A teletsunami (also called an ocean-wide, distant, distant-source, or far-field tsunami) is a tsunami that originates from a faraway source, which is generally more than 1,000 km away from the area of interest (or more than 3 hours tsunami travel time from its source).[1][2] The trans-ocean tsunami can travel vast distances across an entire ocean. All teletsunamis have been generated by major earthquakes, such as the 1960 Valdivia earthquake, 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake, 1964 Alaska earthquake, and 1755 Lisbon earthquake.
Contents |
Teletsunami can be generated several different ways, the most common of which is through seismic activity.[3] A teletsunami can be generated by a large earthquake with a moment magnitude higher than 7.5.[4] More specifically, vertical displacement with a thrust-type earthquake is more likely to produce a teletsunami than an earthquake from a lateral strike-slip fault, such as San Andreas Fault.[5]
Because of this, subduction zones, which occur when a dense oceanic crust burrows underneath less-dense continental crust, are more likely to produce a teletsunami. The Pacific coast of North America is a prime example of a subduction zone. The Cascadia Subduction Zone, off the coasts of British Columbia, Washington, Oregon, and Northern California is an area of concern for possible tsunami generation. The Aleutian Islands and Gulf of Alaska coast of Alaska are also capable of producing very large offshore earthquakes that may produce large tsunamis. The 1964 tsunami, discussed later in detail, was generated by a large earthquake offshore Alaska.[6]
Natural precursors that may indicate the approach of a teletsunami include a drawback, or a large withdrawal of the ocean usually well below low tide.[7] This may not always occur, but the presence of retreating surf is a sign of impending danger. An analogy would be a slingshot, retracting fairly slowly and calmly, but it will return much more quickly and with more force.
The general characteristics of teletsunamis are similar to local tsunamis. The interval between waves can range from 5 to 60 minutes, although usually falling between 10 and 30 minutes.[8] The speed at which the teletsunami travels is dependent on the depth of the water. On average tsunamis in the Pacific Ocean travel at about 480 miles/hour, but due to the depth of the ocean, the height may only be a few feet.[9] This weak wave height and the very broad distance from peak to trough, spanning 50 to 150 miles, makes vessels in open water unaware of a tsunami passing. In shallow water, scuba divers caught in the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami were reportedly tossed about under the water, yet those in the boat floating above them did not feel and were unaware of the wave passing through.[9]
Teletsunami generally consists of a series of waves, rather than a singular wave.[10] The number of waves can vary, but data have shown that there are usually between two and ten waves. Further, the first wave is typically not the largest one. For example, during the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, the second wave was regarded as the largest one, and in the 1964 Alaska tsunami, it was the fourth wave that proved most destructive in Crescent City, California.[9] This can sometime pose a serious problem, as the retreat of the first wave may falsely imply that the tsunami has "finished", which can lead to people moving back out to the beach out of curiosity, only to be swept away by the next incoming wave. The period between waves can also vary, but generally falls between 5 and 60 minutes. This will become a major issue for public safety officials responding to a tsunami.
Coastal water usually recedes before the first tsunami strikes[11], and many witnesses have reported that the abnormal ocean activity, a wall of water, and approaching teletsunami waves create a loud roaring sound similar to that of a train or jet aircraft.[12]
Although teletsunamis are usually generated by a large earthquake, the areas affected are too far from the epicenter to feel it. Teletsunamis are also virtually undetectable to the human eye until it has nearly reached the shore. In this regard, several scientific equipments have been developed to establish a tsunami warning system, and this allows an adequate response to be initiated for a teletsunami generated by a distant earthquake.
The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center (PTWC) in Hawaii provides warnings for Pacific based teletsunami to almost every country around the Pacific and to most of the Pacific island states. A few destructive teletsunamis are generated each century by great earthquakes around the Pacific Rim. Such tsunami can propagate across the entire Pacific in less than 24 hours, and cause widespread destruction along shorelines located thousands of miles from the source. With ever-increasing population and development along most coastlines, there is a corresponding increase in risk. The last destructive Pacific teletsunami was generated by the 2004 earthquake near the Sumatra coast[13].
The West Coast and Alaska Tsunami Warning Center (WCATWC) in Palmer, Alaska watches for teletsunami against the West Coast of the United States. The above mentioned PTWC will not issue watches or warnings for the west coast unless this warning system in Alaska fails. This is to reduce confusion in two different warning centers issuing two separate messages, which can oftentimes contradict one another.[14]
There are few guidelines set by the AWCTWC for issuing watches and warnings. (1) A watch is first issued if the arrival time for a potential teletsunami is more than 2 hours from the time of the warning. In this case, there would be enough time to verify the existence or nonexistence of a tsunami by way of NOAA buoys before a warning or cancellation message was issued. (2) Either a watch or warning is immediately issued if a magnitude 7.5 or greater earthquake occurs anywhere in the Pacific Rim, depending on circumstances. (3) A warning is issued if the potentially resulting tsunami would arrive onshore within 2 hours of the warning.[14]
For example, if an 8.0 earthquake occurs in the Aleutian Islands, west coast states such as Washington, Oregon, and California would receive a tsunami watch first, and if there was verification of a tsunami, a warning would follow. If there is no wave observed, a cancellation message would follow before a warning was issued. However, if an 8.0 earthquake were to occur off of the west coast of the United States, a warning without verification of a tsunami will be issued. This is due to the fact that there would not be enough time to first verify a wave and then order and conduct an evacuation of vulnerable areas.[14]
Based on recorded history, destructive teletsunamis have occurred once or twice a century, making teletsunami very rare and infrequent events. Whereas there are lots of data pertaining to hundreds of devastating natural disasters, there is only handful of data for teletsunamis. Later large tsunami events in 1868, 1946, 1960, 1964, 1995, and 2004 have provided adequate amount of data for more accurate analysis.[14]
One of the oldest teletsunamis was reported in November 1755, when a major earthquake known as the 1755 Lisbon earthquake resulted in a teletsunami, which caused near-total destruction of Lisbon in the Kingdom of Portugal. This teletsunami crossed the Atlantic and was noticed throughout the eastern Caribbean from Barbados to Antigua and as far west as Cuba. This earthquake is commonly referred to as the Great Lisbon Earthquake. The amplitude of the tsunami in all islands was about 2-3 meters and waves continued to arrive for many hours. No damage or casualties were reported. European sources also reported that the Azores fracture zone generated a second teletsunami in March 1761 but no local confirmed observations were made in the Caribbean.[6]
The most recent destructive teletsunami occurred in 2004 by a powerful undersea megathrust earthquake off the northern coast of the Sumatra in Indonesia. It caused nearly 300,000 deaths in several countries along the Indian Ocean.
In 1946, following a large earthquake in the Aleutian Islands, a teletsunami that originated in Alaska devastated Hilo, Hawaii. 30 foot waves were observed in Hilo, and at least 170 people were killed. There was no warning issued for this event, and as a result of raising concern, the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center (PTWC) was founded in Ewa Beach, HI. This 1946 teletsunami event was also observed in California, but no casualties were reported and damage was minimal (almost exclusively to personal vessels in the harbors).[15]
In 1960, a teletsunami generated near the coast of Chile again devastated Hilo. It was originated by the largest earthquake ever recorded, an earthquake with magnitude 9.6 that struck offshore Chile. This time, the warning was accurate in predicting arrival time, but unable to provide sufficient time for majority of Hilo residents to evacuate. 61 lives were lost as a result. With greater magnitude at origin, the teletsunami brought 35 foot waves to harbors in Hilo. This 1960 teletsunami also reached the west coast of the United States.[16]
In 1964, a large tsunami that originated as a result of the 9.2 earthquake from the Gulf of Alaska was the first teletsunami to largely affect the U.S. West Coast in recent decades. California observed 20–25 foot waves and some region sustained heavy damages from flooding, resulting in total loss of 11 lives. Other regions such as Alaska, Vancouver, Washington, Oregon, and Hawaii were also impacted by the teletsunami to varying degrees. The California report indicates that it was the fourth wave caused the most damage, emphasizing that first wave of the teletsunami may not be the only one or the largest wave.[17]
This teletsunami was generated by the 8.0 earthquake occurred offshore Jalisco and Colima, the Pacific coast of Mexico. The earthquake itself was accountable for approximately 40 lost lives as a result of extensive inland damage. The tsunami generated quickly reached the west coast of the United States and affected 200 km of coastline. Some flat regions experienced flood as deep as 200 meters inland. A large recession of the ocean, followed by a large incoming wave was also observed. Several ports sustained heavy damage and extensive beach erosion was observed. This teletsunami event is notable as it occurred as a result of a large, yet smaller than usual earthquake for tsunami generation.[18]
Causing approximately 300,000 fatalities in total, the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami is by far the world’s most destructive teletsunami. The majority of the damage and fatalities were reported in Indonesia. The teletsunami generated by the 9.0 earthquake off the northern coast of the Sumatra also heavily impacted Thailand, Sri Lanka, and India.
The fact that this tsunami incident is recognized as the world’s first major tsunami event since 1964 (after a period of relatively high tsunami frequency from 1850-1975), it brought an impression to world that the hazard “skipped a generation”. For the first time, there was a lot of video evidence of the teletsunami filmed at many locations. This visual evidence of the tsunami helped many scientists and emergency planners to solve few more mechanism of inundation and run-up characteristics of teletsunami.
Although this event is considered to be a horrendous and tragic event, the consequences of 2004 tsunami provoked a much-needed public awareness and preparedness against the future tsunami incidents.
  | IOC Tsunami Glossary - ITIC :: About tsunamis :: IOC Tsunami Glossary :: |
|
|
Wikis
Map
Search