Supreme Court of Canada: Wikis

  
  
  

Note: Many of our articles have direct quotes from sources you can cite, within the Wikipedia article! This article doesn't yet, but we're working on it! See more info or our list of citable articles.

Encyclopedia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Supreme Court of Canada
CourtSeal-400.jpg
Logo of the Supreme Court
Established April 1875
Jurisdiction Canada
Location Ottawa
Composition method Judicial appointments in Canada
Authorized by Constitution Act, 1867
Number of positions 9
Website www.scc-csc.gc.ca
Chief Justice of Canada
Currently Beverley McLachlin
Since January 2000
Canada

This article is part of the series:
Politics and government of
Canada


Red bar plain.png

Red bar plain.png

Other countries · Atlas
Politics portal

The Supreme Court of Canada (French: Cour suprême du Canada) is the highest court of Canada and is the final court of appeal in the Canadian justice system.[1] The court grants permission to between 40 and 75 litigants each year to appeal decisions rendered by provincial, territorial and federal appellate courts, and its decisions are stare decisis, binding upon all lower courts of Canada. The Supreme Court of Canada is composed of nine judges: eight Puisne Justices and the Chief Justice of Canada.[2]

Contents

History

The creation of the Court was provided for by the British North America Act, 1867, renamed in 1982 the Constitution Act, 1867. The first bills for the creation of federal supreme court, introduced in the Parliament of Canada in 1869 and in 1870, were withdrawn. It was not until 8 April 1875, that a bill was finally passed providing for the creation of a Supreme Court of Canada.

Old Courthouse building

Prior to 1949, however, the Supreme Court did not constitute the court of last resort; litigants could appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London. As well, some cases could bypass the Court and go directly to the Judicial Committee from the provincial courts of appeal. The Supreme Court's influence was thus rather modest. Attitudes among many English Canadians changed when the Privy Council made various unpopular decisions in the 1930s, striking down several overreaching federal legislative initiatives.[citation needed] These decisions were rooted in the Judicial Committee's perception that the division of powers provided for strong provincial powers. Many Canadian nationalists took the opposite view, and as a consequence, public pressure forced the federal government to push for complete judicial independence from the United Kingdom. The Supreme Court of Canada formally became the court of last resort for criminal appeals in 1933 and for all other appeals in 1949. The last decisions of the Judicial Committee on cases from Canada were made in the mid-1950s as a result of their being heard in a court of first instance prior to 1949. The increase in the importance of the Court was mirrored by the numbers of its members. The Court was established in 1875 with six judges, and these were augmented by an additional member in 1927. It was in 1949 that the bench reached its current size: 9 judges.

Prior to 1949, most of the appointees to the Supreme Court of Canada owed their position to political patronage. Each judge had strong ties to the government in power at the time of their appointment. In 1973, the appointment of a constitutional law professor, Bora Laskin, as Chief Justice represented a major turning point for the Court. Increasingly in this period, appointees either came from academic backgrounds, or were well-respected practitioners with several years experience in appellate courts. Laskin's federalist and liberal views were shared by Prime Minister Trudeau, who appointed him, and exerted an influence on many of the Court's decisions.

SCC Courtroom panoramic view

The Constitution Act, 1982 greatly expanded the role of the Court in Canadian society by the addition of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which greatly broadened the scope of judicial review. The evolution from the Dickson Court (1984–90) through to the Lamer Court (1990–2000) witnessed a continuing vigour in the protection of civil liberties. Lamer's criminal law background proved an influence on the number of criminal cases heard by the Court during his time as Chief Justice. Nonetheless, the Lamer Court was more conservative with Charter rights, with only about one-percent success rate for Charter claimants.

The appointment of Beverly McLachlin as Chief Justice in 2000 has resulted in a more centrist and unified Court. Dissenting and concurring opinions are fewer than during the Dickson and Lamer Courts. With the 2005 appointments of Justices Charron and Abella, the Court has become the world's most gender-balanced national high court, four of its nine members being female.

The role of the Supreme Court

The structure of the Canadian court system is pyramidal, a broad base being formed by the various provincial and territorial courts whose judges are appointed by the provincial or territorial governments. At the next level are the provinces' and territories' superior courts, where judges are appointed by the federal government. Judgments from the superior courts may be appealed to a still higher level, the provincial or territorial courts of appeal. Several federal courts also exist: the Tax Court of Canada, the Federal Court, the Federal Court of Appeal and the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada. Unlike the provincial superior courts, which exercise inherent or general jurisdiction, the federal courts' jurisdiction is limited by statute. In all there are over 1000 federally-appointed judges at various levels across Canada.

The Supreme Court of Canada rests at the apex of the judicial pyramid. This institution hears appeals from the provincial courts of last resort, usually the provincial or territorial courts of appeal, and the Federal Court of Appeal (although in some matters appeals come straight from the trial courts, as in the case of publication bans and other orders that are otherwise not appealable). In most cases, permission to appeal must first be obtained from a panel of three judges of the court. By convention, this panel never explains why it gives leave to appeal or not. Cases for which leave to appeal is not required are primarily criminal cases (in which a Judge below dissented on a point of law) and appeals from provincial references. A final source of cases is the referral power of the federal government. In such cases, the Supreme Court is required to give an opinion on questions referred to it by the Governor-in-Council (cabinet). However, in many cases, including the most recent Same-Sex Reference, the Court has declined to answer a question from the Cabinet. In that case, the Court said it would not decide if same-sex marriages were required by the Charter of Rights, because the government had announced it would change the law regardless of its opinion, and subsequently did.

The Supreme Court thus performs a unique function. It can be asked by the Governor-in-Council to hear references considering important questions of law. Such referrals may concern the constitutionality or interpretation of federal or provincial legislation, or the division of powers between federal and provincial levels of government. Any point of law may be referred in this manner. However, the court is not often called upon to hear references. When it is, the opinion on the question referred is often of national importance; one recent example concerns the constitutionality of Same-sex marriage. References have been used to re-examine criminal convictions that have concerned the country as in the cases of David Milgaard and Steven Truscott.

Constitutional questions may, of course, also be raised in the normal case of appeals involving individual litigants, governments, government agencies or crown corporations. In such cases the federal and provincial governments must be notified of any constitutional questions and may intervene to submit a brief and attend oral argument at the court. Usually the other governments are given the right to argue their case in the Court, although on rare occasions this has been curtailed and prevented by order of one of the Court's judges.

Sessions of the Court

View from the Ottawa River

The Court sits for 18 weeks of the year beginning the first Monday of October and usually runs until the end of June and sometimes into July. Hearings only take place in Ottawa, although litigants can present oral arguments from remote locations by means of a video-conference system. The court's hearings are open to the public. Most hearings are taped for delayed telecast in both of Canada's official languages. When in session, the court sits Monday to Friday, hearing two appeals a day. A quorum consists of five members for appeals. A panel of nine justices hears most cases.

On the bench, the Chief Justice of Canada, or, in her absence, the senior puisne justice, presides from the centre chair with the other justices seated to her right and left by order of seniority of appointment. At sittings of the Court, the justices usually appear in black silk robes but they wear their ceremonial robes of bright scarlet trimmed with Canadian white mink in court on special occasions and in the Senate at the opening of each new session of Parliament.

The decision of the court is sometimes—but rarely—rendered orally at the conclusion of the hearing. More often, judgment is reserved to enable the justices to write considered reasons. Decisions of the court need not be unanimous; a majority may decide, with dissenting reasons given by the minority. Each justice may write reasons in any case if he or she chooses to do so.

The Supreme Court has the ultimate power of judicial review over Canadian federal and provincial laws' constitutional validity. If a federal or provincial law has been held contrary to the division of power provisions of one of the various Constitution Acts, the legislature or Parliament must either live with the result, amend the law so that it complies, or obtain an amendment to the constitution. If a law is declared contrary to certain sections of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Parliament or the provincial legislatures may make that particular law temporarily valid again against by using the "override power" of the notwithstanding clause. In one case, the Quebec National Assembly invoked this power to override a Supreme Court decision (Ford v. Quebec (A.G.)) that held that one of Quebec's language laws banning the display of English commercial signs was inconsistent with the charter. Saskatchewan used it to uphold labour laws. This override power can be exercised for five years, after which time the override must be renewed, or the decision comes into force.

In some cases, the Court may stay the effect of its judgments so that unconstitutional laws continue in force for a period of time. Usually this is done to give Parliament or the legislature time to enact a new replacement scheme of legislation. For example, in Reference re Manitoba Language Rights the Court struck down Manitoba's laws because they were not enacted in the French language, as required by the constitution. However the Court stayed its judgment for 5 years to give Manitoba time to re-enact all its legislation in French. It turned out five years was insufficient so the Court was asked, and agreed to give more time.

A puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada is referred to as "The Honourable Mr/Madam Justice" and the chief justice as "Right Honourable." At one time, Judges were called "My Lord/Lady" during sessions of the court, but this style of address was disapproved of by the current Chief Justice, Rt. Hon. Beverly McLachlin, who has directed lawyers to use the simpler "Your Honour" or "Justice." The designation "My Lord/My Lady" continues in many provincial Superior Courts, and in the Federal Court of Canada and Federal Court of Appeal where it is optional.

Building

Supreme Court Building in Ottawa

The Supreme Court of Canada Building is home to the Supreme Court of Canada. It also contains two court rooms used by both the Federal Court of Canada and the Federal Court of Appeal. Construction began in 1939, with the cornerstone laid by Queen Elizabeth, consort to King George VI and later Queen Mother. It was designed by Ernest Cormier, architect of the Quebec Court of Appeal Building, the Government Printing Bureau in Gatineau, Quebec, and the Université de Montréal. The Court began hearing cases in the new building by January 1946. The building is renowned for its Art Deco details. [3] In 2000, it was named by the Royal Architectural Institute of Canada as one of the top 500 buildings produced in Canada during the last millennium.[4]

Two flagstaffs have been erected in front of the building. A flag on one is flown daily, while the other is hoisted only on those days when the court is in session. Also located on the grounds are several statues, notably:

Previous homes of Canada's top courts include:

Appointments

Louis St. Laurent statue in front of Supreme Court building

Justices of the Supreme Court of Canada are appointed by the Governor-in-Council, a process whereby the Governor General makes appointments based on the advice and consent of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada. By tradition and convention, only the Cabinet advises the Governor General, as opposed to the entire Privy Council. (Technically, the Cabinet is only a standing committee in the larger council.) This advice is usually expressed to the Queen's representative exclusively through a consultation with the Prime Minister. Thus, the provinces and Parliament have no formal role in such appointments, a point of ongoing contention.

The Supreme Court Act limits eligibility for appointment to persons who have been judges of a superior court, or members of the bar for ten or more years. Members of the bar or superior judiciary of Quebec, by law, must hold three of the nine positions on the Supreme Court of Canada.[5] This is justified on the basis that Quebec uses civil law, rather than common law, as in the rest of the country. The 3/9 ratio persists even though just 24 percent of Canada's population resides in Quebec. By convention, the remaining six positions are divided in the following manner: three from Ontario, two from the western provinces and one from the Atlantic provinces, alternating between Nova Scotia and New Brunswick.

A Supreme Court justice, as with all federal judges, may only sit on the bench until the age of 75 years.

In 2006, an interview phase by an ad hoc committee of members of Parliament was added. Justice Marshall Rothstein became the first justice to undergo the new process. The Prime Minister still has the final say on who becomes the candidate that is recommended to the Governor General for appointment to the Court. The government proposed an interview phase again in 2008, but a general election and minority parliament intervened with delays such that the Prime Minister appointed Justice Cromwell after consulting the Leader of Her Majesty's Official Opposition.

Current membership

The current Justices of the Supreme Court of Canada are as follows. See also List of Justices of the Supreme Court of Canada.

Name Date of birth Home province Appointed on the advice of Date appointed Mandatory retirement date Law School Position Before Appointment
McLachlin, BeverleyBeverley McLachlin
(Chief Justice)
01943-09-07 7 September 1943 British Columbia Mulroney (as puisne justice)
Chrétien (as chief justice)
01989-03-30 30 March 1989
02000-01-07 7 January 2000
02018-09-07 7 September 2018 University of Alberta Chief Justice of the British Columbia Supreme Court
Puisne Justice of the Supreme Court
Binnie, IanIan Binnie 01939-04-14 14 April 1939 Ontario Chrétien 01998-01-08 8 January 1998 02014-04-14 14 April 2014 University of Toronto
University of Cambridge
Lawyer, McCarthy Tétrault
LeBel, LouisLouis LeBel 01939-11-30 30 November 1939 Quebec Chrétien 02000-01-07 7 January 2000 02014-11-30 30 November 2014 Université Laval Quebec Court of Appeal
Deschamps, MarieMarie Deschamps 01952-10-02 2 October 1952 Quebec Chrétien 02002-08-07 7 August 2002 02027-10-02 2 October 2027 Université de Montréal Quebec Court of Appeal
Fish, MorrisMorris Fish 01938-11-16 16 November 1938 Quebec Chrétien 02003-05-08 8 May 2003 02013-11-16 16 November 2013 McGill University Quebec Court of Appeal
Abella, RosalieRosalie Abella 01946-07-01 1 July 1946 Ontario Martin 02004-04-10 10 April 2004 02021-07-01 1 July 2021 University of Toronto Court of Appeal for Ontario
Charron, LouiseLouise Charron 01951-03-02 2 March 1951 Ontario Martin 02004-10-04 4 October 2004 02026-03-02 2 March 2026 University of Ottawa Court of Appeal for Ontario
Rothstein, MarshallMarshall Rothstein 01940-12-25 25 December 1940 Manitoba Harper 02006-03-01 1 March 2006 02015-12-25 25 December 2015 University of Manitoba Federal Court of Appeal
Cromwell, ThomasThomas Cromwell 01952-05-05 5 May 1952 Nova Scotia Harper 02008-12-22 22 December 2008 02027-05-05 5 May 2027 Queen's University
University of Oxford
Nova Scotia Court of Appeal

Supreme Court clerks

Since 1967 the Court has hired clerks to assist in legal research. Typically, the clerks are selected from among the top students of each law school across the country. Between 1967 and 1982, each puisne justice was assisted by one clerk and the chief justice had two. From 1982, the number was increased to three clerks for each justice.

Clerks conduct research, draft bench memorandum, assist in drafting judgments, as well as aid with any other duties of the judge such as drafting speeches or articles.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Supreme Court of Canada (2007). "Role of the Court" (asp). About the Court. http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/AboutCourt/role/index_e.asp. Retrieved April 18 2007. 
  2. ^ Supreme Court of Canada (2007). "Judges of the Court" (asp). About the Court. http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/aboutcourt/judges/aboutjudges_e.asp. Retrieved April 18 2007. 
  3. ^ http://canada.archiseek.com/ontario/ottawa/supreme_court.html]
  4. ^ Cook, Marcia (11 May 2000). "Cultural consequence". Ottawa Citizen (Canwest). http://www.ty-a.ca/Citizen/top500.htm. Retrieved 2009-10-11. 
  5. ^ Supreme Court Act, s. 6.

References

  • Martin, Robert, The Most Dangerous Branch: How the Supreme Court of Canada Has Undermined Our Law and Our Democracy, McGill-Queen's University Press, 2003, ISBN 0773526145

External links

Coordinates: 45°25′19″N 75°42′20″W / 45.42195°N 75.705682°W / 45.42195; -75.705682








Got something to say? Make a comment.
Your name
Your email address
Message