The Full Wiki

Splatter film: Wikis

  
  

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Encyclopedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For the film in production called Splatter, see Splatter (film).
Poster art for Blood Feast (1963)

A splatter film or gore film is a sub-genre of horror film that deliberately focuses on graphic portrayals of gore and graphic violence. These films, through the use of special effects and excessive blood and guts, tend to display an overt interest in the vulnerability of the human body and the theatricality of its mutilation. Due to their willingness to portray images society might consider shocking, splatter films share some ideological grounds with the transgressive art movement. The term "splatter cinema" was coined by George A. Romero to describe his film Dawn of the Dead, though Dawn of the Dead is generally considered by critics to have higher aspirations, such as social commentary, than to be simply exploitative for its own sake.[1]

The combination of graphic violence and sexually suggestive imagery in some films has been labeled "torture porn" or "gorno" (a portmanteau of "gore" and "porno").[2] By contrast, in films such as Braindead, the gore is sometimes so excessive that it becomes a comedic device.

Contents

Characteristics

Splatter films, according to film critic Michael Arnzen, "self-consciously revel in the special effects of gore as an artform."[3] Where typical horror films deal with fear of the unknown, the supernatural, the dark, and so on, the impetus for fear in a splatter film comes from physical destruction of the body. There is also an emphasis on visuals, style and technique, including hyperactive camerawork. Where most horror films have a tendency to re-establish the social and moral order with good triumphing over evil, splatter films thrive on a lack of plot and order. Arnzen argues that "the spectacle of violence replaces any pretentions to narrative structure, because gore is the only part of the film that is reliably consistent."[3] These films also feature fragmented narratives and direction, including "manic montages full of subject camera movement...cross-cuttings from hunted to hunter, and ominous juxtapositions and contrasts."[3] As a result, not only are the characters fragmented, so is the audience.

Prehistory of splatter

The splatter film has its aesthetic roots in French Grand Guignol theatre, which endeavored to stage realistic scenes of blood and carnage for its patrons. In 1908, Grand Guignol made its first appearance in England, although the gore was downplayed in favor of a more Gothic tone, owing to the greater censorship of the arts in Britain.[1]

The first appearance of gore—the realistic mutilation of the human body—in cinema can be traced back to D. W. Griffith's Intolerance (1916), which features numerous Guignol-esque touches, including two onscreen decapitations, and a scene in which a spear is slowly driven through a soldier's naked abdomen as blood wells from the wound. Several of Griffith's subsequent films, and those of his contemporary Cecil B. DeMille, featured similarly realistic carnage.

In the early 1920s, a number of high-profile scandals, including the Fatty Arbuckle scandal, rocked Hollywood, leading to calls for reform of the "indecency" being "promoted" by motion pictures. These resulted in the Production Code, which set standards for behavior depicted in Hollywood films and effectively censored gore out of mainstream cinema for almost fifty years.

The modern era

In the late 1950s and early 1960s, the public was reintroduced to splatter themes and motifs by groundbreaking films such as Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho (1960) and the output of Hammer Film Productions (an artistic outgrowth of the English Grand Guignol style) such as The Curse of Frankenstein (1957) and The Horror of Dracula (1958). Perhaps the most explicitly violent film of this era was Nobuo Nakagawa's Jigoku (1960), which included numerous scenes of flaying and dismemberment in its depiction of the Buddhist underworld. Other noticeable and influential films from the period includes the French Eyes Without a Face (1959) and the Italian Black Sunday (1960)".

Splatter came into its own as a distinct genre of cinema in the early 1960s with the films of Herschell Gordon Lewis in the United States. Lewis had been producing low-budget nudie films for several years but the market for such fare was losing ground to Hollywood, which was beginning to show more and more nudity in its films. Eager to maintain a profitable niche, Lewis turned to the one thing mainstream cinema still shied away from: scenes of visceral, explicit gore. In 1963, he directed Blood Feast, widely considered the first splatter film.[4] In the 15 years following its release, Blood Feast took in an estimated $7 million. It was made for an estimated $24,500.[5] The film has since become a cult favorite and was followed by the exploitation-style film, Blood Feast 2: All U Can Eat (2002). Lewis' next film, Two Thousand Maniacs! (1964), was remade as 2001 Maniacs in 2005 (with a follow up 2001 Maniacs: Beverly Hellbillys in 2008). Both updated versions stuck true to their predecessors in terms of theme and content.[citation needed]

As influential and profitable as it was, for many years Blood Feast remained little seen outside drive-in theaters in the Southern United States. Graphically violent imagery was starting to experience some mainstream acceptance in films such as Bonnie and Clyde (1967), The Wild Bunch (1969), and Soldier Blue (1970), but largely remained taboo in Hollywood.

The first splatter film to truly popularize the genre was George A. Romero's Night of the Living Dead (1968), the director's attempt to replicate the atmosphere and gore of EC's horror comics on film. Initially derided by the American press as "appalling," it quickly became a national sensation, playing not just in drive-ins but at midnight showings in indoor theaters across the country. Foreign critics were more kind to the film; venerable British film magazine Sight & Sound put it on its list of "Ten Best Films of 1968."[1]

Its sequel, Dawn of the Dead, became one of the most successful splatter films, both critically and commercially.[6] It was released in United States theaters unrated rather than with the X-rating it would have received for its explicit carnage. Critic Roger Ebert called it "one of the best horror films ever made."[7] Romero's film was also important in that it upped the ante in terms of technique, special effects and the quality of writing, characterization, and so on.[8]

The 1980s saw the rise of the MPAA ratings board which curtailed the violence in many splatter films. Roger Ebert in America and Member of Parliament Graham Bright in the U.K. led the charge to censor splatter films on home video with the film critic going after I Spit On Your Grave while the politician sponsored the Video Recordings Act which is a system of censorship and certification for home video.[8] This resulted in the outright banning of many splatter films in the U.K.

Some splatter directors have gone on to produce blockbusters. Sam Raimi, now known for directing the Spider-Man film series, became famous from creating The Evil Dead (1981), which he followed up with the sequels Evil Dead II (1987) and Army of Darkness (1992).[9] Peter Jackson, who is now best known for The Lord of the Rings trilogy, started off his career in New Zealand by directing splatter movies like Bad Taste (1987) and Braindead (1992). These films featured so much gore that it became a comedic device. These comedic gore films have been dubbed "splatstick", defined as physical comedy that involves evisceration.[1] Another example of this sub-genre was Re-Animator (1985), adapted by Stuart Gordon from a story by H.P. Lovecraft.

The Blair Witch Project' is similar to the 1980 film Cannibal Holocaust.[10] The story in Cannibal Holocaust is told through footage from a group of people making a documentary about a portion of the Amazon which is said to be populated by cannibals. This "mockumentary" format was later used in Blair Witch.

"Torture porn"

Bijou Phillips tortured in Eli Roth's 2007 film Hostel: Part II.

In the 2000s, there has been a resurgence of films influenced by the splatter genre that depict nudity, torture, mutilation and sadism, sometimes labeled "torture porn" by critics and detractors.[11] The Eli Roth film, Hostel (2005), was the first to be called "torture porn" by critic David Edelstein in January 2006, but the classification has since been applied to Saw (2004) and its sequels (though its creators disagree with the classification),[12] The Devil's Rejects (2005), Wolf Creek (2005), and the earlier films Baise-moi (2000) and Ichi the Killer (2001).[11][13][14] Edelstein also included Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ (2004) in the genre, due to its explicit scenes.[11] A difference between this group of films and earlier splatter films is that they are often mainstream Hollywood films that receive a wide release and have comparatively high production values.[13]

The "torture porn" sub-genre has proven to be very profitable: Saw, made for $1.2 million, grossed over $100 million worldwide, while Hostel, which cost less than $5 million to produce, grossed over $80 million.[15] Lionsgate, the studio behind the films, made considerable gains in its stock price from the box office showing.[16] The financial success led the way for the release of similar films: Turistas in 2006, Hostel: Part II, Borderland, and Captivity, starring Elisha Cuthbert and Pruitt Taylor Vince, in 2007.[15][17] The double feature Grindhouse (2007), produced and directed by Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez, has also been considered part of the trend,[14] as has the Lindsay Lohan thriller I Know Who Killed Me (2007).[18]

Some films in the genre received criticism. Billboards and posters used in the marketing of Hostel: Part II[19] and Captivity drew criticism for their graphic imagery, causing them to be taken down in many locations.[20] Director Eli Roth claimed that the use of the term "torture porn" by critics, "genuinely says more about the critic's limited understanding of what horror movies can do than about the film itself",[21] and that "they're out of touch."[22] Horror author Stephen King defended Hostel: Part II and "torture porn" stating, "sure it makes you uncomfortable, but good art should make you uncomfortable."[23] Influential director George A. Romero stated, "I don’t get the torture porn films", "they're lacking metaphor."[24]

In 2008, other entries into the sub-genre included: Untraceable, starring Diane Lane and Billy Burke,[25] the British WΔZ, starring Stellan Skarsgård and Selma Blair [26], its US counterpart, Scar starring Angela Bettis and Ben Cotton [27] the French Martyrs, directed by Pascal Laugier,[28] and the Australian film Dying Breed.[29] The Poughkeepsie Tapes (2009) and remakes of The Last House on the Left (1972) and I Spit On Your Grave (1978) are set to continue the trend.[15][17][30] Rapper Eminem explored the genre in his 2009 music video for the single "3 a.m.".[31] Danish filmmaker Lars von Trier’s Antichrist, starring Willem Dafoe and Charlotte Gainsbourg, was labeled "torture porn" by critics when it premiered at the 2009 Cannes Film Festival due to scenes of extreme violence, graphic sex, and genital self-mutilation.[32] The Collector, a film directed by Marcus Dunstan and co-written with Patrick Melton (both writers from the Saw series), was released in July 2009.[33]

Into 2009, the box office draw of "torture porn" films have mostly been replaced in the U.S. by the profitable trend of remaking or rebooting earlier horror films such as The Amityville Horror (2005), The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning (2006), Halloween (2007), My Bloody Valentine 3D (2009), and Friday the 13th.[34] An exception is the Saw series, which has become the most profitable horror film franchise of all-time.[35]

Splatter and other genres

Scene from Shogun Assassin (1980)

The term “splatter film” is often confused with “slasher film”. While there is often overlap, many slasher movies, like Halloween (1978), are not considered splatter films because they do not have enough on-screen gore. Other films, like Maniac (1980), The Prowler (1981), The Burning Moon (1992) and Haute Tension (2003) can fall into both subgenres.

Scenes of splatter also appear in other genres. Some examples are El Topo (1970), a western, and Kill Bill (2003), a revenge-thriller, The Final Destination (2009), a new supernatural thriller in 3D. Many chambara films, a subgenre of samurai movies, contain elements of splatter, where excessive amounts of blood spray from injuries. Examples include Lady Snowblood (1973) and the films of the Lone Wolf and Cub series (1972-74).

The group of transgressive French films known as New French Extremity include such films as Haute Tension, À l'intérieur, and Martyrs.[36]

References

  1. ^ a b c d McCarty, John. (1984). Splatter Movies: Breaking the Last Taboo of the Screen. St. Martin's Press. New York, NY.
  2. ^ Boucher, Geoff (June 3, 2007). "A queasy-does-it guy". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved on June 11, 2007.
  3. ^ a b c Arnzen, Michael A. (1994). "Who's Laughing Now?...The Postmodern Splatter Film". Journal of Popular Film and Television.
  4. ^ Bankard, Bob. "Making 'Blood Feast'". Philly Burbs.
  5. ^ Briggs, Joe Bob (June 28, 2003). Profoundly Disturbing: Shocking Movies That Changed History. Universe Publishing
  6. ^ IMDb: Business Data for Dawn of the Dead (1978)
  7. ^ Ebert, Roger. (1979). "Review of Dawn of the Dead". The Chicago Sun Times.
  8. ^ a b Newman, Kim. (1990). Nightmare Movies. Bloomsbury Publishing. London.
  9. ^ Bankard, Bob. "'Listen Mister...' A Sam Raimi Guide". Philly Burbs.
  10. ^ Deodato, Ruggero. Interview with Sage Stallone; Bob Murawski. "Cult-Con 2000", Cannibal Holocaust DVD Commentary., Tarrytown, New York. 2000-11-12
  11. ^ a b c Edelstein, David (February 6, 2006). "Now Playing at Your Local Multiplex: Torture Porn". New York Magazine. Retrieved on June 11, 2007.
  12. ^ Warner, Kara. "Saw IV Press Conference". UGO.com.
  13. ^ a b Skenazy, Lenore (May 28, 2007). "It's Torture! It's Porn! What's Not to Like? Plenty, Actually". Advertising Age.
  14. ^ a b May 3, 2007. "Is there a link between 'torture porn' and real sexual violence?". The Guardian. Retrieved on June 11, 2007.
  15. ^ a b c Murray, Steve (June 7, 2007). "'Horror porn' a bloody success". Associated Press. Retrieved on June 11, 2007.
  16. ^ La Monica, Paul R. (June 8, 2007). "'Torture porn' helps Lionsgate roar". Retrieved on June 14, 2007.
  17. ^ a b Kinsella, Warren (June 7, 2007). "Torture porn's dark waters". National Post. Retrieved on June 11, 2007.
  18. ^ Moore, Roger (July 28, 2007). "Review: 'I Know Who Killed Me' doesn't save Lohan". The Dallas Morning News. Retrieved on February 15, 2008.
  19. ^ The Problem with Torture Porn
  20. ^ May 1, 2007. "For your entertainment". The Guardian. Retrieved on June 11, 2007.
  21. ^ June 3, 2007. "Capone and Eli Roth discuss horror movies, gore, Stephen King, the phrase "Torture Porn" and much more!!!". Ain't It Cool News. Retrieved on June 11, 2007.
  22. ^ Horowitz, Josh (March 28, 2007) "'Hostel' Helmer Eli Roth Says Horror Should Have No Limits: 'It's All Fake'". MTV. Retrieved on June 11, 2007.
  23. ^ Olsen, Marc. "Stephen King on the artistic merits of torture porn". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved on July 14, 2007.
  24. ^ Onstad ,Katrina (February 10, 2008). "Horror Auteur Is Unfinished With the Undead". The New York Times. Retrieved on February 15, 2008.
  25. ^ Corliss, Richard (January 25, 2008). "Hiding from Untraceable". Time. Retrieved on February 15, 2008.
  26. ^ Evans, Mark (August 30, 2008). "Crime W Delta Z / The Killing Gene". Evening Herald. Retrieved on September 12, 2008.
  27. ^ "[1]" Retrieved on November 22
  28. ^ Pasche, Alexandre (30 August, 2008). "Martyrs : quelles limites pour le torture porn à la française ?". Rue 89. Retrieved on September 12, 2008.
  29. ^ Simon, Alissa (April 28, 2008). "Dying Breed". Variety. Retrieved on June 8, 2009.
  30. ^ Ogden, Brianne (February 18, 2008). "Torture porn says something about society". The Roanoke Times. Retrieved on February 18, 2008.
  31. ^ Graham, Mark (April 30, 2009). "Eminem Resurrects Torture Porn for ‘3 A.M.’ Video". New York Magazine. Retrieved on June 4, 2009.
  32. ^ Singh, Anita (May 18 , 2009). "Cannes Film Festival 2009 : Lars Von Trier's 'torture porn' film Antichrist shocks". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved on June 4, 2009.
  33. ^ Ordoña, Michael (August 1, 2009). "The Collector". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved on August 1, 2009.
  34. ^ Bowles, Scott (February 13, 2009), "Classic horror films come back to life, profitably". USA Today. Retrieved on June 4, 2009.
  35. ^ Lariam Peter (October 24, 2008) "'Saw' May Become Best Horror Franchise Ever". New York Post. Retrieved on June 4, 2009.
  36. ^ Quandt, James, "Flesh & Blood: Sex and violence in recent French cinema", ArtForum, February 2004 [2] Access date: July 10, 2008.

External links








Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message