Hoffman, P. F.; Kaufman, A. J.; Halverson, G. P.; Schrag, D. P. (1998). "A Neoproterozoic Snowball Earth". Science 281 (5381): 1342–1346. doi:10.1126/science.281.5381.1342.  edit
  9. ^ Detailed information on International Geoscience Programme (IGCP) Project 512: Neoproterozoic Ice Ages can be found at
  10. ^ Calibrating the Cryogenian, Abstract only: "Ice ... implies that the Sturtian glaciation was global in extent". 5th March 2010.
  11. ^ Snowball Earth: New Evidence Hints at Global Glaciation 716.5 Million Years Ago Geologists have found evidence that sea ice extended to the equator 716.5 million years ago. 5th March 2010.
  12. ^ Harland, W.B. (1964). "Critical evidence for a great infra-Cambrian glaciation" (PDF). International Journal of Earth Sciences 54 (1): 45–61. Retrieved 2008-03-11. 
  13. ^ Budyko, M.I. (1969). "The effect of solar radiation variations on the climate of the earth.". Tellus 21: 611–9. 
  14. ^ a b c d e f g h i Eyles, N.; Januszczak, N. (2004). "’Zipper-rift’: A tectonic model for Neoproterozoic glaciations during the breakup of Rodinia after 750 Ma" (PDF). Earth-Science Reviews 65 (1-2): 1–73. doi:10.1016/S0012-8252(03)00080-1. Retrieved 2007-05-04. 
  15. ^ Briden, J.C.; Smith, A.G.; Sallomy, J.T. (1971). "The geomagnetic field in Permo-Triassic time". Geophys. JR astr. Soc. 23: 101–117. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.1971.tb01805.x (inactive 2008-06-25). 
  16. ^ a b Reprinted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature 405:425-429, copyright 2000. See Hyde et al (2000).
  17. ^ a b D.A.D. Evans (2000). "Stratigraphic, geochronological, and palaeomagnetic constraints upon the Neoproterozoic climatic paradox". American Journal of Science 300 (5): 347–433. doi:10.2475/ajs.300.5.347. 
  18. ^ a b Young, G.M. (1995-02-01). "Are Neoproterozoic glacial deposits preserved on the margins of Laurentia related to the fragmentation of two supercontinents?". Geology 23 (2): 153–6. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<0153:ANGDPO>2.3.CO;2. Retrieved 2007-04-27. 
  19. ^ Meert, J.G.; Van Der Voo, R. (1994). "The Neoproterozoic (1000-540 Ma) glacial intervals: No more snowball earth?". Earth and Planetary Science Letters 123 (1-3): 1–13. doi:10.1016/0012-821X(94)90253-4. 
  20. ^ a b Meert, J.G.; Van Der Voo, R.; Payne, T.W. (1994). "Paleomagnetism of the Catoctin volcanic province: A new Vendian-Cambrian apparent polar wander path for North America". Journal of Geophysical Research 99 (B3): 4625–41. doi:10.1029/93JB01723. Retrieved 2008-03-11. 
  21. ^ Sohl, L.E.; Christie-blick, N.; Kent, D.V. (1999). "Paleomagnetic polarity reversals in Marinoan (ca. 600 Ma) glacial deposits of Australia; implications for the duration of low-latitude glaciation in Neoproterozoic time". Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 111 (8): 1120–39. doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1999)111<1120:PPRIMC>2.3.CO;2. Retrieved 2008-03-11. 
  22. ^ Arnaud, E.; Eyles, C.H. (2002). "Glacial influence on Neoproterozoic sedimentation: the Smalfjord Formation, northern Norway". Sedimentology 49 (4): 765–88. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3091.2002.00466.x. Retrieved 2007-05-05. 
  23. ^ Donovan, SK; Pickerill, RK (2007-04-27). "Dropstones: their origin and significance: a comment" (PDF). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 131 (1): 175–8. doi:10.1016/S0031-0182(96)00150-2. Retrieved 2007-04-27. 
  24. ^ Thunell, R.C.; Tappa, E., Anderson, D.M. (1995-12-01). "Sediment fluxes and varve formation in Santa Barbara Basin, offshore California". Geology 23 (12): 1083–6. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<1083:SFAVFI>2.3.CO;2. Retrieved 2007-04-27. 
  25. ^ Jensen, PA; Wulff-pedersen, E. (1996-03-01). "Glacial or non-glacial origin for the Bigganjargga tillite, Finnmark, Northern Norway". Geological Magazine 133 (2): 137–45. doi:10.1017/S0016756800008657. Retrieved 2007-04-27. 
  26. ^ a b Condon, D.J.; Prave, A.R., Benn, D.I. (2002-01-01). "Neoproterozoic glacial-rainout intervals: Observations and implications". Geology 30 (1): 35–38. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0443:APCCAI>2.0.CO;2 (inactive 2008-06-25). Retrieved 2007-05-04. 
  27. ^ Halverson, G.P.; Maloof, A.C., Hoffman, P.F. (2004). "The Marinoan glaciation (Neoproterozoic) in northeast Svalbard". Basin Research 16 (3): 297–324. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2117.2004.00234.x. Retrieved 2007-05-05. 
  28. ^ Peltier, W.R. (2004). "Climate dynamics in deep time: modeling the “snowball bifurcation” and assessing the plausibility of its occurrence". in Jenkins, G.S., McMenamin, M.A.S., McKey, C.P., & Sohl, L. (. The Extreme Proterozoic: Geology, Geochemistry, and Climate. American Geophysical union. pp. 107–124. 
  29. ^ D.H. Rothman; J.M. Hayes; R.E. Summons (2003). "Dynamics of the Neoproterozoic carbon cycle". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (14): 124–9. doi:10.1073/pnas.0832439100. PMID 12824461. 
  30. ^ Kaufman, Alan J.; Knoll, Andrew H., Narbonne, Guy M. (1997-06-24). "Isotopes, ice ages, and terminal Proterozoic earth history". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94 (13): 6600. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.13.6600. PMID 11038552. PMC 21204. Retrieved 2007-05-06. 
  31. ^ Le Guerroué, E., Allen, P.A., Cozzi, A. (2006). "Chemostratigraphic and sedimentological framework of the largest negative carbon isotopic excursion in Earth history: The Neoproterozoic Shuram Formation (Nafun Group, Oman).". Precambrian Research 146 (1-2): 68–92. doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2006.01.007. (inactive 2010-01-06). 
  32. ^ Le Guerroué, E.; Allen, P.A., Cozzi, A., Etienne, J.L. and Fanning, C.M. (2006). "50 Myr recovery from the largest negative δ13C excursion in the Ediacaran ocean.". Terra Nova 18 (2): 147–153. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.2006.00674.x. 
  33. ^ Le Guerroué, E.; Allen, P.A., Cozzi, A. (2006). "Parasequence development in the Ediacaran Shuram Formation (Nafun Group, Oman): primary origin stratigraphic test of negative carbon isotopic ratios". Basin Research 18: 205–20. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2117.2006.00292.x. 
  34. ^ M.J. Kennedy (1996). "Stratigraphy, sedimentology, and isotopic geochemistry of Australian Neoproterozoic postglacial camp dolostones: deglaciation, d13C excursions and carbonate precipitation". Journal of Sedimentary Research 66 (6): 1050–64. 
  35. ^ Spencer, A.M. (1971). "Late Pre-Cambrian glaciation in Scotland". Mem. Geol. Soc. Lond. 6. 
  36. ^ P. F. Hoffman; D. P. Schrag (2002). "The snowball Earth hypothesis: testing the limits of global change" (PDF 1.3 Mb). Terra Nova 14: 129–55. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3121.2002.00408.x. 
  37. ^ Wang, Jiasheng; Jiang, Ganqing; Xiao, Shuhai; Li, Qing; Wei, Qing (2008). "Carbon isotope evidence for widespread methane seeps in the ca. 635 Ma Doushantuo cap carbonate in south China" (PDF). Geology 36: 347. doi:10.1130/G24513A.1. 
  38. ^ δ11B, in Kasemann, S.A.; Hawkesworth, C.J., Prave, A.R., Fallick, A.E., Pearson, P.N. (2005). "Boron and calcium isotope composition in Neoproterozoic carbonate rocks from Namibia: evidence for extreme environmental change". Earth and Planetary Science Letters 231 (1-2): 73–86. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2004.12.006. Retrieved 2007-05-04. 
  39. ^ Bodiselitsch, Bernd.; Koeberl, C., Master, S., Reimold, W.U. (2005-04-08). "Estimating Duration and Intensity of Neoproterozoic Snowball Glaciations from Ir Anomalies". Science 308 (5719): 239. doi:10.1126/science.1104657. PMID 15821088. Retrieved 2007-05-04. 
  40. ^ a b Grey, K.; Walter, M.R.; Calver, C.R. (2003-05-01). "Neoproterozoic biotic diversification: Snowball Earth or aftermath of the Acraman impact?". Geology 31 (5): 459–62. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031 (inactive 2008-06-25). Retrieved 2007-05-29. 
  41. ^ a b R. Rieu; P.A. Allen; M. Plotze; T. Pettke (2007). "Climatic cycles during a Neoproterozoic "snowball" glacial epoch" (PDF). Geology 35 (4): 299–302. doi:10.1130/G23400A.1. 
  42. ^ a b Young, G.M. (1999). "Some aspects of the geochemistry, provenance and palaeoclimatology of the Torridonian of NW Scotland". Journal of the Geological Society 156 (6): 1097–1111. doi:10.1144/gsjgs.156.6.1097. 
  43. ^ a b Harland, W. B. (2007). "Origin and assessment of snowball Earth hypotheses". Geology Magazine 144 (4): 633–42. doi:10.1017/S0016756807003391. 
  44. ^ Fairchild, I. J.; Kennedy, M. J. (2007). "Neoproterozoic glaciations in the Earth System". Journal of the Geological Society 164: 895–921. doi:10.1144/0016-76492006-191. 
  45. ^ Chumakov, N. M. (2008). "A problem of Total Glaciations on the Earth in the Late Precambrian". Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation 16 (2): 107–119. doi:10.1134/S0869593808020019. 
  46. ^ a b Hoffman, P.F. (2005). "On Cryogenian (Neoproterozoic) ice-sheet dynamics and the limitations of the glacial sedimentary record". South African Journal of Geology 108: 557–77. doi:10.2113/108.4.557. 
  47. ^ Jacobsen, S.B. (2001). "Earth science. Gas hydrates and deglaciations." (PDF). Nature 412 (6848): 691–3. doi:10.1038/35089168. PMID 11507621. Retrieved 2007-05-21. 
  48. ^ Meert, J.G.; Torsvik, T.H. (2004). "Paleomagnetic Constraints on Neoproterozoic ‘Snowball Earth’Continental Reconstructions" (PDF). GS Jenkins, MAS McMenamin, CP McKey, CP and L. Sohl (Editors), the Extreme Proterozoic: Geology, Geochemistry, and Climate. American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph 146: 5–11. Retrieved 2007-05-06. 
  49. ^ Smith, A.G.; Pickering, K.T. (2003). "Oceanic gateways as a critical factor to initiate icehouse Earth". Journal of the Geological Society 160 (3): 337–40. doi:10.1144/0016-764902-115. Retrieved 2007-04-26. 
  50. ^ Kerr, R.A. (1999). "Early life thrived despite earthly travails.". Science 284 (5423): 2111–3. doi:10.1126/science.284.5423.2111. PMID 10409069. 
  51. ^ Kirschvink, J.L. (2002). "When All of the Oceans Were Frozen" (PDF). Recherche 355: 26–30. Retrieved 2008-01-17. 
  52. ^ Schrag, D.P.; Berner, R.A., Hoffman, P.F., Halverson, G.P. (2002). "On the initiation of a snowball Earth". Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst 3 (10.1029): 1036. doi:10.1029/2001GC000219. Retrieved 2007-02-28. 
  53. ^ Hoffman, P.F.; Kaufman, A.J., Halverson, G.P., Schrag, D.P. (1998-08-28). "A Neoproterozoic Snowball Earth". Science 281 (5381): 1342. doi:10.1126/science.281.5381.1342. PMID 9721097. Retrieved 2007-05-04.  Full online article (pdf 260 Kb)
  54. ^ Hyde, W.T.; Crowley, T.J., Baum, S.K., Peltier, W.R. (2000). "Neoproterozoic 'snowball Earth' simulations with a coupled climate/ice-sheet model" (PDF). Nature 405 (6785): 425–9. doi:10.1038/35013005. PMID 10839531. Retrieved 2007-05-05. 
  55. ^ a b Crowley, T.J.; Hyde, W.T., Peltier, W.R. (2001). "CO 2 levels required for deglaciation of a ‘near-snowball’Earth". Geophys. Res. Lett 28: 283–6. doi:10.1029/2000GL011836. 
  56. ^ Pierrehumbert, R.T. (2004). "High levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide necessary for the termination of global glaciation". Nature 429 (6992): 646–9. doi:10.1038/nature02640. PMID 15190348. Retrieved 2007-05-29. 
  57. ^ Kennedy, Martin; David Mrofka and Chris von der Borch (2008). "Snowball Earth termination by destabilization of equatorial permafrost methane clathrate" (PDF). Nature 453 (29 May): 642–5. doi:10.1038/nature06961. 
  58. ^ Hoffman, P.F. (1999). "The break-up of Rodinia, birth of Gondwana, true polar wander and the snowball Earth". Journal of African Earth Sciences 28 (1): 17–33. doi:10.1016/S0899-5362(99)00018-4. Retrieved 2007-04-29. 
  59. ^ Kilner, B.; Niocaill, C.M.; Brasier, M. (2005). "Low-latitude glaciation in the Neoproterozoic of Oman". Geology 33 (5): 413–6. doi:10.1130/G21227.1. 
  60. ^ Poulsen, C.J.; Pierrehumbert, R.T.; Jacob, R.L. (2001). "Impact of ocean dynamics on the simulation of the Neoproterozoic``snowball Earth". Geophysical Research Letters 28 (8): 1575–8. doi:10.1029/2000GL012058. 
  61. ^ Kennedy, M.J.; Christie-blick, N.; Sohl, L.E. (2001). "Are Proterozoic cap carbonates and isotopic excursions a record of gas hydrate destabilization following Earth's coldest intervals?" (PDF). Geology 29 (5): 443–6. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0443:APCCAI>2.0.CO;2. 
  62. ^ " The Day The Earth Fell Over". 
  63. ^ Kirschvink, J.L.; Ripperdan, R.L., Evans, D.A. (1997-07-25). "Evidence for a Large-Scale Reorganization of Early Cambrian Continental Masses by Inertial Interchange True Polar Wander". Science 277 (5325): 541. doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.541. Retrieved 2007-05-05. 
  64. ^ Meert, J.G. (1999). "A palaeomagnetic analysis of Cambrian true polar wander" (PDF). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett 168: 131–144. doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(99)00042-4. Retrieved 2007-05-06. 
  65. ^ Torsvik, T.H. (1998-01-02). "Polar Wander and the Cambrian". Science 279 (5347): 9. doi:10.1126/science.279.5347.9a. Retrieved 2007-05-05. 
  66. ^ Corsetti, F.A.; Awramik, S.M.; Pierce, D. (2003-04-15). "A complex microbiota from snowball Earth times: Microfossils from the Neoproterozoic Kingston Peak Formation, Death Valley, USA". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 (8): 4399–4404. doi:10.1073/pnas.0730560100. PMID 12682298. PMC 153566. Retrieved 2007-06-28. 
  67. ^ Vincent, W.F. (2000). "Life on Snowball Earth". Science 287 (5462): 2421. doi:10.1126/science.287.5462.2421b. PMID 10766616. Retrieved 2007-05-05. 
  68. ^ McKay, C.P. (2000). "Thickness of tropical ice and photosynthesis on a snowball Earth.". Geophys Res Lett 27 (14): 2153–6. doi:10.1029/2000GL008525. PMID 11543492. 
  69. ^ Hoffman, P.F.; Schrag, D.P. (2000). "Snowball Earth". Scientific American 282 (1): 68–75. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0100-68. 
  70. ^ Corsetti, F. A. (2009). "Palaeontology: Extinction before the snowball". Nature Geoscience 2: 386. doi:10.1038/ngeo533.  edit
  71. ^ Corsetti, F.A.; Olcott, A.N.; Bakermans, C. (2006). "The biotic response to Neoproterozoic Snowball Earth". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 232 (232): 114–130. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.10.030. 
  72. ^
  73. ^ Stern, R.J.; Avigad, D.; Miller, N.R.; Beyth, M. (2006). "Geological Society of Africa Presidential Review: Evidence for the Snowball Earth Hypothesis in the Arabian-Nubian Shield and the East African Orogen" ( – Scholar search). Journal of African Earth Sciences 44: 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2005.10.003. Retrieved 2008-03-11. 
  74. ^ Smith, A.G. (in press (2008)). "Neoproterozoic time scales and stratigraphy". Geol. Soc. (Special publication). 
  75. ^ Allen, Philip A.; Etienne, James L. (2008). "Sedimentary challenge to Snowball Earth". Nature Geoscience 1: 817. doi:10.1038/ngeo355. 
  76. ^ Williams G.E.; Schmidt P.W. (1997). "Paleomagnetism of the Paleoproterozoic Gowganda and Lorrain formations, Ontario: low palaeolatitude for Huronian glaciation" (PDF). EPSL 153 (3): 157–169. doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00181-7. 
  77. ^ a b Robert E. Kopp, Joseph L. Kirschvink, Isaac A. Hilburn, and Cody Z. Nash (2005). "The Paleoproterozoic snowball Earth: A climate disaster triggered by the evolution of". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102 (32): 11131–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.0504878102. PMID 16061801. PMC 1183582. 
  78. ^ Evans, D. A., Beukes, N. J. & Kirschvink, J. L. (1997) Nature 386, 262–266.
  79. ^ "The Antarctic Sun: Snowball Earth, June 19, 2009". The Antarctic Sun. 

Further reading

  • Allen, Philip A.; Etienne, James L. (2008). "Sedimentary challenge to Snowball Earth". Nature Geoscience 1: 817. doi:10.1038/ngeo355. 
  • Etienne, J.L., Allen, P.A., Rieu, R. and Le Guerroué, E. (2007). "Neoproterozoic glaciated basins: A critical review of the Snowball Earth hypothesis by comparison with Phanerozoic glaciations". In: Glacial Sedimentary Processes and Products. Edited by: Michael Hambrey, Poul Christoffersen,Neil Glasser and Bryn Hubbard. IAS Special Publication. v. 39 (Malden, MA: IAS/Blackwell Pub.) 39: 343–399. ISBN 978-1-4051-8300-0. 
  • Gabrielle Walker (2003). Snowball Earth. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 0-7475-6433-7. 
  • Micheels, A., Montenari, M. (2008). "A snowball Earth versus a slushball Earth: Results from Neoproterozoic climate modeling sensitivity experiments". Geosphere 4 (2): 401–10. doi:10.1130/GES00098.1.  (Geol. Soc. America).
  • Roberts, J.D. (1971). "Late Precambrian glaciation: an anti-greenhouse effect?". Nature 234: 216–7. doi:10.1038/234216a0. 
  • Roberts, J.D. (1976). "Late Precambrian dolomites, Vendian glaciation, and the synchroneity of Vendian glaciation". J. Geology 84: 47–63. doi:10.1086/628173. 
  • Sankaran, A.V. (2003). "Neoproterozoic "snowball earth" and the "cap" carbonate controversy" (PDF). Current Science 84 (7): 871. Retrieved 2007-05-06. 
  • Torsvik, T.H., Rehnström, E.F. (2001). "Cambrian palaeomagnetic data from Baltica: Implications for true polar wander and Cambrian palaeogeography". J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 158: 321–9. 

External links

Simple English

Snowball Earth or Icehouse Earth refers to times when the Earth's surface was nearly or entirely frozen. The occurrence of Snowball (or Slushball) Earths is still controversial, but it is now probable that extensive glaciation occurred in periods of the Proterozoic. What is still debatable is how extensive those glaciations were. Proponents claim the theory explains sedimentary deposits of glacial origin at tropical latitudes and other enigmatic features of the geological record. Opponents do not draw the same inferences from the geological evidence, and doubt the geophysical feasibility of an ice or slush-covered ocean.[1]

= Neoproterozoic

= There were three or four significant ice ages during the late Neoproterozoic. Of these, the Marinoan was the most significant, and the Sturtian glaciations were also truly widespread. These were both in the Cryogenian period, before the Ediacaran.[2] Even the leading Snowball proponent Hoffman agrees that the million year long Gaskiers glaciation did not lead to global glaciation,[3] although it was probably as intense as the late Ordovician glaciation. The status of the Kaigas glaciation or "cooling event" is unclear. Some do not recognise it as glacial, and others believe it may indeed be a third ice age. It was certainly less significant than the Sturtian or Marinoan glaciations, and probably not global in extent. Evidence does suggest that the Earth underwent a number of glaciations during the Neoproterozoic.[4]


The Snowball Earth hypothesis has been invoked to explain glacial deposits in the Huronian supergroup of Canada. The palaeomagnetic evidence, which suggests ice sheets at low latitudes, is contested.[5][6] The glacial sediments of the Makganyene formation of South Africa are slightly younger than the Huronian glacial deposits (~2.25 billion years old) and were deposited at tropical latitudes.[7] Perhaps the rise of free oxygen that occurred during this part of the Paleoproterozoic removed methane in the atmosphere through oxidation. As the Sun was notably weaker at the time, the Earth's climate may have relied on methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, to maintain surface temperatures above freezing. In the absence of this methane greenhouse, temperatures plunged and a snowball event could have occurred.[6]


  1. Harland, W.B. (2007). [Expression error: Unexpected < operator "Origin and assessment of snowball Earth hypotheses"]. Geology Magazine 144 (4): 633–642. 
  2. Stern R.J.; Avigad D. Miller N.R. Beyth, M. (2006). [Expression error: Unexpected < operator "Geological Society of Africa Presidential Review: Evidence for the Snowball Earth hypothesis in the Arabian-Nubian shield and the East African orogen"]. Journal of African Earth Sciences 44: 1–20. 
  3. Hoffman P.F. (2005). [Expression error: Unexpected < operator "On Cryogenian (Neoproterozoic) ice-sheet dynamics and the limitations of the glacial sedimentary record"]. South African Journal of Geology 108: 557–577. doi:10.2113/108.4.557. 
  4. Allen, Philip A. (2008). [Expression error: Unexpected < operator "Sedimentary challenge to Snowball Earth"]. Nature Geoscience 1: 817. doi:10.1038/ngeo355. 
  5. Williams G.E. & Schmidt P.W. (1997). "Paleomagnetism of the Paleoproterozoic Gowganda and Lorrain formations, Ontario: low palaeolatitude for Huronian glaciation" (PDF). EPSL 153 (3): 157–169. doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00181-7. 
  6. 6.0 6.1 Robert E. Kopp, Joseph L. Kirschvink, Isaac A. Hilburn, and Cody Z. Nash (2005). "The Paleoproterozoic snowball Earth: A climate disaster triggered by the evolution of". PNAS 102 (32): 11131–11136. doi:10.1073/pnas.0504878102. PMID 16061801. 
  7. Evans D.A. Beukes N.J. & Kirschvink J.L. 1997. Nature 386, 262–266.


Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address